Historical distribution of Cree peoples
|Native to||Canada; United States (Montana)|
|96,260, 27% of ethnic population (2016 census)|
(including Montagnais-Naskapi and Atikamekw)
|Latin, Canadian Aboriginal syllabics (Cree)|
Official language in
Cree  (also known as Cree-Montagnais-Naskapi) is a dialect continuum of Algonquian languages spoken by approximately 117,000 people across Canada, from the Northwest Territories to Alberta to Labrador. If considered one language, it is the aboriginal language with the highest number of speakers in Canada. The only region where Cree has any official status is in the Northwest Territories, alongside eight other aboriginal languages. There, Cree is spoken mainly in Fort Smith and Hay River.
Endonyms are nêhiyawêwin ? (Plains Cree), n?hithaw?win ? (Woods Cree), Nehirâmowin (Atikamekw), Nehlueun (Western Montagnais, Piyekwâkamî dialect), Ilnu-Aimûn (Western Montagnais, Betsiamites dialect), Innu-Aimûn (Eastern Montagnais), Iyiniu-Ayamiwin ? (Southern East Cree), Iyiyiu-Ayamiwin ? (Northern East Cree), ililîmowin (Moose Cree), ininîmowin (Eastern Swampy Cree), and nêhinawêwin ? (Western Swampy Cree).
Cree is believed to have begun as a dialect of the Proto-Algonquian language spoken between 2,500 and 3,000 years ago in the original Algonquian homeland, an undetermined area thought to be near the Great Lakes. The speakers of the proto-Cree language are thought to have moved north, and diverged rather quickly into two different groups on each side of James Bay. The eastern group then began to diverge into separate dialects, whereas the western grouping probably broke into distinct dialects much later. After this point it is very difficult to make definite statements about how different groups emerged and moved around, because there are no written works in the languages to compare, and descriptions by Europeans are not systematic; as well, Algonquian people have a tradition of bilingualism and even of outright adopting a new language from neighbours.
A traditional view among 20th century anthropologists and historians of the fur trade posits that the Western Woods Cree and the Plains Cree (and therefore their dialects) did not diverge from other Cree peoples before 1670, when the Cree expanded out of their homeland near James Bay because of access to European firearms. By contrast, James Smith of the Museum of the American Indian stated, in 1987, that the weight of archeological and linguistic evidence puts the Cree as far west as the Peace River Region of Alberta before European contact.
Doug Cuthand argues three reasons for the loss of the Cree language. First, residential schools cultivated the prejudice that their language was inferior. While students were still speaking their native language at home, their learning stopped at school. When they left residential schools as adults, they went home and their vocabulary and knowledge of language did not include concepts or forms that an adult speaker who had not been taken to a residential school would have.
Cuthand also argues that the loss of the Cree language can be attributed to the migration of native families away from the reserve, voluntarily or not. Oftentimes, the elders are left on the reserve. This breaks up the traditional intergenerational flow of lingual knowledge from elder to youth.
The third point Cuthand argues is that Cree language loss was adopted by the speakers. Parents stopped teaching their children their native language in the belief that doing so would help their children find economic success or avoid discrimination.
The Cree dialect continuum can be divided by many criteria. Dialects spoken in northern Ontario and the southern James Bay, Lanaudière, and Mauricie regions of Quebec differentiate /?/ (sh as in she) and /s/, while those to the west have merged the two phonemes as /s/ and in east the phonemes are merged as either /?/ or /h/. In several dialects, including northern Plains Cree and Woods Cree, the long vowels /e:/ and /i:/ have merged into a single vowel, /i:/. In the Quebec communities of Chisasibi, Whapmagoostui, and Kawawachikamach, the long vowel /e:/ has merged with /a:/.
