Inverse Function

Get Inverse Function essential facts below. View Videos or join the Inverse Function discussion. Add Inverse Function to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
## Definitions

### Example: Squaring and square root functions

### Inverses and composition

### Notation

## Properties

### Uniqueness

### Symmetry

### Self-inverses

## Inverses in calculus

### Formula for the inverse

### Graph of the inverse

### Inverses and derivatives

## Real-world examples

## Generalizations

### Partial inverses

### Left and right inverses

#### Left inverses

#### Right inverses

#### Two-sided inverses

### Preimages

## See also

## Notes

## References

## Bibliography

## Further reading

## External links

This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Inverse Function

In mathematics, an **inverse function** (or **anti-function**)^{[1]} is a function that "reverses" another function: if the function f applied to an input x gives a result of y, then applying its inverse function g to y gives the result x, i.e., *g*(*y*) = *x* if and only if *f*(*x*) = *y*.^{[2]}^{[3]} The inverse function of f is also denoted as .^{[4]}^{[5]}^{[6]}

As an example, consider the real-valued function of a real variable given by *f*(*x*) = 5*x* - 7. Thinking of this as a step-by-step procedure (namely, take a number x, multiply it by 5, then subtract 7 from the result), to reverse this and get x back from some output value, say y, we would undo each step in reverse order. In this case, it means to add 7 to y, and then divide the result by 5. In functional notation, this inverse function would be given by,

With *y* = 5*x* - 7 we have that *f*(*x*) = *y* and *g*(*y*) = *x*.

Not all functions have inverse functions.^{[nb 1]} Those that do are called *invertible*. For a function *f*: *X* -> *Y* to have an inverse, it must have the property that for every y in Y, there is exactly one x in X such that *f*(*x*) = *y*. This property ensures that a function *g*: *Y* -> *X* exists with the necessary relationship with f.

Let f be a function whose domain is the set X, and whose codomain is the set Y. Then f is *invertible* if there exists a function g with domain Y and codomain X, with the property:

If f is invertible, then the function g is unique,^{[7]} which means that there is exactly one function g satisfying this property. Moreover, it also follows that the ranges of g and f equal their respective codomains.
The function g is called *the* inverse of f, and is usually denoted as *f*^{ -1},^{[4]} a notation introduced by John Frederick William Herschel in 1813.^{[8]}^{[9]}^{[10]}^{[11]}^{[12]}^{[nb 2]}

Stated otherwise, a function, considered as a binary relation, has an inverse if and only if the converse relation is a function on the codomain Y, in which case the converse relation is the inverse function.^{[13]}

Not all functions have an inverse. For a function to have an inverse, each element *y* ? *Y* must correspond to no more than one *x* ? *X*; a function f with this property is called one-to-one or an injection. If *f*^{ -1} is to be a function on Y, then each element *y* ? *Y* must correspond to some *x* ? *X*. Functions with this property are called surjections. This property is satisfied by definition if Y is the image of f, but may not hold in a more general context. To be invertible, a function must be both an injection and a surjection. Such functions are called bijections. The inverse of an injection *f*: *X* -> *Y* that is not a bijection (that is, not a surjection), is only a partial function on Y, which means that for some *y* ? *Y*, *f*^{ -1}(*y*) is undefined. If a function f is invertible, then both it and its inverse function *f*^{-1} are bijections.

Another convention is used in the definition of functions, referred to as the "set-theoretic" or "graph" definition using ordered pairs, which makes the codomain and image of the function the same.^{[14]} Under this convention, all functions are surjective,^{[nb 3]} so bijectivity and injectivity are the same. Authors using this convention may use the phrasing that a function is invertible if and only if it is an injection.^{[15]} The two conventions need not cause confusion, as long as it is remembered that in this alternate convention, the codomain of a function is always taken to be the image of the function.

