Christiaan Huygens  

Born  
Died  8 July 1695 The Hague, Dutch Republic  (aged 66)
Alma mater  
Known for  List

Scientific career  
Fields  
Institutions  
Academic advisors  Frans van Schooten 
Influences  
Influenced 

Signature  
Christiaan Huygens, Lord of Zeelhem, ( HYg?nz,^{[4]} HOYg?nz,^{[5]}^{[6]} Dutch: ['kr?stija:n '?oey(n)s] , also spelled Huyghens; Latin: Hugenius; 14 April 1629  8 July 1695) was a Dutch mathematician, physicist, engineer, astronomer, and inventor, who is regarded as one of the greatest scientists of all time and a major figure in the scientific revolution.^{[7]}^{[8]} In physics, Huygens made groundbreaking contributions in optics and mechanics, while as an astronomer he is chiefly known for his studies of the rings of Saturn and the discovery of its moon Titan. As an engineer and inventor, he improved the design of telescopes and invented the pendulum clock, a breakthrough in timekeeping and the most accurate timekeeper for almost 300 years. An exceptionally talented mathematician and physicist, Huygens was the first to idealize a physical problem by a set of parameters then analyse it mathematically,^{[9]} and the first to fully mathematize a mechanistic explanation of an unobservable physical phenomenon.^{[10]}^{[11]} For these reasons, he has been called the first theoretical physicist and one of the founders of modern mathematical physics.^{[12]}^{[13]}
Huygens first identified the correct laws of elastic collision in his work De Motu Corporum ex Percussione, completed in 1656 but published posthumously in 1703.^{[14]} In 1659, Huygens derived geometrically the standard formulae in classical mechanics for the centrifugal force in his work De vi Centrifuga, a decade before Newton.^{[15]} In optics, he is best known for his wave theory of light, which he proposed in 1678 and described in his Traité de la Lumière (1690). His mathematical theory of light was initially rejected in favour of Newton's corpuscular theory of light, until AugustinJean Fresnel adopted Huygens's principle to give a complete explanation of the rectilinear propagation and diffraction effects of light in 1821. Today this principle is known as the HuygensFresnel principle.
Huygens invented the pendulum clock in 1657, which he patented the same year. His research in horology resulted in an extensive analysis of the pendulum in Horologium Oscillatorium (1673), regarded as one of the most important 17th century works on mechanics. While the first and last parts contain descriptions of clock designs, most of the book is an analysis of pendulum motion and a theory of curves. In 1655, Huygens began grinding lenses with his brother Constantijn to build refracting telescopes for astronomical research. He discovered the first of Saturn's moons, Titan, and was the first to explain Saturn's strange appearance as due to "a thin, flat ring, nowhere touching, and inclined to the ecliptic."^{[16]}^{[17]} In 1662 Huygens developed what is now called the Huygenian eyepiece, a telescope with two lenses, which diminished the amount of dispersion.
As a mathematician, Huygens developed the theory of evolutes and wrote on games of chance and the problem of points in Van Rekeningh in Spelen van Gluck, which Frans van Schooten translated and published as De Ratiociniis in Ludo Aleae (1657).^{[18]} The use of expectation values by Huygens and others would later inspire Jacob Bernoulli's work on probability theory.^{[19]}^{[20]}
Christiaan Huygens was born on 14 April 1629 in The Hague, into a rich and influential Dutch family,^{[21]}^{[22]} the second son of Constantijn Huygens. Christiaan was named after his paternal grandfather.^{[23]}^{[24]} His mother, Suzanna van Baerle, died shortly after giving birth to Huygens's sister.^{[25]} The couple had five children: Constantijn (1628), Christiaan (1629), Lodewijk (1631), Philips (1632) and Suzanna (1637).^{[26]}
Constantijn Huygens was a diplomat and advisor to the House of Orange, in addition to being a poet and a musician. He corresponded widely with intellectuals across Europe; his friends included Galileo Galilei, Marin Mersenne, and René Descartes.^{[27]} Christiaan was educated at home until the age of sixteen, and from a young age liked to play with miniatures of mills and other machines. His father gave him a liberal education: he studied languages, music, history, geography, mathematics, logic, and rhetoric, but also dancing, fencing and horse riding.^{[23]}^{[26]}
In 1644 Huygens had as his mathematical tutor Jan Jansz Stampioen, who assigned the 15yearold a demanding reading list on contemporary science.^{[28]} Descartes was later impressed by his skills in geometry, as was Mersenne, who christened him "the new Archimedes."^{[10]}^{[22]}^{[29]}
At sixteen years of age, Constantijn sent Huygens to study law and mathematics at Leiden University, where he studied from May 1645 to March 1647.^{[23]} Frans van Schooten was an academic at Leiden from 1646, and became a private tutor to Huygens and his elder brother, Constantijn Jr., replacing Stampioen on the advice of Descartes.^{[30]}^{[31]} Van Schooten brought his mathematical education up to date, in particular introducing him to the work of Viète, Descartes, and Fermat.^{[32]}
