White Serbia
Get White Serbia essential facts below. View Videos or join the White Serbia discussion. Add White Serbia to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
White Serbia

White Serbia (Serbian: ? / Bela Srbija; Sorbian: Bio Srbsko), called also Boiki (Ancient Greek: , romanizedBoiki; Serbian: / Bojka; Sorbian: Boika), is the name applied to the assumed homeland of the White Serbs (Serbian: ? ? / Beli Srbi), a tribal subgroup of Wends, a mixed and the westernmost group of Early Slavs. They are the ancestors of the modern Serbs and Sorbs. Boiki is mentioned in De Administrando Imperio, a 10th-century work by Byzantine Emperor Constantine VII (r. 913-959). According to it, the "White Serbs" lived on the "other side of Turkey" (i.e. Hungary), in the area that they called "Boiki" (Bohemia). The area adjacent to it was Francia as well as White Croatia, from where the White Croats trace their origin.

Location

Sources

Constantine VII in De Administrando Imperio recounts in Chapter 32, "It should be known that the Serbs are descended from the unbaptized Serbs, also called 'white', who live beyond Turkey, in a region called by them Boïki, where their neighbor is Francia, as is also Megali Croatia, the unbaptized, also called 'white'. In this place, then, these Serbs also dwelt from the beginning... Now, after the two brothers succeeded their father in the rule of Serbia, one of them, taking one half of the folk, came as the refugee to Heraclius, the emperor of the Romaioi... Then, after some time these same Serbs decided to depart to their own homes, and the emperor sent them off. And so, when they had crossed the Danube River, they changed their minds and sent a request to the Emperor Heraclius... the emperor settled these same Serbs in these countries".[1][2]

In the 33rd chapter he says, "(It should be known) that the clan of the anthypatos and patrikios Michael, son of Visevitz, archon of the Zachlumians, came from the unbaptized inhabitants on the Visla River, called Litziki, and they settled on the river called Zachluma".[1][2]

A Latin document from the early 10th century said that the "Hungarians moved to Pannonia from Serbia (Ungarorum gens a Servia egressa in Pannoniam)". ?ivkovi? suggest that this likely refers to Boïki (Bohemia).[3]

Dispute

Theories on the location of the so-called "Boiki" and "White" Serbs have been disputed, but it is generally established to have been around the region of Bohemia and Saxony.[4][5][6][7][8] Since the 19th century, two most prominent theories were of Bohemia, and the land of the Boykos in Eastern Galicia in the Carpathians. The latter was mostly argued by 19th-century scholars, like Pavel Jozef ?afárik (1795-1865) and Henry Hoyle Howorth (1842-1923),[9] who also included the White Serbs among the Polabian Slavs.[10] Rather than relating Boiki and Bohemia, which in turn derived from ethnonym of the Celtic tribe Boii, they related the toponym to the much younger ethnonym of the Rusyns sub-ethnic group Boykos. Béni Kállay (1839-1903) noted that many historians assumed that Serbian territory was identical to the Czech lands (Bohemia) based on DAI's account and the name Bojka, but he also supported ?afárik's thesis.[11] Other scholars who had a similar opinion were Vladimir ?orovi? (1885-1941),[12] and Ljubivoje Cerovi? (b. 1936).[13] However, most scholars like Borivoje Drobnjakovi? (1890-1961),[14]Andreas Stratos (1905-1981),[6]Sima ?irkovi? (1929-2009),[15] and Relja Novakovi? (1911-2003) located them to the West in the area between the Elbe and Saale rivers, roughly between Bohemia and East Germany (Polabia).[16] According to Mykhailo Hrushevsky (1898), Gerard Labuda (1949), Gyula Moravcsik (1949), Jaroslav Rudnyckyj (1962-1972) and Henryk ?owmia?ski (1964) unlike Croats, there is no proof that Serbs ever lived within Bohemia or in Eastern Galicia, only that they lived near Bohemia, and the connection between Boiki and Boykos is considered to be scholarly outdated and rejected.[4][5][17][18]

