This article has multiple issues. Please help talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)or discuss these issues on the
M?ori mythology and M?ori traditions are two major categories into which the remote oral history of New Zealand's M?ori may be divided. M?ori myths concern 'out of this world' tales relating to the origins of what was the observable world for the pre-European M?ori, often involving gods and demigods. M?ori tradition concerns more folkloric legends often involving historical or semi-historical forebears. Both categories merge in whakapapa to explain the overall origin of the M?ori and their connections to the world which they lived in.
M?ori had yet to invent a writing system before European contact, beginning in 1769, so they had no method to permanently record their histories, traditions, or mythologies. They relied on oral retellings memorised from generation to generation. The three forms of expression prominent in M?ori and Polynesian oral literature are genealogical recital, poetry, and narrative prose. Experts in these subjects were broadly known as tohunga.
The rituals, beliefs, and general worldview of M?ori society were ultimately based on an elaborate mythology that had been inherited from a Polynesian homeland (Hawaiki) and adapted and developed in the new setting. Alongside different Polynesian cultures having different versions of a given tradition, often the same story for a character, event, or object will have many different variations for every iwi, hap?, or individual who retells it, meaning there is never a fixed or 'correct' version of any particular story.
This section relies largely or entirely on a single source. (June 2020)
The reciting of genealogies (whakapapa) was particularly well developed in M?ori oral literature, where it served several functions in the recounting of tradition. Firstly it served to provide a kind of time scale which unified all M?ori mythology, tradition, and history, from the distant past to the present. It linked living people to the gods and the legendary heroes. By quoting appropriate genealogical lines, a narrator emphasised his or her connection with the characters whose deeds were being described, and that connection also proved that the narrator had the right to speak of them.
Prose narrative forms the great bulk of M?ori legendary material. Some appear to have been sacred or esoteric, but many of the legends were well-known stories told as entertainment in the long nights of winter.
Nevertheless, they should not be regarded simply as fairy tales to be enjoyed only as stories. The Maui myth, for example, was important not only as entertainment but also because it embodied the beliefs of the people concerning such things as the origin of fire, of death, and of the land in which they lived. The ritual chants concerning firemaking, fishing, death, and so on made reference to Maui and derived their power from such reference.-- Bruce Grandison Biggs, Maori Myths and Traditions (1966)
M?ori poetry was always sung or chanted; musical rhythms rather than linguistic devices served to distinguish it from prose. Rhyme or assonance were not devices used by the M?ori; only when a given text is sung or chanted will the metre become apparent. The lines are indicated by features of the music. The language of poetry tends to differ stylistically from prose. Typical features of poetic diction are the use of synonyms or contrastive opposites, and the repetition of key words.
Archaic words are common, including many which have lost any specific meaning and acquired a religious mystique. Abbreviated, sometimes cryptic utterances and the use of certain grammatical constructions not found in prose are also common.-- Bruce Grandison Biggs, Maori Myths and Traditions (1966)
Few records survive of the extensive body of M?ori mythology and tradition from the early years of European contact. The missionaries had the best opportunity to get the information, but failed to do so at first, in part because their knowledge of the language was imperfect. Most of the missionaries who did master the language were unsympathetic to M?ori beliefs, regarding them as 'puerile beliefs', or even 'works of the devil'. Exceptions to this general rule were Johan Wohlers of the South Island,[a] Richard Taylor, who worked in the Taranaki and Wanganui River areas, and William Colenso who lived at the Bay of Islands and also in Hawke's Bay. Their writings are valuable as some of the best sources for the legends of the areas where they worked.
