Dra%C5%BEa Mihailovi%C4%87
Get Dra%C5%BEa Mihailovi%C4%87 essential facts below. View Videos or join the Dra%C5%BEa Mihailovi%C4%87 discussion. Add Dra%C5%BEa Mihailovi%C4%87 to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
Dra%C5%BEa Mihailovi%C4%87
Dra?a Mihailovi?
Draza Mihailovic,1943.jpg
Mihailovi? during World War II
Birth nameDragoljub Mihailovi?
Nickname(s)"Uncle Dra?a"
Born(1893-04-27)27 April 1893
Ivanjica, Kingdom of Serbia
Died17 July 1946(1946-07-17) (aged 53)
Belgrade, PR Serbia, Yugoslavia
Allegiance Serbia (1910-18)
 Yugoslavia (1918-41)
Kingdom of Yugoslavia Yugoslav government-in-exile (1941-44)
Chetniks (1941-46)
Service/branch
Years of service1910-1945
RankArmy General[1]
Commands held Chetnik movement
Battles/wars
Awards

Dragoljub "Dra?a" Mihailovi?[a] (Serbian Cyrillic: ?; 27 April 1893 - 17 July 1946) was a Yugoslav Serb general during World War II. A staunch royalist, he retreated to the mountains near Belgrade when the Germans overran Yugoslavia in April 1941 and there he organized bands of guerrillas known as the Chetnik Detachments of the Yugoslav Army.

The organisation is commonly known as the Chetniks, although the name of the organisation was later changed to the Yugoslav Army in the Fatherland (JVUO, ?).[6] Founded as the first Yugoslav resistance movement, it was royalist and nationalist, as opposed to the other, Josip Broz Tito's Partisans who were communist. Initially, the two groups operated in parallel, but by late 1941 began fighting each other in the attempt to gain control of post-war Yugoslavia. Many Chetnik groups collaborated or established modus vivendi with the Axis powers. Mihailovi? himself collaborated with Milan Nedi? and Dimitrije Ljoti? at the end of the war. After the war, Mihailovi? was captured by the communists. He was tried and convicted of high treason and war crimes by the communist authorities of the Federal People's Republic of Yugoslavia, and executed by firing squad in Belgrade. The nature and extent of his responsibility for collaboration and ethnic massacres remains controversial. On 14 May 2015, Mihailovi?'s verdict was overturned on appeal with the ruling showing that his trial amounted to a communist kangaroo court. The Supreme Court of Cassation, and appellate court handed out the rulings. While some see this as a rehabilitation the courts did not go as far and only ruled on the previous trial without offering to retry the case. This was done to satisfy his offspring's legal rights to property which the ruling at his trial stripped from them.

Early life and military career

Dragoljub "Dra?a" Mihailovi? was born on 27 April 1893 in Ivanjica, Kingdom of Serbia to Mihailo and Smiljana Mihailovi? (née Petrovi?).[7] His father was a court clerk. Orphaned at seven years of age, Mihailovi? was raised by his paternal uncle in Belgrade.[8] As both of his uncles were military officers, Mihailovi? himself joined the Serbian Military Academy in October 1910. He fought as a cadet in the Serbian Army during the Balkan Wars of 1912-13 and was awarded the Silver Medal of Valor at the end of the First Balkan War, in May 1913.[9] At the end of the Second Balkan War, during which he mainly led operations along the Albanian border, he was given the rank of second lieutenant as the top soldier in his class, ranked sixth at the Serbian military academy.[9] He served in World War I and was involved in the Serbian Army's retreat through Albania in 1915. He later received several decorations for his achievements on the Salonika Front. Following the war, he became a member of the Royal Guard of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes but had to leave his position in 1920 after taking part in a public argument between communist and nationalist sympathizers. He was subsequently stationed to Skopje. In 1921, he was admitted to the Superior Military Academy of Belgrade. In 1923, having finished his studies, he was promoted as an assistant to the military staff, along with the fifteen other best alumni of his promotion.[10] He was promoted to the rank of lieutenant colonel in 1930. That same year, he spent three months in Paris, following classes at the École spéciale militaire de Saint-Cyr. Some authors claim that he met and befriended Charles de Gaulle during his stay, although there is no known evidence of this.[11] In 1935, he became a military attaché to the Kingdom of Bulgaria and was stationed to Sofia. On 6 September 1935, he was promoted to the rank of colonel. Mihailovi? then came in contact with members of Zveno and considered taking part in a plot which aimed to provoke Boris III's abdication and the creation of an alliance between Yugoslavia and Bulgaria, but, being untrained as a spy, he was soon identified by Bulgarian authorities and was asked to leave the country. He was then appointed as an attaché to Czechoslovakia in Prague.[12]

His military career almost came to an abrupt end in 1939, when he submitted a report strongly criticizing the organization of the Royal Yugoslav Army (Serbo-Croatian: Vojska Kraljevine Jugoslavije, VKJ). Among his most important proposals were abandoning the defence of the northern frontier to concentrate forces in the mountainous interior; re-organizing the armed forces into Serb, Croat, and Slovene units in order to better counter subversive activities; and using mobile Chetnik units along the borders. Milan Nedi?, the Minister of the Army, was incensed by Mihailovi?'s report and ordered that he be confined to barracks for 30 days.[13] Afterwards, Mihailovi? became a professor at Belgrade's staff college.[14] In the summer of 1940, he attended a function put on by the British military attaché for the Association of Yugoslav Reserve NCOs. The meeting was seen as highly anti-Nazi in tone, and the German ambassador protested Mihailovi?'s presence. Nedi? once more ordered him confined to barracks for 30 days as well as demoted and placed on the retired list. These last punishments were avoided only by Nedi?'s retirement in November and his replacement by Petar Pe?i?.[13]

In the years preceding the Axis invasion of Yugoslavia, Mihailovi? was stationed in Celje, Drava Banovina (modern Slovenia). At the time of the invasion, Colonel Mihailovi? was an assistant to the chief-of-staff of the Yugoslav Second Army in northern Bosnia. He briefly served as the Second Army chief-of-staff[15] prior to taking command of a "Rapid Unit" (brzi odred) shortly before the Yugoslav High Command capitulated to the Germans on 17 April 1941.[16]

World War II

Following the invasion and occupation of Yugoslavia by Germany, Italy, Hungary, a small group of officers and soldiers led by Mihailovi? escaped in the hope of finding VKJ units still fighting in the mountains. After skirmishing with several Usta?e and Muslim bands and attempting to sabotage several objects, Mihailovi? and about 80 of his men crossed the Drina River into German-occupied Serbia[b] on 29 April.[17] Mihailovi? planned to establish an underground intelligence movement and establish contact with the Allies, though it is unclear if he initially envisioned to start an actual armed resistance movement.[18]

Formation of the Chetniks

The Chetnik flag. The flag reads: "For King and Fatherland - Liberty or Death".

For the time being, Mihailovi? established a small nucleus of officers with an armed guard, which he called the "Command of Chetnik Detachments of the Yugoslav Army".[18] After arriving at Ravna Gora in early May 1941, he realized that his group of seven officers and twenty four non-commissioned officers and soldiers was the only one.[19] He began to draw up lists of conscripts and reservists for possible use. His men at Ravna Gora were joined by a group of civilians, mainly intellectuals from the Serbian Cultural Club, who took charge of the movement's propaganda sector.[18]

The Chetniks of Kosta Pe?anac, which were already in existence before the invasion, did not share Mihailovi?'s desire for resistance.[20] In order to distinguish his Chetniks from other groups calling themselves Chetniks, Mihailovi? and his followers identified themselves as the "Ravna Gora movement".[20] The stated goal of the Ravna Gora movement was the liberation of the country from the occupying armies of Germany, Italy and the Usta?e, and the Independent State of Croatia (Serbo-Croatian: Nezavisna Dr?ava Hrvatska, NDH).[21]

Mihailovi? spent most of 1941 consolidating scattered VKJ remnants and finding new recruits. In August, he set up a civilian advisory body, the Central National Committee, composed of Serb political leaders including some with strong nationalist views such as Dragi?a Vasi? and Stevan Moljevi?.[21] On 19 June, a clandestine Chetnik courier reached Istanbul, whence royalist Yugoslavs reported that Mihailovi? appeared to be organizing a resistance movement against Axis forces.[22] Mihailovi? first established radio contact with the British in September 1941, when his radio operator raised a ship in the Mediterranean. On 13 September, Mihailovi?'s first radio message to King Peter's government-in-exile announced that he was organizing VKJ remnants to fight against the Axis powers.[22]

Mihailovi? also received help from officers in other areas of Yugoslavia, such as Slovene officer Rudolf Perinhek, who brought reports on the situation in Montenegro. Mihailovi? sent him back to Montenegro with written authorization to organize units there, with the oral approval of officers such as ?or?ije La?i?, Pavle ?uri?i?, Dimitrije Ljoti? and Kosta Mu?icki. Mihailovi? only gave vague and contradictory orders to Perinhek, mentioning the need to put off civil strife and to "remove enemies".[23]

Mihailovi?'s strategy was to avoid direct conflict with the Axis forces, intending to rise up after Allied forces arrived in Yugoslavia.[24] Mihailovi?'s Chetniks had had defensive encounters with the Germans, but reprisals and the tales of the massacres in the NDH made them reluctant to engage directly in armed struggle, except against the Usta?e in Serbian border areas.[25] In the meantime, following the Axis invasion of the Soviet Union, the Communist Party of Yugoslavia (KPJ), led by Josip Broz Tito, also went into action and called for a popular insurrection against the Axis powers in July 1941. Tito subsequently set up a communist resistance movement known as the Yugoslav Partisans.[26] By the end of August, Mihailovi?'s Chetniks and the Partisans began attacking Axis forces, sometimes jointly despite their mutual diffidence, and captured numerous prisoners.[27] On 28 October 1941 Mihailovi? received an order from the Prime Minister of the Yugoslav Government in exile Du?an Simovi? who urged Mihailovi? to avoid premature actions and avoid reprisals.[28] Mihailovi? discouraged sabotage due to German reprisals (such as more than 3,000 killed in Kraljevo and Kragujevac) unless some great gain could be accomplished. Instead, he favored sabotage that could not easily be traced back to the Chetniks.[29] His reluctance to engage in more active resistance meant that most sabotage carried out in the early period of the war were due to efforts by the Partisans, and Mihailovi? lost several commanders and a number of followers who wished to fight the Germans to the Partisan movement.[30]