After two years, starting in March 1647, Huygens continued his studies at the newly founded Orange College, in Breda, where his father was a curator. His time in Breda ended when his brother Lodewijk, who was already enrolled, duelled with another student.^{[8]}^{[33]} Constantijn Huygens was closely involved in the new College, which lasted only to 1669; the rector was André Rivet.^{[34]} Christiaan Huygens lived at the home of the jurist Johann Henryk Dauber while attending college, and had mathematics classes with the English lecturer John Pell. He completed his studies in August 1649.^{[23]} He then had a stint as a diplomat on a mission with Henry, Duke of Nassau. It took him to Bentheim, then Flensburg. He took off for Denmark, visited Copenhagen and Helsingør, and hoped to cross the Øresund to visit Descartes in Stockholm. It was not to be.^{[35]}
Although his father Constantijn had wished his son Christiaan to be a diplomat, circumstances kept him from becoming so. The First Stadtholderless Period that began in 1650 meant that the House of Orange was no longer in power, removing Constantijn's influence. Further, he realized that his son had no interest in such a career.^{[36]}
Huygens generally wrote in French or Latin.^{[37]} In 1646, while still a college student at Leiden, he began a correspondence with his father's friend the intelligencer Mersenne, who died quite soon afterwards in 1648.^{[23]} Mersenne wrote to Constantijn on his son's talent for mathematics, and flatteringly compared him to Archimedes on 3 January 1647.^{[38]}
The letters show Huygens's early interest in mathematics. In October 1646 there is the suspension bridge and the demonstration that a hanging chain is not a parabola, as Galileo thought.^{[39]} Huygens would later label that curve the catenaria (catenary) in 1690 while corresponding with Gottfried Leibniz.^{[40]}
In the next two years (164748), Huygens's letters to Mersenne covered various topics, including a mathematical proof of the law of free fall, the claim by Grégoire de SaintVincent of circle quadrature, which Huygens showed to be wrong, the rectification of the ellipse, projectiles, and the vibrating string.^{[41]} Some of Mersenne's concerns at the time, such as the cycloid (he sent Huygens Torricelli's treatise on the curve), the centre of oscillation, and the gravitational constant, were matters Huygens only took seriously towards the end of the 17th century.^{[9]} Mersenne had also written on musical theory. Huygens preferred meantone temperament; he innovated in 31 equal temperament (which was not itself a new idea but known to Francisco de Salinas), using logarithms to investigate it further and show its close relation to the meantone system.^{[42]}
In 1654, Huygens returned to his father's house in The Hague, and was able to devote himself entirely to research.^{[23]} The family had another house, not far away at Hofwijck, and he spent time there during the summer. Despite being very active, his scholarly life did not allow him to escape bouts of depression.^{[43]}
Subsequently, Huygens developed a broad range of correspondents, though picking up the threads after 1648 was hampered by the fiveyear Fronde in France. Visiting Paris in 1655, Huygens called on Ismael Boulliau to introduce himself, who took him to see Claude Mylon.^{[44]} The Parisian group of savants that had gathered around Mersenne held together into the 1650s, and Mylon, who had assumed the secretarial role, took some trouble from then on to keep Huygens in touch.^{[45]} Through Pierre de Carcavi Huygens corresponded in 1656 with Pierre de Fermat, whom he admired greatly, though this side of idolatry. The experience was bittersweet and somewhat puzzling, since it became clear that Fermat had dropped out of the research mainstream, and his priority claims could probably not be made good in some cases. Besides, Huygens was looking by then to apply mathematics to physics, while Fermat's concerns ran to purer topics.^{[46]}
Like some of his contemporaries, Huygens was often slow to commit his results and discoveries to print, preferring to disseminate his work through letters instead.^{[47]} In his early days, his mentor Frans van Schooten provided technical feedback and was cautious for the sake of his reputation.^{[48]}
Between 1651 and 1657, Huygens published a number of works that showed his talent for mathematics and his mastery of both classical and analytical geometry, which allowed him to increase his reach and reputation among mathematicians.^{[38]} Around the same time, Huygens began to question Descartes's laws of collision, which were largely wrong, deriving the correct laws algebraically and later by way of geometry.^{[49]} He showed that, for any system of bodies, the centre of gravity of the system remains the same in velocity and direction, which Huygens called the conservation of "quantity of movement". His theory of collisions was the closest anyone had come to the idea of kinetic energy prior to Newton.^{[8]} These results were known through correspondence and in a short article in Journal des Sçavans, but would remain largely unpublished until after his death with the publication of De Motu Corporum ex Percussione (Concerning the motion of colliding bodies).^{[49]}