The function *f*: **R** -> [0,?) given by *f*(*x*) = *x*^{2} is not injective, since each possible result *y* (except 0) corresponds to two different starting points in X - one positive and one negative, and so this function is not invertible. With this type of function, it is impossible to deduce a (unique) input from its output. Such a function is called non-injective or, in some applications, information-losing.^{[]}

If the domain of the function is restricted to the nonnegative reals, that is, the function is redefined to be *f*: [0, ?) -> [0, ?) with the same *rule* as before, then the function is bijective and so, invertible.^{[16]} The inverse function here is called the *(positive) square root function*.

If f is an invertible function with domain X and codomain Y, then

- , for every ; and , for every .
^{[6]}

Using the composition of functions, we can rewrite this statement as follows:

- and

where id_{X} is the identity function on the set X; that is, the function that leaves its argument unchanged. In category theory, this statement is used as the definition of an inverse morphism.

Considering function composition helps to understand the notation *f*^{ -1}. Repeatedly composing a function with itself is called iteration. If f is applied n times, starting with the value x, then this is written as *f*^{ n}(*x*); so *f*^{ 2}(*x*) = *f* (*f* (*x*)), etc. Since *f*^{ -1}(*f* (*x*)) = *x*, composing *f*^{ -1} and *f*^{ n} yields *f*^{ n-1}, "undoing" the effect of one application of f.

While the notation *f*^{ -1}(*x*) might be misunderstood,^{[6]} (*f*(*x*))^{-1} certainly denotes the multiplicative inverse of *f*(*x*) and has nothing to do with the inverse function of f.^{[12]}

In keeping with the general notation, some English authors use expressions like sin^{-1}(*x*) to denote the inverse of the sine function applied to x (actually a partial inverse; see below).^{[17]}^{[12]} Other authors feel that this may be confused with the notation for the multiplicative inverse of sin (*x*), which can be denoted as (sin (*x*))^{-1}.^{[12]} To avoid any confusion, an inverse trigonometric function is often indicated by the prefix "arc" (for Latin *arcus*).^{[18]}^{[19]} For instance, the inverse of the sine function is typically called the arcsine function, written as arcsin(*x*).^{[4]}^{[18]}^{[19]} Similarly, the inverse of a hyperbolic function is indicated by the prefix "ar" (for Latin *?rea*).^{[19]} For instance, the inverse of the hyperbolic sine function is typically written as arsinh(*x*).^{[19]} Other inverse special functions are sometimes prefixed with the prefix "inv", if the ambiguity of the *f*^{ -1} notation should be avoided.^{[1]}^{[19]}

Since a function is a special type of binary relation, many of the properties of an inverse function correspond to properties of converse relations.

If an inverse function exists for a given function f, then it is unique.^{[20]} This follows since the inverse function must be the converse relation, which is completely determined by f.

There is a symmetry between a function and its inverse. Specifically, if f is an invertible function with domain X and codomain Y, then its inverse *f*^{ -1} has domain Y and image X, and the inverse of *f*^{ -1} is the original function f. In symbols, for functions *f*:*X* -> *Y* and *f*^{-1}:*Y* -> *X*,^{[20]}

- and

This statement is a consequence of the implication that for f to be invertible it must be bijective. The involutory nature of the inverse can be concisely expressed by^{[21]}

The inverse of a composition of functions is given by^{[22]}

Notice that the order of g and f have been reversed; to undo f followed by g, we must first undo g, and then undo f.

For example, let *f*(*x*) = 3*x* and let *g*(*x*) = *x* + 5. Then the composition *g* ? *f* is the function that first multiplies by three and then adds five,

To reverse this process, we must first subtract five, and then divide by three,

This is the composition
(*f*^{ -1} ? *g*^{ -1})(*x*).

If X is a set, then the identity function on X is its own inverse:

More generally, a function *f* : *X* -> *X* is equal to its own inverse, if and only if the composition *f* ? *f* is equal to id_{X}. Such a function is called an involution.

