Get Australian English Phonology essential facts below. View Videos or join the Australian English Phonology discussion. Add Australian English Phonology to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
The Australian English vowels /?/, /e/ and /e:/ are noticeably closer (pronounced with a higher tongue position) than their contemporary Received Pronunciation equivalents.
The vowels of Australian English can be divided according to length. The long vowels, which include monophthongs and diphthongs, mostly correspond to the tense vowels used in analyses of Received Pronunciation (RP) as well as its centring diphthongs. The short vowels, consisting only of monophthongs, correspond to the RP lax vowels. There exist pairs of long and short vowels with overlapping vowel quality giving Australian English phonemic length distinction, which is unusual amongst the various dialects of English. As with General American and New Zealand English, the weak vowel merger is nearly complete in Australian English: unstressed /?/ (sometimes transcribed as /?/) is merged with /?/ (schwa) except before a following velar.
There are two families of phonemic transcriptions of Australian English: revised ones, which attempt to more accurately represent the phonetic sounds of Australian English; and the Mitchell-Delbridge system, which is minimally distinct from Jones' original transcription of RP. This page uses a revised transcription based on Durie and Hajek (1994) and Harrington, Cox and Evans (1997) but also shows the Mitchell-Delbridge equivalents as this system is commonly used for example in the Macquarie Dictionary and much literature, even recent.
The target for /?/ is tenser (higher) than in other varieties of English----and may sometimes sound like it has shifted to to speakers of other dialects or languages. Thus, words like bin and sin may sound like bean and seen, but shorter, although there is never a full merger, as /i:/ is most commonly a diphthong of the [?i? ~ ?i?] type.
/e/ tends to be higher than the corresponding vowel in General American or RP. The typical realization is close-mid , although for some speakers it may be even closer (according to John Wells, this pronunciation can occur only in Broad varieties). A recent change is the lowering of /e/ to the region.
For some Victorian speakers /e/ has merged with /æ/ in pre-lateral environments, and thus the words celery and salary are homophonous as /'sæli:/. See salary-celery merger.
The sound /æ:/ is traditionally transcribed and analysed the same as the short /æ/, but minimal pairs exist in at least some Australians' speech. It is found in the adjectives bad, mad, glad and sad, before the /?/ sound (for example, hag, rag, bag) and also in content words before /m/ and /n/ in the same syllable (for example, ham, tan, plant). In South Australiaplant is usually pronounced with the vowel sound /?:/, as in rather and father. In some speakers, especially those with the broad accent, /æ:/ and /æ/ will be shifted toward and , respectively.
There is æ-tensing before a nasal consonant. The nasal sounds create changes in preceding vowels because air can flow into the nose during the vowel. Nasal consonants can also affect the articulation of a vowel. So for several speakers, the /æ:/ vowel in words like jam, man, dam and hand will be shifted towards [e:]. This is also present in General American and Cockney English.
The trap-bath split is partially in effect in Australian English. It is more advanced in South Australia, but failed to progress as far in the other Australian states, which were largely settled earlier.
/æ/ is pronounced as fully open by many younger speakers.
As with New Zealand English the PALM/START vowel in words like park/p?:k/, calm/k?:m/ and farm/f?:m/ is central (in the past even front) in terms of tongue position and non-rhotic. This is the same vowel sound used by speakers of the Boston accent of North Eastern New England in the United States. Thus the phrase park the car is said identically by a New Zealander, Australian or Bostonian.
The phoneme /?:/ is pronounced at least as high as /e:/ , and has a lowered F3 that might indicate that it is rounded . The ⟨?:⟩ glyph is used -- rather than ⟨?:⟩ or ⟨?:⟩ -- as most revisions of the phonemic orthography for Australian English predate the 1993 modifications to the International Phonetic Alphabet. At the time, ⟨?:⟩ was suitable for any mid central vowel, rounded or unrounded.
As in most varieties of English, the phoneme /?/ is used only in unstressed syllables.
The vowel /i:/ has an onset [?i?], except before laterals. The onset is often lowered to [?i], so that beat is [b?it] for some speakers.
As in American English and modern RP, the final vowel in words like happy and city is pronounced as /i:/ (happee, citee), not as /?/ (happy-tensing).
In some parts of Australia, a fully backed allophone of /?:/, transcribed [?:], is common before /l/. As a result, the pairs full/fool and pull/pool differ phonetically only in vowel length for those speakers. The usual allophone is further forward in New South Wales than Victoria. It is moving further forwards, however, in both regions at a similar rate. Many cases of RP // correspond to the sequence /?:?/ in Australian English.
Other diphthongs of the broad variety shown on a vowel chart, reconstructed from Harrington, Cox & Evans (1997). //, a phonological diphthong, is shown here as a long monophthong [?:].
