Bra-ket Notation

Get Bra%E2%80%93ket Notation essential facts below. View Videos or join the Bra%E2%80%93ket Notation discussion. Add Bra%E2%80%93ket Notation to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
## Introduction

## Vector spaces

### Vectors vs kets

### Bra-Ket notation

### Inner product and bra-ket identification on Hilbert space

#### Bras and kets as row and column vectors

### Non-normalizable states and non-Hilbert spaces

## Usage in quantum mechanics

### Spinless position-space wave function

### Overlap of states

### Changing basis for a spin- particle

### Misleading uses

## Linear operators

### Linear operators acting on kets

### Linear operators acting on bras

### Outer products

### Hermitian conjugate operator

## Properties

### Linearity

### Associativity

### Hermitian conjugation

## Composite bras and kets

## The unit operator

## Notation used by mathematicians

## See also

## Notes

## References

## External links

This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Bra%E2%80%93ket Notation

In quantum mechanics, **bra-ket notation** is a common notation for quantum states, i.e. vectors in a complex Hilbert space on which an algebra of observables acts. More generally the notation uses the angle brackets (the ? and ? symbols) and a vertical bar (the | symbol), for a **ket** (for example, ) to denote a vector in an abstract (usually complex) vector space and a **bra**, (for example, ) to denote a linear functional on , i.e. a co-vector, an element of the dual vector space . The natural pairing of a linear functional with a vector is then written as . On Hilbert spaces, the scalar product (with anti linear first argument) gives an (anti-linear) identification of a vector ket with a linear functional bra . Using this notation, the scalar product .
For the vector space , kets can be identified with column vectors, and bras with row vectors. Combinations of bras, kets, and operators are interpreted using matrix multiplication. If has the standard hermitian inner product , under this identification, the identification of kets and bras and vice versa provided by the inner product is taking the hermitian conjugate .

It is common to suppress the vector or functional from the bra-ket notation and only use a label inside the typography for the bra or ket. For example, the spin operator on a two dimensional space of spinors, has eigenvalues with eigen spinors . In bra-ket notation one typically denotes this as , and . Just as above, kets and bras with the same label are interpreted as kets and bras corresponding to each other using the inner product. In particular when also identified with row and column vectors, kets and bras with the same label are identified with Hermitian conjugate column and row vectors.

Bra-ket notation was effectively established in 1939 by Paul Dirac^{[1]}^{[2]} and is thus also known as the **Dirac notation**. (Still, the bra-ket notation has a precursor in Hermann Grassmann's use of the notation for his inner products nearly 100 years earlier.^{[3]}^{[4]})

Bra-ket notation is a notation for linear algebra and linear operators on complex vector spaces together with their dual space both in the finite-dimensional and infinite-dimensional case. It is specifically designed to ease the types of calculations that frequently come up in quantum mechanics. Its use in quantum mechanics is quite widespread. Many phenomena that are explained using quantum mechanics are explained using bra-ket notation.

In mathematics, the term "vector" is used for an element of any vector space. In physics, however, the term "vector" is much more specific: "vector" refers almost exclusively to quantities like displacement or velocity, which have components that relate directly to the three dimensions of space, or relativistically, to the four of space time. Such vectors are typically denoted with over arrows (), boldface () or indices ().

In quantum mechanics, a quantum state is typically represented as an element of a complex Hilbert space, for example, the infinite-dimensional vector space of all possible wavefunctions (square integrable functions mapping each point of 3D space to a complex number) or some more abstract Hilbert space constructed more algebraically. Since the term "vector" is already used for something else (see previous paragraph), and physicists tend to prefer conventional notation to stating what space something is an element of, it is common and useful to denote an element of an abstract complex vector spaces as a ket using vertical bars and angular brackets and refer to them as "kets" rather than as vectors and pronounced "ket-" or "ket-A" for . Symbols, letters, numbers, or even words--whatever serves as a convenient label--can be used as the label inside a ket, with the making clear that the label indicates a vector in vector space. In other words, the symbol "" has a specific and universal mathematical meaning, while just the "*A*" by itself does not. For example, + might or might not be equal to . Nevertheless, for convenience, there is usually some logical scheme behind the labels inside kets, such as the common practice of labeling energy eigenkets in quantum mechanics through a listing of their quantum numbers.