Single-variable calculus is primarily concerned with functions that map real numbers to real numbers. Such functions are often defined through formulas, such as:

A surjective function f from the real numbers to the real numbers possesses an inverse, as long as it is one-to-one. That is, the graph of *y* = *f*(*x*) has, for each possible y value, only one corresponding x value, and thus passes the horizontal line test.

The following table shows several standard functions and their inverses:

Function *f*(*x*)Inverse *f*^{ -1}(*y*)Notes *x*+*a**y*-*a**a*-*x**a*-*y**mx*y/m *m*? 01/x (i.e. *x*^{-1})1/y (i.e. *y*^{-1})*x*,*y*? 0*x*^{2}(i.e. *y*^{1/2})*x*,*y*>= 0 only*x*^{3}(i.e. *y*^{1/3})no restriction on x and y *x*^{p}(i.e. *y*^{1/p})*x*,*y*>= 0 if p is even; integer*p*> 02 ^{x}lb *y**y*> 0*e*^{x}ln *y**y*> 010 ^{x}log *y**y*> 0*a*^{x}log _{a}*y**y*> 0 and*a*> 0*x**e*^{x}W ( *y*)*x*>= -1 and*y*>= -1/*e*trigonometric functions inverse trigonometric functions various restrictions (see table below) hyperbolic functions inverse hyperbolic functions various restrictions

One approach to finding a formula for *f*^{ -1}, if it exists, is to solve the equation *y* = *f*(*x*) for x.^{[23]} For example, if f is the function

then we must solve the equation *y* = (2*x* + 8)^{3} for x:

Thus the inverse function *f*^{ -1} is given by the formula

Sometimes, the inverse of a function cannot be expressed by a formula with a finite number of terms. For example, if f is the function

then f is a bijection, and therefore possesses an inverse function *f*^{ -1}. The formula for this inverse has an infinite number of terms:

If f is invertible, then the graph of the function

is the same as the graph of the equation

This is identical to the equation *y* = *f*(*x*) that defines the graph of f, except that the roles of x and y have been reversed. Thus the graph of *f*^{ -1} can be obtained from the graph of f by switching the positions of the x and y axes. This is equivalent to reflecting the graph across the line
*y* = *x*.^{[24]}^{[6]}

A continuous function f is invertible on its range (image) if and only if it is either strictly increasing or decreasing (with no local maxima or minima).^{[]} For example, the function

is invertible, since the derivative
*f′*(*x*) = 3*x*^{2} + 1 is always positive.

If the function f is differentiable on an interval I and *f′*(*x*) ? 0 for each *x* ? *I*, then the inverse *f*^{ -1} is differentiable on *f*(*I*).^{[25]} If *y* = *f*(*x*), the derivative of the inverse is given by the inverse function theorem,

Using Leibniz's notation the formula above can be written as

This result follows from the chain rule (see the article on inverse functions and differentiation).

The inverse function theorem can be generalized to functions of several variables. Specifically, a differentiable multivariable function *f *: **R**^{n} -> **R**^{n} is invertible in a neighborhood of a point p as long as the Jacobian matrix of f at p is invertible. In this case, the Jacobian of *f*^{ -1} at *f*(*p*) is the matrix inverse of the Jacobian of f at p.

- Let f be the function that converts a temperature in degrees Celsius to a temperature in degrees Fahrenheit, then its inverse function converts degrees Fahrenheit to degrees Celsius,
^{[5]}since - Suppose f assigns each child in a family its birth year. An inverse function would output which child was born in a given year. However, if the family has children born in the same year (for instance, twins or triplets, etc.) then the output cannot be known when the input is the common birth year. As well, if a year is given in which no child was born then a child cannot be named. But if each child was born in a separate year, and if we restrict attention to the three years in which a child was born, then we do have an inverse function. For example,
- Let R be the function that leads to an x percentage rise of some quantity, and F be the function producing an x percentage fall. Applied to $100 with x = 10%, we find that applying the first function followed by the second does not restore the original value of $100, demonstrating the fact that, despite appearances, these two functions are not inverses of each other.
- The formula to calculate the pH of a solution is pH=-log10[H+]. In many cases we need to find the concentration of acid from a pH measurement. The inverse function [H+]=10^-pH is used.