Even though Mihailovi? initially asked for discreet support, propaganda from the British and from the Yugoslav government-in-exile quickly began to exalt his feats. The creation of a resistance movement in occupied Europe was received as a morale booster. On 15 November, the BBC announced that Mihailovi? was the commander of the Yugoslav Army in the Fatherland, which became the official name of Mihailovi?'s Chetniks.[31]

Conflicts with Axis troops and Partisans

Nazi wanted poster for Colonel Mihailovi? from 9 December 1941
1942 German proclamation and reward offer for Mihailovi?, after the Chetnik killing of four German officers
Dra?a Mihailovi? as a small pet in the hands of the supposedly Jewish-controlled United States, United Kingdom and Soviet Union as part of Judeo-Masonic conspiracy theory, depicted in a poster from the Grand Anti-Masonic Exhibition

Mihailovi? soon realized that his men did not have the means to protect Serbian civilians against German reprisals.[32][33] The prospect of reprisals also fed Chetnik concerns regarding a possible takeover of Yugoslavia by the Partisans after the war, and they did not wish to engage in actions that might ultimately result in a post-war Serb minority.[34] Mihailovi?'s strategy was to bring together the various Serb bands and build an organization capable of seizing power after the Axis withdrew or were defeated, rather than engaging in direct confrontation with them.[35] In contrast to the reluctance of Chetnik leaders to directly engage the Axis forces, the Partisans advocated open resistance, which appealed to those Chetniks desiring to fight the occupation.[36] By September 1941, Mihailovi? began losing men to the Partisans, such as Vlado Ze?evi? (a priest), Lieutenant Ratko Martinovi?, and the Cer Chetniks led by Captain Dragoslav Ra?i?[36][37]

On 19 September 1941, Tito met with Mihailovi? to negotiate an alliance between the Partisans and Chetniks, but they failed to reach an agreement as the disparity of the aims of their respective movements was great enough to preclude any real compromise.[38] Tito was in favour of a joint full-scale offensive, while Mihailovi? considered a general uprising to be premature and dangerous, as he thought it would trigger reprisals.[32] For his part, Tito's goal was to prevent an assault from the rear by the Chetniks, as he was convinced that Mihailovi? was playing a "double game", maintaining contacts with German forces via the Nedi? government. Mihailovi? was in contact with Nedi?'s government, receiving monetary aid via Colonel Popovi?.[39] On the other hand, Mihailovi? sought to prevent Tito from assuming the leadership role in the resistance,[38][40] as Tito's goals were counter to his goals of the restoration of the Kara?or?evi? dynasty and the establishment of Greater Serbia.[41] Further talks were scheduled for 16 October.[40]

At the end of September, the Germans launched a massive offensive against both Partisans and Chetniks called Operation U?ice.[32] A joint British-Yugoslav intelligence mission, quickly assembled by the Special Operations Executive (SOE) and led by Captain D. T. Hudson, arrived on the Montenegrin coast on 22 September, whence they had made their way with the help of Montenegrin Partisans to their headquarters, and then on to Tito's headquarters at U?ice,[42] arriving on or around 25 October.[43] Hudson reported that earlier promises of supplies made by the British to Mihailovi? contributed to the poor relationship between Mihailovi? and Tito, as Mihailovi? correctly believed that no one outside of Yugoslavia knew about the Partisan movement,[44][45][46] and felt that "the time was ripe for drastic action against the communists".[44]

Tito and Mihailovi? met again on 27 October 1941 in the town of Braji?i near Ravna Gora in an attempt to achieve an understanding, but found consensus only on secondary issues.[47] Immediately following the meeting, Mihailovi? began preparations for an attack on the Partisans, delaying the attack only for lack of arms.[48] Mihailovi? reported to the Yugoslav government-in-exile that he believed the occupation of U?ice, the location of a gun factory, was required to prevent the strengthening of the Partisans.[45] On 28 October, two Chetnik liaison officers first approached Nedi? and later that day German officer Josef Matl of the Armed Forces Liaison Office, and offered Mihailovi?'s services in the struggle against the Partisans in exchange for weapons.[33][48] This offer was relayed to the German general in charge of the Territory of the Military Commander in Serbia, and a meeting was proposed by the German for 3 November. On 1 November, the Chetniks attacked the Partisan headquarters at U?ice, but were beaten back.[49][50] On 3 November 1941 Mihailovi? postponed the proposed meeting with the German officers until 11 November, citing the "general conflict" in which the Chetniks and Partisans were engaged requiring his presence at his headquarters.[50][51] The meeting, organized through one of Mihailovi?'s representatives in Belgrade, took place between the Chetnik leader and an Abwehr official, although it remains controversial if the initiative came from the Germans, from Mihailovi? himself, or from his liaison officer in Belgrade.[c] In the negotiations Mihailovi? assured the Germans that "it is not my intention to fight against the occupiers" and claimed that "I have never made a genuine agreement with the communists, for they do not care about the people. They are led by foreigners who are not Serbs: the Bulgarian Jankovi?, the Jew Lindmajer, the Magyar Borota, two Muslims whose names I do not know and the Ustasha Major Bogani?. That is all I know of the communist leadership."[52] It appears that Mihailovi? offered to cease activities in the towns and along the major communication lines, but ultimately no agreement was reached at the time due to German demands for the complete surrender of the Chetniks,[53][54][55] and the German belief that the Chetniks were likely to attack them despite Mihailovi?'s offer.[56] After the negotiations, an attempt was made by the Germans to arrest Mihailovi?.[57] Mihailovi? carefully kept the negotiations with the Germans secret from the Yugoslav government-in-exile, as well as from the British and their representative Hudson.[53][49]

Mihailovi?'s assault on the Partisan headquarters at U?ice and Po?ega failed, and the Partisans mounted a rapid counterattack.[48][58] Within two weeks, the Partisans repelled Chetnik advances and surrounded Mihailovi?'s headquarters at Ravna Gora. Having lost troops in clashes with the Germans,[59] sustained the loss of approximately 1,000 troops and considerable equipment at the hands of the Partisans,[60] received only one small delivery of arms from the British in early November,[61] and been unsuccessful in convincing the Germans to provide him with supplies,[50] Mihailovi? found himself in a desperate situation.[60][62]

In mid-November, the Germans launched an offensive against the Partisans, Operation Western Morava, which bypassed Chetnik forces.[58][63][64] Having been unable to quickly overcome the Chetniks, faced with reports that the British considered Mihailovi? as the leader of the resistance, and under pressure from the German offensive, Tito approached Mihailovi? with an offer to negotiate, which resulted in talks and later an armistice between the two groups on 20 or 21 November.[63][58][65] Tito and Mihailovi? had one last phone conversation on 28 November, in which Tito announced that he would defend his positions, while Mihailovi? said that he would disperse.[32][54][64] On 30 November, Mihailovi?'s unit leaders decided to join the "legalized" Chetniks under General Nedi?'s command, in order to be able to continue the fight against the Partisans without the possibility of being attacked by the Germans and to avoid compromising Mihailovi?'s relationship with the British. Evidence suggests that Mihailovi? did not order this, but rather only sanctioned the decision.[56][66] About 2,000-3,000 of Mihailovi?'s men actually enlisted in this capacity within the Nedi? regime. The legalization allowed his men to have a salary and an alibi provided by the collaborationist administration, while it provided the Nedi? regime with more men to fight the communists, although they were under the control of the Germans.[67] Mihailovi? also considered that he could, using this method, infiltrate the Nedi? administration, which was soon fraught with Chetnik sympathizers.[68] While this arrangement differed from the all-out collaboration of Kosta Pe?anac, it caused much confusion over who and what the Chetniks were.[69] Some of Mihailovi?'s men crossed into Bosnia to fight the Usta?e while most abandoned the struggle.[69] Throughout November, Mihailovi?'s forces had been under pressure from German forces, and on 3 December, the Germans issued orders for Operation Mihailovic, an attack against his forces in Ravna Gora.[64] On 5 December, the day before the operation, Mihailovi? was warned by contacts serving under Nedi? of the impending attack,[64] likely by Milan A?imovi?.[70] He closed down his radio transmitter on that day to avoid giving the Germans hints of his whereabouts[71] and then dispersed his command and the remainder of his forces.[64] The remnants of his Chetniks retreated to the hills of Ravna Gora, but were under German attack throughout December.[72] Mihailovi? narrowly avoided capture.[73] On 10 December, a bounty was put on his head by the Germans.[57] In the meantime, on 7 December, the BBC announced his promotion to the rank of brigade general.[74]

Activities in Montenegro and the Territory of the Military Commander in Serbia

2nd Ravna Gora Corps under command of Captain Predrag Rakovi? on the forced march through the Peshter Plateau rushed to aid Supreme Commande on the eve of Operation Schwarz in early spring 1943.

Mihailovi? did not resume radio transmissions with the Allies before January 1942. In early 1942, the Yugoslav government-in-exile reorganized and appointed Slobodan Jovanovi? as prime minister, and the cabinet declared the strengthening of Mihailovi?'s position as one of its primary goals. It also unsuccessfully sought to obtain support from both the Americans and the British.[75] On 11 January, Mihailovi? was named "Minister of the Army, Navy and Air Forces" by the government-in-exile.[76] The British had suspended support in late 1941 following Hudson's reports of the conflict between the Chetniks and Partisans. Mihailovi?, infuriated by Hudson's recommendations, denied Hudson radio access and had no contact with him through the first months of 1942.[77] Although Mihailovi? was in hiding, by March the Nedi? government located him, and a meeting sanctioned by the German occupation took place between him and A?imovi?. According to historian Jozo Tomasevich, following this meeting, General Bader was informed that Mihailovi? was willing to put himself at the disposal of the Nedi? government in the fight against the communists, but Bader refused his offer.[73] In April 1942, Mihailovi?, still hiding in Serbia, resumed contact with British envoy Hudson, who was also able to resume his radio transmission to Allied headquarters in Cairo, using Mihailovi?'s transmitter. In May, the British resumed sending assistance to the Chetniks, although only to a small extent,[78] with a single airdrop on 30 March.[79] Mihailovi? subsequently left for Montenegro, arriving there on 1 June.[80] He established his headquarters there and on 10 June was formally appointed as Chief-of-Staff of the Supreme Command of the Yugoslav Army in the Fatherland.[81] A week later he was promoted to the rank of General of the Army.[1] The Partisans, in the meantime, insisted to the Soviets that Mihailovi? was a traitor and a collaborator, and should be condemned as such. The Soviets initially saw no need for it, and their propaganda kept supporting Mihailovi?. Eventually, on 6 July 1942, the station Radio Free Yugoslavia, located in the Comintern building in Moscow, broadcast a resolution from Yugoslav "patriots" in Montenegro and Bosnia labeling Mihailovi? a collaborator.[82]

Captain Predrag Rakovi?, General Dragoljub Mihailovic and Academician Dragi?a Vasi?, after deliverance from a hostile environment during Operation Schwarz, May 1943, in the Lim Valley. Behind General, Major Miljan Janketic, Commander of the Support Battalion.
German warrant after Operation Schwarz for Mihailovi? offering a reward of 100,000 gold marks for his capture, dead or alive, 1943. According to the photo, the Germans probably did not know that Mihailovic was wearing a beard.

