This article includes a list of references, but its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations. (October 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
|Ethnicity||West Germanic peoples|
|Originally between the Rhine, Alps, Elbe, and North Sea; today worldwide|
|Linguasphere||52-AB & 52-AC|
The three most prevalent West Germanic languages are English, German, and Dutch. The family also includes other High and Low German languages including Afrikaans and Yiddish (which are daughter languages of Dutch and German, respectively), in addition to other Franconian languages, like Luxembourgish, and Ingvaeonic (North Sea Germanic) languages next to English, such as the Frisian languages and Scots. Additionally, several creoles, patois, and pidgins are based on Dutch and English as they were languages of colonial empires.
The West Germanic languages share many lexemes not existing in North Germanic and/or East Germanic--archaisms as well as common neologisms.
Most scholars doubt that there was a Proto-West-Germanic proto-language common to the West Germanic languages and no others, though a few maintain that Proto-West-Germanic existed. Most agree that after East Germanic broke off (an event usually dated to the 2nd or 1st century BC), the remaining Germanic languages, the Northwest Germanic languages, divided into four main dialects: North Germanic, and the three groups conventionally called "West Germanic", namely
Although there is quite a bit of knowledge about North Sea Germanic or Anglo-Frisian (due to characteristic features of its daughter languages, Anglo-Saxon/Old English and Old Frisian), linguists know almost nothing about "Weser-Rhine Germanic" and "Elbe Germanic". In fact, these two terms were coined in the 1940s to refer to groups of archaeological findings rather than linguistic features. Only later were these terms applied to hypothetical dialectal differences within both regions. Even today, the very small number of Migration Period runic inscriptions from this area--many of them illegible, unclear or consisting only of one word, often a name--is insufficient to identify linguistic features specific to the two supposed dialect groups.
Evidence that East Germanic split off before the split between North and West Germanic comes from a number of linguistic innovations common to North and West Germanic, including:
Under this view, the properties that the West Germanic languages have in common separate from the North Germanic languages are not necessarily inherited from a "Proto-West-Germanic" language, but may have spread by language contact among the Germanic languages spoken in central Europe, not reaching those spoken in Scandinavia or reaching them much later. Rhotacism, for example, was largely complete in West Germanic at a time when North Germanic runic inscriptions still clearly distinguished the two phonemes. There is also evidence that the lowering of ? to ? occurred first in West Germanic and spread to North Germanic later, since word-final ? was lowered before it was shortened in West Germanic, whereas in North Germanic the shortening occurred first, resulting in e that later merged with i. However, there are also a number of common archaisms in West Germanic shared by neither Old Norse nor Gothic. Some authors who support the concept of a West Germanic proto-language claim that not only shared innovations can require the existence of a linguistic clade but that there can be also archaisms that cannot be explained simply as retentions later lost in the North and/or East because this assumption can produce contradictions with attested features of these other branches.
The debate on the existence of a Proto-West-Germanic clade was recently summarized:
That North Germanic is .. a unitary subgroup [of Proto-Germanic] is completely obvious, as all of its dialects shared a long series of innovations, some of them very striking. That the same is true of West Germanic has been denied, but I will argue in vol. ii that all the West Germanic languages share several highly unusual innovations that virtually force us to posit a West Germanic clade. On the other hand, the internal subgrouping of both North Germanic and West Germanic is very messy, and it seems clear that each of those subfamilies diversified into a network of dialects that remained in contact for a considerable period of time (in some cases right up to the present).
Several scholars have published reconstructions of Proto-West-Germanic morphological paradigms and many authors have reconstructed individual Proto-West-Germanic morphological forms or lexemes. The first comprehensive reconstruction of the Proto-West-Germanic language was published in 2013 by Wolfram Euler.
If indeed Proto-West-Germanic existed, it must have been between the 2nd and 4th centuries. Until the late 2nd century AD, the language of runic inscriptions found in Scandinavia and in Northern Germany were so similar that Proto-North-Germanic and the Western dialects in the south were still part of one language ("Proto-Northwest-Germanic"). After that, the split into West and North Germanic occurred. By the 4th and 5th centuries the great migration set in which probably help diversify the West Germanic family even more.
