Quantization (physics)

Get Quantization Physics essential facts below. View Videos or join the Quantization Physics discussion. Add Quantization Physics to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
## Quantization methods

### Canonical quantization

### Quantization schemes

### Covariant canonical quantization

### Deformation quantization

### Geometric quantization

### Loop quantization

### Path integral quantization

### Quantum statistical mechanics approach

### Schwinger's variational approach

## See also

## References

## Notes

This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Quantization Physics

In physics, **quantization** (in British English **quantisation**) is the process of transition from a classical understanding of physical phenomena to a newer understanding known as quantum mechanics. It is a procedure for constructing a quantum field theory starting from a classical field theory. This is a generalization of the procedure for building quantum mechanics from classical mechanics. Also related is **field quantization**, as in the "quantization of the electromagnetic field", referring to photons as field "quanta" (for instance as light quanta). This procedure is basic to theories of particle physics, nuclear physics, condensed matter physics, and quantum optics.

Quantization converts classical fields into operators acting on quantum states of the field theory. The lowest energy state is called the vacuum state. The reason for quantizing a theory is to deduce properties of materials, objects or particles through the computation of quantum amplitudes, which may be very complicated. Such computations have to deal with certain subtleties called renormalization, which, if neglected, can often lead to nonsense results, such as the appearance of infinities in various amplitudes. The full specification of a quantization procedure requires methods of performing renormalization.

The first method to be developed for quantization of field theories was canonical quantization. While this is extremely easy to implement on sufficiently simple theories, there are many situations where other methods of quantization yield more efficient procedures for computing quantum amplitudes. However, the use of canonical quantization has left its mark on the language and interpretation of quantum field theory.

Canonical quantization of a field theory is analogous to the construction of quantum mechanics from classical mechanics. The classical field is treated as a dynamical variable called the canonical coordinate, and its time-derivative is the canonical momentum. One introduces a commutation relation between these which is exactly the same as the commutation relation between a particle's position and momentum in quantum mechanics. Technically, one converts the field to an operator, through combinations of creation and annihilation operators. The field operator acts on quantum states of the theory. The lowest energy state is called the vacuum state. The procedure is also called second quantization.

This procedure can be applied to the quantization of any field theory: whether of fermions or bosons, and with any internal symmetry. However, it leads to a fairly simple picture of the vacuum state and is not easily amenable to use in some quantum field theories, such as quantum chromodynamics which is known to have a complicated vacuum characterized by many different condensates.

Even within the setting of canonical quantization, there is difficulty associated to quantizing arbitrary observables on the classical phase space. This is the *ordering ambiguity*: Classically the position and momentum variables *x* and *p* commute, but their quantum mechanical counterparts do not. Various *quantization schemes* have been proposed to resolve this ambiguity,^{[1]} of which the most popular is the Weyl quantization scheme. Nevertheless, the *Groenewold-van Hove theorem* says that no perfect quantization scheme exists. Specifically, if the quantizations of *x* and *p* are taken to be the usual position and momentum operators, then no quantization scheme can perfectly reproduce the Poisson bracket relations among the classical observables.^{[2]} See Groenewold's theorem for one version of this result.

There is a way to perform a canonical quantization without having to resort to the non covariant approach of foliating spacetime and choosing a Hamiltonian. This method is based upon a classical action, but is different from the functional integral approach.

The method does not apply to all possible actions (for instance, actions with a noncausal structure or actions with gauge "flows"). It starts with the classical algebra of all (smooth) functionals over the configuration space. This algebra is quotiented over by the ideal generated by the Euler-Lagrange equations. Then, this quotient algebra is converted into a Poisson algebra by introducing a Poisson bracket derivable from the action, called the Peierls bracket. This Poisson algebra is then -deformed in the same way as in canonical quantization.

There is also a way to quantize actions with gauge "flows". It involves the Batalin-Vilkovisky formalism, an extension of the BRST formalism.

In mathematical physics, geometric quantization is a mathematical approach to defining a quantum theory corresponding to a given classical theory. It attempts to carry out quantization, for which there is in general no exact recipe, in such a way that certain analogies between the classical theory and the quantum theory remain manifest. For example, the similarity between the Heisenberg equation in the Heisenberg picture of quantum mechanics and the Hamilton equation in classical physics should be built in.