However, the most transparent phonological variation between different Cree dialects are the reflexes of Proto-Algonquian *l in the modern dialects, as shown below:
|Word for "native person"
|Word for "you"|
|Plains Cree||SK, AB, BC, NT||y||iyiniw||k?ya|
|Woods Cree||MB, SK||ð/th||iðiniw/ithiniw||k?ða/k?tha|
|Swampy Cree||ON, MB, SK||n||ininiw||k?na|
|Northern East Cree||QC||y||iyiyiw||y|
|Southern East Cree||QC||y||iyiy?/iyin?||y|
|Eastern Innu||QC, NL||n||innu||n|
The Plains Cree, speakers of the y dialect, refer to their language as n?hiyaw?win, whereas Woods Cree speakers say n?hithaw?win, and Swampy Cree speakers say n?hinaw?win.
Another important phonological variation among the Cree dialects involves the palatalisation of Proto-Algonquian *k: East of the Ontario-Quebec border (except for Atikamekw), Proto-Algonquian *k has changed into /t?/ or /ts/ before front vowels. See the table above for examples in the *k?la column.
Very often the Cree dialect continuum is divided into two languages: Cree and Montagnais. Cree includes all dialects which have not undergone the *k > /t?/ sound change (BC-QC) while Montagnais encompasses the territory where this sound change has occurred (QC-NL). These labels are very useful from a linguistic perspective but are confusing as East Cree then qualifies as Montagnais. For practical purposes, Cree usually covers the dialects which use syllabics as their orthography (including Atikamekw but excluding Kawawachikamach Naskapi), the term Montagnais then applies to those dialects using the Latin script (excluding Atikamekw and including Kawawachikamach Naskapi). The term Naskapi typically refers to Kawawachikamach (y-dialect) and Natuashish (n-dialect).
The Cree dialects can be broadly classified into nine groups. Roughly from west to east:
code and name
code and name
code and name
name (and code)
|dialect type||additional comments|
|cre Cree (generic)||cwd Woods Cree
|Cree-Montagnais-Naskapi||Western Cree||Wood Cree||Cree-Montagnais-Naskapi
|ð||k||s||?||In this dialect ? has merged into ?.|
|Western York Cree||r -> ð||k||s||?||Missinipi Cree (N?hiraw?win). Also known as "Rocky Cree". Historical r have transitioned to ð and have merged into Woods Cree. While Woods Cree proper have hk, Missinipi Cree have sk, e.g., Woods Cree mihkosiw v. Missinipi Cree miskosiw : "he/she is red".|
|crk Plains Cree||crk
|Plains Cree||Northern Alberta Cree||y||k||s||?||(northern)||Divided to Southern Plains Cree (N?hiyaw?win) and Northern Plains Cree (N?hiyaw?win or N?hiyaw?mowin). In the Northern dialect, ? has merged into ?.|
|Nuclear Plains Cree||y||k||s||?||(southern)|
|csw Swampy Cree
Swampy Cree, West
|Swampy Cree||Swampy Cree
|Western Swampy Cree||n||k||s||?||Eastern Swampy Cree, together with Moose Cree, also known as "West Main Cree," "Central Cree," or "West Shore Cree." In the western dialect, ? has merged with s. Western Swampy Cree also known as "York Cree;" together with Northern Plains Cree and Woods Cree, also known as "Western Woodland Cree."|
Swampy Cree, East
|Eastern Swampy Cree||n||k||?||?|
|crm Moose Cree
|Moose Cree||Moose Cree
|n\l||k||?||?||(lowland)||Together with the Eastern Swampy Cree, also known as "West Main Cree," "Central Cree," or "West Shore Cree." In Swampy Cree influenced areas, some speakers use n instead of l, e.g., upland Moose Cree iliniw v. lowland Moose Cree ililiw : "human". Kesagami Lake Cree was an r dialect but has transitioned and merged with l dialect of Moose Cree.|
|r -> l||k||?||?||(Kesagami Lake)|
|crl Northern East Cree
Northern East Cree
|Eastern Cree||East Cree||Northern East Cree