Ket notation was invented by Paul Dirac ^{[5]}

Since kets are just vectors in a Hermetian vector space they can be manipulated using the usual rules of linear algebra, for example:

Note how the last line above involves infinitely many different kets, one for each real number *x*.

If the ket is an element of a vector space, a **bra** is an element of its dual space, i.e. a bra is a linear functional which is a linear map from the vector space to the complex numbers. Thus, it is useful to think of kets and bras as being elements of different vector spaces (see below however) with both being different useful concepts.

A bra and a ket (i.e. a functional and a vector), can be combined to an operator of rank one with outer product

The bra-ket notation is particularly useful in Hilbert spaces which have an inner product^{[6]} that allows Hermitian conjugation and identifying a vector with a linear functional, i.e. a ket with a bra, and vice versa (see Riesz representation theorem). The inner product on Hilbert space (with the first argument anti linear as preferred by physicists) is fully equivalent to an (anti linear) identification between the space of kets and that of bras in the bra ket notation: for a vector ket define a functional (i.e. bra) by

In the simple case where we consider the vector space , a ket can be identified with a column vector, and a bra as a row vector. If moreover we use the standard hermitian innerproduct on , the bra corresponding to a ket, in particular a bra and a ket with the same label are conjugate transpose. Moreover, conventions are set up in such a way that writing bras, kets, and linear operators next to each other simply imply matrix multiplication.^{[7]} In particular the outer product of a column and a row vector ket and bra can be identified with matrix multiplication (column vector times row vector equals matrix).

For a finite-dimensional vector space, using a fixed orthonormal basis, the inner product can be written as a matrix multiplication of a row vector with a column vector:

Based on this, the bras and kets can be defined as:

and then it is understood that a bra next to a ket implies matrix multiplication.

The conjugate transpose (also called *Hermitian conjugate*) of a bra is the corresponding ket and vice versa:

because if one starts with the bra

then performs a complex conjugation, and then a matrix transpose, one ends up with the ket

Writing elements of a finite dimensional (or mutatis mutandis, countably infinite) vector space as a column vector of numbers requires picking a basis. Picking a basis is not always helpful because quantum mechanics calculations involve frequently switching between different bases (e.g. position basis, momentum basis, energy eigenbasis), and one can write something like "" without committing to any particular basis. In situations involving two different important basis vectors, the basis vectors can be taken in the notation explicitly and here will be referred simply as "" and "".

Bra-ket notation can be used even if the vector space is not a Hilbert space.

In quantum mechanics, it is common practice to write down kets which have infinite norm, i.e. non-normalizable wavefunctions. Examples include states whose wavefunctions are Dirac delta functions or infinite plane waves. These do not, technically, belong to the Hilbert space itself. However, the definition of "Hilbert space" can be broadened to accommodate these states (see the Gelfand-Naimark-Segal construction or rigged Hilbert spaces). The bra-ket notation continues to work in an analogous way in this broader context.

Banach spaces are a different generalization of Hilbert spaces. In a Banach space B, the vectors may be notated by kets and the continuous linear functionals by bras. Over any vector space without topology, we may also notate the vectors by kets and the linear functionals by bras. In these more general contexts, the bracket does not have the meaning of an inner product, because the Riesz representation theorem does not apply.

The mathematical structure of quantum mechanics is based in large part on linear algebra:

- Wave functions and other quantum states can be represented as vectors in a complex Hilbert space. (The exact structure of this Hilbert space depends on the situation.) In bra-ket notation, for example, an electron might be in the "state" . (Technically, the quantum states are
*rays*of vectors in the Hilbert space, as*c*corresponds to the same state for any nonzero complex number*c*.) - Quantum superpositions can be described as vector sums of the constituent states. For example, an electron in the state +
*i*is in a quantum superposition of the states and . - Measurements are associated with linear operators (called observables) on the Hilbert space of quantum states.
- Dynamics are also described by linear operators on the Hilbert space. For example, in the Schrödinger picture, there is a linear time evolution operator
*U*with the property that if an electron is in state right now, at a later time it will be in the state*U*, the same*U*for every possible . - Wave function normalization is scaling a wave function so that its norm is 1.