In addition to his work on mechanics, he made important scientific discoveries, such as the identification of Saturn's moon Titan in 1655, and the invention of the pendulum clock in 1657, both of which brought him fame across Europe.^{[23]} On 3 May 1661, Huygens observed the planet Mercury transit over the Sun, using the telescope of instrument maker Richard Reeve in London, together with astronomer Thomas Streete and Reeve.^{[50]} Streete then debated the published record of the transit of Hevelius, a controversy mediated by Henry Oldenburg.^{[51]} Huygens passed to Hevelius a manuscript of Jeremiah Horrocks on the transit of Venus, 1639, which thereby was printed for the first time in 1662.^{[52]}
In the same year Huygens, who played the harpsichord, took an interest in Simon Stevin's theories on music; however, he showed very little concern to publish his theories on consonance, some of which were lost for centuries.^{[53]}^{[54]} For his contributions to science, the Royal Society of London elected him a Fellow in 1665 when Huygens was just 36 years old.^{[55]}
The Montmor Academy was the form the old Mersenne circle took after the mid1650s.^{[56]} Huygens took part in its debates, and supported its "dissident" faction who favoured experimental demonstration to curtail fruitless discussion, and opposed amateurish attitudes.^{[57]} During 1663 he made what was his third visit to Paris; the Montmor Academy closed down, and Huygens took the chance to advocate a more Baconian program in science. Three years later, in 1666, he moved to Paris on an invitation to fill a position at King Louis XIV's new French Académie des sciences.^{[58]}
While in Paris, Huygens had an important patron and correspondent in JeanBaptiste Colbert, First Minister to Louis XIV.^{[59]} However, his relationship with the Academy was not always easy, and in 1670 Huygens, seriously ill, chose Francis Vernon to carry out a donation of his papers to the Royal Society in London, should he die.^{[60]} The aftermath of the FrancoDutch War (167278), and particularly England's role in it, may have damaged his relationship with the Royal Society.^{[61]} Robert Hooke, as a representative of the Royal Society, lacked the finesse to handle the situation in 1673.^{[62]}
The physicist and inventor Denis Papin was assistant to Huygens from 1671.^{[63]} One of their projects, which did not bear fruit directly, was the gunpowder engine.^{[64]} Papin moved to England in 1678 to continue work in this area.^{[65]} Also in Paris, Huygens made further astronomical observations using the Observatory recently completed in 1672. He introduced Nicolaas Hartsoeker to French scientists such as Nicolas Malebranche and Giovanni Cassini in 1678.^{[8]}^{[66]}
Huygens met the young diplomat Gottfried Leibniz, visiting Paris in 1672 on a vain mission to meet Arnauld de Pomponne, the French Foreign Minister. At this time Leibniz was working on a calculating machine, and he moved on to London in early 1673 with diplomats from Mainz. From March 1673, Leibniz was tutored in mathematics by Huygens, who taught him analytical geometry.^{[67]} An extensive correspondence ensued, in which Huygens showed at first reluctance to accept the advantages of Leibniz's infinitesimal calculus.^{[68]}
Huygens moved back to The Hague in 1681 after suffering another bout of serious depressive illness. In 1684, he published Astroscopia Compendiaria on his new tubeless aerial telescope. He attempted to return to France in 1685 but the revocation of the Edict of Nantes precluded this move. His father died in 1687, and he inherited Hofwijck, which he made his home the following year.^{[36]}
On his third visit to England, Huygens met Isaac Newton in person on 12 June 1689. They spoke about Iceland spar, and subsequently corresponded about resisted motion.^{[69]}
Huygens returned to mathematical topics in his last years and observed the acoustical phenomenon now known as flanging in 1693.^{[70]} Two years later, on 8 July 1695, Huygens died in The Hague and was buried in an unmarked grave in the Grote Kerk there, as was his father before him.^{[71]}
Huygens never married.^{[72]}
Huygens first became internationally known for his work in mathematics, publishing a number of important results that drew the attention of many European geometers.^{[73]} Huygens's preferred method in his published works was that of Archimedes, though he used Descartes's analytic geometry and Fermat's infinitesimal techniques more extensively in his private notebooks.^{[23]}
Huygens's first publication was Theoremata de Quadratura Hyperboles, Ellipsis et Circuli (Theorems on the quadrature of the hyperbola, ellipse, and circle), published by the Elzeviers in Leiden in 1651.^{[47]} The first part of the work contained theorems for computing the areas of hyperbolas, ellipses, and circles that paralleled Archimedes's work on conic sections, particularly his Quadrature of the Parabola.^{[38]} The second part included a refutation to Grégoire de SaintVincent's claims on circle quadrature, which he had discussed with Mersenne earlier.