In the 1840s Edward Shortland, Sir George Grey, and other non-missionaries began to collect the myths and traditions. At that time many M?ori were literate in their own language and the material collected was, in general, written by M?ori themselves in the same style as they spoke. The new medium seems to have had minimal effect on the style and content of the stories. Genealogies, songs, and narratives were written out in full, just as if they were being recited or sung. Many of these early manuscripts have been published, and as of 2012 scholars have access to a great body of material (more than for any other area of the Pacific) containing multiple versions of the great myth cycles known in the rest of Polynesia, as well as of the local traditions pertaining only to New Zealand. A great deal of the best material is found in two books, Nga Mahi a nga Tupuna (The Deeds of the Ancestors), collected by Sir George Grey and translated as Polynesian Mythology; and Ancient History of the M?ori (six volumes), edited by John White.[b]
Myths are set in the remote past and their content often have to do with the supernatural. They present M?ori ideas about the creation of the universe and the origins of gods (atua) and people. The mythology accounts for natural phenomena, the weather, the stars and the moon, the fish of the sea, the birds of the forest, and the forests themselves. Much of the culturally institutioned behaviour of the people finds its sanctions in myth, such as opening ceremonies performed at dawn to reflect the coming of light into the world.
The M?ori understanding of the development of the universe was expressed in genealogical form. These genealogies appear in many versions, in which several symbolic themes constantly recur. The cosmogonic genealogies are usually brought to a close by the two names Rangi and Papa (sky father and earth mother). The marriage of this celestial pair produced the gods and, in due course, all the living things of the earth.
In one generalised telling of the universe's creation: in the beginning there was Te Kore (The Nothing; Void) which became Te Korematua (The Parentless Void) in its search for procreation. From it came Te P? (The Night), becoming Te P?roa (The Long Night), and then becoming Te P?nui (The Great Night). Gradually Te Ao (The Light) glimmered into existence, stretching to all corners of the universe to become Te Aot?roa (The Long-Standing Light). Next came Te Ata (The Dawn), from which came Te M?k? (The Moisture), and Mahoranuiatea (Cloud of the Dawn). Te M?k? and Mahoranuiatea wed to form Rangi.:56
In other versions the evolution of the universe is likened to a tree, with its base, tap roots, branching roots, and root hairs. Another theme likens evolution to the development of a child in the womb, as in the sequence "the seeking, the searching, the conception, the growth, the feeling, the thought, the mind, the desire, the knowledge, the form, the quickening". Some, or all, of these themes may appear in the same genealogy.-- Bruce Grandison Biggs, Maori Myths and Traditions (1966)
Generally, Rangi's wife is Papa, though they are known throughout Polynesia, even when they're not considered spouses.:892 The pair laid in a tight embrace which blocked light from touching the world. From them came the children Haumia, Rongo, T?whiri, Tangaroa, T?, and T?ne. Some traditions may list some of these children alongside Rehua, Urutengangana, Aitu?, Tiki, Whiro, or Ruaumoko, among others. Often, a war or skirmish between the siblings ends with them becoming the ancestors of certain concepts, habitats, mannerisms, animals, tools, or plants that they each represent. For instance T?ne became T?ne Mahuta, the father of birds and the forest, and T? became T?matauenga, the father of humanity and its activities, such as war. Sometimes, T?ne Mahuta ascends to the sky after Ranginui to dress him with stars, who mourns for his wife every time it rains. Similarly, Papatnuku strains in an effort to reach the sky, causing earthquakes, and the mist comes from her sighing.
In a version involving Urutengangana, Whiro, T?whiri, Tangaroa, Tuamatua, Tumatakaka, T?, Paia, and T?ne; T?whiri "finally" agreed to the separation, while Whiro was against it. T?ne instructed Tumatakaka and T? to fetch axes with which to cut Rangi's arms off, and the blood that dripped from him down onto Papatnuku is said to be where the red sunset now comes from, as well as the origin of the colours red and blue in painting: red oxide and blue phosphate of iron. This is very different to the telling in which T?ne discards T?'s suggestions to slaughter the parents to ensure their separation, where T?whiri is the brother most upset by the idea to separate the parents at all.
In South Island traditions, Rakinui weds at least three wives including Papatnuku. Poharuatep? is one of Rakinui's wives, and they are Aoraki's parents. In these versions, the gods that are usually considered Rakinui's children may become each other's half-siblings, some even becoming Rakinui's grandsons.
