Composition of Relations

Get Composition of Relations essential facts below. View Videos or join the Composition of Relations discussion. Add Composition of Relations to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
## Definition

### Notational variations

## Properties

## Composition in terms of matrices

## Heterogeneous relations

### Example

## Schröder rules

## Quotients

## Join: another form of composition

## See also

## Notes

## References

This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Composition of Relations

In the mathematics of binary relations, the **composition relations** is a concept of forming a new relation from two given relations *R* and *S*. The composition of relations is called **relative multiplication**^{[1]} in the calculus of relations. The composition is then the **relative product**^{[2]}^{:40} of the factor relations. Composition of functions is a special case of composition of relations.

The words uncle and aunt indicate a compound relation: for a person to be an uncle, he must be a brother of a parent (or a sister for an aunt). In algebraic logic it is said that the relation of Uncle ( *xUz* ) is the composition of relations "is a brother of" ( *xBy* ) and "is a parent of" ( *yPz* ).

Beginning with Augustus De Morgan,^{[3]} the traditional form of reasoning by syllogism has been subsumed by relational logical expressions and their composition.^{[4]}

If and are two binary relations, then their composition is the relation

In other words, is defined by the rule that says if and only if there is an element such that (i.e. and ).^{[5]}^{:13}

The semicolon as an infix notation for composition of relations dates back to Ernst Schroder's textbook of 1895.^{[6]}Gunther Schmidt has renewed the use of the semicolon, particularly in *Relational Mathematics* (2011).^{[2]}^{:40}^{[7]} The use of semicolon coincides with the notation for function composition used (mostly by computer scientists) in category theory,^{[8]} as well as the notation for dynamic conjunction within linguistic dynamic semantics.^{[9]}

A small circle has been used for the infix notation of composition of relations by John M. Howie in his books considering semigroups of relations.^{[10]} However, the small circle is widely used to represent composition of functions which *reverses* the text sequence from the operation sequence. The small circle was used in the introductory pages of *Graphs and Relations*^{[5]}^{:18} until it was dropped in favor of juxtaposition (no infix notation). Juxtaposition is commonly used in algebra to signify multiplication, so too, it can signify relative multiplication.

Further with the circle notation, subscripts may be used. Some authors^{[11]} prefer to write and explicitly when necessary, depending whether the left or the right relation is the first one applied. A further variation encountered in computer science is the Z notation: is used to denote the traditional (right) composition, but ? (a fat open semicolon with Unicode code point U+2A3E) denotes left composition.^{[12]}^{[13]}

The binary relations are sometimes regarded as the morphisms in a category **Rel** which has the sets as objects. In **Rel**, composition of morphisms is exactly composition of relations as defined above. The category **Set** of sets is a subcategory of **Rel** that has the same objects but fewer morphisms.

- Composition of relations is associative:
- The converse relation of is . This property makes the set of all binary relations on a set a semigroup with involution.
- The composition of (partial) functions (i.e. functional relations) is again a (partial) function.
- If
*R*and*S*are injective, then is injective, which conversely implies only the injectivity of*R*. - If
*R*and*S*are surjective, then is surjective, which conversely implies only the surjectivity of*S*. - The set of binary relations on a set
*X*(i.e. relations from*X*to*X*) together with (left or right) relation composition forms a monoid with zero, where the identity map on*X*is the neutral element, and the empty set is the zero element.

Finite binary relations are represented by logical matrices. The entries of these matrices are either zero or one, depending on whether the relation represented is false or true for the row and column corresponding to compared objects. Working with such matrices involves the Boolean arithmetic with 1 + 1 = 1 and 1 × 1 = 1. An entry in the matrix product of two logical matrices will be 1, then, only if the row and column multiplied have a corresponding 1. Thus the logical matrix of a composition of relations can be found by computing the matrix product of the matrices representing the factors of the composition. "Matrices constitute a method for *computing* the conclusions traditionally drawn by means of hypothetical syllogisms and sorites."^{[14]}

Consider a heterogeneous relation *R* ? *A* × *B*. Then using composition of relation *R* with its converse *R*^{T}, there are homogeneous relations *R R*^{T} (on *A*) and *R*^{T}*R* (on *B*).

If ?*x* ? *A* ?*y* ? B *xRy* (*R* is a total relation), then ?*x* *xRR*^{T}*x* so that *R R*^{T} is a reflexive relation or I ? *R R*^{T} where I is the identity relation {*x*I*x* : *x* ? *A*}. Similarly, if *R* is a surjective relation then

*R*^{T}*R*? I = {*x*I*x*:*x*?*B*}. In this case*R*?*R R*^{T}*R*. The opposite inclusion occurs for a difunctional relation.

The composition is used to distinguish relations of Ferrer's type, which satisfy

Let *A* = { France, Germany, Italy, Switzerland } and *B* = { French, German, Italian } with the relation *R* given by *aRb* when *b* is a national language of *a*. The logical matrix for *R* is given by

- Using the converse relation
*R*^{T}, two questions can be answered: "Is there a translator?" has answer the universal relation on*B*. The international question, "Does he speak my language?" is answered by This symmetric matrix, representing a homogeneous relation on*A*, is associated with the star graph S_{3}augmented by a loop at each node.