Even if a function f is not one-to-one, it may be possible to define a **partial inverse** of f by restricting the domain. For example, the function

is not one-to-one, since *x*^{2} = (-*x*)^{2}. However, the function becomes one-to-one if we restrict to the domain *x* >= 0, in which case

(If we instead restrict to the domain *x* , then the inverse is the negative of the square root of y.) Alternatively, there is no need to restrict the domain if we are content with the inverse being a multivalued function:

Sometimes, this multivalued inverse is called the **full inverse** of f, and the portions (such as and -) are called *branches*. The most important branch of a multivalued function (e.g. the positive square root) is called the *principal branch*, and its value at y is called the *principal value* of *f*^{ -1}(*y*).

For a continuous function on the real line, one branch is required between each pair of local extrema. For example, the inverse of a cubic function with a local maximum and a local minimum has three branches (see the adjacent picture).

These considerations are particularly important for defining the inverses of trigonometric functions. For example, the sine function is not one-to-one, since

for every real x (and more generally sin(*x* + 2?*n*) = sin(*x*) for every integer n). However, the sine is one-to-one on the interval
[-?/2, ?/2], and the corresponding partial inverse is called the arcsine. This is considered the principal branch of the inverse sine, so the principal value of the inverse sine is always between -?/2 and ?/2. The following table describes the principal branch of each inverse trigonometric function:^{[26]}

function Range of usual principal value arcsin -?/2 -1( *x*) ?/2arccos 0 -1( *x*) ?arctan -?/2 < tan ^{-1}(*x*) < ?/2arccot 0 < cot ^{-1}(*x*) < ?arcsec 0 -1( *x*) ?arccsc -?/2 -1( *x*) ?/2

Left and right inverses are not necessarily the same. If g is a left inverse for f, then g may or may not be a right inverse for f; and if g is a right inverse for f, then g is not necessarily a left inverse for f. For example, let *f*: **R** → [0, ?) denote the squaring map, such that *f*(*x*) = *x*^{2} for all x in **R**, and let g: [0, ?) → **R** denote the square root map, such that *g*(*x*) = for all *x* >= 0. Then *f*(*g*(*x*)) = *x* for all x in [0, ?); that is, g is a right inverse to f. However, g is not a left inverse to f, since, e.g., *g*(*f*(-1)) = 1 ? -1.

If *f*: *X* -> *Y*, a **left inverse** for f (or *retraction* of f ) is a function *g*: *Y* -> *X* such that composing f with g from the left gives the identity function^{[]}:

That is, the function g satisfies the rule

- If , then

Thus, g must equal the inverse of f on the image of f, but may take any values for elements of Y not in the image.

A function f is injective if and only if it has a left inverse or is the empty function.^{[]}

- If g is the left inverse of f, then f is injective. If f(x) = f(y), then .
- If f: X->Y is injective, f either is the empty function (
*X*= ?) or has a left inverse g:*Y*->*X*(X ? ?), which can be constructed as follows: for all y ? Y, if y is in the image of f (there exists x ? X such that f(x)=y), let g(y)=x (x is unique because f is injective); otherwise, let g(y) be an arbitrary element of X. For all x ? X, f(x) is in the image of f, so g(f(x)) = x by above, so g is a left inverse of f.

In classical mathematics, every injective function f with a nonempty domain necessarily has a left inverse; however, this may fail in constructive mathematics. For instance, a left inverse of the inclusion {0,1} -> **R** of the two-element set in the reals violates indecomposability by giving a retraction of the real line to the set {0,1} .^{[]}

A **right inverse** for f (or *section* of f ) is a function *h*: *Y* -> *X* such that^{[]}

That is, the function h satisfies the rule

- If , then

Thus, *h*(*y*) may be any of the elements of X that map to y under f.