According to archaeologist V. V. Sedov (1995), the 32nd chapter of De Administrando Imperio indicates it was located in the Lower Lusatia territory where were located the Sorbs,[19] but the 33rd chapter about Zachlumia caused confusion which resulted with several hypotheses.[20] The first group of scholars argued the homeland existed between rivers Elbe and Saale, the second in the upper course of rivers Vistula and Oder, and the third from Elbe and Saale to the upper course of Vistula.[20] However, Sedov concluded that the archaeological data does not confirm any of these hypotheses, and most plausible is the consideration by Lubor Niederle that there's no evidence that White Serbia ever existed and Constantine VII most probably made up Northern Great Serbia only according to the analogy with Great Croatia,[20] which by other historians also did not exist.[21] According to Tibor ?ivkovi?, the structure and content of the subchapter about the family of Michael of Zahumlje indicates that this account was likely told by Michael himself. He is not noted as being of Serbian origin. ?ivkovi? thought Michael's family may have preserved the memory of their tribal origin.[22]

Toponyms and antroponyms

Tadeusz Lewicki in his toponomastic research of Polish lands found many toponyms documented between 12th and 14th century with a root "Serb-" and "Sarb-" and defined them as both a trace and remnant population of the so-called White Serbs in DAI. Since the 13th and 15th centuries were recorded also personal names and surnames which possibly derive from the ethnonym. However, according to Hanna Popowska-Taborska, the method didn't take into account the unambiguous etymological interpretation of the Serbian ethnonym because of which most probably the majority of the toponyms don't derive from the ethnonym itself. Also, both ?owmia?ski and Popowska-Taborska found them and their abundance unusual which cannot reflect the early medieval great migration of the Slavs, and it rather describes the Sorbian population living on the Polish territory which was brought there from the Elbe river as captives by the Piast dynasty.[23][24]