Since virtually every calculation in quantum mechanics involves vectors and linear operators, it can involve, and often does involve, bra-ket notation. A few examples follow:

The Hilbert space of a spin-0 point particle is spanned by a "position basis" { }, where the label **r** extends over the set of all points in position space. This label is the eigenvalue of the position operator acting on such a basis state, . Since there are an uncountably infinite number of vector components in the basis, this is an uncountably infinite-dimensional Hilbert space. The dimensions of the Hilbert space (usually infinite) and position space (usually 1, 2 or 3) are not to be conflated.

Starting from any ket in this Hilbert space, one may *define* a complex scalar function of **r**, known as a wavefunction,

On the left-hand side, ?(**r**) is a function mapping any point in space to a complex number; on the right-hand side, = ? d^{3}**r** ?(**r**) is a ket consisting of a superposition of kets with relative coefficients specified by that function.

It is then customary to define linear operators acting on wavefunctions in terms of linear operators acting on kets, by

For instance, the momentum operator has the following form,

One occasionally encounters an expression such as

though this is something of an abuse of notation. The differential operator must be understood to be an abstract operator, acting on kets, that has the effect of differentiating wavefunctions once the expression is projected onto the position basis,
even though, in the momentum basis, this operator amounts to a mere multiplication operator (by *i?***p**). That is, to say,

or

In quantum mechanics the expression is typically interpreted as the probability amplitude for the state *?* to collapse into the state *?*. Mathematically, this means the coefficient for the projection of *?* onto *?*. It is also described as the projection of state *?* onto state *?*.

A stationary spin- particle has a two-dimensional Hilbert space. One orthonormal basis is:

where is the state with a definite value of the spin operator *S _{z}* equal to + and is the state with a definite value of the spin operator

Since these are a basis, *any* quantum state of the particle can be expressed as a linear combination (i.e., quantum superposition) of these two states:

where *a _{?}* and

A *different* basis for the same Hilbert space is:

defined in terms of *S _{x}* rather than

Again, *any* state of the particle can be expressed as a linear combination of these two:

In vector form, you might write

depending on which basis you are using. In other words, the "coordinates" of a vector depend on the basis used.

There is a mathematical relationship between *a*_{?}, *b*_{?}, *c*_{?} and *d*_{?}; see change of basis.

This section does not cite any sources. (July 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) |

There are a few conventions and abuses of notation that are generally accepted by the physics community, but which might confuse the non-initiated.

It is common to use the same symbol for *labels* and *constants* in the same equation. For example, = *?* , where the symbol *?* is used **simultaneously** as the *name of the operator* , its *eigenvector* and the associated *eigenvalue* *?*.

Something similar occurs in component notation of vectors. While *?* (uppercase) is traditionally associated with wavefunctions, *?* (lowercase) may be used to denote a *label*, a *wave function* or *complex constant* in the same context, usually differentiated only by a subscript.

The main abuses are including operations inside the vector labels. This is done for a fast notation of scaling vectors. E.g. if the vector is scaled by , it might be denoted by , which makes no sense since *?* is a label, not a function or a number, so you can't perform operations on it.

This is especially common when denoting vectors as tensor products, where part of the labels are moved **outside** the designed slot, e.g. = ? . Here part of the labeling that should state that all three vectors are different was moved outside the kets, as subscripts 1 and 2. And a further abuse occurs, since *?* is meant to refer to the norm of the first vector--which is a *label* denoting a *value*.

A linear operator is a map that inputs a ket and outputs a ket. (In order to be called "linear", it is required to have certain properties.) In other words, if * A* is a linear operator and is a ket, then

In an *N*-dimensional Hilbert space, can be written as an *N* × 1 column vector, and then * A* is an

Linear operators are ubiquitous in the theory of quantum mechanics. For example, observable physical quantities are represented by self-adjoint operators, such as energy or momentum, whereas transformative processes are represented by unitary linear operators such as rotation or the progression of time.

Operators can also be viewed as acting on bras *from the right hand side*. Specifically, if * A* is a linear operator and is a bra, then

(in other words, a function composition). This expression is commonly written as (cf. energy inner product)

In an *N*-dimensional Hilbert space, can be written as a 1 × *N* row vector, and * A* (as in the previous section) is an

If the same state vector appears on both bra and ket side,

then this expression gives the expectation value, or mean or average value, of the observable represented by operator * A* for the physical system in the state .