For a given set *V*, the collection of all binary relations on *V* forms a Boolean lattice ordered by inclusion (?). Recall that complementation reverses inclusion:
In the calculus of relations^{[15]} it is common to represent the complement of a set by an overbar:

If *S* is a binary relation, let represent the converse relation, also called the *transpose*. Then the Schröder rules are

Verbally, one equivalence can be obtained from another: select the first or second factor and transpose it; then complement the other two relations and permute them.^{[5]}^{:15–19}

Though this transformation of an inclusion of a composition of relations was detailed by Ernst Schröder, in fact Augustus De Morgan first articulated the transformation as Theorem K in 1860.^{[4]} He wrote

^{[16]}

With Schröder rules and complementation one can solve for an unknown relation *X* in relation inclusions such as

For instance, by Schröder rule and complementation gives which is called the **left residual of S by R** .

Just as composition of relations is a type of multiplication resulting in a product, so some compositions compare to division and produce quotients. Three quotients are exhibited here: left residual, right residual, and symmetric quotient. The left residual of two relations is defined presuming that they have the same domain (source), and the right residual presumes the same codomain (range, target). The symmetric quotient presumes two relations share a domain and a codomain.

**Definitions:**

- Left residual:
- Right residual:
- Symmetric quotient:

Using Schröder's rules, *AX* ? *B* is equivalent to *X* ? *A**B*. Thus the left residual is the greatest relation satisfying *AX* ? *B*. Similarly, the inclusion *YC* ? *D* is equivalent to *Y* ? *D*/*C*, and the right residual is the greatest relation satisfying *YC* ? *D*.^{[2]}^{:43–6}

A fork operator (<) has been introduced to fuse two relations *c*: *H* -> *A* and *d*: *H* -> *B* into *c*(<)*d*: *H* -> *A* × *B*.
The construction depends on projections *a*: *A* × *B* -> *A* and *b*: *A* × *B* -> *B*, understood as relations, meaning that there are converse relations *a*^{T} and *b*^{T}. Then the **fork** of *c* and *d* is given by

^{[17]}

Another form of composition of relations, which applies to general *n*-place relations for *n* >= 2, is the *join* operation of relational algebra. The usual composition of two binary relations as defined here can be obtained by taking their join, leading to a ternary relation, followed by a projection that removes the middle component. For example, in the query language SQL there is the operation Join (SQL).

**^**Bjarni Jónssen (1984) "Maximal Algebras of Binary Relations", in*Contributions to Group Theory*, K.I. Appel editor American Mathematical Society ISBN 978-0-8218-5035-0- ^
^{a}^{b}^{c}Gunther Schmidt (2011)*Relational Mathematics*, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 132, Cambridge University Press ISBN 978-0-521-76268-7 **^**A. De Morgan (1860) "On the Syllogism: IV and on the Logic of Relations"- ^
^{a}^{b}Daniel D. Merrill (1990)*Augustus De Morgan and the Logic of Relations*, page 121, Kluwer Academic ISBN 9789400920477 - ^
^{a}^{b}^{c}Gunther Schmidt & Thomas Ströhlein (1993)*Relations and Graphs*, Springer books **^**Ernst Schroder (1895) Algebra und Logik der Relative**^**Paul Taylor (1999).*Practical Foundations of Mathematics*. Cambridge University Press. p. 24. ISBN 978-0-521-63107-5. A free HTML version of the book is available at http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~pt/Practical_Foundations/**^**Michael Barr & Charles Wells (1998) Category Theory for Computer Scientists Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine, page 6, from McGill University**^**Rick Nouwen and others (2016) Dynamic Semantics §2.2, from Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy**^**John M. Howie (1995)*Fundamentals of Semigroup Theory*, page 16, LMS Monograph #12, Clarendon Press ISBN 0-19-851194-9**^**Kilp, Knauer & Mikhalev, p. 7**^**ISO/IEC 13568:2002(E), p. 23**^**Unicode character: Z Notation relational composition from FileFormat.info**^**Irving Copilowish (December 1948) "Matrix development of the calculus of relations", Journal of Symbolic Logic 13(4): 193-203 Jstor link, quote from page 203**^**Vaughn Pratt The Origins of the Calculus of Relations, from Stanford University**^**De Morgan indicated contraries by lower case, conversion as M^{-1}, and inclusion with )), so his notation was**^**Gunther Schmidt and Michael Winter (2018):*Relational Topology*, page 26, Lecture Notes in Mathematics vol. 2208, Springer books, ISBN 978-3-319-74451-3

- M. Kilp, U. Knauer, A.V. Mikhalev (2000)
*Monoids, Acts and Categories with Applications to Wreath Products and Graphs*, De Gruyter Expositions in Mathematics vol. 29, Walter de Gruyter,ISBN 3-11-015248-7.

This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Popular Products

Music Scenes

Popular Artists