A function f has a right inverse if and only if it is surjective (though constructing such an inverse in general requires the axiom of choice).

- If h is the right inverse of f, then f is surjective. For all , there is such that .
- If f is surjective, f has a right inverse h, which can be constructed as follows: for all , there is at least one such that (because f is surjective), so we choose one to be the value of h(y).
^{[]}

An inverse that is both a left and right inverse (a **two-sided inverse**), if it exists, must be unique. In fact, if a function has a left inverse and a right inverse, they are both the same two-sided inverse, so it can be called **the inverse**.

- If is a left inverse and a right inverse of , for all , .

A function has a two-sided inverse if and only if it is bijective.

- A bijective function f is injective, so it has a left inverse (if f is the empty function, is its own left inverse). f is surjective, so it has a right inverse. By the above, the left and right inverse are the same.
- If f has a two-sided inverse g, then g is a left inverse and right inverse of f, so f is injective and surjective.

If *f*: *X* -> *Y* is any function (not necessarily invertible), the **preimage** (or **inverse image**) of an element *y* ∈ *Y*, is the set of all elements of X that map to y:^{[]}

The preimage of y can be thought of as the image of y under the (multivalued) full inverse of the function f.

Similarly, if S is any subset of Y, the preimage of S, denoted ,^{[4]} is the set of all elements of X that map to S:

For example, take a function *f*: **R** -> **R**, where *f*: *x* ? *x*^{2}. This function is not invertible for reasons discussed in § Example: Squaring and square root functions. Yet preimages may be defined for subsets of the codomain:

The preimage of a single element *y* ∈ *Y* - a singleton set {*y*} - is sometimes called the *fiber* of y. When Y is the set of real numbers, it is common to refer to *f*^{ -1}({*y*}) as a *level set*.

- Lagrange inversion theorem, gives the Taylor series expansion of the inverse function of an analytic function
- Integral of inverse functions
- Inverse Fourier transform
- Reversible computing

- ^
^{a}^{b}Hall, Arthur Graham; Frink, Fred Goodrich (1909). "Article 14: Inverse trigonometric functions". Written at Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.*Plane Trigonometry*. New York: Henry Holt & Company. pp. 15-16. Retrieved .? = arcsin

*m*This notation is universally used in Europe and is fast gaining ground in this country. A less desirable symbol, ? = sin^{-1}*m*, is still found in English and American texts. The notation ? = inv sin*m*is perhaps better still on account of its general applicability. [...] A similar symbolic relation holds for the other trigonometric functions. It is frequently read 'arc-sine*m'*or 'anti-sine*m*,' since two mutually inverse functions are said each to be the anti-function of the other. **^**Keisler, Howard Jerome. "Differentiation" (PDF). Retrieved .§2.4

