Great Wall of Sand
Get Great Wall of Sand essential facts below. View Videos or join the Great Wall of Sand discussion. Add Great Wall of Sand to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
Great Wall of Sand

"Great Wall of Sand" is a name first used in March 2015 by US Admiral Harry Harris, who was commander of the Pacific Fleet, to describe a series of uniquely large-scale land reclamation projects by the People's Republic of China (PRC) in the Spratly Islands area of the South China Sea in the period from late 2013 to late 2016.[1]

Spratlys reclamations 2013–2016

In late 2013 the PRC embarked on large scale reclamations at seven locations - in order to strengthen territorial claims to the region demarcated by the "Nine-Dash Line".[2][3][4][5]

The artificial islands were created by dredging sand onto coral reefs which were then concreted to make permanent structures. By the time of the 2015 Shangri-La Dialogue, over 810 hectares (2,000 acres) of new land had been created.[6] By December 2016 it had reached 3,200 acres (1,300 ha) and "'significant' weapons systems, including anti-aircraft and anti-missile systems" had been installed.[7]

The PRC states that the construction is for "improving the working and living conditions of people stationed on these islands",[8] and that, "China is aiming to provide shelter, aid in navigation, weather forecasts and fishery assistance to ships of various countries passing through the sea."[9]

Defence analysts IHS Janes states that it is a "methodical, well planned campaign to create a chain of air and sea-capable fortresses".[10] These "military-ready" installations include sea-walls and deep-water ports, barracks, and notably include runways on three of the reclaimed "islands", including Fiery Cross Reef,[11][12]Mischief Reef and Subi Reef.[2] Aside from geo-political tensions, concerns have been raised about the environmental impact on fragile reef ecosystems through the destruction of habitat, pollution and interruption of migration routes.[13]

Map showing the seven sites of PRC land reclamation.
(The site labelled "Chigua Reef" is mis-named; this is, in fact, the site of Hughes Reef.)

The Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative's "Island tracker" has listed the following locations as the sites of the PRC island reclamation activities:[14]

Name Reclaimed area
English Chinese Filipino Vietnamese Facilities added acres hectares Ref.
Cuarteron Reef Calderon Reef ?á Châu Viên Access channel, Breakwaters, Multiple support buildings, New helipad, Possible radar facility 56 23 [1]
Fiery Cross Reef Y?ngsh? Ji?o () Kagitingan Reef ?á Ch? Th?p Airstrip (~3000m), Harbor, Multiple cement plants, Multiple support buildings, Piers 677 274 [2]
Gaven Reefs Nánx?n Ji?o () Burgos Reefs ?á Ga Ven Access channel, Anti-air guns, Communications equipment, Construction support structure, Defensive tower, Naval guns 34 14 [3]
Hughes Reef -- ?á T? Ngh?a Access channel, Coastal fortifications, Four Defensive Towers, Harbor, Multi-level military facility 19 8 [4]
Mabini Reef ?á G?c Ma Access channel, Concrete plant, Defensive Towers, Desalination pumps, Fuel dump, Multi-level military facility, Possible radar facility 27 11 [5]
Mischief Reef M?ijì Ji?o () ?á Vành Kh?n Airstrip (~3000m), Access channel, Fortified Seawalls 1379 558 [6]
Subi Reef Zh?bì Ji?o () Zamora Reef ?á Xu Bi Airstrip (~3000m), Access channel, Piers 976 395 [7]

Total reclaimed area by PRC on 7 reefs: approx. 13.5 square kilometres (5.2 sq mi)

Machinery used

The PRC used hundreds of dredges and barges[] including a giant self-propelled dredger, the Tian Jing Hao. Built in 2009 in China, the Tian Jing Hao is a 127m-long seagoing cutter suction dredger designed by German engineering company Vosta LMG; (Lübecker Maschinenbau Gesellschaft (de)). At 6,017 gross tonnes, with a dredging capacity of 4500m3/h, it is credited as being the largest of its type in Asia. It has been operating on Cuarteron Reef, the Gaven Reefs, and at Fiery Cross Reef.[15]