Huygens demonstrated that the centre of gravity of a segment of any hyperbola, ellipse, or circle was directly related to the area of that segment. He was then able to show the relationships between triangles inscribed in conic sections and the centre of gravity for those sections. By generalizing these theorems to all conic sections, Huygens extended classical methods to generate new results.^{[23]}
Quadrature was a live issue in the 1650s and, through Mylon, Huygens intervened in the discussion of the mathematics of Thomas Hobbes. Persisting in trying to explain the errors Hobbes had fallen into, he made an international reputation.^{[74]}
Huygens's next publication was De Circuli Magnitudine Inventa (New findings in the measurement of the circle), published in 1654. In this work, Huygens was able to narrow the gap between the circumscribed and inscribed polygons found in Archimedes's Measurement of the Circle, showing that the ratio of the circumference to its diameter or ? must lie in the first third of that interval.^{[47]}
Using a technique equivalent to Richardson extrapolation,^{[75]} Huygens was able to shorten the inequalities used in Archimedes's method; in this case, by using the centre of the gravity of a segment of a parabola, he was able to approximate the centre of gravity of a segment of a circle, resulting in a faster and accurate approximation of the circle quadrature.^{[76]} From these theorems, Huygens obtained two set of values for ?: the first between 3.1415926 and 3.1415927, and the second between 3.1415926538 and 3.1415926533.^{[77]}
Huygens also showed that, in the case of the hyperbola, the same approximation with parabolic segments produces a quick and simple method to calculate logarithms.^{[78]} He appended a collection of solutions to classical problems at the end of the work under the title Illustrium Quorundam Problematum Constructiones (Construction of some illustrious problems).^{[47]}
Huygens became interested in games of chance after he visited Paris in 1655 and encountered the work of Fermat, Blaise Pascal and Girard Desargues years earlier.^{[79]} He eventually published what was, at the time, the most coherent presentation of a mathematical approach to games of chance in De Ratiociniis in Ludo Aleae (On reasoning in games of chance).^{[80]}^{[81]} Frans van Schooten translated the original Dutch manuscript into Latin and published it in his Exercitationum Mathematicarum (1657).^{[82]}^{[18]}
The work contains early gametheoretic ideas and deals in particular with the problem of points.^{[20]}^{[18]} Huygens took from Pascal the concepts of a "fair game" and equitable contract (i.e., equal division when the chances are equal), and extended the argument to set up a nonstandard theory of expected values.^{[83]} His success in applying algebra to the realm of chance, which hitherto seemed inaccessible to mathematicians, demonstrated the power of combining Euclidean synthetic proofs with the symbolic reasoning found in the works of Viète and Descartes.^{[84]}
In 1662 Sir Robert Moray sent Huygens John Graunt's life table, and in time Huygens and his brother Lodewijk dabbled on life expectancy.^{[47]}^{[85]}
Huygens had earlier completed a manuscript in the manner of Archimedes's On Floating Bodies entitled De Iis quae Liquido Supernatant (About parts floating above liquids). It was written around 1650 and was made up of three books. Although he sent the completed work to Frans van Schooten for feedback, in the end Huygens chose not to publish it, and at one point suggested it be burned.^{[38]}^{[86]} Some of the results found here were not rediscovered until the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.^{[14]}
Huygens first rederives Archimedes's results for the stability of the sphere and the paraboloid by a clever application of Torricelli's principle (i.e., that bodies in a system move only if their centre of gravity descends).^{[87]} He then proves the general theorem that, for a floating body in equilibrium, the distance between its centre of gravity and its submerged portion its at a minimum.^{[14]} Huygens uses this theorem to arrive at original solutions for the stability of floating cones, parallelepipeds, and cylinders, in some cases through a full cycle of rotation.^{[88]} His approach was thus equivalent to the principle of virtual work. Huygens was also the first to recognize that, for homogeneous solids, their specific weight and their aspect ratio are the essentials parameters of hydrostatic stability.^{[89]}^{[90]}
Huygens was the leading European natural philosopher between Descartes and Newton.^{[23]}^{[91]} However, unlike many of his contemporaries, Huygens had no taste for grand theoretical or philosophical systems, and generally avoided dealing with metaphysical issues (if pressed, he adhered to the Cartesian and mechanical philosophy of his time).^{[12]}^{[38]} Instead, Huygens excelled in extending the work of his predecessors, such as Galileo, to derive solutions to unsolved physical problems that were amenable to mathematical analysis. In particular, he sought explanations that relied on contact between bodies and avoided action at a distance.^{[23]}^{[92]}
In common with Robert Boyle and Jacques Rohault, Huygens advocated an experimentally oriented, corpuscularmechanical natural philosophy during his Paris years. This approach was sometimes labelled "Baconian," without being inductivist or identifying with the views of Francis Bacon in a simpleminded way.^{[93]}
After his first visit to England in 1661 and attending a meeting at Gresham College where he learned directly about Boyle's air pump experiments, Huygens spent time in late 1661 and early 1662 replicating the work. It proved a long process that brought to the surface both an experimental issue ("anomalous suspension") and a theoretical issue ("horror vacui"), and which ended in July 1663 as Huygens became a Fellow of the Royal Society. Huygens came to accept Boyle's view of the void against the Cartesian denial of it, while the replication of results of Boyle's experiments with the air pump trailed off messily.^{[94]}^{[95]}
Newton's influence on John Locke was mediated by Huygens, who assured Locke that Newton's mathematics was sound, leading to Locke's acceptance of a corpuscularmechanical physics.^{[96]}