It has been argued that, judging by their nearly identical syntax, the West Germanic dialects were closely enough related to have been mutually intelligible up to the 7th century. Over the course of this period, the dialects diverged successively. The High German consonant shift that occurred mostly during the 7th century AD in what is now southern Germany, Austria, and Switzerland can be considered the end of the linguistic unity among the West Germanic dialects, although its effects on their own should not be overestimated. Bordering dialects very probably continued to be mutually intelligible even beyond the boundaries of the consonant shift. In fact, many dialects of Limburgish and Ripuarian are still mutually intelligible today.
During the Early Middle Ages, the West Germanic languages were separated by the insular development of Old and Middle English on one hand, and by the High German consonant shift on the continent on the other.
The High German consonant shift distinguished the High German languages from the other West Germanic languages. By early modern times, the span had extended into considerable differences, ranging from Highest Alemannic in the South (the Walliser dialect being the southernmost surviving German dialect) to Northern Low Saxon in the North. Although both extremes are considered German, they are not mutually intelligible. The southernmost varieties have completed the second sound shift, whereas the northern dialects remained unaffected by the consonant shift.
Of modern German varieties, Low German is the one that most resembles modern English. The district of Angeln (or Anglia), from which the name English derives, is in the extreme northern part of Germany between the Danish border and the Baltic coast. The area of the Saxons (parts of today's Schleswig-Holstein and Lower Saxony) lay south of Anglia. The Anglo-Saxons, two Germanic tribes, were a combination of a number of peoples from northern Germany and the Jutland Peninsula.
Note that divisions between subfamilies of continental Germanic languages are rarely precisely defined; most form dialect continua, with adjacent dialects being mutually intelligible and more separated ones not.
The following table shows a list of various linguistic features and their extent among the West Germanic languages. Some may only appear in the older languages but are no longer apparent in the modern languages.
|Old English||Old Frisian||Old Saxon||Old Dutch||Old Central
|Palatalisation of velars||Yes||Yes||No||No||No||No|
|Unrounding of front rounded vowels||Yes||Yes||No||No||No||No|
|Loss of intervocalic *-h-||Yes||Yes||Developing||Yes||Developing||No|
|Class II weak verb ending *-(?)ja-||Yes||Yes||Sometimes||No||No||No|
|Merging of plural forms of verbs||Yes||Yes||Yes||No||No||No|
|Ingvaeonic nasal spirant law||Yes||Yes||Yes||Rare||No||No|
|Loss of the reflexive pronoun||Yes||Yes||Most dialects||Most dialects||No||No|
|Loss of final *-z in single-syllable words||Yes||Yes||Yes||Yes||No||No|
|Reduction of weak class III to four relics||Yes||Yes||Yes||Yes||No||No|
|Monophthongization of *ai, *au||Yes||Yes||Yes||Usually||Partial||Partial|
|Diphthongization of *?, *?||No||No||Rare||Yes||Yes||Yes|
|Loss of initial *h- before consonant||No||No||No||Yes||Yes||Developing|
|Loss of initial *w- before consonant||No||No||No||No||Most dialects||Yes|
|High German consonant shift||No||No||No||No||Partial||Yes|
The original vowel system of West Germanic was similar to that of Proto-Germanic; note however the lowering of the long front vowels.
The consonant system was also essentially the same as that of Proto-Germanic. Note, however, the particular changes described above, as well as West Germanic gemination.
The noun paradigms of Proto-West Germanic have been reconstructed as follows:
|Case||Nouns in -a- (m.)||Nouns in -ja-||Nouns in -ija-||Nouns in -a- (n.)||Nouns in -?-||Nouns in -i-||Nouns in -u-||Nouns in -u- (n.)|
|Nominative||*dag?||*dag?, -?s||*harj?||*harj?, -?s||*hirdij?||*hirdij?, -ij?s||*jok?||*joku||*gebu||*geb?||*gasti||*gast?||*sunu||*suniwi, -?||*fehu||(?)|
|Dative||*dag?||*dagum||*harj?||*harjum||*hirdij?||*hirdijum||*jok?||*jokum||*geb?||*geb?m||*gastim||*suniwi, -?||*sunum||*fehiwi, -?|
The following table compares a number of Frisian, English, Dutch and German words with common West Germanic (or older) origin. The grammatical gender of each term is noted as masculine (m.), feminine (f.), or neuter (n.) where relevant.