**^**Scheinerman, Edward R. (2013).*Mathematics: A Discrete Introduction*. Brooks/Cole. p. 173. ISBN 978-0840049421.- ^
^{a}^{b}^{c}^{d}"Comprehensive List of Algebra Symbols".*Math Vault*. 2020-03-25. Retrieved . - ^
^{a}^{b}"Inverse Functions".*www.mathsisfun.com*. Retrieved . - ^
^{a}^{b}^{c}^{d}Weisstein, Eric W. "Inverse Function".*mathworld.wolfram.com*. Retrieved . **^**Devlin 2004, p. 101, Theorem 4.5.1**^**Herschel, John Frederick William (1813) [1812-11-12]. "On a Remarkable Application of Cotes's Theorem".*Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London*. London: Royal Society of London, printed by W. Bulmer and Co., Cleveland-Row, St. James's, sold by G. and W. Nicol, Pall-Mall.**103**(Part 1): 8-26 [10]. doi:10.1098/rstl.1813.0005. JSTOR 107384. S2CID 118124706.**^**Herschel, John Frederick William (1820). "Part III. Section I. Examples of the Direct Method of Differences".*A Collection of Examples of the Applications of the Calculus of Finite Differences*. Cambridge, UK: Printed by J. Smith, sold by J. Deighton & sons. pp. 1-13 [5-6]. Archived from the original on 2020-08-04. Retrieved . [1] (NB. Inhere, Herschel refers to his 1813 work and mentions Hans Heinrich Bürmann's older work.)**^**Peirce, Benjamin (1852).*Curves, Functions and Forces*.**I**(new ed.). Boston, USA. p. 203.**^**Peano, Giuseppe (1903).*Formulaire mathématique*(in French).**IV**. p. 229.- ^
^{a}^{b}^{c}^{d}Cajori, Florian (1952) [March 1929]. "§472. The power of a logarithm / §473. Iterated logarithms / §533. John Herschel's notation for inverse functions / §535. Persistence of rival notations for inverse functions / §537. Powers of trigonometric functions".*A History of Mathematical Notations*.**2**(3rd corrected printing of 1929 issue, 2nd ed.). Chicago, USA: Open court publishing company. pp. 108, 176-179, 336, 346. ISBN 978-1-60206-714-1. Retrieved .[...] §473.

(xviii+367+1 pages including 1 addenda page) (NB. ISBN and link for reprint of 2nd edition by Cosimo, Inc., New York, USA, 2013.)*Iterated logarithms*[...] We note here the symbolism used by Pringsheim and Molk in their joint*Encyclopédie*article: "^{2}log_{b}*a*= log_{b}(log_{b}*a*), ...,^{k+1}log_{b}*a*= log_{b}(^{k}log_{b}*a*)." [...] §533.*John Herschel's notation for inverse functions,*sin^{−1}*x*, tan^{−1}*x*, etc., was published by him in the*Philosophical Transactions of London*, for the year 1813. He says (p. 10): "This notation cos.^{−1}*e*must not be understood to signify 1/cos.*e*, but what is usually written thus, arc (cos.=*e*)." He admits that some authors use cos.^{m}*A*for (cos.*A*)^{m}, but he justifies his own notation by pointing out that since*d*^{2}*x*, ?^{3}*x*, ?^{2}*x*mean*dd**x*,*x*,*x*, we ought to write sin.^{2}*x*for sin. sin.*x*, log.^{3}*x*for log. log. log.*x*. Just as we write*d*^{−n}V=?^{n}V, we may write similarly sin.^{−1}*x*=arc (sin.=*x*), log.^{−1}*x*.=c^{x}. Some years later Herschel explained that in 1813 he used*f*^{n}(*x*),*f*^{−n}(*x*), sin.^{−1}*x*, etc., "as he then supposed for the first time. The work of a German Analyst, Burmann, has, however, within these few months come to his knowledge, in which the same is explained at a considerably earlier date. He[Burmann], however, does not seem to have noticed the convenience of applying this idea to the inverse functions tan^{−1}, etc., nor does he appear at all aware of the inverse calculus of functions to which it gives rise." Herschel adds, "The symmetry of this notation and above all the new and most extensive views it opens of the nature of analytical operations seem to authorize its universal adoption."^{[a]}[...] §535.*Persistence of rival notations for inverse function.*— [...] The use of Herschel's notation underwent a slight change in Benjamin Peirce's books, to remove the chief objection to them; Peirce wrote: "cos^{[−1]}*x*," "log^{[−1]}*x*."^{[b]}[...] §537.*Powers of trigonometric functions.*—Three principal notations have been used to denote, say, the square of sin*x*, namely, (sin*x*)^{2}, sin*x*^{2}, sin^{2}*x*. The prevailing notation at present is sin^{2}*x*, though the first is least likely to be misinterpreted. In the case of sin^{2}*x*two interpretations suggest themselves; first, sin*x*· sin*x*; second,^{[c]}sin (sin*x*). As functions of the last type do not ordinarily present themselves, the danger of misinterpretation is very much less than in case of log^{2}*x*, where log*x*· log*x*and log (log*x*) are of frequent occurrence in analysis. [...] The notation sin^{n}*x*for (sin*x*)^{n}has been widely used and is now the prevailing one. [...] **^**Smith, Eggen & St. Andre 2006, p. 202, Theorem 4.9**^**Wolf 1998, p. 198**^**Fletcher & Patty 1988, p. 116, Theorem 5.1**^**Lay 2006, p. 69, Example 7.24**^**Thomas 1972, pp. 304-309- ^
^{a}^{b}Korn, Grandino Arthur; Korn, Theresa M. (2000) [1961]. "21.2.-4. Inverse Trigonometric Functions".*Mathematical handbook for scientists and engineers: Definitions, theorems, and formulars for reference and review*(3 ed.). Mineola, New York, USA: Dover Publications, Inc. p. 811. ISBN 978-0-486-41147-7. - ^
^{a}^{b}^{c}^{d}^{e}Oldham, Keith B.; Myland, Jan C.; Spanier, Jerome (2009) [1987].*An Atlas of Functions: with Equator, the Atlas Function Calculator*(2 ed.). Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-48807-3. ISBN 978-0-387-48806-6. LCCN 2008937525. - ^
^{a}^{b}Wolf 1998, p. 208, Theorem 7.2 **^**Smith, Eggen & St. Andre 2006, pg. 141 Theorem 3.3(a)**^**Lay 2006, p. 71, Theorem 7.26**^**Devlin 2004, p. 101**^**Briggs & Cochran 2011, pp. 28-29**^**Lay 2006, p. 246, Theorem 26.10**^**Briggs & Cochran 2011, pp. 39-42