æ?, , o?, æ?,
The second elements of /æ?/ and /o?/ on one hand and // on the other are somewhat different. The first two approach the KIT vowel /?/, whereas the ending point of // is more similar to the DRESS vowel , which is why it tends to be written with ⟨?e⟩ in modern sources. John Wells writes this phoneme //, with the same ending point as /æ?/ and /o?/ (which he writes with ⟨⟩ and ⟨⟩). However, the second element of // is not nearly as different from that of the other fronting-closing diphthongs as the ending point of /æ?/ is from that of //, which is the reason why ⟨⟩ is used in this article.
The first element of // may be raised and rounded in broad accents.
The first element of /æ?/ is significantly lower [a] than in many other dialects of English.
There is significant allophonic variation in //, including a backed allophone  before a word-final or preconsonantal /l/. The first part of this allophone is in the same position as /?/, but  differs from it in that it possesses an additional closing glide, which also makes it longer than /?/.
// is shifted to [?y] among some speakers. This realisation has its roots in South Australia, but is becoming more common among younger speakers across the country.
The sound // is usually pronounced as a diphthong (or disyllabically [i:?], like CURE) only in open syllables. In closed syllables, it is distinguished from /?/ primarily by length and from /i:/ by the significant onset in the latter.
The phoneme // is rare and almost extinct. Most speakers consistently use [?:?] or [?:] (before /r/) instead. Many cases of RP // are pronounced instead with the /o:/ phoneme in Australian English, but unlike in some British accents there is no general merger between /o:/ and //. "pour" and "poor", "more" and "moor" and "shore" and "sure" are homophones, but "tore" and "tour" remain distinct.
Examples of vowels
strut, bud, hud
bath, palm, start, bard, hard
price, bite, hide
trap, lad, had
face, bait, hade
mouth, bowed, how'd
dress, bed, head
square, bared, haired
nurse, bird, heard
goat, bode, hoed
kit, bid, hid
near, beard, hear
fleece, bead, heat
thought, north, sure, board, hoard, poor
lot, cloth, body, hot
goose, boo, who'd
One needs to be very careful of the symbol /?/, which represents different vowels: the LOT vowel in the Harrington, Cox and Evans (1997) system (transcribed /?/ in the other system), but the THOUGHT vowel in the Mitchell-Delbridge system (transcribed /o:/ in the other system).
Australian English consonants are similar to those of other non-rhotic varieties of English. A table containing the consonantphonemes is given below.
Australian English is non-rhotic; in other words, the /?/ sound does not appear at the end of a syllable or immediately before a consonant. A final /?/ is pronounced as lowered [?] in most speakers (this should not be interpreted as a phoneme /?/, as it can only appear in closed syllables), or [?] for some. So the words butter['b], here[h] and park[p?:k] will not contain the /?/ sound.
The /?/ sound can occur when a word that has a final ⟨r⟩ in the spelling comes before another word that starts with a vowel. For example, in car alarm the sound /?/ can occur in car because here it comes before another word beginning with a vowel. The words far, far more and farm do not contain an /?/ but far out will contain the linking /?/ sound because the next word starts with a vowel sound.
An intrusive /?/ may be inserted before a vowel in words that do not have ⟨r⟩ in the spelling. For example, drawing will sound like draw-ring, saw it will sound like sore it, the tuner is and the tuna is will both be [ð't:n?z].
Intervocalic/t/ (and for some speakers /d/) undergo voicing and flapping to the alveolar tap[?] after the stressed syllable and before unstressed vowels (as in butter, party) and syllabic /l/, though not before syllabic /n/ (bottle['bl?] vs button['b?tn?]), as well as at the end of a word or morpheme before any vowel (what else[w'els], whatever[w'ev?]). For those speakers where /d/ also undergoes the change, there will be homophony, for example, metal and medal or petal and pedal will sound the same (['me?l?] and ['pe?l?], respectively). In formal speech /t/ is retained. When coating becomes coatin' , the t remains voiceless, thus ['ktn?]. [t] in the cluster [nt] can elide. As a result, in quick speech, words like winner and winter can become homophonous (as ['w?n?]). This is a quality that Australian English shares most notably with North American English.
Some speakers use a glottal stop[?] as an allophone of /t/ in final position, for example trait, habit; or in medial position, such as a /t/ followed by a syllabic /n/ is often realized as a glottal stop, for example button or fatten. Alveolar pronunciations nevertheless predominate.
Pronunciation of /l/
The alveolar lateral approximant /l/ is velarised in pre-pausal and preconsonantal positions and often also in morpheme-final positions before a vowel. There have been some suggestions that onset /l/ is also velarised, although that needs to be further researched. Some speakers vocalise preconsonantal, syllable-final and syllabic instances of /l/ to a close back vowel similar to /?/, so that milk can be pronounced [mk] and noodle['n?:d?]. This is more common in South Australia than elsewhere.
Standard Australian English coalesces /tj/ and /dj/ into /t?/ and /d?/ respectively. Because of this palatalisation, dune is pronounced as /d:n/, exactly like June, and the first syllable of Tuesday/'t:zdæ?/ is pronounced like choose/t:z/. /t/ and /d/ in the clusters /t?/ and /d?/ are similarly palatalised.