A convenient way to define linear operators on a Hilbert space H is given by the outer product: if is a bra and is a ket, the outer product

denotes the rank-one operator with the rule

- .

For a finite-dimensional vector space, the outer product can be understood as simple matrix multiplication:

The outer product is an *N* × *N* matrix, as expected for a linear operator.

One of the uses of the outer product is to construct projection operators. Given a ket of norm 1, the orthogonal projection onto the subspace spanned by is

Just as kets and bras can be transformed into each other (making into ), the element from the dual space corresponding to *A* is *A*^{+}, where *A*^{+} denotes the Hermitian conjugate (or adjoint) of the operator *A*. In other words,

If *A* is expressed as an *N* × *N* matrix, then *A*^{+} is its conjugate transpose.

Self-adjoint operators, where *A* = *A*^{+}, play an important role in quantum mechanics; for example, an observable is always described by a self-adjoint operator. If A is a self-adjoint operator, then *A* is always a real number (not complex). This implies that expectation values of observables are real.

Bra-ket notation was designed to facilitate the formal manipulation of linear-algebraic expressions. Some of the properties that allow this manipulation are listed herein. In what follows, *c*_{1} and *c*_{2} denote arbitrary complex numbers, *c** denotes the complex conjugate of *c*, *A* and *B* denote arbitrary linear operators, and these properties are to hold for any choice of bras and kets.

- Since bras are linear functionals,

- By the definition of addition and scalar multiplication of linear functionals in the dual space,
^{[8]}

Given any expression involving complex numbers, bras, kets, inner products, outer products, and/or linear operators (but not addition), written in bra-ket notation, the parenthetical groupings do not matter (i.e., the associative property holds). For example:

and so forth. The expressions on the right (with no parentheses whatsoever) are allowed to be written unambiguously *because* of the equalities on the left. Note that the associative property does *not* hold for expressions that include nonlinear operators, such as the antilinear time reversal operator in physics.

Bra-ket notation makes it particularly easy to compute the Hermitian conjugate (also called *dagger*, and denoted +) of expressions. The formal rules are:

- The Hermitian conjugate of a bra is the corresponding ket, and vice versa.
- The Hermitian conjugate of a complex number is its complex conjugate.
- The Hermitian conjugate of the Hermitian conjugate of anything (linear operators, bras, kets, numbers) is itself--i.e.,

- Given any combination of complex numbers, bras, kets, inner products, outer products, and/or linear operators, written in bra-ket notation, its Hermitian conjugate can be computed by reversing the order of the components, and taking the Hermitian conjugate of each.

These rules are sufficient to formally write the Hermitian conjugate of any such expression; some examples are as follows:

- Kets:

- Inner products:

- Note that is a scalar, so the Hermitian conjugate is just the complex conjugate, i.e.

- Matrix elements:

- Outer products:

Two Hilbert spaces *V* and *W* may form a third space *V* ? *W* by a tensor product. In quantum mechanics, this is used for describing composite systems. If a system is composed of two subsystems described in *V* and *W* respectively, then the Hilbert space of the entire system is the tensor product of the two spaces. (The exception to this is if the subsystems are actually identical particles. In that case, the situation is a little more complicated.)

If is a ket in *V* and is a ket in *W*, the direct product of the two kets is a ket in *V* ? *W*. This is written in various notations:

See quantum entanglement and the EPR paradox for applications of this product.

Consider a complete orthonormal system (*basis*),

for a Hilbert space *H*, with respect to the norm from an inner product ⟨·,·⟩.

From basic functional analysis, it is known that any ket can also be written as

with the inner product on the Hilbert space.

From the commutativity of kets with (complex) scalars, it follows that

must be the *identity operator*, which sends each vector to itself.

This, then, can be inserted in any expression without affecting its value; for example

where, in the last line, the Einstein summation convention has been used to avoid clutter.

In quantum mechanics, it often occurs that little or no information about the inner product of two arbitrary (state) kets is present, while it is still possible to say something about the expansion coefficients = * and of those vectors with respect to a specific (orthonormalized) basis. In this case, it is particularly useful to insert the unit operator into the bracket one time or more.