|y||k\?||?||?||Also known as "James Bay Cree" or "East Main Cree". The long vowels ? and ? have merged in the northern dialect but are distinct in the southern. Southern East Cree is divided between coastal (southwestern) and inland (southeastern) varieties. Also, the inland southern dialect has lost the distinction between s and ?. Here, the inland southern dialect falls in line with the rest of the Naskapi groups where both phonemes have become ?. Nonetheless, the people from the two areas easily communicate. In the northern dialect, ki is found in situations were short unaccented vowel a transitioned to i without changing the k to ?.|
|crj Southern East Cree
Southern East Cree
|Southern East Cree
|Western Naskapi||y||?||?~s||?||Western Naskapi (or simply referred to as Naskapi). Spoken in Kawawachikamach, Quebec.|
|Eastern Naskapi||n||?||?~s||?||Eastern Naskapi; also known as Mushuau Innu. Spoken in Natuashish, Labrador.|
Uashau Innuts + Bersimis
|Western Montagnais||l||?||?||?||Western Montagnais (Lehlueun); also known as the "Betsiamites dialect"|
|n||?||?~h||?||Part of Western Montagnais, but more precisely referred to as Central Montagnais. ? is realized as h in intervocalic position, especially amongst middle-aged and young speakers.|
|Eastern Montagnais||n||?||?~h||?||Eastern Montagnais (Innu-aimûn). ? is mostly realized as h.|
|Western Cree (cont'd)||Attikamek||Atikamekw
This table shows the possible consonant phonemes in the Cree language or one of its varieties.
|Stop||p [p]||t [t]||c [t?s~t]||ch/tc/? [t]||k [k]|
|Fricative||th [ð]||s [s~?]||sh/c/? [?]||h [h]|
|Nasal||m [m]||n/ñ/? [n]|
|Approximant||r [?]||y/i/ý [j]||w [w]|
|Close||ii/?/î [i:]||uu/?/û/?/ô [o:~u:]|
|Near-Close||i [?]||u/o [o~?]|
|Mid||e/?/ê [e:]||a [?]|
In dictionaries focused on Eastern Swampy Cree, Western Swampy Cree may readily substitute ?sh? with ?s?, while Lowland Moose Cree may readily substitute ?ñ? with their ?l?. In dictionaries focused on Southern Plains Cree, Northern Plains Cree may readily substitute with , while materials accommodating Rocky Cree will indicate the Plains Cree [j] that is [ð] in Rocky Cree as ?ý?. Similarly, in dictionaries focused on Western Swampy Cree, Woods Cree may readily substitute with , while materials accommodating Woods Cree will indicate the Western Swampy Cree [n] that is [ð] in Woods Cree as . Atikamekw uses ?c? [?], ?tc? [t], and ?i? [j] (which also serves as ?i? [i]). Eastern James Bay Cree prefers to indicate long vowels (other than [e:]) by doubling the vowel, while the western Cree use either a macron or circumflex diacritic; as [e:] is always long, often it is written as just ?e? without doubling or using a diacritic. While Western Cree dialects make use of ?o? and either or ?ô?, Eastern Cree dialects instead make use of ?u? and either ?uu?, , or ?û?.
Cree features a complex polysynthetic morphosyntax. A common grammatical feature in Cree dialects, in terms of sentence structure, is non-regulated word order. Word order is not governed by a specific set of rules or structure; instead, "subjects and objects are expressed by means of inflection on the verb". Subject, Verb, and Object (SVO) in a sentence can vary in order, for example, SVO, VOS, OVS, and SOV.
Obviation is also a key aspect of the Cree language(s). In a sense, the obviative can be defined as any third-person ranked lower on a hierarchy of discourse salience than some other (proximate) discourse-participant. "Obviative animate nouns, [in the Plains Cree dialect for instance], are marked by [a suffix] ending -a, and are used to refer to third persons who are more peripheral in the discourse than the proximate third person". For example:
Sam wâpam-ew Susan-a
Sam see-3SG Susan-3OBV
"Sam sees Susan."