Aoraki and his brothers Rakiora, Rakirua, and Rarakiroa travelled across the waters of the ocean to visit Rakinui's new wife - Papatnuku. On the return journey, their canoe (waka) became capsized on a reef, so they climbed atop its hull to escape drowning. They froze into stone, becoming the tallest peaks of the Southern Alps. Afterwards they were discovered by T?terakiwh?noa who enlisted Kahukura's help in shaping and clothing the land. Hence Te Waka o Aoraki became the South Island.
In a slight variant, Aoraki and his grandfather Kirikirikatata landed at Shag Point aboard the ?raiteuru, where they turned into the ever-associated mountain and range. Kirikirikatata persuaded Aroarokaehe to come sit with them there, while her husband Mauka Atua became a peak on the Ben Ohau Range.
There are many mythologies that describe the creation of humankind. Though T?matauenga is the major god associated with humanity and its activities, humanity's creation is sometimes credited to T?ne Mahuta,[d] and often involves Tiki. In one story, T?ne Mahuta abandoned his wife Rangahore, for only giving birth to a stone.
One such legend of humanity's origins is which T?ne Mahuta created the first woman, Hineahuone, from soil and with her became the father of Hinet?tama. T?ne Mahuta concealed Hinet?tama's parentage to her, and together they had children. Upon the realisation that he is her father, she flees to the underworld and renames herself to Hinenuitep?, becoming the goddess (atua) of night, death, and the underworld, where she receives the souls of their descendants. A similar story tells how Tiki found the first woman in a pool, imagined through his reflection and birthed into reality by covering the pool with dirt. She later became excited by the sight of an eel, passing on the excitement to Tiki and resulting in the first reproductive act.
Other versions say either T?ne Mahuta or T?matauenga created Tiki as the first man. In Ng?ti Hau traditions, M?rikoriko is said to be the original woman created by ?rohirohi with Paoro's help. After seducing Tiki, she gave birth to Hinekauataata.
In the days of old Tamanuiter?, the sun, used to move through the sky at much too fast a pace for humanity to complete all their days' chores leaving long, cold nights that lasted for many hours while Tamanuiter? slept. M?ui and his brothers journeyed to Tamanuiter?'s sleeping pit with a large rope, which in some tellings was made from their sister Hina's hair. The brothers fashioned the rope into a noose or net, and in doing so "discovered the mode of plaiting flax into stout square-shaped ropes, (tuamaka); and the manner of plaiting flat ropes, (paharahara); and of spinning round ropes", which when Tamanuiter? awoke found himself caught in. Using a patu made from the jawbone of their grandmother, Murirangawhenua, M?ui beat the sun into agreeing to slow down and give the world more time during the day.
In a tale collected from a K?i Tahu woman of Lake Ellesmere / Te Waihora, M?ui threw a giant to the ocean and then buried him beneath a mountain at Banks Peninsula. The next winter, the giant remained still underneath the mountain, but stirred during summer, which caused the land to split and form Akaroa Harbour. M?ui would continue to pile earth on top of the giant, and the giant would continue to stir every summer, creating a lake and Pigeon Bay in the process, until finally the giant could not move anymore.
M?ui's brothers constantly shunned him, and so never allowed him to join their fishing trips. One day he managed to sneak out to the waters with them by hiding in their canoe. Once they were far out to sea he revealed himself and used Murirangawhenua's jawbone, now fashioned into a fishing hook, to catch fish. Since his brothers would not allow him to use their bait, he pierced his nose with the hook and used his blood instead. Soon, M?ui caught hold of a giant fish said to be a gift from Murirangawhenua, which he successfully hauled up to the surface of the ocean, the canoe getting caught atop Mount Hikurangi which according to Ng?ti Porou, is still there.:5 M?ui went to examine his catch, and have it blessed by priests from Hawaiki, trusting his brothers to look after it. Out of jealousy though, the brothers took to beating the fish and cutting it open, carving out the mountains and valleys of what would become Te Ika-a-M?ui, the North Island. Te Waka a M?ui, the South Island, likewise was the name of M?ui's canoe, Stewart Island was Te Punga a M?ui, M?ui's anchor stone, and Cape Kidnappers became Te Matau-a-M?ui, M?ui's fish hook.:284
One night, M?ui put out all the fires in his village, out of a curiosity to learn where it actually comes from. His mother Taranga, the village's rangatira, sent M?ui to his grandmother Mahuika, the atua of fire, to retrieve more. She gave him a fingernail, but he extinguished it, so she kept giving him fingernails until she became furious with him, setting fire to the land and sea to attack M?ui. He transformed into a hawk to escape, but the fire singed the underside of his wings, turning them red. He prayed that his ancestors T?whirim?tea and Whaitirimatakataka send rain to extinguish the fire. Mahuika threw her last nail at M?ui, which missed and set fire to the kaik?mako, t?tara, patete, pukatea, and m?hoe trees; the dried sticks of the m?hoe were brought back by M?ui to show his people how to make fire for themselves.