In Montenegro, Mihailovi? found a complex situation. The local Chetnik leaders, Stani?i? and ?uri?i?, had reached arrangements with the Italians and were cooperating with them against the communist-led Partisans.[83][84] Mihailovi? later claimed at his trial in 1946 that he was unaware of these arrangements prior to his arrival in Montenegro, and had to accept them once he arrived,[85][86] as Stani?i? and ?uri?i? acknowledged him as their leader in name only and would only follow Mihailovi?'s orders if they supported their interests.[86] Mihailovi? believed that Italian military intelligence was better informed than he was of the activities of his commanders.[86] He tried to make the best of the situation, and accepted the appointment of Bla?o ?ukanovi? as the figurehead commander of "nationalist forces" in Montenegro. While Mihailovi? approved the destruction of communist forces, he aimed to exploit the connections of Chetniks commanders with the Italians to get food, arms and ammunition in the expectation of an Allied landing in the Balkans. On 1 December, ?uri?i? organised a Chetnik "youth conference" at ?ahovi?i. The congress, which historian Stevan K. Pavlowitch writes expressed "extremism and intolerance", nationalist claims were made on parts of Albania, Bulgaria, Romania and Italy, while its resolutions posited the restoration of a monarchy with a period of transitional Chetnik dictatorship. Mihailovi? and ?ukanovi? did not attend the event, which was entirely dominated by ?uri?i?, but they sent representatives.[87] In the same month Mihailovi? informed his subordinates that: "The units of the Partisans are filled with thugs of the most varied kinds, such as Usta?as - the worst butchers of the Serb people - Jews, Croats, Dalmatians, Bulgarians, Turks, Magyars, and all the other nations of the world."[88]

British Brigadier Charles Armstrong visits the 2nd Ravna Gora Corps in the fall of 1943. Beside him is the corps' commander, Captain Predrag Rakovi?
The column led by General Dragoljub Mihailovc and Captain Predrag Rakovi?, who headed from Mt. Bobija to Mt. Suvobor, in the village of Ba, where Captain Zvonko Vuckovi?, commander of the 1st Ravna Gora Corps, made his last preparations for organizing the Ba Congress, January 1944.

In the NDH, Ilija Trifunovi?-Bir?anin, a leader of pre-war Chetnik organizations, commanded the Chetniks in Dalmatia, Lika, Bosnia and Herzegovina. He led the "nationalist" resistance against Partisans and Usta?e and acknowledged Mihailovi? as formal leader, but acted on his own, with his troops being used by the Italians as the local Anti-Communist Volunteer Militia (MVAC). Italian commander Mario Roatta aimed to spare Italian lives, but also to counter the Usta?e and Germans, to undermine Mihailovi?'s authority among the Chetniks by playing up local leaders. Chetniks, led by Dobroslav Jev?evi?, came from Montenegro to help the Bosnian Serb population against the Usta?e. They murdered and pillaged in Fo?a until the Italians intervened in August. The Chetniks also asked the Italians for protection against Usta?e retribution. On 22 July, Mihailovi? met with Trifunovi?-Bir?anin, Jev?evi?, and his newly appointed delegate in Herzegovina, Petar Ba?ovi?. The meeting was supposedly secret, but was known to Italian intelligence. Mihailovi? gave no precise orders but expressed his confidence in both his subordinates, adding, according to Italian reports, that he was waiting for help from the Allies to start a real guerrilla campaign, in order to spare Serb lives. Summoned by Roatta upon their return, Trifunovi?-Bir?anin and Jev?evi? assured the Italian commander that Mihailovi? was merely a "moral head" and that they would not attack Italians, even if he should give such an order.[89]

Having become more and more concerned with domestic enemies and concerned that he be in a position to control Yugoslavia after the Allies defeated the Axis, Mihailovi? concentrated from Montenegro on directing operations, in the various parts of Yugoslavia, mostly against Partisans, but also against the Usta?e and Dimitrije Ljoti?'s Serbian Volunteer Corps (SDK).[81] During the autumn of 1942, Mihailovi?'s Chetniks--at the request of the British organization--sabotaged several railway lines used to supply Axis forces in the Western Desert of northern Africa.[90] In September and December, Mihailovi?'s actions damaged the railway system seriously; the Allies gave him credit for inconveniencing Axis forces and contributing to Allied successes in Africa.[91] The credit given to Mihailovi? for sabotages was maybe undeserved:

But an S.O.E. 'appreciation on Jugoslavia' of mid-November said: "... So far no telegrams have been received from either of our liaison officers reporting any sabotage undertaken by General Mihajlovi?, nor have we received any reports of fighting against the Axis troops." In Yugoslavia, therefore, S.O.E. could claim no equivalent to the Gorgopotamos operation in Greece. From all this it might seem that since the autumn of 1941 the British had - wittingly or unwittingly - been co-operating in a gigantic hoax.[92]
Captain Predrag Rakovi? confers with his man. Captain Rakovic committed suicide after being surrounded by a partisans on December 15, 1944.

Early in September 1942, Mihailovi? called for civil disobedience against the Nedi? regime through leaflets and clandestine radio transmitters. This prompted fighting between the Chetniks and followers of the Nedi? regime. The Germans, whom the Nedi? administration had called for help against Mihailovi?, responded to Nedi?'s request and to the sabotages with mass terror, and attacked the Chetniks in late 1942 and early 1943. Roberts mentions Nedi?'s request for help as the main reason for German action, and does not mention the sabotage campaign.[81] Pavlowitch, on the other hand, mentions the sabotages as being conducted simultaneously with the propaganda actions. Thousands of arrests were made and it has been estimated that during December 1942, 1,600 Chetnik combatants were killed by the Germans through combat actions and executions. These actions by the Nedi? regime and the Germans "brought to an abrupt conclusion much of the anti-German action Mihailovi? had started up again since the summer (of 1942)".[93]Adolf Hitler wrote to Benito Mussolini on February 16, 1943, demanding that in addition to the partisans be pursued the chetniks who possessed "a special danger in the long-term plans that Mihailovic's supporters were building." Hitler adds: "In any case, the liquidation of the Mihailovic movement will no longer be an easy task, given the forces at its disposal and the large number of armed Chetniks". At that time, General Mihailovic was with his Supreme Command in Montenegro, which was under Italian occupation. From the beginning of 1943, General Mihailovic prepared his units for the supports of Allied landing on the Adriatic coast. General Mihailovic hoped that the Western Alliance would open the Second Front in the Balkans.

2nd Ravna Gora Corps celebrates Vidovdan on June 28, 1944 at Mt. Jelica. Three months later, the Red Army will arrive in Serbia.

Mihailovi? had great difficulties controlling his local commanders, who often did not have radio contacts and relied on couriers to communicate. He was, however, apparently aware that many Chetnik groups were committing crimes against civilians and acts of ethnic cleansing; according to Pavlowitch, ?uri?i? proudly reported to Mihailovi? that he had destroyed Muslim villages, in retribution against acts committed by Muslim militias. While Mihailovi? apparently did not order such acts himself, and disapproved of them, he also failed to take any action against them, being dependent on various armed groups whose policy he could neither denounce nor condone. He also hid the situation from the British and the Yugoslav government-in-exile.[94] Many terror acts were committed by Chetnik groups against their various enemies, real or perceived, reaching a peak between October 1942 and February 1943.[95] Brigadier Charles Armstrong reported to his command °that Mihailovic believed that Britain had left Yugoslavia to Soviet influence ...°. Mihailovic's units in Serbia during the arrival of the Soviet army in September 1944, do not lead any fighting against the Soviets. Some Chetnik corps commanders, such as Dragutin Keserovic, Predrag Rakovi?, Vlastimir Vesic and Dusan Smiljanic, are trying to co-operate with the Soviet Army

Terror tactics and cleansing actions

Chetnik ideology encompassed the notion of Greater Serbia, to be achieved by forcing population shifts in order to create ethnically homogeneous areas.[96] Partly due to this ideology and partly in response to violent actions undertaken by the Usta?e and the Muslim forces attached to them,[97] Chetniks forces engaged in numerous acts of violence including massacres and destruction of property, and used terror tactics to drive out non-Serb groups.[98] In the spring of 1942, Mihailovi? penned in his diary: "The Muslim population has through its behaviour arrived at the situation where our people no longer wish to have them in our midst. It is necessary already now to prepare their exodus to Turkey or anywhere else outside our borders."[99]

"Instrukcije" ("Instructions") of 1941 attributed to Mihailovi? ordering the cleansing of non-Serbs from territories claimed by the Chetniks as part of a Greater Serbia

Mihailovi?'s role in such actions is unclear as there is "... no definite evidence that [he] himself ever called for ethnic cleansing".[100] Instructions to his Montenegrin subordinates commanders, Major La?i? and Captain Pavle ?uri?i?, which prescribe cleansing actions of non-Serb elements in order to create Greater Serbia have been attributed to Mihailovi? by some historians,[101][102][103][104] but some historians argue that the document was a forgery made by ?uri?i? after he failed to reach Mihailovi? in December 1941 after the latter was driven out of Ravna Gora by German forces.[100][105][106] It is important to note that if the document is a forgery, it was forged by Chetniks hoping it would be taken as a legitimate order, not by their opponents seeking to discredit the Chetniks.[100] The objectives outlined in the directive were:[107]

