User Talk:62.190.148.115
Get User Talk:62.190.148.115 essential facts below. View Videos or join the User Talk:62.190.148.115 discussion. Add User Talk:62.190.148.115 to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
User Talk:62.190.148.115

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

In addition, your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. If you need help, check out popflock.com Resource: Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! SarahStierch (talk) 05:33, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Information icon Hello, I'm Flyer22. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Christian Benteke, because it didn't appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Flyer22 (talk) 10:47, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

December 2013

Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I noticed that you made a change to an article, West Cheshire College, but you didn't provide a source. I've removed it for now, but if you'd like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wikipelli Talk 16:43, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

February 2015

Information icon Hello, I'm TerryAlex. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Ligue 1 because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. TerryAlex (talk) 18:47, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2015

Reference errors on 8 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Information icon Hello, I'm Zppix. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Daria Morgendorffer has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. (Z)(p)(p)(i)(x) (talk) 21:54, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Cold Six Thousand. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dan Koehl (talk) 19:09, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2016

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. -- Half past formerly SUFCboy 00:13, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

May 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Hearst Castle  with this edit, without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to popflock.com resource with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi. I am NOT the person who keeps blanking sections of articles without giving a reason, but I share the same IP address and so I suspect I work in the same office as him/her. Would it be at all helpful if I take ownership of the problem and simply revert on sight any of their edits? 62.190.148.115 (talk) 08:44, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

RE: The Dalek Invasion of Earth

You would need a source that says the ambiguous line of dialogue in Genesis is in any way referring to Invasion, otherwise it would be an original interpretation, which is original research. DonQuixote (talk) 15:25, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at RISSP.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Josvan Talk 07:41, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2017

Information icon Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions --the one you made with this edit to Dick Tracy-- because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU (?) 20:52, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dick Tracy. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ??? ? 20:57, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2018

Information icon Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions --the one you made with this edit to K. K. Nagar, Chennai-- because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:11, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm another user on the same IP address. I reverted an edit to Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly election, 2006 made on this IP address, probably by the same person who did your K. K. Nagar, Chennai edit. If I do find the person in real life who is doing these edits (and since they're on the same IP as me, I imagine they're in proximity to me) I shall deal with them myself most firmly. 62.190.148.115 (talk) 15:42, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tweenies, you may be blocked from editing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:06, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

March 2018

Information icon Hello. Your recent edit to List of Lingayats appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 17:24, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm RA0808. I noticed that in this edit to American Tabloid, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to popflock.com resource with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 17:55, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The Cold Six Thousand, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 17:55, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi to all of the above. Another user on the same IP address as my workplace keeps on blanking stuff. I have taken ownership of this individual and normally revert his/her work on sight but have been on holiday from the past couple of weeks. Now I am back, I should be able to deal with the person's efforts more quickly. I have reverted their last two deletions just now. 62.190.148.115 (talk) 10:08, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

Information icon Hello, I'm Kirbanzo. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The War Games have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Kirbanzo (talk) 16:48, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
I've replied to you on your talk page about this one, but the plot reaqlly does not make it clear who the War Lord character is - it just suddenly mentions him without context. 62.190.148.115 (talk) 16:57, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Four Horsemen (professional wrestling). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kirbanzo (talk) 16:52, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
"Pretty" was never part of Paul Roma's official ring name - it should not have been written like that. I've come up with an alternative. 62.190.148.115 (talk) 16:57, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

May 2018

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Madonna. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Bennv3771 (talk) 11:54, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

This wasn't me but I'll keep an eye out for any similar edits this other person on the IP address does. Thank you. 62.190.148.115 (talk) 12:24, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

August 2018

Hello, I'm Oshwah. An edit you recently made to Gallagher Group (UK) seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:59, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Information icon Hello, I'm JC7V7DC5768. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to popflock.com resource with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. JC7V-constructive zone 06:45, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2018

Information icon Hello, I'm Mdriscoll03. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions --specifically this edit to List of ballooning accidents-- because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Mdriscoll03 (talk) 15:49, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

January 2019

Please use correct citation format

Hello, please use correct citation format when adding references to the Women in punk rock article. In recent weeks many bare URLs WP:BURL have been added. Please see the policy at WP:BAREURL. Bare URLs are subject to link rot. These types of edits can make unnecessary work for other editors. To keep the quality of this article high, please comply with the Manual of Style WP:MOS-REF article on referencing. Citing sources information found here: WP:CS. A notice was put on the article talk page about a week ago, but has apparently gone unnoticed. Thank you. Netherzone (talk) 14:37, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Re: your comment on the article talk page: We have a common interest in improving this article. Please bear in mind that other editors will have to clean up these bare citations, and that they also have busy lives, jobs, families and limited time to make edits. I'm not sure what is meant by "often on the sly in the workplace" however, that sounds like your personal choice and should not affect the quality of the article. Here is some information from the popflock.com resource content guidelines WP:CS, please review it: Each article should use one citation method or style throughout. If an article already has citations, preserve consistency by using that method or seek consensus on the talk page before changing it (the principle is reviewed at § Variation in citation methods). While you should try to write citations correctly, what matters most is that you provide enough information to identify the source. I'm requesting that you kindly keep the citations consistent. Here is the popflock.com resource guideline on web citations WP:CITEWEB, it will be appreciated if this style is used: Citations for World Wide Web pages typically include: URL, name of the author(s), title of the article within quotation marks, title or domain name of the website, publisher, date of publication, retrieval date. Thank you in advance. Netherzone (talk) 01:16, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

IsraellyCool

Do not use IsraellyCool as a source on any popflock.com resource article. It is a blog with a "submit a post" section and no editorial oversight. You have been warned.--NØ 12:14, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

As noted in my Edit summary, if you click on that "Submit Post" button it says, "Aussie Dave will review the submission and post it if it meets our high quality standards." So in other words, it's moderated, not user-generated. Even if they are soliciting for contributors, there is still Editorial Oversight at work, (In any case Aussie Dave himself wrote that particular piece) 62.190.148.115 (talk) 16:19, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Prince Charming (Adam and the Ants song)

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Prince Charming (Adam and the Ants song). Binksternet (talk) 19:15, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

I did include a source, the same one as used for other B-side sections on articles on other Adam and the Ants singles. However if you don't think that was a good enough source then fair enough, I won't contest your reversion.62.190.148.115 (talk) 11:13, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

Information icon Hello, I'm Younotmenotyou. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Veet have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Younotmenotyou (talk) 14:17, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

dusty finish

I think its different. a dusty finish is when the referee saw something and the result is reverted, all inside the storyline. for exaple, batista beating undertaker in a chairs match. however, the rockers is a real life situation, wwe gave them the titles but, because a real life situation, wwe gave back the titles to the hart foundation and gave a storyline reason. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 12:47, 3 August 2019 (UTC)


  This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

User_talk:62.190.148.115
 



 



 
Music Scenes