Collective Number
Get Collective Number essential facts below. View Videos or join the Collective Number discussion. Add Collective Number to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
Collective Number

In linguistics, singulative number and collective number (abbreviated SGV and COL) are terms used when the grammatical number for multiple items is the unmarked form of a noun, and the noun is specially marked to indicate a single item.

This is the opposite of the more common singular-plural pattern, where a noun is unmarked when it represents one item, and is marked to represent more than one item.

In some cases, a further distinction is made between the collective and what is known in some terminologies as the plurative, the former referencing multiple items as a class, the latter referencing them as individual units.

Greenberg's linguistic universal #35 states that no language is purely singulative-collective in the sense that plural is always the null morpheme and singular is not.[1]

Examples

Welsh

Welsh has two systems of grammatical number, singular-plural and collective-singulative. Since the loss of the noun inflection system of earlier Celtic, plurals have become unpredictable and can be formed in several ways: by adding a suffix to the end of the word (most commonly -au), as in tad "father" and tadau "fathers", through vowel mutation, as in bachgen "boy" and bechgyn "boys", or through a combination of the two, as in chwaer "sister" and chwiorydd "sisters". Other nouns take the singulative suffixes -yn (for masculine nouns) or -en (for feminine nouns). Most nouns which inflect according to this system designate objects that are frequently found in groups, for example adar "birds/flock of birds", aderyn "bird"; mefus "a bed of strawberries", mefusen "a strawberry"; plant "children", plentyn "a child"; and coed "forest", coeden "a tree". Still other nouns use suffixes for both singular and plural forms (e.g. merlen "a pony", merlod "ponies", the unsuffixed *merl does not exist); these are similar to nouns formed from other categories of words (e.g. cardod "charity" gives rise to cardotyn "a beggar" and cardotwyr "beggars").

Other languages

Singulatives are featured in some Semitic and Slavic languages.[2]

In Arabic grammar, the singulative is called , "noun of unity". It is formed by the suffixes ? -a(t) and ? -?. The former applies to animals, plants, and inanimate objects,[3] e.g. qam? "wheat", ? qam?a(t) "a grain of wheat"; shajar 'trees', ? shajara(t) 'a tree'; baqar 'cattle'; ? baqara(t) 'a cow'. The latter suffix applies to sentient beings, e.g. jinn (collective), jinn? (singulative); zinj 'black African people', ? zinj? 'a black African person'. In some cases, the singulative has a further plural indicating a collection of the singular units, which may be broken (e.g. e.g., jund 'army', ? jund? 'a soldier', ? jun?d 'soldiers') or regular (e.g. ? `askar 'army, military', `askar? 'a soldier, private, or enlisted man', ? `askar?y?n 'soldiers, privates, enlisted men').

In East Slavic languages, which are basically of singular-plural system, the singular suffix -- ('-in-', Russian, '-yn-', Ukrainian), resp. '--' ('-in-', Belarusian) performs the singulative function for collective nouns.[2] Russian: gorokh (peas in mass) vs. goroshina (a single pea). Ukrainian: /pisok (sand) vs. /pischyna (grain of sand).[2] Belarusian: (potatoes in mass, e.g. as a crop or as a species) vs. (one potato tuber). Notice the affix '-a' in all these examples, which indicates the feminine form. Notice also that plural forms may be derived from these singulatives in a regular way: goroshina->goroshiny (several peas), etc.

In both East Slavic and Arabic, the singulative form always takes on the feminine gender.[clarification needed][]

Singulative markers are found throughout the Nilo-Saharan languages. Majang, for example, has collective ti 'lice', singulative ti-n 'louse'. (Bender 1983:124).

In Dutch, singulative forms of collective nouns are occasionally made by diminutives: snoep "sweets, candy" -> snoepje "sweet, piece of candy". These singulatives can be pluralized like most other nouns: snoepjes "several sweets, pieces of candy".[]

Comparison with mass nouns

A collective form such as the Welsh moch, "pigs", is more basic than the singular form mochyn, "a pig". It is generally the collective form which is used as an adjectival modifier, e.g. cig moch ("pig meat", "pork"). The collective form is therefore similar in many respects to an English mass noun such as "rice", which in fact refers to a collection of items which are logically countable. However, English has no productive process of forming singulative nouns (just phrases such as "a grain of rice"). Therefore, English cannot be said to have singulative number.

Plurative

In some cases, in addition to the collective and singulative forms, a third form, called the "plurative" in the terminology of some scholars, is distinguished from the collective. The collective form, in these cases, denotes multiple items as a class while the plurative denotes them as individuals. Compare, for example, "people" in "People are funny" with "people" in "the people in this room", though in English the same plural form is used for both purposes.

Example: In Arabic, for samak, "fish":[4]

  • samak, collective form, fish in general
  • samak-at, singulative, a single fish
  • ?asmaak, plurative, as in "many fish" or "three fish"

See also

References

  1. ^ Joseph H. Greenberg. "Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements". In: Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.). 1963. Universals of Language. London: MIT Press, pp. 73-113. Via Wayback Machine. Accessed 2018-08-10.
  2. ^ a b c p 47
  3. ^ Wright, William (1862). A Grammar of the Arabic language. 2. Cambridge University Press. p. 147. ISBN 1-84356-028-3.
  4. ^ Fehri, Abdelkader Fassi (2018-08-15). Constructing Feminine to Mean: Gender, Number, Numeral, and Quantifier Extensions in Arabic. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 9. ISBN 978-1-4985-7456-3.

Bibliography

  • Bender, M. Lionel. 1983. "Majang phonology and morphology". In Nilo-Saharan Language Studies, 114-147. East Lansing: Michigan State University.
  • Corbett, Greville G. 2000. Number. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-33845-X
  • Tiersma, Peter Meijes. 1982. "Local and General Markedness." Language 58.4: 832-849

  This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Collective_number
 



 



 
Music Scenes