One of the earliest attempts at a natural quantization was Weyl quantization, proposed by Hermann Weyl in 1927. Here, an attempt is made to associate a quantum-mechanical observable (a self-adjoint operator on a Hilbert space) with a real-valued function on classical phase space. The position and momentum in this phase space are mapped to the generators of the Heisenberg group, and the Hilbert space appears as a group representation of the Heisenberg group. In 1946, H. J. Groenewold^{[3]} considered the product of a pair of such observables and asked what the corresponding function would be on the classical phase space. This led him to discover the phase-space star-product of a pair of functions.
More generally, this technique leads to deformation quantization, where the ?-product is taken to be a deformation of the algebra of functions on a symplectic manifold or Poisson manifold. However, as a natural quantization scheme (a functor), Weyl's map is not satisfactory. For example, the Weyl map of the classical angular-momentum-squared is not just the quantum angular momentum squared operator, but it further contains a constant term 3?2/2. (This extra term is actually physically significant, since it accounts for the nonvanishing angular momentum of the ground-state Bohr orbit in the hydrogen atom.^{[4]}^{[clarification needed]} As a mere representation change, however, Weyl's map underlies the alternate Phase space formulation of conventional quantum mechanics.

A more geometric approach to quantization, in which the classical phase space can be a general symplectic manifold, was developed in the 1970s by Bertram Kostant and Jean-Marie Souriau. The method proceeds in two stages.^{[5]} First, once constructs a "prequantum Hilbert space" consisting of square-integrable functions (or, more properly, sections of a line bundle) over the phase space. Here one can construct operators satisfying commutation relations corresponding exactly to the classical Poisson-bracket relations. On the other hand, this prequantum Hilbert space is too big to be physically meaningful. One then restricts to functions (or sections) depending on half the variables on the phase space, yielding the quantum Hilbert space.

See Loop quantum gravity.

A classical mechanical theory is given by an action with the permissible configurations being the ones which are extremal with respect to functional variations of the action. A quantum-mechanical description of the classical system can also be constructed from the action of the system by means of the path integral formulation.

See Schwinger's quantum action principle.

- First quantization
- Feynman path integral
- Light front quantization
- Photon polarization
- Quantum Hall effect
- Quantum number

- Abraham, R. & Marsden (1985):
*Foundations of Mechanics*, ed. Addison-Wesley, ISBN 0-8053-0102-X. - G. Giachetta, L. Mangiarotti, G. Sardanashvily,
*Geometric and Algebraic Topological Methods in Quantum Mechanics*(World Scientific, 2005) ISBN 981-256-129-3. - Hall, Brian C. (2013),
*Quantum Theory for Mathematicians*, Graduate Texts in Mathematics,**267**, Springer - M. Peskin, D. Schroeder,
*An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory*(Westview Press, 1995) ISBN 0-201-50397-2 - Weinberg, Steven,
*The Quantum Theory of Fields*(3 volumes) - Ali, S. T., & Engli?, M. (2005). "Quantization methods: a guide for physicists and analysts".
*Reviews in Mathematical Physics***17**(04), 391-490. arXiv:math-ph/0405065 - Todorov, Ivan (2012). "Quantization is a mystery." arXiv preprint arXiv:1206.3116 (2012).

**^**Hall 2013 Chapter 13**^**Hall 2013 Theorem 13.13**^**Groenewold, H.J. (1946). "On the principles of elementary quantum mechanics".*Physica*.**12**(7): 405-460. Bibcode:1946Phy....12..405G. doi:10.1016/S0031-8914(46)80059-4. ISSN 0031-8914.**^**Dahl, Jens Peder; Schleich, Wolfgang P. (2002). "Concepts of radial and angular kinetic energies".*Physical Review A*.**65**(2): 022109. arXiv:quant-ph/0110134. Bibcode:2002PhRvA..65b2109D. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.65.022109. ISSN 1050-2947. S2CID 39409789.**^**Hall 2013 Chapters 22 and 23

This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Popular Products

Music Scenes

Popular Artists