Strategic importance

More than half of the world's annual merchant fleet tonnage passes through the Strait of Malacca, Sunda Strait, and Lombok Strait, with the majority continuing on into the South China Sea. Tanker traffic through the Strait of Malacca leading into the South China Sea is more than three times greater than Suez Canal traffic, and well over five times more than the Panama Canal.[16] The People's Republic of China (PRC) has stated its unilateral claim to almost the entire body of water.[17]

Legal issues

Territorial claims in the South China Sea

Territorial waters of an artificial island

As the Mischief and Subi Reefs were under water prior to reclamations, they are considered by the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS III) as "sea bed" in "international waters". Although the PRC had ratified a limited[18]UNCLOS III not allowing innocent passage of war ships, according to the UNCLOS III, features built on the sea bed cannot have territorial waters.[18]

Environmental legal issues

The PRC has ratified UNCLOS III;[18] the convention establishes general obligations for safeguarding the marine environment and protecting freedom of scientific research on the high seas, and also creates an innovative legal regime for controlling mineral resource exploitation in deep seabed areas beyond national jurisdiction, through an International Seabed Authority and the Common heritage of mankind principle.[19]

Regional concept

According to Chinese sources, the concept was invented in 1972 by the Bureau of Survey and Cartography of Vietnam under the Office of Premier Ph?m V?n ng which printed out "The World Atlas" and said "The chain of islands from the Nansha and Xisha Islands to Hainan Island, Taiwan Island, the Penghu Islands and the Zhoushan Islands are shaped like a bow and constitute a Great Wall defending the China mainland."[20]

Reactions

States

  •  Australia - Opposed to "any coercive or unilateral actions to change the status quo in the South and East China Sea",[21] Australia continues to fly routine surveillance operations and exercise the right to freedom of navigation in international airspace "in accordance with the international civil aviation convention, and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea."[22]
  •  China - Following confrontations between US P8-A Poseidon aircraft and the Chinese Navy over the constructions in May 2015,[23] China stated that it has "...the right to engage in monitoring in the relevant air space and waters to protect the country's sovereignty and prevent accidents at sea."[24]
  •  South Korea - No official stance, maintains an "...increasingly notable silence on freedom of navigation in the South China Sea".[25][26]
  •  United States - The construction is considered to be a key motivating factor behind the Obama administration's "Asia Pivot" military strategy.[27] It believes "...that China's activities in the South China Sea are driven by nationalism, part of a wider strategy aimed at undercutting US influence in Asia."[6] It has declared that it would operate military aircraft in the region "'...in accordance with international law in disputed areas of the South China Sea' and would continue to do so 'consistent with the rights freedoms and lawful uses of the sea.'"[24]
Since October 2015, when the USS Lassen passed close to man-made land built upon Subi Reef,[28][29] the US has been conducting Freedom of navigation operations (FONOP) near the artificial islands approximately every three months using Arleigh Burke-class Guided missile destroyers.[30]

Organizations

  • ASEAN - The Association of Southeast Asian Nations stated that the constructions "may undermine peace, security and stability" in the region as well as having strongly negative impact on the marine environment and fishery stocks.[31]
  • G7 - In a "Declaration on maritime security" before the 41st G7 summit, the G7 stated that, "We continue to observe the situation in the East and South China Seas and are concerned by any unilateral actions, such as large scale land reclamation, which change the status quo and increase tensions. We strongly oppose any attempt to assert territorial or maritime claims through the use of intimidation, coercion or force.[32]
  • In July 2016, the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague ruled that China has no historic title over the area.[33]