The general approach of the mechanical philosophers was to postulate theories of the kind now called "contact action." Huygens adopted this method, but not without seeing its difficulties and failures.^{[97]} Leibniz, his student in Paris, later abandoned the theory.^{[98]} Seeing the universe this way made the theory of collisions central to physics. Matter in motion made up the universe, and only explanations in those terms could be truly intelligible. While he was influenced by the Cartesian approach, he was less doctrinaire.^{[99]} He studied elastic collisions in the 1650s but delayed publication for over a decade.^{[32]}
Huygens concluded quite early that Descartes's laws for the elastic collision of two bodies must be wrong, and he formulated the correct laws.^{[100]} An important step was his recognition of the Galilean invariance of the problems.^{[101]} Huygens had actually worked out the laws of collision from 1652 to 1656 in a manuscript entitled De Motu Corporum ex Percussione, though his results took many years to be circulated. In 1661, he passed them on in person to William Brouncker and Christopher Wren in London.^{[102]} What Spinoza wrote to Henry Oldenburg about them in 1666, which was during the Second AngloDutch War, was guarded.^{[103]} The war ended in 1667, and Huygens announced his results to the Royal Society in 1668. He later published them in the Journal des Sçavans in 1669.^{[32]}
In 1659 Huygens found the constant of gravitational acceleration and stated what is now known as the second of Newton's laws of motion in quadratic form.^{[104]} He derived geometrically the now standard formula for the centrifugal force, exerted on an object when viewed in a rotating frame of reference, for instance when driving around a curve. In modern notation:
with m the mass of the object, w the angular velocity, and r the radius.^{[14]} Huygens collected his results in a treatise under the title De vi Centrifuga, unpublished until 1703, where the kinematics of free fall were used to produce the first generalized conception of force prior to Newton.^{[105]} The general formula for the centrifugal force, however, was published in 1673 and was a significant step in studying orbits in astronomy. It enabled the transition from Kepler's third law of planetary motion to the inverse square law of gravitation.^{[106]} Yet, the interpretation of Newton's work on gravitation by Huygens differed from that of Newtonians such as Roger Cotes: he did not insist on the a priori attitude of Descartes, but neither would he accept aspects of gravitational attractions that were not attributable in principle to contact between particles.^{[107]}
The approach used by Huygens also missed some central notions of mathematical physics, which were not lost on others. In his work on pendulums Huygens came very close to the theory of simple harmonic motion; the topic, however, was covered fully for the first time by Newton in Book II of the Principia Mathematica (1687).^{[108]} In 1678 Leibniz picked out of Huygens's work on collisions the idea of conservation law that Huygens had left implicit.^{[109]}
In 1657, inspired by earlier research into pendulums as regulating mechanisms, Huygens invented the pendulum clock, which was a breakthrough in timekeeping and became the most accurate timekeeper for almost 300 years until the 1930s.^{[112]} The pendulum clock was much more accurate than the existing verge and foliot clocks and was immediately popular, quickly spreading over Europe. He contracted the construction of his clock designs to Salomon Coster in The Hague, who built the clock. However, Huygens did not make much money from his invention. Pierre Séguier refused him any French rights, while Simon Douw in Rotterdam and Ahasuerus Fromanteel in London copied his design in 1658.^{[113]} The oldest known Huygensstyle pendulum clock is dated 1657 and can be seen at the Museum Boerhaave in Leiden.^{[114]}^{[115]}^{[116]}^{[117]}
Part of the incentive for inventing the pendulum clock was to create an accurate marine chronometer that could be used to find longitude by celestial navigation during sea voyages. However, the clock proved unsuccessful as a marine timekeeper because the rocking motion of the ship disturbed the motion of the pendulum. In 1660, Lodewijk Huygens made a trial on a voyage to Spain, and reported that heavy weather made the clock useless. Alexander Bruce elbowed into the field in 1662, and Huygens called in Sir Robert Moray and the Royal Society to mediate and preserve some of his rights.^{[118]}^{[114]} Trials continued into the 1660s, the best news coming from a Royal Navy captain Robert Holmes operating against the Dutch possessions in 1664.^{[119]} Lisa Jardine doubts that Holmes reported the results of the trial accurately, as Samuel Pepys expressed his doubts at the time.^{[120]}
A trial for the French Academy on an expedition to Cayenne ended badly. Jean Richer suggested correction for the figure of the Earth. By the time of the Dutch East India Company expedition of 1686 to the Cape of Good Hope, Huygens was able to supply the correction retrospectively.^{[121]}
Sixteen years after the invention of the pendulum clock, in 1673, Huygens published his major work on horology entitled Horologium Oscillatorium: Sive de Motu Pendulorum ad Horologia Aptato Demonstrationes Geometricae (The Pendulum Clock: or Geometrical demonstrations concerning the motion of pendula as applied to clocks). It is the first modern work on mechanics where a physical problem is idealized by a set of parameters then analysed mathematically.^{[9]}
Huygens's motivation came from the observation, made by Mersenne and others, that pendulums are not quite isochronous: their period depends on their width of swing, with wide swings taking slightly longer than narrow swings.^{[122]} He tackled this problem by finding the curve down which a mass will slide under the influence of gravity in the same amount of time, regardless of its starting point; the socalled tautochrone problem. By geometrical methods which anticipated the calculus, Huygens showed it to be a cycloid, rather than the circular arc of a pendulum's bob, and therefore that pendulums needed to move on a cycloid path in order to be isochronous. The mathematics necessary to solve this problem led Huygens to develop his theory of evolutes, which he presented in Part III of his Horologium Oscillatorium.^{[9]}^{[123]}