For more information, see Resolution of the identity,

- 1 = ? d
*x*= ? d*p*, where = ? d*x**e*^{ixp/?}/.

Since = *?*(*x* - *x*?), plane waves follow,^{[9]} = *e*^{ixp/?}/.

Typically, when all matrix elements of an operator such as

are available, this resolution serves to reconstitute the full operator,

The object physicists are considering when using bra-ket notation is a Hilbert space (a complete inner product space).

Let H be a Hilbert space and *h* ? H a vector in H. What physicists would denote by is the vector itself. That is,

- .

Let H* be the dual space of H. This is the space of linear functionals on H. The isomorphism *?* : H -> H* is defined by *?*(*h*) = *? _{h}*, where for every

- ,

where IP(·,·), (·,·), ⟨·,·⟩ and are just different notations for expressing an inner product between two elements in a Hilbert space (or for the first three, in any inner product space). Notational confusion arises when identifying *? _{h}* and

One ignores the parentheses and removes the double bars. Some properties of this notation are convenient since we are dealing with linear operators and composition acts like a ring multiplication.

Moreover, mathematicians usually write the dual entity not at the first place, as the physicists do, but at the second one, and they usually use not an asterisk but an overline (which the physicists reserve for averages and the Dirac spinor adjoint) to denote complex conjugate numbers; i.e., for scalar products mathematicians usually write

whereas physicists would write for the same quantity

- Angular momentum diagrams (quantum mechanics)
- n-slit interferometric equation
- Quantum state
- Inner product

**^**Dirac 1939**^**Shankar 1994, Chapter 1**^**Grassmann 1862**^**Lecture 2 | Quantum Entanglements, Part 1 (Stanford), Leonard Susskind on complex numbers, complex conjugate, bra, ket. 2006-10-02.**^**McMahon, D. (2006).*Quantum Mechanics Demystified*. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0-07-145546-9.**^**Lecture 2 | Quantum Entanglements, Part 1 (Stanford), Leonard Susskind on inner product, 2006-10-02.**^**Gidney, Craig (2017). Bra-Ket Notation Trivializes Matrix Multiplication**^**Lecture notes by Robert Littlejohn, eqns 12 and 13**^**In his book (1958), Ch. III.20, Dirac defines the*standard ket*which, up to a normalization, is the translationally invariant momentum eigenstate in the momentum representation, i.e., . Consequently, the corresponding wavefunction is a constant, , and , as well as .

- Dirac, P. A. M. (1939). "A new notation for quantum mechanics".
*Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society*.**35**(3): 416-418. Bibcode:1939PCPS...35..416D. doi:10.1017/S0305004100021162.. Also see his standard text,*The Principles of Quantum Mechanics*, IV edition, Clarendon Press (1958), ISBN 978-0198520115 - Grassmann, H. (1862).
*Extension Theory*. History of Mathematics Sources. 2000 translation by Lloyd C. Kannenberg. American Mathematical Society, London Mathematical Society. - Cajori, Florian (1929).
*A History Of Mathematical Notations Volume II*. Open Court Publishing. p. 134. ISBN 978-0-486-67766-8. - Shankar, R. (1994).
*Principles of Quantum Mechanics*(2nd ed.). ISBN 0-306-44790-8. - Feynman, Richard P.; Leighton, Robert B.; Sands, Matthew (1965).
*The Feynman Lectures on Physics*.**III**. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0-201-02118-8.

- Richard Fitzpatrick, "Quantum Mechanics: A graduate level course", The University of Texas at Austin. Includes:
- 1. Ket space
- 2. Bra space
- 3. Operators
- 4. The outer product
- 5. Eigenvalues and eigenvectors

- Robert Littlejohn, Lecture notes on "The Mathematical Formalism of Quantum mechanics", including bra-ket notation. University of California, Berkeley.
- Gieres, F. (2000). "Mathematical surprises and Dirac's formalism in quantum mechanics".
*Rep. Prog. Phys*.**63**(12): 1893-1931. arXiv:quant-ph/9907069. Bibcode:2000RPPh...63.1893G. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/63/12/201.

This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Popular Products

Music Scenes

Popular Artists