The suffix -a marks Susan as the obviative, or 'fourth' person, the person furthest away from the discourse.
The Cree language has grammatical gender in a system that classifies nouns as animate or inanimate. The distribution of nouns between animate or inanimate is not phonologically transparent, which means gender must be learned along with the noun. As is common in polysynthetic languages, a Cree word can be very long, and express something that takes a series of words in English. For example, the Plains Cree word for "school" is kiskinoham?towikamikw, "know.CAUS.APPLICATIVE.RECIPROCAL.place" or the "knowing-it-together-by-example place". This means that changing the word order in Cree can place emphasis on different pieces of the sentence. Wolfart and Carroll give the following example by transposing the two Cree words:
kakw?cim?w kis?ýiniwa -> He asked the old man.
kis?ýiniwa kakw?cim?w -> It was the old man he asked.
Cree dialects, except for those spoken in eastern Quebec and Labrador, are traditionally written using Cree syllabics, a variant of Canadian Aboriginal syllabics, but can be written with the Latin script as well. Both writing systems represent the language phonetically. Cree is always written from left to right horizontally. The easternmost dialects are written using the Latin script exclusively. The dialects of Plains Cree, Woods Cree, and western Swampy Cree use Western Cree syllabics and the dialects of eastern Swampy Cree, East Cree, Moose Cree, and Naskapi use Eastern Cree syllabics.
In Cree syllabics, each symbol, which represents a consonant, can be written four ways, each direction representing its corresponding vowel. Some dialects of Cree have up to seven vowels, so additional diacritics are placed after the syllabic to represent the corresponding vowels. Finals represent stand-alone consonants. The Cree language also has two semivowels. The semivowels may follow other consonants or be on their own in a word.
The following tables show the syllabaries of Eastern and Western Cree dialects, respectively:
|Eastern Cree syllabary|
|* Used only in foreign sounds|
|Western Cree syllabary|
Speakers of various Cree dialects have begun creating dictionaries to serve their communities. Some projects, such as the Cree Language Resource Project (CLRP), are developing an online bilingual Cree dictionary for the Cree language.
Cree syllabics has not commonly or traditionally used the period (.). Instead, either a full-stop glyph (?) or a double em-width space has been used between words to signal the transition from one sentence to the next.
For Plains Cree and Swampy Cree, Standard Roman Orthography (SRO) uses fourteen letters of the ISO basic Latin alphabet to denote the dialect's ten consonants (p, t, c, k, s, m, n, w, y and h) and seven vowels (a, i, o, ?, ?, ? and ?). Upper case letters are not used.:5 For more details on the phonetic values of these letters or variant orthographies, see the § Phonology section above.
The /ð/ sound of Woods Cree is written th, or ð in more recent material. Plains and Swampy material written to be cross-dialectical often modify y to ý and n to ñ when those are pronounced /ð/ in Swampy.:7,53? is used in Eastern dialects where s and ? are distinct phonemes. In other dialects, s is used even when pronounced like [?].:54
l and r are used natively in Moose and Attikamek Cree, but in other dialects only for loanwords.:55
The stops, p, t, k, and the affricate, c, can be pronounced either voiced or unvoiced, but the symbols used for writing these sounds all correspond to the unvoiced pronunciation, e.g. p not b, t not d, etc. The phoneme /t?s/ is represented by c, as it is in various other languages.
Long vowels are denoted with either a macron, as in ?, or a circumflex, as in â.:4, 7-8 Use of either the macron or circumflex is acceptable, but usage should be consistent within a work. The vowel ? /e:/, used in southern Plains Cree, is always long and the grapheme e is never used. In northern Plains Cree the sound has merged with ?, and thus ? isn't used at all.:8
The use of unmarked o and marked ? for the phonemes /u/ and /o:/ emphasizes the relationship that can exist between these two vowels. There are situations where o can be lengthened to ?, as for example in ! nikamo! "sing (now)!" and ! nikam?hkan! "sing (later)!".