M?ui turned Hina's husband, Irawaru, into the first dog (kur?) after a dispute they had during a fishing trip.:107 Once they reached the shore M?ui crushed Irawaru underneath the canoe, breaking his back and stretching out his limbs, turning him into a dog. Upon learning of this, Hina threw herself to the ocean. Instead of drowning, she was carried across the waves to Motutapu, where she became the wife of Chief Tinirau, son of Tangaroa. She took on the name Hinauri to reflect her mood since M?ui changed Irawaru.
With Tinirau, Hina became the mother of T?huruhuru. The tohunga, Kae, performed the baptism ritual for the child, and so Tinirau allowed Kae to ride his pet whale (possibly a taniwha), Tutunui, in order to return home. This proved to be a mistake on Tinirau's part, as despite his strict instructions to the contrary, Kae rode Tutunui into shallow water where he became stranded and died. Kae and his people then used the whale's flesh for food. Hinarau and a party of women put Kae to sleep with a magical lullaby and brought him back to Motutapu. After he woke he was taunted and killed. This broke out into a war, a notable event of which Whakatau assisted Tinirau in burning his enemies.
In a South Island variant of that myth, Tinirau and Tutunui met Kae who was in a canoe. Kae borrowed Tutunui, and Tinirau borrowed a nautilus from his friend Tautini in a continued search for Hineteiwaiwa. When Tinirau smells the wind he realises Tutunui is being roasted.
In a very different variant, Hina was M?ui's wife. Over a period of time where Hina visited a bathing pool Te Tunaroa, the father of eels, molested Hina. As revenge, M?ui cut Te Tunaroa's body into bits, throwing them into different habitats where they became different kinds of fish; conger eels, freshwater eels, lampreys, and hagfish.
One day M?ui followed his mother to the underworld in search of his father, Makeatutara, who mistakenly performed the baptismal rituals for M?ui's birth improperly, making it certain that he would die, so M?ui decided to overcome death by facing his ancestress Hinenuitep?. Makeatutara instructs that she can be seen as the red flashes of sunset. His companions vary from version to version, usually being either his brothers or a group of small birds. To defeat Hinenuitep?, M?ui had to crawl through her vagina in the form of a worm, and climb out through her mouth. Unfortunately, one of his brothers, or one of the birds named P?wakawaka, bursts out into laughter at the sight of M?ui beginning the task which wakes Hinenuitep?, who crushes him with the obsidian and pounamu teeth between her thighs.
In one rare tradition, M?ui swapped faces with his wife Rohe against her will, out of jealousy that she was much prettier while he was ugly. She left to the underworld in anger, becoming the atua of night and death. The spirits of those who pass through her realm of Te Urangaoter? may get beaten by her. M?ui and Rohe's child was Rangihore, the atua of rocks and stones.
