Idealized Greenhouse Model
Get Idealized Greenhouse Model essential facts below. View Videos or join the Idealized Greenhouse Model discussion. Add Idealized Greenhouse Model to your topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
Idealized Greenhouse Model

The surface of the Sun radiates light and heat at approximately 5,500 °C. The Earth is much cooler and so radiates heat back away from itself at much longer wavelengths, mostly in the infrared range. The idealized greenhouse model is based on the fact that certain gases in the Earth's atmosphere, including carbon dioxide and water vapour, are transparent to the high-frequency, high-energy solar radiation, but are much more opaque to the lower frequency infrared radiation leaving the surface of the earth. Thus heat is easily let in, but is partially trapped by these gases as it tries to leave. Rather than get hotter and hotter, Kirchhoff's law of thermal radiation says that the gases of the atmosphere also have to re-emit the infrared energy that they absorb, and they do so, also at long infrared wavelengths, both upwards into space as well as downwards back towards the Earth's surface. In the long-term, thermal equilibrium is reached when all the heat energy arriving on the planet is leaving again at the same rate. In this idealized model, the greenhouse gases cause the surface of the planet to be warmer than it would be without them, in order for the required amount of heat energy finally to be radiated out into space from the top of the atmosphere.[1]

The greenhouse effect can be illustrated with an idealized planet. This is a common "textbook model":[2] the planet will have a constant surface temperature Ts and an atmosphere with constant temperature Ta. For diagrammatic clarity, a gap can be depicted between the atmosphere and the surface. Alternatively, Ts could be interpreted as a temperature representative of the surface and the lower atmosphere, and Ta could be interpreted as the temperature of the upper atmosphere, also called the skin temperature. In order to justify that Ta and Ts remain constant over the planet, strong ocean and atmospheric currents can be imagined to provide plentiful lateral mixing. Furthermore, any daily or seasonal cycles in temperature are assumed to be insignificant.

The model

The model will find the values of Ts and Ta that will allow the outgoing radiative power, escaping the top of the atmosphere, to be equal to the absorbed radiative power of sunlight. When applied to a planet like Earth, the outgoing radiation will be longwave and the sunlight will be shortwave. These two streams of radiation will have distinct emission and absorption characteristics. In the idealized model, we assume the atmosphere is completely transparent to sunlight. The planetary albedo ?P is the fraction of the incoming solar flux that is reflected back to space (since the atmosphere is assumed totally transparent to solar radiation, it does not matter whether this albedo is imagined to be caused by reflection at the surface of the planet or at the top of the atmosphere or a mixture). The flux density of the incoming solar radiation is specified by the solar constant S0. For application to planet Earth, appropriate values are S0=1366 W m-2 and ?P=0.30. Accounting for the fact that the surface area of a sphere is 4 times the area of its intercept (its shadow), the average incoming radiation is S0/4.

For longwave radiation, the surface of the Earth is assumed to have an emissivity of 1 (i.e., the earth is a black body in the infrared, which is realistic). The surface emits a radiative flux density F according to the Stefan-Boltzmann law:

where ? is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant. A key to understanding the greenhouse effect is Kirchhoff's law of thermal radiation. At any given wavelength the absorptivity of the atmosphere will be equal to the emissivity. Radiation from the surface could be in a slightly different portion of the infrared spectrum than the radiation emitted by the atmosphere. The model assumes that the average emissivity (absorptivity) is identical for either of these streams of infrared radiation, as they interact with the atmosphere. Thus, for longwave radiation, one symbol ? denotes both the emissivity and absorptivity of the atmosphere, for any stream of infrared radiation.

Idealized greenhouse model with an isothermal atmosphere. The blue arrows denote shortwave (solar) radiative flux density and the red arrow denotes longwave (terrestrial) radiative flux density. The radiation streams are shown with lateral displacement for clarity; they are collocated in the model. The atmosphere, which interacts only with the longwave radiation, is indicated by the layer within the dashed lines. A specific solution is depicted for ?=0.78 and ?p=0.3, representing Planet Earth. The numbers in the parentheses indicate the flux densities as a percent of S0/4.
The equilibrium solution with ε=0.82. The increase by Δε=0.04 corresponds to doubling carbon dioxide and the associated positive feedback on water vapor.
The equilibrium solution with no greenhouse effect: ε=0

The infrared flux density out of the top of the atmosphere:

In the last term, ? represents the fraction of upward longwave radiation from the surface that is absorbed, the absorptivity of the atmosphere. In the first term on the right, ? is the emissivity of the atmosphere, the adjustment of the Stefan-Boltzmann law to account for the fact that the atmosphere is not optically thick. Thus ? plays the role of neatly blending, or averaging, the two streams of radiation in the calculation of the outward flux density.

