Du Nouy Ring Method
Get Du Nouy Ring Method essential facts below. View Videos or join the Du Nouy Ring Method discussion. Add Du Nouy Ring Method to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
Du Nouy Ring Method
An automatic force tensiometer with an electobalance

The du Noüy ring method is a technique for measuring the surface tension of a liquid. The method involves slowly lifting a ring, often made of platinum, from the surface of a liquid. The force, ${\displaystyle F}$, required to raise the ring from the liquid's surface is measured and related to the liquid's surface tension, ${\displaystyle \gamma }$:

${\displaystyle F=w_{(ring)}+2\pi \cdot (r_{i}+r_{a})\cdot \gamma }$

where ${\displaystyle r_{i}}$ is the radius of the inner ring of the liquid film pulled and ${\displaystyle r_{a}}$ is the radius of the outer ring of the liquid film.[1]${\displaystyle w_{(ring)}}$ is the weight of the ring minus the buoyant force due to the part of the ring below the liquid surface.[2]

When the ring's thickness is much smaller than its diameter, this equation can be simplified to:

${\displaystyle F=w_{(ring)}+4\pi R\gamma }$

where R is the average of the inner and outer radius of the ring.[2]

This technique was proposed by the French physicist Pierre Lecomte du Noüy (1883-1947) in a paper published in 1925.[3]

Close up of the ring drawn out of the liquid

The measurement is performed with a force tensiometer, which typically uses an electrobalance to measure the excess force caused by the liquid being pulled up and automatically calculates and displays the surface tension corresponding to the force. Earlier, torsion wire balances were commonly used. The maximum force is used for the calculations, and empirically determined correction factors are required to remove the effect caused by the finite diameter of the ring:

${\displaystyle F=w_{(ring)}+4\pi R\gamma f}$

with f being the correction factor.

The most common correction factors include those by Zuidema and Waters (for liquids with low interfacial tension), Huh and Mason (which covers a wider range than Zuidema-Waters), and Harkins and Jordan (more precise than Huh-Mason while still covering the most widely used liquids).[4]

1. ^ Butt, Hans-Jürgen; Graf, Karlheinz; Kappl, Michael (2003). "Physics and Chemistry of Interfaces": 14-15. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)