User Talk:Lowellian
Get User Talk:Lowellian essential facts below. View Videos or join the User Talk:Lowellian discussion. Add User Talk:Lowellian to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
User Talk:Lowellian

Lowellian's User Talk Page: Please leave new comments at the bottom of this page.

  • If you want me to respond quickly on some issue, it is best to post your responses on my Talk page, as I usually do not use my watchlist.

Please do...

  • ...notify me if an article I have edited is listed for deletion.

Please do not...

  • ...ask me about my personal life, which I keep separate from Wikipedia.

Thanks! --Lowellian

Proposed deletion of Marisol Padilla Sánchez

Notice

The article Marisol Padilla Sánchez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable actor with only minor credits. IMDB has been used as the only source for many years. No evidence of substantial sources available to help improve the article.

While all constructive contributions to popflock.com resource are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 09:45, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Marisol Padilla Sánchez for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marisol Padilla Sánchez is suitable for inclusion in popflock.com resource according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at popflock.com Resource: Articles for deletion/Marisol Padilla Sánchez until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 15:22, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

"popflock.com Resource: Monobook" listed at Redirects for discussion

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect popflock.com Resource: Monobook. Since you had some involvement with the popflock.com Resource: Monobook redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. --J947 [cont] 06:24, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

"Sankoh" listed at Redirects for discussion

Information.svg

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Sankoh. The discussion will occur at popflock.com Resource: Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 27#Sankoh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:57, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cimmeria (Conan)

Notice

The article Cimmeria (Conan) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing popflock.com Resource: General notability guideline and the more detailed popflock.com Resource: Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant English-language coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to popflock.com resource are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:15, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Cimmeria (Conan) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cimmeria (Conan) is suitable for inclusion in popflock.com resource according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at popflock.com Resource: Articles for deletion/Cimmeria (Conan) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:52, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

RFD

See popflock.com Resource: Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_August_3#Best_president, you created one of the redirects there. Hog Farm Bacon 05:09, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

"Desperate Wives" listed at Redirects for discussion

Information.svg A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Desperate Wives. The discussion will occur at popflock.com Resource: Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 19#Desperate Wives until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:33, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fundamental theorems

Notice

The article Fundamental theorems has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

As per WP:INDISCRIMINATE: The only relationship between these theorems is their name. Also, the lead is WP:original synthesis, as trying to elaborate as a concept something that is not a concept.

While all constructive contributions to popflock.com resource are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. D.Lazard (talk) 06:46, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Scale of justice 2.svgHello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Cultural depictions of the dog

Hello. You moved Cultural depictions of the dog -> Cultural depictions of dogs. Thanks. But, please move the talk page too. Christian75 (talk) 11:44, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

@User:Christian75: Thank you for bringing this to my attention. Talk page was not automatically moved due to there being existing page history for the target. I've fixed it now, merging the page histories and restoring all comments for both talk pages. --Lowellian (reply) 18:13, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

  This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

User_talk:Lowellian
 



 



 
Music Scenes