Word initial /sj/ and /zj/ have merged with /s/ and /z/ respectively. Other cases of /sj/ and /zj/ are often pronounced respectively [?] and [?], as in assume/?':m/ and resume/r?':m/ (ashume and rezhume).
For some speakers, /?/ (or "sh") may be uttered instead of /s/ before the stressed /tj/ sound in words like student, history, eschew, street and Australia - As a result, in quick speech, eschew will sound like esh-chew. According to author Wayne P. Lawrence, "this phonemic change seems to be neither dialectal nor regional", as it can also be found among some American, Canadian, British and New Zealand English speakers as well.
Similarly /lj/ has merged with /l/ word initially. Remaining cases of /lj/ are often pronounced simply as [j] in colloquial speech.
/nj/ and other common sequences of consonant plus /j/, are retained.
Between voiced sounds, the glottal fricative /h/ may be realised as voiced , so that e.g. behind may be pronounced as either [b?'hnd] or [b?'nd].
The sequence /hj/ is realised as a voiceless palatal fricative , so that e.g. huge is pronounced [ç?:d?].
/?/ may be a pre-uvular  before /? o o? /, so gaudy might be pronounced ['o:d?i?]. 
The word foyer is usually pronounced /'fo/, as in NZ and American English, rather than /'fo?æ?/ as in British English.
The word data is commonly pronounced /'d?:t?/, with /'dæ?t?/ being the second most common, and /'dæt?/ being very rare.
In English, upward inflexion (a rise in the pitch of the voice at the end of an utterance) typically signals a question. Some Australian English speakers commonly use a form of upward inflexion in their speech that is not associated with asking questions. Some speakers use upward inflexion as a way of including their conversational partner in the dialogue. This is also common in Californian English.
Relationship to other varieties
Correspondence between the IPA help key and Australian English vowels
Australian English pronunciation is most similar to that of New Zealand English: many people from other parts of the world often cannot distinguish them but there are differences. New Zealand English has centralised /?/ and the other short front vowels are higher. New Zealand English more strongly maintains the diphthongal quality of the NEAR and SQUARE vowels and they can be merged as something around [i?]. New Zealand English does not have the bad-lad split, but like Victoria has merged /e/ with /æ/ in pre-lateral environments.
Both New Zealand English and Australian English are also similar to South African English, so that they have even been grouped together under the common label "southern hemisphere Englishes". Like the other two varieties in that group, Australian English pronunciation bears some similarities to dialects from the South-East of Britain; Thus, it is non-rhotic and has the trap-bath split although, as indicated above, this split was not completed in Australia as it was in England, so many words that have the bath vowel in Southeastern England retain the trap vowel in Australia.
Historically, the Australian English also had the same lengthening of /?/ before unvoiced fricatives, but, like the English accents, this has since been reversed. Australian English lacks some innovations in Cockney since the settling of Australia, such as the use of a glottal stop in many places where a /t/ would be found, th-fronting, and h-dropping. The intervocalic alveolar-flapping, which Australian English has instead, is a feature found in similar environments in American English.
This section needs to be updated. Please update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(February 2019)
AusTalk is a database of Australian speech from all regions of the country. Initially 1000 adult voices are to be recorded; the project commenced in 2011, and the first phase is expected to run until June 2015. The database is expected to be expanded in future, to include children's voices and more variations. As well as providing a resource for cultural studies, the database is expected to help improve speech-based technology, such as speech recognition systems and hearing aids.
The AusTalk database was collected as part of the Big Australian Speech Corpus (Big ASC) project, a collaboration between Australian universities and the speech technology experts.
^Durian, David (2007) "Getting [?]tronger Every Day?: More on Urbanization and the Socio-geographic Diffusion of (str) in Columbus, OH," University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: Vol. 13: Iss. 2, Article 6
^Cole, J., Hualde, J.I., Laboratory Phonology 9, Walter de Gruyter 2007, p. 69.
^Lawrence, Wayne P. (2000) "Assimilation at a Distance," American Speech Vol. 75: Iss. 1: 82-87; doi:10.1215/00031283-75-1-82
Durie, M.; Hajek, J (1994), "A revised standard phonemic orthography for Australian English vowels", Australian Journal of Linguistics, 14: 93-107, doi:10.1080/07268609408599503.
Harrington, J.; Cox, Felicity; Evans, Z. (1997), "An acoustic phonetic study of broad, general, and cultivated Australian English vowels", Australian Journal of Linguistics, 17 (2): 155-84, doi:10.1080/07268609708599550
Bauer, Laurie (2015), "Australian and New Zealand English", in Reed, Marnie; Levis, John M. (eds.), The Handbook of English Pronunciation, Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 269-285, ISBN978-1-118-31447-0
Turner, George W. (1994), "6: English in Australia", in Burchfield, Robert (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language, 5: English in Britain and Overseas: Origins and Development, Cambridge University Press, pp. 277-327, ISBN978-0-521-26478-5