|West Frisian||English||Dutch||German||Old English||Old High German||Proto-West-Germanic||Proto-Germanic|
|kaam||comb||kam m.||Kamm m.||camb m.||camb m.||k?b? [see inscription of Erfurt-Frienstedt], *kamb? m.||*kambaz m.|
|dei||day||dag m.||Tag m.||dæ? m.||tag m.||*dag? m.||*dagaz m.|
|rein||rain||regen m.||Regen m.||re?n m.||regan m.||*regn? m.||*regnaz m.|
|wei||way||weg m.||Weg m.||we? m.||weg m.||*weg? m.||*wegaz m.|
|neil||nail||nagel m.||Nagel m.||næ?el m.||nagal m.||*nagl? m.||*naglaz m.|
|tsiis||cheese||kaas m.||Käse m.||se, ese m.||ch?si, k?si m.||*k?s? m.||*k?sijaz m. (late Proto-Germanic, from Latin c?seus)|
|kerk f.||Kirche f.||?iri?e f.||chirihha, *kirihha f.||*kirik? f.||*kirik? f. (from Ancient Greek kuriakón "belonging to the lord")|
|sibbe||sibling[note 1]||sibbe f.||Sippe f.||sibb f. "kinship, peace"||sippa f., Old Saxon: sibbia||sibbju, sibbj? f.||*sibj? f. "relationship, kinship, friendship"|
|kaai f.||key||sleutel m.||Schlüssel m.||c(e), c?ga f. "key, solution, experiment"||sluzzil m.||*slutil? m., *k?g? f.||*slutilaz m. "key"; *k?gaz, *k?guz f. "stake, post, pole"|
|ha west||have been||ben geweest||bin gewesen|
|twa skiep||two sheep||twee schapen n.||zwei Schafe n.||tw? sap n.||zwei sc?fa n.||*twai sk?pu n.||*twai(?) sk?p? n.|
|brea||bread||brood n.||Brot n.||br?ad n. "fragment, bit, morsel, crumb" also "bread"||br?t n.||*braud? m.||*braud? n. "cooked food, leavened bread"|
|hier||hair||haar n.||Haar n.||h?r, h?r n.||h?r n.||*h?r? n.||*h?r? n.|
|ear||ear||oor n.||Ohr n.||?are n. < pre-English *?ora||?ra n.||*aura < *auza n.||*auz?, *aus?n n.|
|doar||door||deur f.||Tür f.||duru f.||turi f.||*duru f.||*durz f.|
|swiet||sweet||zoet||süß||sw?te||s(w)uozi (< *sw?ti)||*sw?t?||*sw?tuz|
|wiet||wet||nat||nass||w?t||naz (< *nat)||*w?t? / *nat?||*w?taz / *nataz|
|each||eye||oog n.||Auge n.||?a?e n. < pre-English *?oga||ouga n.||*auga n.||*aug? n.|
|dream||dream||droom m.||Traum m.||dr?am m. "joy, pleasure, ecstasy, music, song"||troum m.||*draum? m.||*draumaz (< *draugmaz) m.|
|stien||stone||steen m.||Stein m.||st?n m.||stein m.||*stain? m.||*stainaz m.|
|bed||bed||bed n.||Bett n.||bedd n.||betti n.||*badj? n.||*badj? n.|
Other words, with a variety of origins:
|West Frisian||English||Dutch||German||Old English||Old High German||Proto-West-Germanic||Proto-Germanic|
ros n. (dated)
|Pferd n. / Ross n.||hors n. eoh m.||(h)ros n. / pfarifrit n. / ehu- (in compositions)||*hruss? n. / *ehu m.||*hruss? n., *ehwaz m.|
Note that some of the shown similarities of Frisian and English vis-à-vis Dutch and German are secondary and not due to a closer relationship between them. For example, the plural of the word for "sheep" was originally unchanged in all four languages and still is in some Dutch dialects and a great deal of German dialects. Many other similarities, however, are indeed old inheritances.