He also solved a problem posed by Mersenne earlier: how to calculate the period of a pendulum made of an arbitrarilyshaped swinging rigid body. This involved discovering the centre of oscillation and its reciprocal relationship with the pivot point. In the same work, he analysed the conical pendulum, consisting of a weight on a cord moving in a circle, using the concept of centrifugal force.^{[9]}^{[124]}
Huygens was the first to derive the formula for the period of an ideal mathematical pendulum (with massless rod or cord and length much longer than its swing), in modern notation:
with T the period, l the length of the pendulum and g the gravitational acceleration. By his study of the oscillation period of compound pendulums Huygens made pivotal contributions to the development of the concept of moment of inertia.^{[125]}
Huygens also observed coupled oscillations: two of his pendulum clocks mounted next to each other on the same support often became synchronized, swinging in opposite directions. He reported the results by letter to the Royal Society, and it is referred to as "an odd kind of sympathy" in the Society's minutes.^{[126]} This concept is now known as entrainment.^{[127]}
In 1675, while investigating the oscillating properties of the cycloid, Huygens was able to transform a cycloidal pendulum into a vibrating spring through a combination of geometry and higher mathematics.^{[128]} In the same year, Huygens designed a spiral balance spring and patented a pocket watch. These watches are notable for lacking a fusee for equalizing the mainspring torque. The implication is that Huygens thought his spiral spring would isochronize the balance in the same way that cycloidshaped suspension curbs on his clocks would isochronize the pendulum.^{[129]}
He later used spiral springs in more conventional watches, made for him by Thuret in Paris. Such springs are essential in modern watches with a detached lever escapement because they can be adjusted for isochronism. Watches in Huygens's time, however, employed the very ineffective verge escapement, which interfered with the isochronal properties of any form of balance spring, spiral or otherwise.^{[130]}
Huygens's design came around the same time as, though independently of, Robert Hooke's. Controversy over the priority of the balance spring persisted for centuries. In February 2006, a longlost copy of Hooke's handwritten notes from several decades of Royal Society meetings was discovered in a cupboard in Hampshire, England, presumably tipping the evidence in Hooke's favour.^{[131]}^{[132]}
Huygens had a longterm interest in the study of light refraction and lenses or dioptrics.^{[133]} From 1652 date the first drafts of a Latin treatise on the theory of dioptrics, known as the Tractatus, which contained a comprehensive and rigorous theory of the telescope. Huygens was one of the few to raise theoretical questions regarding the properties and working of the telescope, and almost the only one to direct his mathematical proficiency towards the actual instruments used in astronomy.^{[134]}
Huygens repeatedly announced its publication to his colleagues but ultimately postponed it in favor of a much more comprehensive treatment, now under the name of the Dioptrica.^{[10]} It consisted of three parts. The first part focused on the general principles of refraction, the second dealt with spherical and chromatic aberration, while the third covered all aspects of the construction of telescopes and microscopes. In contrast to Descartes' dioptrics which treated only ideal (elliptical and hyperbolical) lenses, Huygens dealt exclusively with spherical lenses, which were the only kind that could really be made and incorporated in devices such as microscopes and telescopes.^{[135]}
Huygens also worked out practical ways to minimize the effects of spherical and chromatic aberration, such as long focal distances for the objective of a telescope, internal stops to reduce the aperture, and a new kind of ocular in the form of a set of two planoconvex lenses, now known as the Huygens's eyepiece.^{[135]} The Dioptrica was never published in Huygens's lifetime and only appeared in press in 1703, when most of its contents were already familiar to the scientific world.
Huygens is especially remembered in optics for his wave theory of light, which he first communicated in 1678 to the Académie des sciences in Paris. Originally a preliminary chapter of his Dioptrica, Huygens's theory was published in 1690 under the title Traité de la Lumière^{[136]} (Treatise on light), and contains the first fully mathematized, mechanistic explanation of an unobservable physical phenomenon (i.e., light propagation).^{[12]}^{[137]} Huygens refers to IgnaceGaston Pardies, whose manuscript on optics helped him on his wave theory.^{[138]}
The challenge at the time was to explain geometrical optics, as most physical optics phenomena (such as diffraction) had not been observed or appreciated as issues. Huygens had experimented in 1672 with double refraction (birefringence) in the Iceland spar (a calcite), a phenomenon discovered in 1669 by Rasmus Bartholin. At first, he could not elucidate what he found but was later able to explain it using his wavefront theory and concept of evolutes.^{[137]} He also developed ideas on caustics.^{[9]} Huygens assumes that the speed of light is finite, based on a report by Ole Christensen Rømer in 1677 but which Huygens is presumed to have already believed.^{[139]} Huygens's theory posits light as radiating wavefronts, with the common notion of light rays depicting propagation normal to those wavefronts. Propagation of the wavefronts is then explained as the result of spherical waves being emitted at every point along the wave front (known today as the HuygensFresnel principle).^{[140]} It assumed an omnipresent ether, with transmission through perfectly elastic particles, a revision of the view of Descartes. The nature of light was therefore a longitudinal wave.^{[139]}