Zero net radiation leaving the top of the atmosphere requires:

Zero net radiation entering the surface requires:

Energy equilibrium of the atmosphere can be either derived from the two above equilibrium conditions, or independently deduced:

Note the important factor of 2, resulting from the fact that the atmosphere radiates both upward and downward. Thus the ratio of Ta to Ts is independent of ?:

Thus Ta can be expressed in terms of Ts, and a solution is obtained for Ts in terms of the model input parameters:


The solution can also be expressed in terms of the effective emission temperature Te, which is the temperature that characterizes the outgoing infrared flux density F, as if the radiator were a perfect radiator obeying F=?Te4. This is easy to conceptualize in the context of the model. Te is also the solution for Ts, for the case of ?=0, or no atmosphere:

With the definition of Te:

For a perfect greenhouse, with no radiation escaping from the surface, or ?=1:

Using the parameters defined above to be appropriate for Earth,

For ?=1:

For ?=0.78,


This value of Ts happens to be close to the published 287.2 K of the average global "surface temperature" based on measurements.[3] ?=0.78 implies 22% of the surface radiation escapes directly to space, consistent with the statement of 15% to 30% escaping in the greenhouse effect.

The radiative forcing for doubling carbon dioxide is 3.71 W m-2, in a simple parameterization. This is also the value endorsed by the IPCC. From the equation for ,

Using the values of Ts and Ta for ?=0.78 allows for = -3.71 W m-2 with =.019. Thus a change of ? from 0.78 to 0.80 is consistent with the radiative forcing from a doubling of carbon dioxide. For ?=0.80,

Thus this model predicts a global warming of ?Ts = 1.2 K for a doubling of carbon dioxide. A typical prediction from a GCM is 3 K surface warming, primarily because the GCM allows for positive feedback, notably from increased water vapor. A simple surrogate for including this feedback process is to posit an additional increase of =.02, for a total =.04, to approximate the effect of the increase in water vapor that would be associated with an increase in temperature. This idealized model then predicts a global warming of ?Ts = 2.4 K for a doubling of carbon dioxide, roughly consistent with the IPCC.

Tabular summary with K, C, and F units

? Ts (K) Ts (C) Ts (F)
0 254.8 -18.3 -1
0.78 288.3 15.2 59
0.80 289.5 16.4 61
0.82 290.7 17.6 64
1 303.0 29.9 86


The simple one-level atmospheric model can be readily extended to a multiple-layer atmosphere. In this case the equations for the temperatures become a series of coupled equations. This simple model always predicts a decreasing temperature away from the surface, and all levels increase in temperature as "greenhouse gases are added". Neither of these effects are fully realistic: in the real atmosphere temperatures increase above the tropopause, and temperatures in that layer are predicted (and observed) to decrease as GHG's are added. This is directly related to the non-greyness of the real atmosphere.

See also


  1. ^ "What is the Greenhouse Effect?" (PDF). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2007.
  2. ^ Chapter 2, The global energy balance, UT course Physical Climatology
  3. ^ Jones, P. D.; New, M.; Parker, D. E.; Martin, S.; Rigor, I. G. (1999). "Surface air temperature and its changes over the past 150 years". Reviews of Geophysics. 37 (2): 173-199. doi:10.1029/1999RG900002.


  • Bohren, Craig F.; Clothiaux, Eugene E. (2006). "1.6 Emissivity and Global Warming". Fundamentals of Atmospheric Radiation. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 31-41. ISBN 978-3-527-40503-9.
  • Petty, Grant W. (2006). "6.4.3 Simple Radiative Models of the Atmosphere". A First Course in Atmospheric Radiation (2nd ed.). Madison, Wisconsin: Sundog Pub. pp. 139-143. ISBN 978-0-9729033-1-8.

External links

  This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.



Music Scenes