  1. The struggle for the liberty of our whole nation under the scepter of His Majesty, King Peter II;
  2. the creation of a Great Yugoslavia and within it of a Great Serbia, which is to be ethnically pure and is to include Serbia [meaning also Vardar Macedonia, Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Srijem, the Banat, and Ba?ka];
  3. the struggle for the inclusion into Yugoslavia of all still unliberated Slovene territories under the Italians and Germans (Trieste, Gorizia, Istria, and Carinthia) as well as Bulgaria, and northern Albania with Scutari;
  4. the cleansing of the state territory of all national minorities and a-national elements [i.e. the Partisans and their supporters];
  5. the creation of contiguous frontiers between Serbia and Montenegro, as well as between Serbia and Slovenia by cleansing the Muslim population from Sand?ak and the Muslim and Croat populations from Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Whether or not the instructions were forged, Mihailovi? was certainly aware of both the ideological goal of cleansing and of the violent acts taken to accomplish that goal. Stevan Moljevi? worked out the basics of the Chetnik program while at Ravna Gora in the summer of 1941,[108] and Mihailovi? sent representatives to the Conference of Young Chetnik Intellectuals of Montenegro where the basic formulations were expanded.[109] ?uri?i? played the dominant role at this conference. Relations between ?uri?i? and Mihailovi? were strained, and although Mihailovi? did not participate, neither did he take any action to counter it.[110] In 1943, ?uri?i? followed Chetnik Supreme Command orders to carry out "cleansing actions" against Muslims and reported the thousands of old men, women and children he massacred to Mihailovi?.[111] Mihailovi? was either "unable or unwilling to stop the massacres".[112] In 1946, Mihailovi? was indicted, amongst other things, of having "given orders to his commanders to destroy the Muslims (whom he called Turks) and the Croats (whom he called Ustashas)."[113] At his trial Mihailovi? claimed that he never ordered the destruction of Croat and Muslim villages and that some of his subordinates hid such activities from him.[114] He was later convicted of crimes that included having "incited national and religious hatred and discord among the peoples of Yugoslavia, as a consequence of which his Chetnik bands carried out mass massacres of the Croat and Muslim as well as of the Serb population that did not accept the occupation."[113]

Relations with the British

Winston Churchill became increasingly doubtful about Mihailovi?.
"General Mihaylovitch saw his contribution to the common cause in turning anti-German feeling into anti-partisan feeling. Only on the most Jesuitical grounds can his action be represented as anything but damaging to the cause of the Allies."[115]

Basil Davidson, member of the British mission

On 15 November 1942, Captain Hudson cabled to Cairo that the situation was problematic, that opportunities for large-scale sabotage were not exploited because of Mihailovi?'s willingness to avoid reprisals and that, while waiting for an Allied landing and victory, the Chetnik leader might come to "any sound understanding with either Italians or Germans which he believed might serve his purposes without compromising him", in order to defeat the communists.[116] In December, Major Peter Boughey, a member of SOE's London staff, insisted to ?ivan Kne?evi?, a member of the Yugoslav cabinet, that Mihailovi? was a quisling, who was openly collaborating with the Italians.[117] The Foreign Office called Boughey's declarations "blundering" but the British were worried about the situation and Mihailovi?'s inactivity.[118] A British senior officer, Colonel S. W. Bailey, was then sent to Mihailovi? and was parachuted into Montenegro on Christmas Day. His mission was to gather information and to see if Mihailovi? had carried out necessary sabotages against railroads.[116] During the following months, the British concentrated on having Mihailovi? stop Chetnik collaboration with Axis forces and perform the expected actions against the occupiers, but they were not successful.[119]

In January 1943, the SOE reported to Churchill that Mihailovi?'s subordinate commanders had made local arrangements with Italian authorities, although there was no evidence that Mihailovi? himself had ever dealt with the Germans. The report concluded that, while aid to Mihailovi? was as necessary as ever, it would be advisable to extend assistance to other resistance groups and to try to reunite the Chetniks and the Partisans.[120] British liaison officers reported in February that Mihailovi? had "at no time" been in touch with the Germans, but that his forces had been in some instances aiding the Italians against the Partisans (the report was simultaneous with Operation Trio). Bailey reported that Mihailovi? was increasingly dissatisfied with the insufficient help he was receiving from the British.[121] Mihailovi?'s movement had been so inflated by British propaganda that the liaison officers found the reality decidedly below expectations.[122]

On 3 January 1943, just before Case White, an Axis conference was held in Rome, attended by German commander Alexander Löhr, NDH representatives, and by Jev?evi? who, this time, collaborated openly with the Axis forces against the Partisans, and had gone to the conference without Mihailovi?'s knowledge. Mihailovi? disapproved of Jev?evi?'s presence and reportedly sent him an angry message, but his actions were limited to announcing that Jev?evi?'s military award would be withdrawn.[123] On 3 February 1943 Charles de Gaulle awarded Mihailovi? with Croix de Guerre, a French military decoration to honour people who fought with the Allies against the Axis forces at any time during World War II.[124]

On 28 February 1943, in Bailey's presence, Mihailovi? addressed his troops in Lipovo. Bailey reported that Mihailovi? had expressed his bitterness over "perfidious Albion" who expected the Serbs to fight to the last drop of blood without giving them any means to do so, had said that the Serbs were completely friendless, that the British were holding King Peter II and his government as virtual prisoners, and that he would keep accepting help from the Italians as long as it would give him the means to annihilate the Partisans. Also according to Bailey's report, he added that his enemies were the Usta?e, the Partisans, the Croats and the Muslims and that only after dealing with them would he turn to the Germans and the Italians.[125][126]

While defenders of Mihailovi? have argued that Bailey had mistranslated the speech,[d] and may have even done so intentionally,[127] the effect on the British was disastrous and marked the beginning of the end for British-Chetnik cooperation. The British officially protested to the Yugoslav government-in-exile and demanded explanations regarding Mihailovi?'s attitude and collaboration with the Italians. Mihailovi? answered to his government that he had had no meetings with Italian generals and that Jev?evi? had no command to do so. The British announced that they would send him more abundant supplies.[128] Also in early 1943, the tone of the BBC broadcasts became more and more favorable to the Partisans, describing them as the only resistance movement in Yugoslavia, and occasionally attributing to them resistance acts actually undertaken by the Chetniks.[129] Bailey complained to the Foreign Office that his position with Mihailovi? was being prejudiced by this.[130] The Foreign Office protested and the BBC apologized, but the line did not really change.[130]

"In the internal struggles in the various occupied countries, the British press has in almost all cases sided with the faction favoured by the Russians and libelled the opposing faction, sometimes suppressing material evidence in order to do so. A particularly glaring case was that of Colonel Mihailovich, the Jugoslav Chetnik leader. The Russians, who had their own Jugoslav protege in Marshal Tito, accused Mihailovich of collaborating with the Germans. This accusation was promptly taken up by the British press: Mihailovich's supporters were given no chance of answering it, and facts contradicting it were simply kept out of print. In July of 1943 the Germans offered a reward of 100,000 gold crowns for the capture of Tito, and a similar reward for the capture of Mihailovich. The British press 'splashed' the reward for Tito, but only one paper mentioned (in small print) the reward for Mihailovich: and the charges of collaborating with the Germans continued."[131]

George Orwell, The Freedom of the Press (1945)

Defeat in the battle of the Neretva

During Case White, the Italians heavily supported the Chetniks in the hope that they would deal a fatal blow to the Partisans. The Germans disapproved of this collaboration, about which Hitler personally wrote to Mussolini.[132] At the end of February, shortly after his speech, Mihailovi? himself joined his troops in Herzegovina near the Neretva in order to try to salvage the situation. The Partisans nevertheless defeated the opposing Chetniks troops, who were in a state of disarray, and managed to go across the Neretva.[133] In March, the Partisans negotiated a truce with Axis forces in order to gain some time and use it to defeat the Chetniks. While Ribbentrop and Hitler finally overruled the orders of their subordinates and forbade any such contacts, the Partisans benefited from this brief truce, during which Italian support for the Chetniks was suspended, and which allowed Tito's forces to deal a severe blow to Mihailovi?'s troops.[134]

In May, the German intelligence service also tried to establish a contact with Mihailovi? to see if an alliance against the Partisans was possible. In Kola?in, they met with a Chetnik officer, who did not introduce himself. They assumed they had met the general himself, but the man was possibly not Mihailovi?, whom Bailey reported to be in another area at the same period. The German command, however, reacted strongly against any attempt at "negotiating with the enemy".[135]

The Germans then turned to their next operation, code-named Schwarz, and attacked the Montenegrin Chetniks. ?uri?i? appears to have suggested to Mihailovi? a short-term cooperation with the Germans against the Partisans, something Mihailovi? refused to condone. ?uri?i? ended up defending his headquarters at Kola?in against the Partisans. On 14 May, the Germans entered Kola?in and captured ?uri?i?, while Mihailovi? escaped.[134][136]

In late May, after regaining control of most of Montenegro, the Italians turned their efforts against the Chetniks, at least against Mihailovi?'s forces, and put a reward of half-a-million lire for the capture of Mihailovi?, and one million for the capture of Tito.[137]

Allied support shifts

In April and May 1943, the British sent a mission to the Partisans and strengthened their mission to the Chetniks. Major Jasper Rootham, one of the liaison officers to the Chetniks, reported that engagements between Chetniks and Germans did occur, but were invariably started by German attacks. During the summer, the British sent supplies to both Chetniks and Partisans.[138]

Mihailovi? returned to Serbia and his movement rapidly recovered its dominance in the region. Receiving more weapons from the British, he undertook a series of actions and sabotages, disarmed Serbian State Guard (SDS) detachments and skirmished with Bulgarian troops, though he generally avoided the Germans, considering that his troops were not yet strong enough. In Serbia, his organization controlled the mountains where Axis forces were absent. The collaborationist Nedi? administration was largely infiltrated by Mihailovi?'s men and many SDS troops being actually sympathetic to his movement. After his defeat in Case White, Mihailovi? tried to improve his organization. Dragi?a Vasi?, the movement's ideologue who had opposed the Italian connection and clashed with Mihailovi?, left the supreme command. Mihailovi? tried to extend his contacts to Croats and traditional parties, and to revitalise his contacts in Slovenia.[139] The United States sent liaison officers to join Bailey's mission with Mihailovi?, while also sending men to Tito.[140] The Germans, in the meantime, became worried by the growing strength of the Partisans and made local arrangements with Chetnik groups, though not with Mihailovi? himself. According to Walter R. Roberts, there is "little doubt" that Mihailovi? was aware of these arrangements and that he might have regarded them as the lesser of two evils, his primary aim being to defeat the Partisans.[141]