His theory of light was not widely accepted, while Newton's rival corpuscular theory of light, as found in his Opticks (1704), gained more support. One strong objection to Huygens's theory was that longitudinal waves have only a single polarization which cannot explain the observed birefringence. However, Thomas Young's interference experiments in 1801, and François Arago's detection of the Poisson spot in 1819, could not be explained through Newton's or any other particle theory, reviving Huygens's ideas and wave models. Fresnel became aware of Huygens's work and in 1821 was able to explain birefringence as a result of light being not a longitudinal (as had been assumed) but actually a transverse wave.^{[141]} The thusnamed HuygensFresnel principle was the basis for the advancement of physical optics, explaining all aspects of light propagation until Maxwell's electromagnetic theory culminated in the development of quantum mechanics and the discovery of the photon.^{[135]}^{[142]}
Together with his brother Constantijn, Huygens began grinding his own lenses in 1655 in an effort to improve telescopes.^{[143]} He designed in 1662 what is now called the Huygenian eyepiece, with two lenses, as a telescope ocular.^{[144]}^{[145]} Lenses were also a common interest through which Huygens could meet socially in the 1660s with Baruch Spinoza, who ground them professionally. They had rather different outlooks on science, Spinoza being the more committed Cartesian, and some of their discussion survives in correspondence.^{[146]} He encountered the work of Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, another lens grinder, in the field of microscopy which interested his father.^{[9]}
Huygens also investigated the use of lenses in projectors. He is credited as the inventor of the magic lantern, described in correspondence of 1659.^{[147]} There are others to whom such a lantern device has been attributed, such as Giambattista della Porta and Cornelis Drebbel, though Huygens's design used lens for better projection (Athanasius Kircher has also been credited for that).^{[148]}
In 1655, Huygens discovered the first of Saturn's moons, Titan, and observed and sketched the Orion Nebula using a refracting telescope with a 43x magnification of his own design.^{[16]}^{[17]} Huygens succeeded in subdividing the nebula into different stars (the brighter interior now bears the name of the Huygenian region in his honour), and discovered several interstellar nebulae and some double stars.^{[149]} He was also the first to propose that the appearance of Saturn, which have baffled astronomers, was due to "a thin, flat ring, nowhere touching, and inclined to the ecliptic".^{[150]}
More than three years later, in 1659, Huygens published his theory and findings in Systema Saturnium. It is considered the most important work on telescopic astronomy since Galileo's Sidereus Nuncius fifty years earlier.^{[151]} Much more than a report on Saturn, Huygens provided measurements for the relative distances of the planets from the Sun, introduced the concept of the micrometer, and showed a method to measure angular diameters of planets, which finally allowed the telescope to be used as an instrument to measure (rather than just sighting) astronomical objects.^{[152]} He was also the first to question the authority of Galileo in telescopic matters, a sentiment that was to be common in the years following its publication.
In the same year, Huygens was able to observe Syrtis Major, a volcanic plain on Mars. He used repeated observations of the movement of this feature over the course of a number of days to estimate the length of day on Mars, which he did quite accurately to 24 1/2 hours. This figure is only a few minutes off of the actual length of the Martian day of 24 hours, 37 minutes.^{[153]}
At the instigation of JeanBaptiste Colbert, Huygens undertook the task of constructing a mechanical planetarium that could display all the planets and their moons then known circling around the Sun. Huygens completed his design in 1680 and had his clockmaker Johannes van Ceulen built it the following year. However, Colbert passed away in the interim and Huygens never got to deliver his planetarium to the French Academy of Sciences as the new minister, FrançoisMichel le Tellier, decided not to renew Huygens's contract.^{[154]}^{[155]}
In his design, Huygens made an ingenious use of continued fractions to find the best rational approximations by which he could choose the gears with the correct number of teeth. The ratio between two gears determined the orbital periods of two planets. To move the planets around the Sun, Huygens used a clockmechanism that could go forwards and backwards in time. Huygens claimed his planetarium was more accurate that a similar device constructed by Ole Rømer around the same time, but his planetarium design was not published until after his death in the Opuscula Posthuma (1703).^{[154]}
Shortly before his death in 1695, Huygens completed Cosmotheoros. At his direction, it was to be published only posthumously by his brother, which Constantijn Jr. did in 1698.^{[156]} In it he speculated on the existence of extraterrestrial life, on other planets, which he imagined was similar to that on Earth. Such speculations were not uncommon at the time, justified by Copernicanism or the plenitude principle. But Huygens went into greater detail,^{[157]} although without the benefit of understanding Newton's laws of gravitation, or the fact that the atmospheres on other planets are composed of different gases.^{[158]} The work, translated into English in its year of publication and entitled The celestial worlds discover'd, has been seen as being in the fanciful tradition of Francis Godwin, John Wilkins, and Cyrano de Bergerac, and fundamentally Utopian; and also to owe in its concept of planet to cosmography in the sense of Peter Heylin.^{[159]}^{[160]}