- Briggs, William; Cochran, Lyle (2011).
*Calculus / Early Transcendentals Single Variable*. Addison-Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-66414-3. - Devlin, Keith J. (2004).
*Sets, Functions, and Logic / An Introduction to Abstract Mathematics*(3 ed.). Chapman & Hall / CRC Mathematics. ISBN 978-1-58488-449-1. - Fletcher, Peter; Patty, C. Wayne (1988).
*Foundations of Higher Mathematics*. PWS-Kent. ISBN 0-87150-164-3. - Lay, Steven R. (2006).
*Analysis / With an Introduction to Proof*(4 ed.). Pearson / Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-0-13-148101-5. - Smith, Douglas; Eggen, Maurice; St. Andre, Richard (2006).
*A Transition to Advanced Mathematics*(6 ed.). Thompson Brooks/Cole. ISBN 978-0-534-39900-9. - Thomas, Jr., George Brinton (1972).
*Calculus and Analytic Geometry Part 1: Functions of One Variable and Analytic Geometry*(Alternate ed.). Addison-Wesley. - Wolf, Robert S. (1998).
*Proof, Logic, and Conjecture / The Mathematician's Toolbox*. W. H. Freeman and Co. ISBN 978-0-7167-3050-7.

- Amazigo, John C.; Rubenfeld, Lester A. (1980). "Implicit Functions; Jacobians; Inverse Functions".
*Advanced Calculus and its Applications to the Engineering and Physical Sciences*. New York: Wiley. pp. 103-120. ISBN 0-471-04934-4. - Binmore, Ken G. (1983). "Inverse Functions".
*Calculus*. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 161-197. ISBN 0-521-28952-1. - Spivak, Michael (1994).
*Calculus*(3 ed.). Publish or Perish. ISBN 0-914098-89-6. - Stewart, James (2002).
*Calculus*(5 ed.). Brooks Cole. ISBN 978-0-534-39339-7.

- "Inverse function",
*Encyclopedia of Mathematics*, EMS Press, 2001 [1994]

This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Popular Products

Music Scenes

Popular Artists