From the beginning of 1943, British impatience with Mihailovi? grew. From the decrypts of German wireless messages, Churchill and his government concluded that the Chetniks' collaboration with the Italians went beyond what was acceptable and that the Partisans were doing the most severe damage to the Axis.[142]

With Italy's withdrawal from the war in September 1943, the Chetniks in Montenegro found themselves under attack by both the Germans and the Partisans, who took control of large parts of Montenegrin territory, including the former "Chetnik capital" of Kola?in. ?uri?i?, having escaped from a German camp in Galicia, found his way to Yugoslavia, was captured again, and was then asked by collaborationist prime minister Milan Nedi? to form a Montenegrin Volunteer Corps against the Partisans. He was pledged to Nedi?, but also made a secret allegiance to Mihailovi?. Both Mihailovi? and ?uri?i? expected a landing by the Western Allies. In Serbia, Mihailovi? was considered the representative of the victorious Allies.[143] In the chaotic situation created by the Italian surrender, several Chetnik leaders overtly collaborated with the Germans against the reinforced Partisans; approached by an Abwehr agent, Jev?evi? offered the services of about 5,000 men. Mom?ilo ?uji? also went to the Germans for cover against the Usta?e and Partisans, although he was distrusted.[144] In October 1943, Mihailovi?, at the Allies' request, agreed to undertake two sabotage operations, which had the effect of making him even more of a wanted man and forced him, according to British reports, to change his headquarters frequently.[145]

By November and December 1943, the Germans had realized that Tito was their most dangerous opponent; German representative Hermann Neubacher managed to conclude secret arrangements with four of Mihailovi?'s commanders for the cessation of hostilities for periods of five to ten weeks. The Germans interpreted this as a sign of weakness from the Mihailovi? movement. The truces were kept secret, but came to the knowledge of the British through decrypts. There is no evidence that Mihailovi? had been involved or approved, though British Military Intelligence found it possible that he was "conniving".[146] At the end of October the local signals decrypted in Cairo had disclosed that Mihailovi? had ordered all Chetnik units to co-operate with Germany against the Partisans.[147] This order for cooperation was originally decrypted by Germans, and it was noted in the Oberkommando der Wehrmacht War Journal.[148][e]

The British were more and more concerned about the fact that the Chetniks were more willing to fight Partisans than Axis troops. At the third Moscow Conference in October 1943, Anthony Eden expressed impatience about Mihailovi?'s lack of action.[149] The report of Fitzroy Maclean, liaison officer to the Partisans, convinced Churchill that Tito's forces were the most reliable resistance group. The report of Charles Armstrong, liaison officer to Mihailovi?, arrived too late for Anthony Eden to take it to the Tehran Conference in late November 1943, though Stevan K. Pavlowitch thinks that it would probably been insufficient to change Churchill's mind. At Tehran, Churchill argued in favor of the Partisans, while Joseph Stalin expressed limited interest but agreed that they should receive the greatest possible support.[150]

On 10 December, Churchill met King Peter II in London and told him that he possessed irrefutable proofs of Mihailovi?'s collaboration with the enemy and that Mihailovi? should be eliminated from the Yugoslav cabinet. Also in early December, Mihailovi? was asked to undertake an important sabotage mission against railways, which was later interpreted as a "final opportunity" to redeem himself. However, possibly not realizing how Allied policy had evolved, he failed to give the go-ahead.[151] On 12 January 1944, the SOE in Cairo sent a report to the Foreign Office, saying that Mihailovi?'s commanders had collaborated with Germans and Italians, and that Mihailovi? himself had condoned and in certain cases approved their actions. This hastened the British's decision to withdraw their thirty liaison officers to Mihailovi?.[152] The mission was effectively withdrawn in the spring of 1944. In April, one month before leaving, liaison officer Brigadier Armstrong noted that Mihailovi? had been mostly active in propaganda against the Axis, that he had missed numerous occasions for sabotage in the last six or eight months and that the efforts of many Chetnik leaders to follow Mihailovi?'s orders for inactivity had evolved into non-aggression pacts with Axis troops, although the mission had no evidence of collaboration with the enemy.[153]

In the meantime, Mihailovi? tried to improve the organization of his movement. On 25 January 1944, with the help of ?ivko Topalovi?, he organized in Ba, a village near Ravna Gora, the Ba Congress also meant to remove the shadow of the previous congress held in Montenegro. The congress was attended by 274 people, representing various parties, and aimed to be a reaction against the arbitrary behaviour of some commanders. The organization of a new, democratic, possibly federal, Yugoslavia, was mentioned, though the proposals remained vague, and an appeal was even made for the KPJ to join. The Chetnik command structure was formally reorganized. ?uri?i? was still in charge of Montenegro and ?uji? of Dalmatia, but Jev?evi? was excluded. The Germans and Bulgarians reacted to the congress by conducting an operation against the Chetniks in northern Serbia in February, killing 80 and capturing 913.[154]

After May and the withdrawal of the British mission, Mihailovi? kept transmitting radio messages to the Allies and to his government, but no longer received replies.

In July and August 1944, Mihailovi? ordered his forces to cooperate with the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) and 60th Troop Carrier Squadron (TCS) in the successful rescue of hundreds downed Allied airmen between August and December 1944 in what was called Operation Halyard;[155][156] for this, he was posthumously awarded the Legion of Merit by United States President Harry S. Truman. Details of this rescue mission are described in The Forgotten 500, by Gregory A. Freeman, published in 2007. [1]

According to historian Marko Attila Hoare, "On other occasions, however, Mihailovi?'s Chetniks rescued German airmen and handed them over safely to the German armed forces ... The Americans, with a weaker intelligence presence in the Balkans than the British, were less in touch with the realities of the Yugoslav civil war. They were consequently less than enthusiastic about British abandonment of the anti-communist Mihailovi?, and more reserved toward the Partisans." Several Yugoslavs were also evacuated in Operation Halyard, along with Topalovi?; they tried to raise more support abroad for Mihailovi?'s movement, but this came too late to reverse Allied policy.[157] The United States also sent an intelligence mission to Mihailovi? in March, but withdrew it after Churchill advised Roosevelt that all support should go to Tito and that "complete chaos" would ensue if the Americans also backed Mihailovi?.[155]

In July, Ivan ?uba?i? formed the new Yugoslav government-in-exile, which did not include Mihailovi? as a minister. Mihailovi?, however, remained the official chief-of-staff of the Yugoslav Army. On 29 August, upon the recommendation of his government, King Peter dissolved by royal decree the Supreme Command, therefore abolishing Mihailovi?'s post. On 12 September, King Peter broadcast a message from London, announcing the gist of 29 August's decree and calling upon all Serbs, Croats and Slovenes to "join the National Liberation Army under the leadership of Marshal Tito". He also proclaimed that he strongly condemned "the misuse of the name of the King and the authority of the Crown by which an attempt has been made to justify collaboration with the enemy". Though the King did not mention Mihailovi?, it was clear who he meant. According to his own account, Peter had obtained after strenuous talks with the British not to say a word directly against Mihailovi?. The message had a devastating effect on the morale of the Chetniks. Many men left Mihailovi? after the broadcast; others remained out of loyalty to him. [158] Mihailovi? resented the fact that he was abandoned by his former allies and in August 1944 summed up his position by stating that:

"More than three years ago I took up arms to fight for democracy against dictatorship in the form of nazism and fascism. In fighting for this cause there were ten occasions on which I almost lost my life. If I must die in fighting against a new form of dictatorship, I shall die, bitter because I have been deserted by those who profess to believe in democracy, but satisfied that I myself have fought bravely and honestly and have refused to compromise my cause."[159]

Defeat in 1944-45

At the end of August 1944, the Soviet Union's Red Army arrived on the eastern borders of Yugoslavia. In early September, it invaded Bulgaria and coerced it into turning against the Axis. Mihailovi?'s Chetniks, meanwhile, were so badly armed to resist the Partisan incursions into Serbia that some of Mihailovi?'s officers, including Nikola Kalabi?, Ne?ko Nedi? and Dragoslav Ra?i?, met German officers on 11 August to arrange a meeting of Mihailovi? with Neubacher and to set forth the conditions for increased collaboration.[160] Nedi?, in turn, apparently picked up the idea and suggested forming an army of united anti-communist forces; he arranged a secret meeting with Mihailovi?, which apparently took place around 20 August. From the existing accounts, they met in a dark room and Mihailovi? remained mostly silent, so much so that Nedi? was not even sure afterwards that he had actually met the real Mihailovi?. According to British official Stephen Clissold, Mihailovi? was initially very reluctant to go to the meeting, but was finally convinced by Kalabi?. It appears that Nedi? offered to obtain arms from the Germans, and to place his Serbian State Guard under Mihailovi?'s command, possibly as part of an attempt to switch sides as Germany was losing the war.[161] Neubacher favored the idea, but it was vetoed by Hitler, who saw this as an attempt to establish an "English fifth column" in Serbia. According to Pavlowitch, Mihailovi?, who was reportedly not enthusiastic about the proposal, and Nedi? might have been trying to "exploit each other's predicaments", while Nedi? may have considered letting Mihailovi? "take over". At the end of August, Mihailovi? also met an OSS mission, headed by Colonel Robert H. McDowell, who stayed with him until November.[162]