Huygens wrote that availability of water in liquid form was essential for life and that the properties of water must vary from planet to planet to suit the temperature range. He took his observations of dark and bright spots on the surfaces of Mars and Jupiter to be evidence of water and ice on those planets.^{[161]} He argued that extraterrestrial life is neither confirmed nor denied by the Bible, and questioned why God would create the other planets if they were not to serve a greater purpose than that of being admired from Earth. Huygens postulated that the great distance between the planets signified that God had not intended for beings on one to know about the beings on the others, and had not foreseen how much humans would advance in scientific knowledge.^{[162]}
It was also in this book that Huygens published his method for estimating stellar distances. He made a series of smaller holes in a screen facing the Sun, until he estimated the light was of the same intensity as that of the star Sirius. He then calculated that the angle of this hole was 1/27,664th the diameter of the Sun, and thus it was about 30,000 times as far away, on the (incorrect) assumption that Sirius is as luminous as the Sun. The subject of photometry remained in its infancy until the time of Pierre Bouguer and Johann Heinrich Lambert.^{[163]}
During his lifetime, Huygens's influence was considerable but began to fade shortly after his death. His skills as a geometer and his mechanical insights elicited the admiration of many of his contemporaries, including Newton, Leibniz, l'Hospital, and the Bernoullis.^{[47]} For his work in physics, Huygens has been deemed one of the greatest scientists in history and a prominent figure in the scientific revolution, rivaled only by Newton in both depth of insight and the number of results obtained.^{[7]}^{[164]} Huygens was also instrumental in the development of institutional frameworks for scientific research on the European continent, making him a leading actor in the establishment of modern science.^{[165]}
In mathematics, Huygens mastered the methods of ancient Greek geometry, particularly the work of Archimedes, and was an adept user of the analytic geometry and infinitesimal techniques of Descartes, Fermat, and others.^{[86]} His mathematical style can be characterized as geometrical infinitesimal analysis of curves and of motion. Drawing inspiration and imagery from mechanics, it remained pure mathematics in form.^{[73]} Huygens brought this type of geometrical analysis to its greatest height but also to its conclusion, as more mathematicians turned away from classical geometry to the calculus for handling infinitesimals, limit processes, and motion.^{[43]}
Huygens was moreover one of the first to fully employ mathematics to answer questions of physics. Often this entailed introducing a simple model for describing a complicated situation, then analyzing it starting from simple arguments to their logical consequences, developing the necessary mathematics along the way. As he wrote at the end of a draft of De vi Centrifuga:^{[38]}
Whatever you will have supposed not impossible either concerning gravity or motion or any other matter, if then you prove something concerning the magnitude of a line, surface, or body, it will be true; as for instance, Archimedes on the quadrature of the parabola, where the tendency of heavy objects has been assumed to act through parallel lines.
Huygens favoured axiomatic presentations of his results, which require rigorous methods of geometric demonstration: although in the selection of primary axioms and hypotheses he allowed levels of uncertainty, the proofs of theorems derived from these could never be in doubt.^{[38]} Huygens's published works were seen as precise, unambiguous, and elegant, and exerted a big influence in Newton's presentation of his own major works.^{[166]}^{[167]}
Besides the application of mathematics to physics and physics to mathematics, Huygens relied on mathematics as methodology, particularly its predictive power to generate new knowledge about the world.^{[168]} Unlike Galileo, who used mathematics primarily as rhetoric or synthesis, Huygens consistently employed mathematics as a method of discovery and analysis, and the cumulative effect of his approach created a norm for eighteenthcentury scientist such as Johann Bernoulli.^{[38]}
Although never intended for publication, Huygens made use of algebraic expressions to represent physical entities in a handful of his manuscripts on collisions.^{[49]} This would make him one of the first to employ mathematical formulae to describe relationships in physics, as it is done today.^{[8]}
Huygens's standing as the greatest scientist in Europe was eclipsed by Newton's at the end of the seventeenth century, despite the fact that, as Hugh AlderseyWilliams notes, "Huygens's achievement exceeds that of Newton in some important respects".^{[169]} His very idiosyncratic style and reluctance to publish his work did much to diminish his influence in the aftermath of the scientific revolution, as adherents of Leibniz' calculus and Newton's physics took centre stage.^{[43]}^{[86]}
His analysis of curves that satisfy certain physical properties, such as the cycloid, led to later studies of many other such curves like the caustic, the brachistochrone, the sail curve, and the catenary.^{[29]}^{[40]} His application of mathematics to physics, such as in his analysis of birefringence, would inspire new developments in mathematical physics and rational mechanics in the following centuries (albeit in the language of the calculus).^{[12]} Additionally, Huygens developed the oscillating timekeeping mechanisms, the pendulum and the balance spring, that have been used ever since in mechanical watches and clocks. These were the first reliable timekeepers fit for scientific use (e.g., it was possible for the first time to make accurate measurements of the inequality of the solar day, which astronomers in the past could not do).^{[9]}^{[122]} His work on this area anticipated the union of applied mathematics with mechanical engineering in the following centuries.^{[129]}
During his lifetime, Huygens and his father had a number of portraits commissioned. These included:
The European Space Agency spacecraft that landed on Titan, Saturn's largest moon, in 2005 was named after him.^{[172]}
A number of monuments to Christiaan Huygens can be found across important cities in the Netherlands, including Rotterdam, Delft, and Leiden.
Source(s):^{[23]}