Italian School of Algebraic Geometry

Get Italian School of Algebraic Geometry essential facts below. View Videos or join the Italian School of Algebraic Geometry discussion. Add Italian School of Algebraic Geometry to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.

## Algebraic surfaces

## Foundational issues

## The geometers

## Advent of topology

## Collapse of the school

## References

## External links

This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Italian School of Algebraic Geometry

This article has an unclear citation style. (June 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) |

In relation with the history of mathematics, the **Italian school of algebraic geometry** refers to the work over half a century or more (flourishing roughly 1885-1935) done internationally in birational geometry, particularly on algebraic surfaces. There were in the region of 30 to 40 leading mathematicians who made major contributions, about half of those being in fact Italian. The leadership fell to the group in Rome of Guido Castelnuovo, Federigo Enriques and Francesco Severi, who were involved in some of the deepest discoveries, as well as setting the style.

The emphasis on algebraic surfaces—algebraic varieties of dimension two—followed on from an essentially complete geometric theory of algebraic curves (dimension 1). The position in around 1870 was that the curve theory had incorporated with Brill-Noether theory the Riemann-Roch theorem in all its refinements (via the detailed geometry of the theta-divisor).

The classification of algebraic surfaces was a bold and successful attempt to repeat the division of curves by their genus *g*. It corresponds to the rough classification into the three types: *g* = 0 (projective line); *g* = 1 (elliptic curve); and *g* > 1 (Riemann surfaces with independent holomorphic differentials). In the case of surfaces, the Enriques classification was into five similar big classes, with three of those being analogues of the curve cases, and two more (elliptic fibrations, and K3 surfaces, as they would now be called) being with the case of two-dimension abelian varieties in the 'middle' territory. This was an essentially sound, breakthrough set of insights, recovered in modern complex manifold language by Kunihiko Kodaira in the 1950s, and refined to include mod p phenomena by Zariski, the Shafarevich school and others by around 1960. The form of the Riemann-Roch theorem on a surface was also worked out.

Some proofs produced by the school are not considered satisfactory because of foundational difficulties. These included frequent use of birational models in dimension three of surfaces that can have non-singular models only when embedded in higher-dimensional projective space. In order to avoid these issues, a sophisticated theory of handling a linear system of divisors was developed (in effect, a line bundle theory for hyperplane sections of putative embeddings in projective space). Many modern techniques were found, in embryonic form, and in some cases the articulation of these ideas exceeded the available technical language.

According to Guerraggio & Nastasi (page 9, 2005) Luigi Cremona is "considered the founder of the Italian school of algebraic geometry". Later they explain that in Turin the collaboration of Enrico D'Ovidio and Corrado Segre "would bring, either by their own efforts or those of their students, Italian algebraic geometry to full maturity". A one-time student of Segre, H.F. Baker wrote (1926, page 269), [Corrado Segre] "may probably be said to be the father of that wonderful Italian school which has achieved so much in the birational theory of algebraical loci." On this topic, Brigaglia & Ciliberto (2004) say "Segre had headed and maintained the school of geometry that Luigi Cremona had established in 1860." Reference to the Mathematics Genealogy Project shows that, in terms of *Italian doctorates*, the real productivity of the school began with Guido Castelnuovo and Federigo Enriques. In the USA Oscar Zariski inspired many Ph.D.s.

The roll of honour of the school includes the following other Italians: Giacomo Albanese, Eugenio Bertini, Luigi Campedelli, Oscar Chisini, Michele De Franchis, Pasquale del Pezzo, Beniamino Segre, Francesco Severi, Guido Zappa (with contributions also from Gino Fano, Carlo Rosati, Giuseppe Torelli, Giuseppe Veronese).

Elsewhere it involved H. F. Baker and Patrick du Val (UK), Arthur Byron Coble (USA), Georges Humbert and Charles Émile Picard (France), Lucien Godeaux (Belgium), Hermann Schubert and Max Noether, and later Erich Kähler (Germany), H. G. Zeuthen (Denmark).

These figures were all involved in algebraic geometry, rather than the pursuit of projective geometry as synthetic geometry, which during the period under discussion was a huge (in volume terms) but secondary subject (when judged by its importance as research).

The new algebraic geometry that would succeed the Italian school was distinguished also by the intensive use of algebraic topology. The founder of that tendency was Henri Poincaré; during the 1930s it was developed by Lefschetz, Hodge and Todd. The modern synthesis brought together their work, that of the Cartan school, and of W.L. Chow and Kunihiko Kodaira, with the traditional material.