As the Red Army approached, Mihailovi? thought that the outcome of war would depend on Turkey entering the conflict, followed at last by an Allied incursion in the Balkans. He called upon all Yugoslavs to remain faithful to the King, and claimed that Peter had sent him a message telling him not to believe what he had heard on the radio about his dismissal. His troops started to break up outside Serbia in mid-August, as he tried to reach to Muslim and Croat leaders for a national uprising. However, whatever his intentions, he proved to have little attraction for non-Serbs. ?uri?i?, while leading his Montenegrin Volunteer Corps, which was related on paper to Ljoti?'s forces, accepted once again Mihailovi?'s command.[163] Mihailovi? ordered a general mobilization on 1 September; his troops were engaged against the Germans and the Bulgarians, while also under attack by the Partisans.[158] On 4 September, Mihailovi? issued a circular telegram ordering his commanders that no action can be undertaken without his orders, save against the communists.[164] German sources confirm the loyalty of Mihailovi? and forces under his direct influence in this period.[f] The Partisans then penetrated Chetnik territory, fighting a difficult battle and ultimately defeating Mihailovi?'s main force by October. On 6 September, what was left of Nedi?'s troops openly joined Mihailovi?. In the meantime, the Red Army encountered both the Partisans and Chetniks while entering from Romania and Bulgaria. They briefly cooperated with the Chetniks against retreating Germans, before disarming them. Mihailovi? sent a delegation to the Soviet command, but his representatives were ignored and ultimately arrested. Mihailovi?'s movement collapsed in Serbia under the attacks of Soviets, Partisans, Bulgarians and fighting with the retreating Germans. Still hoping for a landing by the Western Allies, he headed for Bosnia with his staff, McDowell and a force of a few hundred. He set up a few Muslim units and appointed Croat Major Matija Parac as the head of an as yet non-existent Croatian Chetnik army. Nedi? himself had fled to Austria. On 25 May 1945, he wrote to General Dwight D. Eisenhower, asserting that he had always been a secret ally of Mihailovi?.[165]

Now hoping for support from the United States, Mihailovi? met a small British mission between the Neretva river and Dubrovnik, but realized that it wasn't the signal of the hoped-for landing. McDowell was evacuated on 1 November and was instructed to offer Mihailovi? the opportunity to leave with him. Mihailovi? refused, as he wanted to remain until the expected change of Western Allied policy.[166] During the next weeks, the British government also raised the possibility of evacuating Mihailovi? by arranging a "rescue and honorable detention", and discussed the matter with the United States. In the end, no action was taken.[167] With their main forces in east Bosnia, the Chetniks under Mihailovi?'s personal command in the late months of 1944 continued to collaborate with Germans. Colonel Borota and vojvoda Jev?evi? maintained contacts with Germans for the whole group.[168] In January 1945, Mihailovi? tried to regroup his forces on the Ozren heights, planning Muslim, Croatian and Slovenian units. His troops were, however, decimated and worn out, some selling their weapons and ammunition, or pillaging the local population. ?uri?i? joined Mihailovi?, with his own depleted forces, and found out that Mihailovi? had no plan.[169] ?uri?i? went his own way, and was killed on 12 April in a battle with the Usta?e.[170]

On 17 March 1945, Mihailovi? was visited in Bosnia by German emissary Stärker, who requested that Mihailovi? transmit to the Allied headquarters in Italy a secret German offer of capitulation. Mihailovi? transmitted the message, which was to be his last.[171] Ljoti? and several independent Chetnik leaders in Istria proposed the forming of a common anti-communist front in the north-western coast, which could be acceptable to the Western Allies. Mihailovi? was not in favor of such a heterogeneous gathering, but did not reject Ljoti?'s proposal entirely, since the littoral area would be a convenient place to meet the Western Allies, and to join Slovene anti-communists, while Germany's collapse might make an anti-communist alliance possible. He authorized the departure of all who wanted to go, but few Chetniks ultimately arrived on the coast, with many being decimated on their way by Usta?e, Partisans, sickness and hunger.[172] On 13 April, Mihailovi? set out for northern Bosnia, on a 280 km-long march back to Serbia, aiming to start over a resistance movement, this time against the communists. His units were decimated by clashes with the Usta?e and Partisans, as well as dissension and typhus. On 10 May, they were attacked and defeated by Yugoslav People's Army (JNA), the successor to the Partisans, in battle of Zelengora. Mihailovi? managed to escape with 1,000-2,000 men, who gradually dispersed. Mihailovi? himself went into hiding in the mountains with a handful of men.[173]

Capture, trial and execution

Mihailovi?'s trial

The Yugoslav authorities wanted to catch Mihailovi? alive in order to stage a full-scale trial.[174] He was finally caught on 13 March 1946.[175] The elaborate circumstances of his capture were kept secret for sixteen years. According to one existing version, Mihailovi? was approached by men who were supposedly British agents offering him help and an evacuation by airplane. After hesitating, he boarded the airplane, only to discover that it was a trap set up by the OZNA. Another version, proposed by the Yugoslav government, is that he was betrayed by Nikola Kalabi?, who revealed his place of hiding in exchange for leniency.[176]

Monument to General Dra?a Mihailovi? on Ravna Gora, Serbia.

The trial of Dra?a Mihailovi? opened on 10 June 1946. His co-defendants were other prominent figures of the Chetnik movement as well as members of the Yugoslav government-in-exile, such as Slobodan Jovanovi?, who were tried in absentia, but also members of ZBOR and of the Nedi? regime.[177] The main prosecutor was Milo? Mini?, later Minister of Foreign Affairs in the Yugoslav government. The Allied airmen he had rescued in 1944 were not allowed to testify in his favor.[178] Mihailovi? evaded several questions by accusing some of his subordinates of incompetence and disregard of his orders. The trial shows, according to Jozo Tomasevich, that he never had firm and full control over his local commanders.[179] A Committee for the Fair Trial of General Mihailovi? was set up in the United States, but to no avail. Mihailovi? is quoted as saying, in his final statement, "I wanted much; I began much; but the gale of the world carried away me and my work."[180]

Roberts considers that the trial was "anything but a model of justice" and that "it is clear that Mihailovi? was not guilty of all, or even many, of the charges brought against him" though Tito would probably not have had a fair trial either, had Mihailovi? prevailed. Mihailovi? was convicted of high treason and war crimes, and was executed on 17 July 1946.[175] He was executed together with nine other officers in Lisi?iji Potok, about 200 meters from the former Royal Palace. His body was reportedly covered with lime and the position of his unmarked grave was kept secret.[181]

Rehabilitation

In March 2012, Vojislav Mihailovi? filed a request for his grandfather's rehabilitation in the high court.[182] The announcement caused a negative reaction in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia and Serbia alike.[182]?eljko Kom?i?, presidency member of Bosnia and Herzegovina, advocated the withdrawal of the Bosnian ambassador to Serbia if rehabilitation passes.[183] Former Croatian President Ivo Josipovi? stated that the attempted rehabilitation is harmful for Serbia and contrary to historical facts.[184] He elaborated that Mihailovi? "is a war criminal and Chetnikism is a quisling criminal movement".[184] Croatian foreign minister Vesna Pusi? commented that the rehabilitation will only cause suffering to Serbia.[185] In Serbia, fourteen NGOs stated in an open letter that "the attempted rehabilitation of Dra?a Mihailovi? demeans the struggle of both the Serbians and all the other peoples of the former Yugoslavia against fascism".[182] Members of the Women in Black protested in front of the higher court.[186]

The High Court rehabilitated Dra?a Mihailovi? on 14 May 2015. This ruling reverses the judgment passed in 1946, sentencing Mihailovi? to death for collaboration with the occupying Nazi forces and stripping him of all his rights as a citizen. According to the ruling, the Communist regime staged a politically and ideologically motivated trial.[187][188]

Family

In 1920, Mihailovi? married Jelica Brankovi?; they had three children. One of his sons, Branko Mihailovi?, was a Communist sympathizer and later supported the Partisans.[189] His daughter, Gordana Mihailovi?, also sided with the Partisans. She spent most of the war in Belgrade and, after the Partisans took the city, spoke on the radio to denounce her father as a traitor.[190] While Mihailovi? was in prison, his children did not come to see him, and only his wife visited him.[175] In 2005, Gordana Mihailovi? personally came to accept her father's posthumous award in the United States. Another son, Vojislav Mihailovi?, fought alongside his father and was killed in battle in May 1945.[191] His grandson, Vojislav Mihailovi? (born 1951, named after his uncle) is a Serbian politician, member of the Serbian Renewal Movement and later of the Serbian Democratic Renewal Movement. He was the mayor of Belgrade for one year, from 1999 to 2000 and ran unsuccessfully in the 2000 Yugoslav presidential elections.[192]

Legacy

The Legion of Merit, awarded to Mihailovi? by U.S. president Harry Truman

Historians vary in their assessments of Mihailovi?. Tomasevich suggests one main cause of his defeat was his failure to grow professionally, politically or ideologically as his responsibilities increased, rendering him unable to face both the exceptional circumstances of the war and the complex situation of the Chetniks.[193] Tomasevich also criticizes Mihailovi?'s loss of the Allied support through Chetnik collaboration with the Axis, as well as his doctrine of "passive resistance" which was perceived as idleness, stating "of generalship in the general there was precious little."[194] Pavlowitch also points to Mihailovi?'s failure to grow and evolve during the conflict and describes him as a man "generally out of his depth".[195] Roberts asserts that Mihailovi?'s policies were "basically static", that he "gambled all in the faith of an Allied victory," and that ultimately he was unable to control the Chetniks, who, "although hostile to the Germans and the Italians ... allowed themselves to drift into a policy of accommodations with both in the face of what they considered the greatest danger."[196]

Political views of Mihailovi? cover a wide range. After the war, Mihailovi?'s wartime role was viewed in the light of his movement's collaboration, particularly in Yugoslavia where he was considered a collaborator convicted of high treason. Charles de Gaulle considered Mihailovi? a "pure hero" and always refused to have personal meetings with Tito, whom he considered as Mihailovi?'s "murderer".[197][198] During the war, Churchill believed intelligence reports had shown that Mihailovi? had engaged "... in active collaboration with the Germans".[199] He observed that, under the pressure of German reprisals in 1941, Mihailovi? "drifted gradually into a posture where some of his commanders made accommodations with German and Italian troops to be left alone in certain mountain areas in return for doing little or nothing against the enemy", but concluded that "those who have triumphantly withstood such strains may brand his [Mihailovi?'s] name, but history, more discriminating, should not erase it from the scroll of Serbian patriots."[200] In the United States, due to the efforts of Major Richard L. Felman and his friends, President Truman, on the recommendation of Eisenhower, posthumously awarded Mihailovi? the Legion of Merit for the rescue of American airmen by the Chetniks. The award and the story of the rescue was classified secret by the State Department so as not to offend the Yugoslav government.