Whaitiri, a cannibalistic atua of thunder and a granddaughter of M?ui, married the mortal Kaitangata (Eat people) believing, as his name suggested, that he too was a cannibal. After she killed her favourite slave for him, she was disappointed to learn that he is instead a kind man, who was horrified at the flesh offering. His diet consisted of fish instead, but Whaitiri grew tired of eating fish, and so killed Kaitangata's relatives. When he returned from a fishing trip she asked him to perform the chants that are used to offer flesh to the gods, but he did not know any such chants. After eating, she turned his relatives' bones into barbed fish hooks for Kaitangata to use, with which he caught a few h?puku. She ate the fish, which had become infused with tapu from the hooks, and as a result she was gradually blinded. Later she was insulted by her husband when he remarked at her strange nature, so she revealed that she is 'thunder' from the sky, and returned there.
Whaitiri's son Hem? had been killed by the ponaturi. His sons, T?whaki and Karihi, made an ascent into the sky, where they found Whaitiri, who had since become fully blinded. Her only food consisted of k?mara and taro. She reveals to her grandsons how to climb further into the heavens but, in some versions, Karihi falls to his death.
While they were in the sky, T?whaki met his wife, either Tangotango or Hinepiripiri. In the version with Tangotango, the couple quarrel and she returns to heaven. There's another version where T?whaki was entirely human, and offended his wife Tangotango (daughter of Whaitiri), prompting her to return to the sky. In order to find her he meets his blind ancestress Matakerep?, who helps him climb further.
The brothers managed to save their mother, and together they trapped the ponaturi in their house and blocked off all potential sources of light or escape. Their mother explained that sunlight could kill the ponaturi, so the three tricked the ponaturi into believing it was still night, and then suddenly lit the building on fire, and tore the door off. Only two ponaturi survived; Tongahiti and Kanae.
A son named Wahieroa was born to T?whaki and Hinepiripiri, so named because after an attack on T?whaki, Hinepiripiri warmed him by the fire, with firewood. Alternatively, T?whaki's people were too lazy to collect firewood for their village, so T?whaki collected it himself and threw it to the ground, startling the people. Wahieroa would marry Matoka-rau-t?whiri, who when pregnant had a craving for t flesh, and so asked her Wahieroa to kill t for her to eat. In journeying through the forest, Wahieroa is captured and killed by the ogre Matuku-tangotango.
R?t?, the son of Wahieroa and Hinepiripiri, set out to avenge his father's death. How he killed Matoka-rau-t?whiri is dependent on where the tale is told, but, he won in the end, and used the ogre's bones to make spears. He soon found out though, that Wahieroa's bones were lying with T?whaki's old enemies, the ponaturi.
In order to get to the ponaturi, R?t? had to build a canoe. R?t? set about chopping down the tree for his canoe, cutting the top away, and went home after the day's work was over. The next day, he found the tree standing upright as if it had never been touched. He repeated the task of chopping it, and the next day it was again re-erected. He decided to hide in a nearby bush for the night to understand what was happening, and discovered that his work was being undone by the birdlike h?kuturi spirits, who explained that he didn't perform the correct rituals and thus his attempts to fell the tree were an insult to T?ne Mahuta. With expressing regret, the h?kuturi constructed his canoe for him.
While rescuing Wahieroa's bones, R?t? overheard the ponaturi singing a song called Titikura while banging the bones together. He killed the priests and later used the song to turn the tides of a losing battle against them. In a flash, the dead of R?t?'s people returned to life and slaughtered the ponaturi in their thousands.
R?t?'s sons by Tonga-rau-tawhiri were T?whakararo and Whakatau. In other accounts, their parents were T?huruhuru and Apakura.:15 In other accounts still, Apakura as T?whakararo's wife threw an apron or girdle into the ocean, which a deity named Rongotakawhiu turned into Whakatau. The boy was taught a handful of magical secrets by the deity, and he was capable of living under the sea. As Whakatau's brother, T?whakararo had been murdered by the ?ti H?pai (or Raeroa) tribe, so the former avenged him by gathering an army and slaughtering the offending tribe. This is one event that was said to trigger migrations from Hawaiki.