This section does not cite any sources. (December 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) |

In the earlier years of the Italian school under Castelnuovo, the standards of rigor were as high as most areas of mathematics. Under Enriques it gradually became acceptable to use somewhat more informal arguments instead of complete rigorous proofs, such as the "principle of continuity" saying that what is true up to the limit is true at the limit, a claim that had neither a rigorous proof nor even a precise statement. At first this did not matter too much, as Enriques's intuition was so good that essentially all the results he claimed were in fact correct, and using this more informal style of argument allowed him to produce spectacular results about algebraic surfaces. Unfortunately, from about 1930 onwards under Severi's leadership the standards of accuracy declined further, to the point where some of the claimed results were not just inadequately proved, but were hopelessly wrong. For example, in 1934 Severi claimed that the space of rational equivalence classes of cycles on an algebraic surface is finite-dimensional, but Mumford (1968) showed that this is false for surfaces of positive geometric genus, and in 1946 Severi published a paper claiming to prove that a degree-6 surface in 3-dimensional projective space has at most 52 nodes, but the Barth sextic has 65 nodes. Severi did not accept that his arguments were inadequate, leading to some acrimonious disputes as to the status of some results.

By about 1950 it had become too difficult to tell which of the results claimed were correct, and the informal intuitive school of algebraic geometry simply collapsed due to its inadequate foundations. From about 1950 to 1980 there was considerable effort to salvage as much as possible from the wreckage, and convert it into the rigorous algebraic style of algebraic geometry set up by Weil and Zariski. In particular in the 1960s Kodaira and Shafarevich and his students rewrote the Enriques classification of algebraic surfaces in a more rigorous style, and also extended it to all compact complex surfaces, while in the 1970s Fulton and MacPherson put the classical calculations of intersection theory on rigorous foundations.

- Babbit, Donald; Goodstein, Judith (August 2009), "Guido Castelnuovo and Francesco Severi: Two Personalities, Two Letters" (PDF),
*Notices of the American Mathematical Society*,**56**(7): 800-808, MR 2546822, Zbl 1221.01101. - Baker, H. F. (1926), "Corrado Segre",
*Journal of the London Mathematical Society*,**1**(4): 263-271, doi:10.1112/jlms/s1-1.4.263, JFM 52.0032.08. - Aldo Brigaglia (2001) "The creation and the persistence of national schools: The case of Italian algebraic geometry", Chapter 9 (pages 187–206) of
*Changing Images in Mathematics*, Umberto Bottazzini and Amy Delmedico editors, Routledge . - Aldo Brigaglia & Ciro Ciliberto (2004) "Remarks on the relations between the Italian and American schools of algebraic geometry in the first decades of the 20th century", Historia Mathematica 31:310–19.
- Brigaglia, Aldo; Ciliberto, Ciro; Pedrini, Claudio (2004), "The Italian school of algebraic geometry and Abel's legacy",
*The legacy of Niels Henrik Abel*, Berlin: Springer, pp. 295-347, ISBN 3-540-43826-2, MR 2077577 - Coolidge, J. L. (May-June 1927), "Corrado Segre",
*Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society*,**33**(3): 352-357, doi:10.1090/S0002-9904-1927-04373-7, JFM 53.0034.09, MR 1561376. - Guerraggio, Angelo; Nastasi, Pietro (2005),
*Italian mathematics between the two World Wars*, Science Networks. Historical Studies,**29**, Birkhäuser Verlag, ISBN 978-3-7643-6555-4, MR 2188015 - Mumford, David (1968), "Rational equivalence of 0-cycles on surfaces",
*Journal of Mathematics of Kyoto University*,**9**: 195-204, doi:10.1215/kjm/1250523940, ISSN 0023-608X, MR 0249428 - Vesentini, Edoardo (2005), "Beniamino Segre and Italian geometry" (PDF),
*Rendiconti di Matematica e delle sue Applicazioni*,**25**(2): 185-193, MR 2197882, Zbl 1093.01009.

- David Mumford email about the errors of the Italian algebraic geometry school under Severi
- Kevin Buzzard what mistakes did the Italian algebraic geometers actually make?
- A. Brigaglia, C. Ciliberto, & E. Sernesi Geometria algebraica italiana at University of Palermo.

This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Popular Products

Music Scenes

Popular Artists