Popular Science
Get Popular Science essential facts below. View Videos or join the Popular Science discussion. Add Popular Science to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
Popular Science

Popular science (also called pop-science or popsci) is an interpretation of science intended for a general audience. While science journalism focuses on recent scientific developments, popular science is more broad-ranging. It may be written by professional science journalists or by scientists themselves. It is presented in many forms, including books, film and television documentaries, magazine articles, and web pages.

Role

Popular science is a bridge between scientific literature as a professional medium of scientific research, and the realms of popular political and cultural discourse. The goal of the genre is often to capture the methods and accuracy of science, while making the language more accessible. Many science-related controversies are discussed in popular science books and publications, such as the long-running debates over biological determinism and the biological components of intelligence, stirred by popular books such as The Mismeasure of Man and The Bell Curve.[1]

The purpose of scientific literature is to inform and persuade peers as to the validity of observations and conclusions and the forensic efficacy of methods. Popular science attempts to inform and convince scientific outsiders (sometimes along with scientists in other fields) of the significance of data and conclusions and to celebrate the results. Statements in scientific literature are often qualified and tentative, emphasizing that new observations and results are consistent with and similar to established knowledge wherein qualified scientists are assumed to recognize the relevance. By contrast, popular science emphasizes uniqueness and generality, taking a tone of factual authority absent from the scientific literature. Comparisons between original scientific reports, derivative science journalism and popular science typically reveal at least some level of distortion and oversimplification which can often be quite dramatic, even with politically neutral scientific topics.[2]

Popular science literature can be written by non-scientists who may have a limited understanding of the subject they are interpreting and it can be difficult for non-experts to identify misleading popular science, which may also blur the boundaries between real science and pseudoscience. However, sometimes non-scientists with a fair scientific background and strong technical communication skills can make good popular science writers because of their ability to put themselves in the layperson's place more easily.

Common threads

Some usual features of popular science productions include:

  • Entertainment value or personal relevance to the audience
  • Emphasis on uniqueness and radicalness
  • Exploring ideas overlooked by specialists or falling outside of established disciplines
  • Generalized, simplified science concepts
  • Presented for an audience with little or no science background, hence explaining general concepts more thoroughly
  • Synthesis of new ideas that cross multiple fields and offer new applications in other academic specialties
  • Use of metaphors and analogies to explain difficult or abstract scientific concepts

Notable English-language popularizers of science

In alphabetical order by last name:

Some sources of popular science

Science media

Science in the headlines

News online

News agencies

Press

Daily newspapers

Weeklies

Fortnightlies

Monthlies

Bimonthlies

See also

Notes and references

  1. ^ Murdz William McRae, "Introduction: Science in Culture" in The Literature of Science, pp. 1-3, 10-11
  2. ^ Jeanne Fahnestock, "Accommodating Science: The Rhetorical Life of Scientific Facts" in The Literature of Science, pp. 17-36
  3. ^ Dawkins, Richard (2008). The Oxford book of modern science writing. Oxford [Oxfordshire]: Oxford University Press. p. 179. ISBN 0-19-921680-0.
  4. ^ Editorial (October 1987). "Peter Medawar (obituary)". New Scientist. 116 (1581): 16.
  5. ^ "Pharyngula". Scienceblogs.com. 2011-11-04. Retrieved .
  6. ^ "The Loom". Blogs.discovermagazine.com. Retrieved .
  7. ^ "ABC Science". Retrieved .
  8. ^ "BBC Nature". Retrieved .
  9. ^ "BBC Science". Retrieved .
  10. ^ "BEYOND: Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science". Retrieved .
  11. ^ "CASW". Retrieved .
  12. ^ "Science & Technology". Retrieved .
  13. ^ "60 Minutes: Health & Science". Retrieved .
  14. ^ "60 Minutes: Nature". Retrieved .
  15. ^ "This Morning: HealthWatch". Retrieved .
  16. ^ "Evening News: Health". Retrieved .
  17. ^ "Sunday Morning: Nature". Retrieved .
  18. ^ "Discovery Radio Programme". Retrieved .
  19. ^ "Discovery Podcasts". Retrieved .
  20. ^ "Inside Science". Retrieved .
  21. ^ "Inside Science (AIP)". Retrieved .
  22. ^ "ITV Science News". Retrieved .
  23. ^ "Leading Edge". Retrieved .
  24. ^ "The Life Scientific". Retrieved .
  25. ^ "MITnews:science". Retrieved .
  26. ^ "Nature online"
  27. ^ "NBC Science". Retrieved .
  28. ^ "NBC Technology". Retrieved .
  29. ^ "NBC Health". Retrieved .
  30. ^ "Behind the Headlines ¬ Your guide to the science that makes the news"
  31. ^ "PBS Science & Nature". Retrieved .
  32. ^ "PBS NewsHour: Science". Retrieved .
  33. ^ "Nova: science in the news". Retrieved .
  34. ^ "CBCnews Technology & Science". Retrieved .
  35. ^ "The Ri Channel". Retrieved .
  36. ^ "Science Fantastic with Michio Kaku News/Audio/Video/About/Listen Live". Talk Radio Network. Retrieved .
  37. ^ "NPR Science". Retrieved .
  38. ^ "The Science Hour". Retrieved .
  39. ^ "The Science Hour Podcasts". Retrieved .
  40. ^ "Online Science"
  41. ^ "Science Niblets". Retrieved .
  42. ^ "Science & Technology News - Latest in scientific breakthroughs and gadgets - VOA News". Retrieved .
  43. ^ "Science World". Retrieved .
  44. ^ "WIRED Science". Retrieved .
  45. ^ "WIRED Science Blogs". Retrieved .
  46. ^ "WIRED UK Science". Archived from the original on 2012-07-08. Retrieved .
  47. ^ "Latest News from Science"

Bibliography

  • McRae, Murdo William (editor). The Literature of Science: Perspectives on Popular Scientific Writing. The University of Georgia Press: Athens, 1993. ISBN 0-8203-1506-0

  This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Popular_science
 



 



 
Music Scenes