Every M?ori social group had its own body of traditional belief which validated its claims to the territory it occupied, gave authority to those of high rank, and justified the group's external relationships with other groups. These purposes were served because the members of the groups concerned believed that the traditions were true records of past events, and they acted accordingly. Alliances between groups were facilitated if it was believed that they shared a common heritage, and the commoner's respect for and fear of his chief were based, in part at least, on his belief in the semi-divine ancestry of those of high rank.-- Bruce Grandison Biggs, Maori Myths and Traditions (1966):450
Traditions, as opposed to myths, tell of incidents which are for the most part humanly possible. Genealogical links with the present place them within the past millennium. They are geographically located in New Zealand and knowledge of them is confined to this country.-- Bruce Grandison Biggs, Maori Myths and Traditions (1966)
The South Island's earliest iwi, Waitaha, traces its ancestors back to the Uruaokapuarangi, captained by R?kaihaut? who sailed from Te Patunuio?io to New Zealand with the tohunga k?k?rangi (astronomer) Matiti's advice, and in mythology was credited with digging many of the island's great lakes and waterways. The Kapakitua is sometimes said to have arrived at a similar time, bringing the progenators of Ng?ti Hawea - an iwi that became absorbed into Waitaha. Similar ancient groups that have slipped into mythology might include Maero and Rapuwai.
Toi (Toi-kai-r?kau; Toi-the-wood-eater) is the traditional origin ancestor of the tribes of the east coast of the North Island. Their traditions make no mention of his coming to New Zealand, and the inference is that he was born there. Ng?i T?hoe say that Toi's 'ancestor' T?wakawaka was the first to settle the country aboard Te Aratauwh?iti, "but only his name is remembered".:451[e] A man named Kahukura would take Toi's canoe, the Horouta and return to Hawaiki with it. He sent k?mara back to the new lands with the canoe, which in Ng?ti Kahungunu traditions was accompanied by Kiwa, who later sailed around to Gisborne and became the first man there.
According to the iwi of North Auckland and the west coast of the North Island, Kupe sailed to New Zealand in the Matahourua from Hawaiki after murdering a man called Hoturapa, and making off with his wife, Kuramarotini. Traditional songs recount Kupe's travels along the coast of New Zealand. In Ng?puhi tradition, he brought the first three dogs and sent them to Cape Reinga with a few men to guard the passage to the afterlife, who would become the Ng?ti Kur?. Kupe's exploration of Marlborough had been impeded by Te K?hui Tipua, frequently described as a tribe of ogres or giants that arrived with R?kaihaut?. Kupe managed to kill Te K?hui Tipua by creating Lake Grassmere and drowning their villages. He sailed back to Hawaiki and never came back to the land he discovered. However, others came to New Zealand according to his directions.:451
Ngahue, a contemporary of Kupe, sailed to New Zealand in his canoe, the T?whirirangi. While there he killed a moa and discovered pounamu. After returning to Hawaiki, Ngahue helped build the Arawa using adzes made from the pounamu.
Patupaiarehe were credited with being the source of fishing nets and flax weaving. There are at least two traditions regarding this: In one story, another man named Kahukura happened across the patupaiarehe pulling in their nets during the night, and offered to help them. When they realised he was a mortal, they fled from him.:328 In another story of the Hauraki M?ori, a patupaiarehe named Hinerehia from the Moehau Range married a mortal man. She only weaved during the night, and so was tricked into weaving past dawn. Upset by this, she travelled within a cloud back to her mountains, where her laments can still be heard under heavy fog.
Migration traditions are numerous, and often only pertain to small areas and to small groups of iwi.
A deifed person, or persons, named Uenuku features with certain roles in some canoes' migration stories. Often he is an ariki of Hawaiki who serves as a catalyst for disputes, which end with the migrations to New Zealand.:572 The name Uenuku also belongs to one or more atua associated with rainbows and war;:572 depending on the telling, he was either a mortal who was visited by a mistmaiden from the heavens and then turned into a rainbow to be with her after tricking her into staying in his house past dawn, or he was a spirit who visited Tamatea Arikinui's wife night after night and impregnated her. Te Uenuku is a Tainui artefact associated with the rainbow entity.