In alphabetic writing, the use of punctuation has been inconsistent. For instance, in the Plains Cree dialect, the interrogative enclitic cî can be included in the sentence to mark a yes-no question such that this is sometimes considered to be sufficient without including a question mark (?). However, in many modern publications and text collections (cf. The Counselling Speeches of Jim Kâ-Nîpitêhtêw (1998)) full punctuation is used.
John cî kî-mîcisow?
John cî kî-mîciso-w
John INTER PST-eat-3SG
"Did John eat?"
Additionally, other interrogatives (where, when, what, why, who) can be used, as in other languages, and questions marks can thus be used for such questions in Cree as well.
Hyphenation can be used to separate a particle from the root word that it prefixes, especially particles that precede verbs ("preverbs" or "indeclinable preverbs") or nouns ("prenouns" or "indeclinable prenouns"). One example is m?ci-p?kiskw? ("start speaking!"), derived from p?kiskw?. Note that m?ci- can neither stand alone as a separate word, nor is it an essential part of a stem. There are some more complex situations where it is difficult to determine whether an element is a particle. Some frequently used compound words can be written as unhyphenated.:16-19 Stress can be predicted in some cases based on hyphenation.
Vowel reduction or vowel dropping, as is common of unstressed short i [?], is not denoted in order to be more cross-dialectal--instead of using apostrophes, the full unreduced vowels are written.:23
Representation of sandhi (such as oski-aya -> osk-?ya) can be written or not written, as sandhi representation introduces greater complexity.:24-25 There are additional rules regarding h and iy that may not match a given speaker's speech, to enable a standardized transcription.
Cree is also a component language in two contact languages, Michif and Bungi. Both languages were spoken by members of the Métis, the Voyageurs, and European settlers of Western Canada and parts of the Northern United States.
Michif is a mixed language which combines Cree with French. For the most part, Michif uses Cree verbs, question words, and demonstratives while using French nouns. Michif is unique to the Canadian prairie provinces as well as to North Dakota and Montana in the United States. Michif is still spoken in central Canada and in North Dakota.
Bungi is a creole based on Scottish English, Scots, Scottish Gaelic, Cree, and Ojibwe. Some French words have also been incorporated into its lexicon. This language flourished at and around the Red River Settlement (modern day location of Winnipeg, Manitoba) by the mid to late 1800s. Bungi is now virtually extinct, as its features are being abandoned in favor of standard English.
Cree has also been incorporated into another mixed language within Canada, Nehipwat, which is a blending of Cree with Assiniboine. Nehipwat is found only in a few southern Saskatchewan reserves and is now nearing extinction. Nothing is known of its structure.
The social and legal status of Cree varies across Canada. Cree is one of the eleven official languages of the Northwest Territories, but is only spoken by a small number of people there in the area around the town of Fort Smith. It is also one of two principal languages of the regional government of Eeyou Istchee/Baie-James Territory in Northern Quebec, the other being French.
Cree has about 117,000 documented speakers today. They are still a minority language given the dominance of English and French in Canada. There are programs in place to maintain and revitalize the language, though. In the Quebec James Bay Cree community, a resolution was put into action in 1988 that made Cree the language of education in primary schools and eventually elementary schools.
The Mistissini council decided to require their employees to learn Cree syllabics in 1991.
The Cree School Board now has their annual report available in both English and Cree.
There is a push to increase the availability of Cree stations on the radio.
The Government of the Northwest Territories releases an annual report on First Nations languages. The 2016-2017 report features successes they have had in revitalizing and supporting and projects they are working on. For example, they released a Medicinal Plant Guide that had information in both Cree and English. An important part of making the guide was input from the elders. Another accomplishment was the dubbing of a movie in Cree. They are working on broadcasting a radio station that "will give listeners music and a voice for our languages".
This section includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. (September 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)