Gallery

See also

References

  1. ^ a b ?ivkovi? 2012, p. 152-185.
  2. ^ a b Sedov 2013, p. 458-459.
  3. ^ ?ivkovi? 2012, p. 153.
  4. ^ a b Mykhailo Hrushevsky (1997) [1898]. Andrzej Poppe; Frank E. Sysyn; Uliana M. Pasiczny (eds.). History of Ukraine-Rus'. Volume 1: From Prehistory to the Eleventh Century. Translated by Marta Skorupsky. Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies Press. pp. 161-162. ISBN 978-1-895571-19-6. The second detail in Constantine's account, which supposedly points to the eastern Carpathians, is his reference to a 'place called Boiki (Boiki)' on the border with the White Serbs; for a long time this was considered -- and some consider it still - to be a reference to the Ukrainian Boikos. That is very unlikely, however, because the location is too far east for the Serbs, nor is there any indication that the name of the Boikos was ever in such wide usage. So all we are left with to suggest the existence of a Rus' Croatia in the Carpathians is the Primary Chronicle ... Published by H. Jireiek, the Karten zur Geschichte (1897) also show the 'Boiki' on the Dnister (map 4). It is more likely that Boiki is a distorted variant of the name Boiohem, or Bohemia, as most scholars now believe...
  5. ^ a b Gyula Moravcsik, ed. (1949). De administrando imperio. Pázmány Péter Tudományegyetemi Görög Filoogiai Intézet. pp. 130-131. ...should be modern Saxony, where remnants of Serbs (Sorbs) are still living. The name 'Boiki' has been much disputed over by specialists ... has proved that the 'place called Boiki' can only be Bohemia. Grégoire (L'Origine, 98) rejects Skok's proposal to read 'Boioi', and suggests 'Boimi'. C.'s account contains one serious inexactitude: namely, the statement that the Serbs lived 'in a place called by them Boiki'. Although we have documentation of Croats in Bohemia, we have none to suggest that Serbs lived there. Bohemia was in fact another neighbour of White Serbia
  6. ^ a b Andreas Nikolaou Stratos (1968). Byzantium in the seventh century. Adolf M. Hakkert. p. 326. These, he says, descended from the unbaptised Serbs who were also called "white" and lived in a place called by them "Boiki" (Bohemia)...
  7. ^ Acta archaeologica Carpathica. Pa?stwowe Wydawn. Naukowe. 1999. p. 163. Wielu spo?ród nich osiedlili królowie w?gierscy u zachodnich granic swego królestwa; morze Ciemne = Ba?tyk; Boiki = Bohemia, czyli Czechy...
  8. ^ Slavia antiqua. 44. Pozna? Society of Friends of Learning. 2003. p. 13. Serbów balkañskich znajdowala siç w kraju zwanym u nich Boiki (Bohemia=Czechy)...
  9. ^ Howorth, H. H. (1878). "The Spread of the Slaves. Part I. The Croats" (PDF). The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. 7: 326. doi:10.2307/2841009. JSTOR 2841009.
  10. ^ Howorth, H. H. (7 December 1880). "The Spread of the Slaves. Part III. The Northern Serbs or Sorabians and the Obodriti". The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. 9: 181-232. doi:10.2307/2841974. JSTOR 2841974.
  11. ^ Béni Kállay (1882). Istorija srpskoga naroda. Petar Cur?i?. p. 14.
  12. ^ ?orovi? 2001, ch. ? ? .
  13. ^ Ljubivoje Cerovi? (2002). Srbi u Ukrajini. Muzej Vojvodine. p. 13.
  14. ^ Borivoje M. Drobnjakovi? (1960). Etnologija naroda Jugoslavije. 1 (1960). Nau?na knjiga. p. 102.
  15. ^ ?irkovi? 2004, p. 17.
  16. ^ Vizantolo?ki institut (1996). Recueil de travaux de l'Institut des études byzantines. 35. Vizantolo?ki institut SANU. p. 127. ? ?, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? . ? ?. ?- , ? ? ? ? ?.37 ? ? ? ? , ? ? ? - ? ? ? ? . ? ? ? ?, ? ? , ?. ? - ? ? ? ?. ? ? ? ? ? ? , ? .38 ?, ?. ? ? ? , . ? ?, ? , . ? ? , ? ? ?, (), ? ? ? ? ?- (?) ? 1.59 ?. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - , ? ? ? ? ?, ? ? ? V IV ? .40 ? ?. ? ? ? ?, ? VIII ?.
  17. ^ ?owmia?ski, Henryk (2004) [1964]. Nosi?, Milan (ed.). Hrvatska pradomovina (Chorwacja Nadwi?la?ska in Pocz?tki Polski) [Croatian ancient homeland] (in Croatian). Translated by Kry?an-Stanojevi?, Barbara. Maveda. p. 16, 76-77. OCLC 831099194.
  18. ^ Jaroslav Rudnyckyj (1962-1972). An Etymological Dictionary of the Ukrainian Language: Parts 1-11, A-G (in English and Ukrainian). 1. Winnipeg: Ukrainian Free Academy of Sciences (UVAN). p. 162.
  19. ^ Sedov 2013, p. 458.
  20. ^ a b c Sedov 2013, p. 459.
  21. ^ Majorov 2012, p. 58.
  22. ^ ?ivkovi? 2012, p. 185.
  23. ^ ?owmia?ski, Henryk (2004) [1964]. Nosi?, Milan (ed.). Hrvatska pradomovina (Chorwacja Nadwi?la?ska in Pocz?tki Polski) [Croatian ancient homeland] (in Croatian). Translated by Kry?an-Stanojevi?, Barbara. Maveda. pp. 104-105. OCLC 831099194.
  24. ^ Popowska-Taborska, Hanna (1993). "?lady etnonimów s?owia?skich z elementem obcym w nazewnictwie polskim". Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Linguistica (in Polish). 27: 225-230. Retrieved 2020.

Sources

Further reading

  • Saka?, Simeon (1994). -- ? ? . (in Serbian). 36: 145-149.
  • Novakovi?, Relja (1977). Odakle su Srbi do?li na Balkansko poluostrvo (in Serbian). Istorijski institut.
  • ?upani?, Niko (1922). "Bela Srbija". Narodna Starina (in Croatian). Zagreb. 2: 107-118.

  This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

White_Serbia
 



 



 
Music Scenes