Ecological impact

Swallow Reef in Spratly islands

Aside from geo-political tensions, concerns have been raised about the environmental impact on fragile reef ecosystems through the destruction of habitat, pollution and interruption of migration routes.[13] These new islands are built on reefs previously one metre (3 ft 3 in) below the level of the sea. For back-filling these seven artificial islands, a total area of 13.5 square kilometres (5.2 sq mi), to the height of few meters, China had to destroy surrounding reefs and pump 40 to 50 million cubic metres (1.4×10^9 to 1.8×10^9 cu ft) of sand and corals, resulting in significant and irreversible damage to the environment. Frank Muller-Karger, professor of biological oceanography at the University of South Florida, said sediment "can wash back into the sea, forming plumes that can smother marine life and could be laced with heavy metals, oil and other chemicals from the ships and shore facilities being built." Such plumes threaten the biologically diverse reefs throughout the Spratlys, which Dr. Muller-Karger said may have trouble surviving in sediment-laden water.[34]

Rupert Wingfield-Hayes, visiting the vicinity of the Philippine-controlled island of Pagasa by plane and boat, said he saw Chinese fishermen poaching and destroying the reefs on a massive scale. As he saw Chinese fishermen poaching endangered species like massive giant clams, he noted "None of this proves China is protecting the poachers. But nor does Beijing appear to be doing anything to stop them. The poachers we saw showed absolutely no sign of fear when they saw our cameras filming them". He concludes: "However shocking the reef plundering I witnessed, it is as nothing compared to the environmental destruction wrought by China's massive island building programme nearby. The latest island China has just completed at Mischief Reef is more than 9km (six miles) long. That is 9km of living reef that is now buried under millions of tonnes of sand and gravel."[35]

A 2014 United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) report noted that "Sand is rarer than one thinks."[36] "The average price of sand imported by Singapore was US$3 per tonne from 1995 to 2001, but the price increased to US$190 per tonne from 2003 to 2005".[36] Although the Philippines and the PRC had both ratified the UNCLOS III,[18] in the case of Johnson South Reef, Hughes Reef and Mischief Reef, the PRC dredged sand for free in the EEZ the Philippines had claimed from 1978,[37] arguing this to be the "waters of China's Nansha Islands". "Although the consequences of substrate mining are hidden, they are tremendous. Aggregate particles that are too fine to be used are rejected by dredging boats, releasing vast dust plumes and changing water turbidity".[36]

John McManus, a professor of marine biology and ecology at the University of Miami's Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, said: "The worst thing anyone can do to a coral reef is to bury it under tons of sand and gravel ... There are global security concerns associated with the damage. It is likely broad enough to reduce fish stocks in the world's most fish-dependent region." He explained that the reason "the world has heard little about the damage inflicted by the People's Republic of China to the reefs is that the experts can't get to them", and noted "I have colleagues from the Philippines, Taiwan, PRC, Vietnam and Malaysia who have worked in the Spratly area. Most would not be able to get near the artificial islands except possibly some from PRC, and those would not be able to release their findings".[38]