"The unparalleled rescue of over 500 American Airmen from capture by the Enemy Occupation Forces in Yugoslavia during World War II by General Dragoljub Mihailovich and his Chetnik Freedom Fighters for which this "Legion of Merit" medal was awarded by President Harry S. Truman, also represents a token of deep personal appreciation and respect by all those rescued American Airmen and their descendants, who will be forever grateful." (NATIONAL COMMITTEE OF AMERICAN AIRMEN RESCUED BY GENERAL Mihailovi?H - 1985)

Generalfeldmarschall von Weichs, German commander-in-chief south east 1943-1945, in his interrogation statement in October 1945, wrote about Mihailovi? and his forces in section named "Groups Aiding Germany":

"MIHAILOVIC 's troops once fought against our occupation troops out of loyalty to their King. At the same time they fought against TITO, because of anti--Communist convictions. This two front war could not last long, particularly when British support favored TITO. Consequently MIHAILOVIC showed pro-German leanings. There were engagements during which Serbian Chetniks fought TITO alongside German troops. On the other hand, hostile Chetnik groups were known to attack German supply trains in order to replenish their own stocks."
"MIHAILOVIC liked to remain in the background, and leave such affairs up to his subordinates. He hoped to bide his time with this play of power until an Anglo--American landing would provide sufficient support against TITO. Germany welcomed his support, however temporary. Chetnik reconnaissance activities were valued highly by our commanders."[201]

Almost sixty years after his death, on 29 March 2005, Mihailovi?'s daughter, Gordana, was presented with the posthumous decoration by president George W. Bush.[202] The decision was controversial; in Croatia Zoran Pusi?, head of the Civil Committee for Human Rights, protested against the decision and stated that Mihailovi? was directly responsible for the war crimes committed by the Chetniks.[203][204]

With the breakup of Yugoslavia and the renewal of ethnic nationalism, the historical perception of Mihailovi?'s collaboration has been challenged by parts of the public in Serbia and other ethnic Serb-populated regions of the former Yugoslavia. In the 1980s, political and economic problems within Yugoslavia undermined faith in the communist regime, and historians in Serbia began a re-evaluation of Serbian historiography and proposed the rehabilitation of Mihailovi? and the Chetniks.[204] In the 1990s, during the Yugoslav Wars, several Serbian nationalist groups began calling themselves "Chetniks", while Serb paramilitaries often self-identified with them and were referred to as such.[205]Vojislav ?e?elj's Serbian Radical Party formed the White Eagles, a paramilitary group considered responsible for war crimes and ethnic cleansing, which identified with the Chetniks.[206][207]Vuk Dra?kovi?'s Serbian Renewal Movement was closely associated with the Serbian Guard, which was also associated with Chetniks and monarchism.[208] Reunions of Chetnik survivors and nostalgics and of Mihailovi? admirers have been held in Serbia[209] By the late 20th and early 21st century, Serbian history textbooks and academic works characterized Mihailovi? and the Chetniks as "fighters for a just cause", and Chetnik massacres of civilians and commission of war crimes were ignored or barely mentioned.[204] In 2004, Mihailovi? was officially rehabilitated in Serbia by an act of the Serbian Parliament.[210] In a 2009 survey carried out in Serbia, 34.44 percent of respondents favored annulling the 1946 verdict against Mihailovi? (in which he was found to be a traitor and Axis collaborator), 15.92 percent opposed, and 49.64 percent stated they did not know what to think.[211]

The revised image of Mihailovi? is not shared in non-Serbian post-Yugoslav nations. In Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina analogies are drawn between war crimes committed during World War II and those of the Yugoslav Wars, and Mihailovi? is "seen as a war criminal responsible for ethnic cleansing and genocidal massacres."[204] The differences were illustrated in 2004, when a Serbian basketball player, Milan Gurovi?, who has a tattoo of Mihailovi? on his left arm, was banned by the Croatian Ministry of the Interior Zlatko Mehun from traveling to Croatia for refusing to cover the tattoo, as its display was deemed equivalent to "provoking hatred or violence because of racial background, national identity or religious affiliation."[204][212] Serbian press and politicians reacted to the ban with surprise and indignation, while in Croatia the decision was seen as "wise and a means of protecting the player himself against his own stupidity."[204] In 2009, a Serb group based in Chicago offered a reward of $100,000.00 for help finding Mihailovi?'s grave.[213] A commission formed by the Serbian government began an investigation and in 2010 suggested Mihailovi? may have been interred at Ada Ciganlija.[210]

General Dragoljub Mihailovich distinguished himself in an outstanding manner as Commander-in-Chief of the Yugoslavian Army Forces and later as Minister of War by organizing and leading important resistance forces against the enemy which occupied Yugoslavia, from December 1941 to December 1944. Through the undaunted efforts of his troops, many United States airmen were rescued and returned safely to friendly control. General Mihailovich and his forces, although lacking adequate supplies, and fighting under extreme hardships, contributed materially to the Allied cause, and were instrumental in obtaining a final Allied victory.

-- Harry S. Truman, March 29, 1948

The ultimate tragedy of Draza Mihailovic cannot erase the memory of his heroic and often lonely struggle against the twin tyrannies that afflicted his people, Nazism and Communism. He knew that totalitarianism, whatever name it might take, is the death of freedom. He thus became a symbol of resistance to all those across the world who have had to fight a similar heroic and lonely struggle against totalitarianism. Mihailovic belonged to Yugoslavia; his spirit now belongs to all those who are willing to fight for freedom.

-- Ronald Reagan, September 8, 1979[214]

As of 2019, a street in Kragujevac is named after him.[215]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Referred to by his supporters as Uncle Dra?a (? , ?i?a Dra?a).
  2. ^ Official name of the occupied territory. Hehn 1971, pp. 344-373; Pavlowitch 2002, p. 141.
  3. ^ Pavlowitch asserts that it cannot be determined who initiated the meeting, but Roberts attributes it to Matl. Pavlowitch 2007, pp. 65; Roberts 1973, p. 36.
  4. ^ Roberts quotes Konstantin Foti?, though he adds that even the latter, a Mihailovi? supporter, admits that the speech was "unfortunate". Roberts 1973, p. 94.
  5. ^ The text in Kriegstagebuch des Oberkommando der Wehrmacht for November 23rd 1943: Mihailovic hat nach sicherer Quelle seinen Unterführern den Befehl gegeben, mit den Deutschen zusammenzuarbeiten; er selbst können mit Rücksicht auf die Stimmung der Bevölkerung nicht in diesem Sinne hervortreten. Schramm 1963, p. 1304
  6. ^ Army Group F HQ Chief Intelligence Officer notice for the October 2nd Conference in Belgrade: Chetnik attitude remains uneven. Serbian Chetniks fight together with German troops against communist bands. DM himself even asked for German help to ensure the intended relocation of his HQ from NW Serbia to SW-Belgrade area but this intention was not carried out. In contrast, hostile attitude of the Chetniks in E-Bosnia, Herzegovina and S-Montenegro and movement of these forces to the coast in the area of Dubrovnik with the aim at to secure connenction with expected Engl. landing and to seek the protection from Red. From reliable source is known that DM expressly disapproves the anti-German attitude of these Chetniks. (German: Cetnik-Haltung weiterhin uneinheitlich. Serbische Cetniks kämpfen zusammen mit deutscher Truppe gegen komun. Banden. DM. selbst bat sogar um deutsche Hilfe zur Sicherung beabsichtigter Verlegung seines Hauptstabes von NW-Serbien in Raum SW Belgrad. Diese Absicht jedoch nicht durchgeführt. Demgegenüber feindselige Haltung der Cetniks in O-Bosnien, Herzegovina und S-Montenegro und Bewegung dieser Kräfte zur Küste in den Raum Dubrovnik mit dem Ziel, bei erwarteter engl. Landung Verbindung mit Alliierten aufzunehmen und Schutz gegen Rote zu suchen. Nach S.Qu. bekannt, dass DM. die deutschfeindliche Haltung dieser Cetniks ausdrücklich missbilligt). (National Archive and Research Administration, Washington, T311, Roll 194, 000105-6)