Each tribal group, whether iwi or hap?, maintained its discrete traditional record, which generally concerned "great battles and great men"; these stories were linked together by genealogy, which in M?ori tradition is an elaborate art.:453 Hap? were often named after a notable ancestor from the wider iwi; the name of the iwi itself was often borrowed from a founding ancestor. Sometimes, a group was named after a particular event.
After the arrival of the Arawa in the Bay of Plenty, its people dispersed outwards and towards Lake Taupo. From the canoe, a separate Waitaha iwi evolved. Descendants of the canoe's priest Ng?toro-i-rangi, Ng?ti T?wharetoa, began attacking the local Ng?ti Hotu and Ng?ti Ruakopiri, and drove them from Lake Taupo and Lake Rotoaira. The Whanganui M?ori would later drive them from Kakahi further into the King Country, after which they disappeared from history.
Most of the greatest remembered traditions of the South Island are often told by or involve K?ti M?moe, Ng?i Tara, Ng?ti Wairangi, Ng?ti T?matak?kiri, Ng?i Tahu, or Rangit?ne; Waitaha was conquered and absorbed into K?ti M?moe, which along with Ng?ti Wairangi and Ng?ti T?matak?kiri were conquered by Ng?i Tahu. Ng?ti T?matak?kiri were additionally harassed by their brethren iwi Ng?ti Kuia and Ng?ti Apa.
The M?ori that clashed with Abel Tasman's crew at Golden Bay in December 1642 were of Ng?ti T?matak?kiri, and it is sometimes theorised that Ng?ti T?matak?kiri may have interpreted the Dutch as patupaiarehe. Another theory suggests that the iwi was concerned about the intruders possibly waking the taniwha Ng?rara Huarau in anchoring too close to a certain point.
Some of Ng?i Tahu's more memorable ancestors included;
One battle that K?ti M?moe won against Ng?i Tahu was at Lowther under Tutemakohu, whose taua retreated to the mist after their victory. A K?ti M?moe chief of Waiharakeke Pa named Te Whetuki was described as being "of strangely wild aspect", and covered in long hair.:194 One tradition states that a group of K?ti M?moe managed to escape an attack by forever disappearing into the forests on the other side of Lake Te Anau,:196 the descendants of which were possibly sighted in the H?wea / Bligh Sound by Captain Howell in 1843, and again in 1850/1 by Captain Stokes, and in 1872 by Kupa Haereroa at Lake Ada,:198 and finally in 1882.
Io is a godly figure whose existence before European (specifically Christian European) arrival has been debated. He didn't appear in manuscripts or oral discourse until late in the 19th century. At least two references to him from 1891 appear in Edward Tregear's The Maori-Polynesian comparative dictionary, where he is described as "God, the Supreme Being",:106 and as a figure in Moriori genealogy, but as Tiki's descendant.:669 A third reference might be found in the same book under Ng?ti Maniapoto's genealogy.:667 It should also be noted that Io seems to be present in mythologies from Hawai'i, the Society Islands, and the Cook Islands.
In some versions of T?whaki's story, he sends his people to a high place to escape a flood which he summons to drown the village of his jealous brothers-in-law. There is a suggestion that this story might have inspiration from the Genesis flood narrative, and Hem? is sometimes reimagined as Shem. The way George Grey recorded the myths of T?whaki in his 1854 Polynesian Mythology may have given rise to these connections::165
[T?whaki] left the place where his faithless brothers-in-law lived, and went away taking all his own warriors and their families with him, and built a fortified village upon the top of a very lofty mountain, where he could easily protect himself; and they dwelt there. Then he called aloud to the Gods, his ancestors, for revenge, and they let the floods of heaven descend, and the earth was overwhelmed by the waters and all human beings perished, and the name given to that event was 'The overwhelming of the Mataaho,' and the whole of the race perished.-- Sir George Grey, Polynesian Mythology (1854)
Similarly, in the migration story where Ruatapu attempts to kill his brother Paikea, one Ng?ti Porou tradition says that Ruatapu summoned great waves that destroyed their village, which Paikea only survived through the intervention of a goddess named Moakuramanu, and that Ruatapu then threatened to return as the great waves of the eighth month.:143-146