Warning: Use of undefined constant total - assumed 'total' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/adddocom/public_html/s2/lib/db/youtube.php on line 221
Talk:Tragic Overture (Brahms) Resource | Learn About, Share and Discuss Talk:Tragic Overture (Brahms) At Popflock.com
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/adddocom/public_html/s2/lib/cm/ma.php:1) in /home/adddocom/public_html/s2/lib/mpr.php on line 332




Talk:Tragic Overture (Brahms)
Get Talk:Tragic Overture Brahms essential facts below. View Videos or join the Talk:Tragic Overture Brahms discussion. Add Talk:Tragic Overture Brahms to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
Talk:Tragic Overture Brahms
WikiProject Classical music
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
 

Jackson and Webster?

"Theorists have disagreed in analyzing the form of the piece: Jackson finds Webster's multifarious description rather obscurist..."

Maybe this is something that "any fan of Brahms" or "any classical music scholar" would know - and Jackson is footnoted - but my reaction to this sentence was "Who the h*ll are Jackson and Webster?"

I don't know enough to answer my own question and hence don't know enough to provide the needed edit. I imagine an improvement would be something like:

Theorists have disageed in analyzing the form of the piece. Historically Bigglesworth M. Webster's analysis of the piece as XXXXXXX has held sway, but Timothy L. Jackson finds Webster's multifarious description rather obscurist and prefers to label the work's form as a "reversed sonata design" in which the second group is recapitulated before the first, with Beethoven's Coriolan Overture as a possible formal model.[1]

Preferably with links to entries on Mr. Webster and Mr. Jackson so we can find out why we should care about their opinions. --Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.26.224.50 (talk) 12:12, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Well, you were able to figure out that Webster and Jackson are music theorists. But still, this could be clearer. My main motivation for adding that paragraph almost two months ago was that I didn't see some tagging idiot slap on an "unreferenced" tag. But I guess now they could slap on a "jargon" tag. Willi Gers07 (talk) 19:51, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

  This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Talk:Tragic_Overture_(Brahms)
 



 



 
Music Scenes