See also

References

  1. ^ "Speech delivered to the Australian Strategic Policy Institute" (PDF). Commander, US Pacific Fleet. U.S. Navy. 31 March 2015. Retrieved .
  2. ^ a b Wingfield-Hayes, Rupert (9 September 2014). "China's Island Factory". BBC. Retrieved .
  3. ^ "US Navy: Beijing creating a 'great wall of sand' in South China Sea". The Guardian. 31 March 2015. Retrieved .
  4. ^ "China building a 'great wall of sand' in South China Sea - US Navy". RT. 31 March 2015. Retrieved .
  5. ^ Marcus, Jonathan (29 May 2015). "US-China tensions rise over Beijing's 'Great Wall of Sand'". BBC. Retrieved 2015.
  6. ^ a b Brown, James (6 June 2015). "China building islands, not bridges". The Saturday Paper. Retrieved 2015.
  7. ^ Phillips, Tom (2016-12-14). "Images show 'significant' Chinese weapons systems in South China Sea". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved .
  8. ^ "China building 'great wall of sand' in South China Sea". BBC. 1 April 2015. Retrieved .
  9. ^ "China Voice: Drop fearmongering over South China Sea". news.xinhuanet.com. 16 April 2015. Retrieved .
  10. ^ "South China Sea dispute: What you need to know". Sydney Morning Herald. 28 May 2015. Retrieved .
  11. ^ Hardy, James; O'Connor, Sean (16 April 2015). "China's first runway in Spratlys under construction". IHS Jane's 360. Retrieved .
  12. ^ "China 'building runway in disputed South China Sea island'". BBC News. Retrieved .
  13. ^ a b Batongbacal, Jay (7 May 2015). "Environmental Aggression in the South China Sea". Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative. Retrieved .
  14. ^ "Land reclamation by country". Island Tracker. Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative. Retrieved .
  15. ^ "China goes all out with major island building project in Spratlys".
  16. ^ "South China Sea Oil Shipping Lanes".
  17. ^ "China's new n-submarine base sets off alarm bells". IndianExpress. 2008-05-03. Archived from the original on 2008-05-06. Retrieved .
  18. ^ a b c d "UNCLOS. Declarations upon ratification".
  19. ^ Jennifer Frakes, The Common Heritage of Mankind Principle and the Deep Seabed, Outer Space, and Antarctica: Will Developed and Developing Nations Reach a Compromise? Wisconsin International Law Journal. 2003; 21:409
  20. ^ "The Operation of the HYSY 981 Drilling Rig: Vietnam's Provocation and China's Position". 2014-06-09. : "1972?5?,(4)?1974?,(5):",......?,''?""
  21. ^ Wroe, David; Wen, Philip (1 June 2015). "South China Sea dispute: Strong indication Australia will join push back on China's island-building". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 2015.
  22. ^ Wroe, David; Wen, Phillip (15 December 2015). "South China Sea: Australia steps up air patrols in defiance of Beijing". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 2015.
  23. ^ Sciutto, Jim (21 May 2015). "Exclusive: China warns U.S. surveillance plane". CNN. Retrieved 2015.
  24. ^ a b "South China Sea: China's navy told US spy plane flying over islands to leave 'eight times', CNN reports". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. 2015-05-22. Retrieved 2015.
  25. ^ Kelly, Robert (7 July 2015). "South China Sea: Why Korea is silent, and why that's a good thing". The Interpreter. Lowy Institute for International Policy. Retrieved 2015.
  26. ^ Jackson, Van (24 June 2015). "The South China Sea Needs South Korea". The Diplomat. Retrieved 2015.
  27. ^ Callick, Rowan (22 May 2015). "US push-back in Asia gains momentum to reassure partners". The Australian. Retrieved .
  28. ^ David Wroe and Philip Wen (31 October 2015). "South China Sea: Whose neighbourhood is it, anyway?". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 2015.
  29. ^ "China furious after US Navy destroyer passes disputed islands in S. China Sea". www.rt.com. RT.com. 27 October 2015. Retrieved 2015.
  30. ^ "US Navy carries out third FONOP in South China Sea". The Interpreter. Lowy Institute for International Policy. 10 May 2016. Retrieved 2016.
  31. ^ Schofield, Clive (14 May 2015). "Why the world is wary of China's 'great wall of sand' - CNN.com". CNN. Retrieved .
  32. ^ "G7 Foreign Ministers' Declaration on Maritime Security". G8 Information Center. University of Toronto. 14 April 2015. Retrieved 2015.
  33. ^ Harvey, Adam (13 July 2016). "Philippines celebrates victory in South China Sea case, despite China's refusal to accept result". ABC News. Retrieved 2016.
  34. ^ Derek Watkins, « What China Has Been Building in the South China Sea », The New York Times, 27 october 2015
  35. ^ Wingfield-Hayes, Rupert (27 October 2015). "Why are Chinese fishermen destroying coral reefs in the South China Sea?". BBC News. Retrieved .
  36. ^ a b c "Sand, rarer than one thinks" (PDF). 1 March 2014. p. 41.
  37. ^ "Presidential Decree No. 1599 establishing an Exclusive Economic Zone and for other purposes". Chan Robles Law Library. June 11, 1978.
  38. ^ Clark, Colin (18 November 2015). "'Absolute Nightmare' as Chinese destroy South China Reefs; fish stocks at risk". breakingdefense.com.

  This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Great_wall_of_sand
 



 



 
Music Scenes