Epsilon Numbers (mathematics)

Get Epsilon Numbers Mathematics essential facts below. View Videos or join the Epsilon Numbers Mathematics discussion. Add Epsilon Numbers Mathematics to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.

## Ordinal ? numbers

## Representation of by rooted trees

## Veblen hierarchy

## Surreal ? numbers

## See also

## References

This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Epsilon Numbers Mathematics

This article includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. (May 2021) |

In mathematics, the **epsilon numbers** are a collection of transfinite numbers whose defining property is that they are fixed points of an **exponential map**. Consequently, they are not reachable from 0 via a finite series of applications of the chosen exponential map and of "weaker" operations like addition and multiplication. The original epsilon numbers were introduced by Georg Cantor in the context of ordinal arithmetic; they are the ordinal numbers *?* that satisfy the equation

in which ? is the smallest infinite ordinal.

The least such ordinal is ** ?_{0}** (pronounced

Larger ordinal fixed points of the exponential map are indexed by ordinal subscripts, resulting in . The ordinal ?_{0} is still countable, as is any epsilon number whose index is countable (there exist uncountable ordinals, and uncountable epsilon numbers whose index is an uncountable ordinal).

The smallest epsilon number ?_{0} appears in many induction proofs, because for many purposes, transfinite induction is only required up to ?_{0} (as in Gentzen's consistency proof and the proof of Goodstein's theorem). Its use by Gentzen to prove the consistency of Peano arithmetic, along with Gödel's second incompleteness theorem, show that Peano arithmetic cannot prove the well-foundedness of this ordering (it is in fact the least ordinal with this property, and as such, in proof-theoretic ordinal analysis, is used as a measure of the strength of the theory of Peano arithmetic).

Many larger epsilon numbers can be defined using the Veblen function.

A more general class of epsilon numbers has been identified by John Horton Conway and Donald Knuth in the surreal number system, consisting of all surreals that are fixed points of the base ? exponential map *x* -> ?^{x}.

Hessenberg (1906) defined gamma numbers (see additively indecomposable ordinal) to be numbers ?>0 such that ?+?=? whenever ?<?, and delta numbers (see multiplicatively indecomposable ordinals) to be numbers ?>1 such that =? whenever 0<?<?, and epsilon numbers to be numbers *?*>2 such that *?*^{?}=*?* whenever 1<*?*<*?*. His gamma numbers are those of the form ?^{?}, and his delta numbers are those of the form ?^{??}.

The standard definition of ordinal exponentiation with base ? is:

- for limit .

From this definition, it follows that for any fixed ordinal *?* > 1, the mapping is a normal function, so it has arbitrarily large fixed points by the fixed-point lemma for normal functions. When , these fixed points are precisely the ordinal epsilon numbers. The smallest of these, ?_{0}, is the supremum of the sequence

in which every element is the image of its predecessor under the mapping . (The general term is given using Knuth's up-arrow notation; the operator is equivalent to tetration.) Just as ?^{?} is defined as the supremum of { ?^{k} } for natural numbers *k*, the smallest ordinal epsilon number ?_{0} may also be denoted ; this notation is much less common than ?_{0}.

The next epsilon number after is

in which the sequence is again constructed by repeated base ? exponentiation but starts at instead of at 0. Notice

A different sequence with the same supremum, , is obtained by starting from 0 and exponentiating with base ?_{0} instead:

The epsilon number indexed by any successor ordinal ?+1 is constructed similarly, by base ? exponentiation starting from (or by base exponentiation starting from 0).

An epsilon number indexed by a limit ordinal ? is constructed differently. The number is the supremum of the set of epsilon numbers . The first such number is . Whether or not the index ? is a limit ordinal, is a fixed point not only of base ? exponentiation but also of base ? exponentiation for all ordinals .

Since the epsilon numbers are an unbounded subclass of the ordinal numbers, they are enumerated using the ordinal numbers themselves. For any ordinal number , is the least epsilon number (fixed point of the exponential map) not already in the set . It might appear that this is the non-constructive equivalent of the constructive definition using iterated exponentiation; but the two definitions are equally non-constructive at steps indexed by limit ordinals, which represent transfinite recursion of a higher order than taking the supremum of an exponential series.

The following facts about epsilon numbers are very straightforward to prove:

- Although it is quite a large number, is still countable, being a countable union of countable ordinals; in fact, is countable if and only if is countable.
- The union (or supremum) of any nonempty set of epsilon numbers is an epsilon number; so for instance

- is an epsilon number. Thus, the mapping is a normal function.

- The initial ordinal of any uncountable cardinal is an epsilon number.

Any epsilon number ? has Cantor normal form , which means that the Cantor normal form is not very useful for epsilon numbers. The ordinals less than ?_{0}, however, can be usefully described by their Cantor normal forms, which leads to a representation of ?_{0} as the ordered set of all finite rooted trees, as follows. Any ordinal has Cantor normal form where *k* is a natural number and are ordinals with , uniquely determined by . Each of the ordinals in turn has a similar Cantor normal form. We obtain the finite rooted tree representing ? by joining the roots of the trees representing to a new root. (This has the consequence that the number 0 is represented by a single root while the number is represented by a tree containing a root and a single leaf.) An order on the set of finite rooted trees is defined recursively: we first order the subtrees joined to the root in decreasing order, and then use lexicographic order on these ordered sequences of subtrees. In this way the set of all finite rooted trees becomes a well-ordered set which is order-isomorphic to ?_{0}.

The fixed points of the "epsilon mapping" form a normal function, whose fixed points form a normal function, whose ...; this is known as the Veblen hierarchy (the Veblen functions with base ?_{0}(?) = ?^{?}). In the notation of the Veblen hierarchy, the epsilon mapping is ?_{1}, and its fixed points are enumerated by ?_{2}.

Continuing in this vein, one can define maps ?_{?} for progressively larger ordinals ? (including, by this rarefied form of transfinite recursion, limit ordinals), with progressively larger least fixed points ?_{?+1}(0). The least ordinal not reachable from 0 by this procedure--i. e., the least ordinal ? for which ?_{?}(0)=?, or equivalently the first fixed point of the map --is the Feferman-Schütte ordinal ?_{0}. In a set theory where such an ordinal can be proven to exist, one has a map ? that enumerates the fixed points ?_{0}, ?_{1}, ?_{2}, ... of ; these are all still epsilon numbers, as they lie in the image of ?_{?} for every ? 0, including of the map ?_{1} that enumerates epsilon numbers.

In *On Numbers and Games*, the classic exposition on surreal numbers, John Horton Conway provided a number of examples of concepts that had natural extensions from the ordinals to the surreals. One such function is the -map ; this mapping generalises naturally to include all surreal numbers in its domain, which in turn provides a natural generalisation of the Cantor normal form for surreal numbers.

It is natural to consider any fixed point of this expanded map to be an epsilon number, whether or not it happens to be strictly an ordinal number. Some examples of non-ordinal epsilon numbers are

and

There is a natural way to define for every surreal number *n*, and the map remains order-preserving. Conway goes on to define a broader class of "irreducible" surreal numbers that includes the epsilon numbers as a particularly-interesting subclass.

- J.H. Conway,
*On Numbers and Games*(1976) Academic Press ISBN 0-12-186350-6 - Section XIV.20 of Sierpi?ski, Wac?aw (1965),
*Cardinal and ordinal numbers*(2nd ed.), PWN - Polish Scientific Publishers

This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Popular Products

Music Scenes

Popular Artists