The roots of verbs and most nouns in the Semitic languages are characterized as a sequence of consonants or "radicals" (hence the term consonantal root). Such abstract consonantal roots are used in the formation of actual words by adding the vowels and non-root consonants (or "transfixes") which go with a particular morphological category around the root consonants, in an appropriate way, generally following specific patterns. It is a peculiarity of Semitic linguistics that a large majority of these consonantal roots are triliterals (although there are a number of quadriliterals, and in some languages also biliterals).
The following are some of the forms which can be derived from the triconsonantal root k-t-b (general overall meaning "to write") in Hebrew and Arabic:
Note: The Hebrew fricatives transcribed as "?" and "?" can also be transcribed in a number of other ways, such as "ch" and "v" , which are pronounced and , respectively. They are transliterated "?" and "?" on this page to retain the connection with the pure consonantal root k-t-b. Also notice that in Modern Hebrew, there is no gemination.
|Semitological abbreviation||Hebrew name||Arabic name||Morphological category||Hebrew Form||Arabic form||Approximate translation|
|G verb stem||
pa'al (or qal)
|3rd. masc. sing perfect||kata? ||kataba||"he wrote"|
|1st. plur. perfect||kata?nu ||katabn?||"we wrote"|
|3rd. masc. sing. imperfect||yi?to? ||yaktubu ?||"he writes, will write"|
|1st. plur. imperfect||ni?to? ||naktubu ?||"we write, will write"|
|masc. sing. active participle||kote? ?||k?tib ?||"writer"|
|? verb stem||
|3rd. masc. sing perfect||hi?ti? ||aktaba ?||"he dictated"|
|3rd. masc. sing. imperfect||ya?ti? ||yuktibu ?||"he dictates, will dictate"|
|?t(D) verb stem||?
|3rd. masc. sing perfect||hitkatte? ||istaktaba||"he corresponded" (Hebrew), "he asked (someone) to write (something), had a copy made" (Arabic)|
|3rd. masc. sing. imperfect||yitkatte? ||yastaktibu||(imperfect of above)|
|Noun with m- prefix and original short vowels||mip?'al
|singular||mi?ta? ?||maktab ?||"letter" (Hebrew), "office" (Arabic)|
In Hebrew grammatical terminology, the word binyan (Hebrew: ?, plural binyanim) is used to refer to a verb derived stem or overall verb derivation pattern, while the word mishqal (or mishkal) is used to refer to a noun derivation pattern, and these words have gained some use in English-language linguistic terminology. The Arabic terms, called wazn (plural , awz?n) for the pattern and ja?r (plural ?, jur) for the root have not gained the same currency in cross-linguistic Semitic scholarship as the Hebrew equivalents, and Western grammarians continue to use "stem"/"form"/"pattern" for the former and "root" for the latter--though "form" and "pattern" are accurate translations of the Arabic grammatical term wazn (originally meaning 'weight, measure'), and "root" is a literal translation of ja?r.
Although most roots in Hebrew seem to be triliteral, many of them were originally biliteral, cf. the relation between:
as well as between:
|||?p-r-z||divide a city|
|||?p-r-r||crumble into pieces|
|||?p-r-'||pay a debt |
The Hebrew root - ?sh-q-p "look out/through" deriving from - ?q-p "bend, arch, lean towards" and similar verbs fit into the shaCCéC verb-pattern.
This verb-pattern sh-C-C is usually causative, cf.
| - ?sh-?-p 'wash, rinse, make wet', from - -p 'wet'|
| - ?sh-l-k 'cast off, throw down, cause to go' from - ?l-k 'go'".|
According to a study of the Proto-Semitic lexicon, biconsonantal roots are more abundant for words denoting Stone Age materials, whereas materials discovered during the Neolithic are uniquely triconsonantal. This implies a change in Proto-Semitic language structure concomitant with the transition to agriculture. In particular monosyllabic biconsonantal names are associated with a pre-Natufian cultural background, more than 16,500 years ago. As we have no texts from any Semitic language older than 5,500 years ago, reconstructions of Proto-Semitic are inferred from these more recent Semitic texts.
A quadriliteral is a consonantal root containing a sequence of four consonants (instead of three consonants, as is more often the case). A quadriliteral form is a word derived from such a four-consonant root. For example, the abstract quadriliteral root t-r-g-m / t-r-j-m gives rise to the verb forms ? tirgem in Hebrew, ? tarjama in Arabic, ? "täräggwämä" in Amharic, all meaning "he translated". In some cases, a quadriliteral root is actually a reduplication of a two-consonant sequence. So in Hebrew ? digdeg means "he tickled", and in Arabic zilz?l means "earthquake".
Generally, only a subset of the verb derivations formed from triliteral roots are allowed with quadriliteral roots. For example, in Hebrew, the Pi?el, Pu?al, and Hi?pa?el, and in Arabic, forms similar to the stem II and stem V forms of triliteral roots.
Another set of quadriliteral roots in modern Hebrew is the set of secondary roots. A secondary root is a root derived from word that was derived from another root. For example, the root ?-?-?-? m-s-p-r is secondary to the root ?-?-? s-p-r. saphar, from the root s-p-r, means "counted"; mispar, from the same root, means "number"; and misper, from the secondary root ?-?-?-?, means "numbered".
An irregular quadriliteral verb made from a loanword is:
Traditionally, in the Semitic languages, forms with more than four basic consonants (i.e. consonants not introduced by morphological inflection or derivation) were occasionally found in nouns, mainly in loanwords from other languages, but never in verbs. However, in modern Israeli Hebrew, syllables are allowed to begin with a sequence of two consonants (a relaxation of the situation in early Semitic, where only one consonant was allowed), which has opened the door for a very small set of loan words to manifest apparent five root-consonant forms, such as tilgref "he telegraphed". However, -lgr- always appears as an indivisible cluster in the derivation of this verb and so the five root-consonant forms do not display any fundamentally different morphological patterns from four root-consonant forms (and the term "quinqueliteral" or "quinquiliteral" would be misleading if it implied otherwise).
Other examples are:
In Amharic, there is a very small set of verbs which are conjugated as quinquiliteral roots. One example is wä?änäffärä 'rain fell with a strong wind' The conjugation of this small class of verb roots is explained by Wolf Leslau. Unlike the Hebrew examples, these roots conjugate in a manner more like regular verbs, producing no indivisible clusters.