Citations

Footnotes

  1. ^ a b Tomasevich 1975, p. 271.
  2. ^ Dra?a Mihailovi? - Na krstu sudbine - Pero Simi?: Laguna 2013
  3. ^ Miloslav Samard?i?: General Dra?a Mihailovi? i OP?TA istoriia ?etni?kog pokreta/General Dra?a Mihailovi? and the general history of the Chetnik movement. 2 vols 4 Ed Novi pogledi, Kragujevac, 2005
  4. ^ Dra?a Mihailovi? - Na krstu sudbine - Pero Simi?: Laguna 2013
  5. ^ Dra?a Mihailovi? - Na krstu sudbine - Pero Simi?: Laguna 2013
  6. ^ Tomasevich 1975, p. 125.
  7. ^ Mihailovi? 1946, p. 13.
  8. ^ Buisson 1999, p. 13.
  9. ^ a b Buisson 1999, pp. 26-27.
  10. ^ Buisson 1999, pp. 45-49.
  11. ^ Buisson 1999, pp. 55-56.
  12. ^ Buisson 1999, pp. 63-65.
  13. ^ a b Trew 1998, pp. 5-6.
  14. ^ Buisson 1999, pp. 66-68.
  15. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, p. 53.
  16. ^ Milazzo 1975, pp. 12-13.
  17. ^ Milazzo 1975, p. 13.
  18. ^ a b c Pavlowitch 2007, p. 54.
  19. ^ Freeman 2007, p. 123.
  20. ^ a b Roberts 1973, p. 21.
  21. ^ a b Roberts 1973, pp. 21-22.
  22. ^ a b Roberts 1973, p. 22.
  23. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, p. 79.
  24. ^ Roberts 1973, p. 26.
  25. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, p. 59.
  26. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, p. 56.
  27. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, p. 60.
  28. ^ (Karchmar 1973, p. 241)
  29. ^ Freeman 2007, pp. 124-126.
  30. ^ Roberts 1973, pp. 26-27.
  31. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, p. 64.
  32. ^ a b c d Pavlowitch 2007, p. 63.
  33. ^ a b Tomasevich 1975, p. 148.
  34. ^ Roberts 1973, p. 48.
  35. ^ Milazzo 1975, pp. 15-16.
  36. ^ a b Milazzo 1975, p. 21.
  37. ^ Tomasevich 1975, p. 141.
  38. ^ a b Tomasevich 1975, p. 140.
  39. ^ Ramet 2006, p. 133.
  40. ^ a b Milazzo 1975, p. 26.
  41. ^ Tomasevich 1975, p. 178.
  42. ^ Tomasevich 1975, p. 143.
  43. ^ Milazzo 1975, p. 33.
  44. ^ a b Milazzo 1975, p. 34.
  45. ^ a b Roberts 1973, p. 34.
  46. ^ Tomasevich 1975, p. 152.
  47. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, pp. 62-64.
  48. ^ a b c Milazzo 1975, p. 35.
  49. ^ a b Roberts 1973, pp. 34-35.
  50. ^ a b c Tomasevich 1975, p. 149.
  51. ^ Milazzo 1975, pp. 36-37.
  52. ^ Hoare 2006, p. 156.
  53. ^ a b Milazzo 1975, p. 38.
  54. ^ a b Tomasevich 1975, p. 150.
  55. ^ Milju? 1982, p. 119.
  56. ^ a b Tomasevich 1975, p. 155.
  57. ^ a b Pavlowitch 2007, pp. 65-66.
  58. ^ a b c Tomasevich 1975, p. 151.
  59. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, p. 65.
  60. ^ a b Milazzo 1975, p. 37.
  61. ^ Tomasevich 1975, p. 196.
  62. ^ Karchmar 1987, p. 256.
  63. ^ a b Milazzo 1975, p. 39.
  64. ^ a b c d e Karchmar 1987, p. 272.
  65. ^ Trew 1998, pp. 86-88.
  66. ^ Milazzo 1975, p. 40.
  67. ^ Tomasevich 1975, p. 200.
  68. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, pp. 66-67, 96.
  69. ^ a b Pavlowitch 2007, pp. 66-67.
  70. ^ Tomasevich 1975, pp. 214-216.
  71. ^ Roberts 1973, p. 38.
  72. ^ Roberts 1973, pp. 37-38.
  73. ^ a b Tomasevich 1975, p. 199.
  74. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, p. 66.
  75. ^ Tomasevich 1975, pp. 269-271.
  76. ^ Roberts 1973, p. 53.
  77. ^ Roberts 1973, pp. 53-54.
  78. ^ Tomasevich 1975, p. 184.
  79. ^ Roberts 1973, p. 56.
  80. ^ Roberts 1973, pp. 57-58.
  81. ^ a b c Roberts 1973, p. 67.
  82. ^ Roberts 1973, pp. 58-62.
  83. ^ Roberts 1973, p. 40-41.
  84. ^ Tomasevich 1975, p. 210.
  85. ^ Tomasevich 1975, p. 219.
  86. ^ a b c Pavlowitch 2007, p. 110.
  87. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, pp. 110-112.
  88. ^ Hoare 2006, p. 161.
  89. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, pp. 122-126.
  90. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, p. 98.
  91. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, pp. 98-100.
  92. ^ Barker 1976, p. 162.
  93. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, p. 100.
  94. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, pp. 127-128.
  95. ^ Tomasevich 1975, p. 256.
  96. ^ Tomasevich 1975, p. 169.
  97. ^ Tomasevich 1975, p. 259.
  98. ^ Hoare 2006, p. 148.
  99. ^ Hoare 2006, p. 143.
  100. ^ a b c Malcolm 1994, p. 179.
  101. ^ Lerner 1994, p. 105.
  102. ^ Mulaj 2008, p. 42.
  103. ^ Milazzo 1975, p. 64.
  104. ^ Tomasevich 1975, pp. 256-261.
  105. ^ Karchmar 1987, p. 397.
  106. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, pp. 79-80.
  107. ^ Tomasevich 1975, p. 170.
  108. ^ Tomasevich 1975, p. 179.
  109. ^ Tomasevich 1975, p. 171.
  110. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, p. 112.
  111. ^ Tomasevich 1975, pp. 258-259.
  112. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, p. 158.
  113. ^ a b Hoare 2010, p. 1198.
  114. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, p. 127.
  115. ^ Basil Davidson: PARTISAN PICTURE
  116. ^ a b Roberts 1973, pp. 70-71.
  117. ^ Tomasevich 1975, p. 290.
  118. ^ Roberts 1973, p. 72.
  119. ^ Tomasevich 1975, p. 231.
  120. ^ Roberts 1973, pp. 90-91.
  121. ^ Roberts 1973, pp. 91-92.
  122. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, p. 167.
  123. ^ Buisson 1999, p. 164.
  124. ^ Miljus, Branko (1982). La Revolution yougoslave. - [Paris]: L'Age d'homme (1982). 247 S. 8°. L'AGE D'HOMME. p. 127. GGKEY:3ETA934ZGPG.
  125. ^ Roberts 1973, pp. 92-93.
  126. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, pp. 166-167.
  127. ^ Buisson 1999, pp. 162-163.
  128. ^ Roberts 1973, pp. 93-96.
  129. ^ Tomasevich 1975, p. 361.
  130. ^ a b Roberts 1973, p. 86.
  131. ^ George Orwell, The Freedom of the Press, Orwell's Proposed Preface to 'Animal Farm' at orwell.ru, accessed 14 November 2017
  132. ^ Roberts 1973, p. 103-106.
  133. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, pp. 159-160.
  134. ^ a b Pavlowitch 2007, pp. 161-165.
  135. ^ Roberts 1973, pp. 123-124.
  136. ^ Roberts 1973, pp. 106-112.
  137. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, p. 171.
  138. ^ Roberts 1973, pp. 117-120.
  139. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, pp. 182-186.
  140. ^ Roberts 1973, pp. 138-144.
  141. ^ Roberts 1973, pp. 156-157.
  142. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, pp. 189-190.
  143. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, pp. 192-195.
  144. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, pp. 204-205.
  145. ^ Roberts 1973, pp. 153-154.
  146. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, pp. 197-199.
  147. ^ Hinsley 1993, p. 358.
  148. ^ Schramm 1963, pp. 1304.
  149. ^ Roberts 1973, pp. 157-160.
  150. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, pp. 191-192.
  151. ^ Roberts 1973, pp. 178-180.
  152. ^ Roberts 1973, p. 197.
  153. ^ Roberts 1973, p. 225.
  154. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, pp. 223-226.
  155. ^ a b Roberts 1973, pp. 245-257.
  156. ^ Tomasevich 1975, p. 378.
  157. ^ Roberts 1973, pp. 253-254.
  158. ^ a b Roberts 1973, pp. 258-260.
  159. ^ Martin 1946, p. 292.
  160. ^ Tomasevich 1975, p. 342.
  161. ^ Roberts 1973, pp. 257-258.
  162. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, pp. 228-230.
  163. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, pp. 230-235.
  164. ^ Tomasevich 1975, p. 380.
  165. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, pp. 231-238.
  166. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, pp. 254.
  167. ^ Roberts 1973, pp. 280-282.
  168. ^ Tomasevich 1975, p. 433.
  169. ^ Tomasevich 1975, p. 440.
  170. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, pp. 254-256.
  171. ^ Roberts 1973, pp. 306-307.
  172. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, pp. 256-258.
  173. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, pp. 266-267.
  174. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, p. 267.
  175. ^ a b c Roberts 1973, p. 307.
  176. ^ Buisson 1999, p. 250-251.
  177. ^ Buisson 1999, p. 262.
  178. ^ Buisson 1999, p. 260-262.
  179. ^ Tomasevich 1975, pp. 462-463.
  180. ^ Time & 7 October 1957.
  181. ^ Buisson 1999, p. 272.
  182. ^ a b c Ristic 2012.
  183. ^ Gu?i? & 30 March 2012.
  184. ^ a b B92, Josipovi? & 23 March 2012.
  185. ^ B92, Pusi? & 23 March 2012.
  186. ^ Blic & 23 March 2012.
  187. ^ B92 & Rehabilitation.
  188. ^ "Draza Mihailovic rehabilitated". InSerbia. 14 May 2015.
  189. ^ Buisson 1999, p. 97.
  190. ^ Buisson 1999, p. 227.
  191. ^ Buisson 1999, p. 242.
  192. ^ BBC & 7 August 2000.
  193. ^ Tomasevich 1975, p. [page needed].
  194. ^ Tomasevich 1975, p. 470.
  195. ^ Pavlowitch 2007, p. 279.
  196. ^ Roberts 1973, p. 322.
  197. ^ Peyrefitte 1997, pp. 209-210.
  198. ^ Lutard-Tavard 2005, p. 78.
  199. ^ Churchill 1953, pp. 409-415.
  200. ^ Churchill 1953, pp. 408-409.
  201. ^ von Weichs 1945, p. 22.
  202. ^ Hoare 2005.
  203. ^ Balkan News 2005.
  204. ^ a b c d e f Sindbæk 2009.
  205. ^ Cathcart 1994.
  206. ^ Allen 1996, p. [page needed].
  207. ^ Bassiouni 1994.
  208. ^ Glas javnosti 1999.
  209. ^ Buisson 1999, pp. 9-10.
  210. ^ a b Cviji? 2010.
  211. ^ Ramet 2011, p. 2.
  212. ^ MSNBC 2004.
  213. ^ Meyer 2009.
  214. ^ https://philosophymr.com/pdf/publications/10-Nixon_Reagan_on_General_Draza_Mihailovic.pdf
  215. ^ " ? ? ? ?". ziginfo.rs (in Serbian). Retrieved 2019.

References

Further reading

  • Juce, Sinoc. Pjetlovi nad Tigrovima, Sanski Most, BiH: Begovic-Bosanska Krajina Press 2007
  • Marcia Christoff Kurapovna (2010). Shadows on the mountain: the Allies, the Resistance, and the rivalries that doomed WWII Yugoslavia. John Wiley and Sons. ISBN 978-0-470-08456-4.
  • Martin, David. Ally Betrayed: The Uncensored Story of Tito and Mihailovi?. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1946.
  • Martin, David. Patriot or Traitor: The Case of General Mihailovi?: Proceedings and Report of the Commission of Inquiry of the Committee for a Fair Trial for Draja Mihailovi?. Hoover Archival Documentaries. Hoover Institution Publication, volume 191. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, Stanford University, 1978.
  • Pero Simi?. Dra?a Mihailovi? - Na krstu sudbine - SRB Laguna 2013
  • Seitz, Albert Blazier (1953). Mihailovic, Hoax Or Hero?. Leigh House.
  • Tucakovi?, Semso. Srpski zlocini nad Bosnjacima Muslimanima, 1941-1945. Sarajevo: El Kalem, 1995.

External links


  This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Dra%C5%BEa_Mihailovi%C4%87
 



 



 
Music Scenes