Rhoticity in English
Get Rhoticity in English essential facts below. View Videos or join the Rhoticity in English discussion. Add Rhoticity in English to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
Rhoticity in English

Rhoticity in English is the pronunciation of the historical rhotic consonant /r/ in all contexts by speakers of certain varieties of English. The presence or absence of rhoticity is one of the most prominent distinctions by which varieties of English can be classified. In rhotic varieties, the historical English /r/ sound is preserved in all pronunciation contexts. In non-rhotic varieties, speakers no longer pronounce /r/ in postvocalic environments--that is, when it is immediately after a vowel and not followed by another vowel.[1][2] For example, in isolation, a rhotic English speaker pronounces the words hard and butter as and , whereas a non-rhotic speaker "drops" or "deletes" the /r/ sound, pronouncing them as and .[a] When an r is at the end of a word but the next word begins with a vowel, as in the phrase "better apples", most non-rhotic speakers will pronounce the /r/ in that position (the linking R), since it is followed by a vowel in this case. (Not all non-rhotic varieties use the linking R; for example, it is absent in non-rhotic varieties of Southern American English.)[5] Many speakers that use the linking R generalize it as the intrusive R, applying it to words that traditionally do not end in /r/ (as in "Australia and New Zealand", where /r/ may be suffixed to Australia because the next word begins with a vowel, despite the spelling), but this is sometimes stigmatized.[by whom?]

The rhotic varieties of English include the dialects of South West England, Scotland, Ireland, and most of the United States and Canada. The non-rhotic varieties include most of the dialects of modern England, Wales, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa. In some varieties, such as those of some parts of the southern and northeastern United States,[6][2] rhoticity is a sociolinguistic variable: postvocalic r is deleted depending on an array of social factors such as the speaker's age, social class, ethnicity, or the degree of formality of the speech event.

Evidence from written documents suggests that loss of postvocalic /r/ began sporadically during the mid-15th century, although these /r/-less spellings were uncommon and were restricted to private documents, especially ones written by women.[2] In the mid-18th century, postvocalic /r/ was still pronounced in most environments, but by the 1740s to 1770s it was often deleted entirely, especially after low vowels. By the early 19th century, the southern British standard was fully transformed into a non-rhotic variety, though some variation persisted as late as the 1870s.[7]

The loss of postvocalic /r/ in British English influenced southern and eastern American port cities with close connections to Britain, causing their upper-class pronunciation to become non-rhotic while the rest of the United States remained rhotic.[8] Non-rhotic pronunciation continued to influence American prestige speech until the 1860s, when the American Civil War began to shift America's centers of wealth and political power to rhotic areas with fewer cultural connections to the old colonial and British elites.[9] Rhotic speech in particular became prestigious in the United States rapidly after the Second World War,[10] reflected in the national standard of radio and television since the mid-20th century embracing historical /r/.



Red areas indicate where rural English accents were rhotic in the 1950s.[11]
Red areas are where English dialects of the late 20th century were rhotic.[12]

The earliest traces of a loss of /r/ in English appear in the early 15th century and occur before coronal consonants, especially /s/, giving modern "ass (buttocks)" (Old English ears, Middle English ers or ars), and "bass (fish)" (OE bærs, ME bars).[2] A second phase of /r/-loss began during the 15th century and was characterized by sporadic and lexically variable deletion, such as monyng "morning" and cadenall "cardinal".[2] These /r/-less spellings appeared throughout the 16th and the 17th centuries but are uncommon and are restricted to private documents, especially ones written by women.[2] No English authorities described loss of /r/ in the standard language before the mid-18th century, and many did not fully accept it until the 1790s.[2]

During the mid-17th century, a number of sources described /r/ as being weakened but still present.[13] The English playwright Ben Jonson's English Grammar, published posthumously in 1640, recorded that /r/ was "sounded firme in the beginning of words, and more liquid in the middle, and ends."[7] The next major documentation of the pronunciation of /r/ appeared a century later, in 1740, when the British author of a primer for French students of English said that "in many words r before a consonant is greatly softened, almost mute, and slightly lengthens the preceding vowel."[14]

By the 1770s, postvocalic /r/-less pronunciation was becoming common around London even in formal educated speech. The English actor and linguist John Walker used the spelling ar to indicate the long vowel of aunt in his 1775 rhyming dictionary.[4] In his influential Critical Pronouncing Dictionary and Expositor of the English Language (1791), Walker reported, with a strong tone of disapproval, that "the r in lard, bard,... is pronounced so much in the throat as to be little more than the middle or Italian a, lengthened into baa, baad...."[7] Americans returning to England after the American Revolutionary War, which lasted from 1775 to 1783, reported surprise at the significant changes in fashionable pronunciation that had taken place.[15]

By the early 19th century, the southern British standard had been fully transformed into a non-rhotic variety but continued to be variable as late as the 1870s.[7] The extent of rhoticity across England in the mid-19th century is summarized as widespread in the book New Zealand English: its Origins and Evolution:

[T]he only areas of England... for which we have no evidence of rhoticity in the mid-nineteenth century lie in two separate corridors. The first runs south from the North Riding of Yorkshire through the Vale of York into north and central Lincolnshire, nearly all of Nottinghamshire, and adjacent areas of Derbyshire, Leicestershire, and Staffordshire. The second includes all of Norfolk, western Suffolk and Essex, eastern Cambridgeshire and Hertfordshire, Middlesex, and northern Surrey and Kent.[16]

North America

The loss of postvocalic /r/ in the British prestige standard in the late 18th and the early 19th centuries influenced American port cities with close connections to Britain and caused upper-class pronunciation to become non-rhotic in many eastern and southern port cities, such as New York City, Boston, Alexandria, Charleston, and Savannah.[8] Like regional dialects in England, however, the accents of other areas in America remained rhotic in a display of linguistic "lag," which preserved the original pronunciation of /r/.[8]

Non-rhotic pronunciation continued to influence American prestige speech until the 1860s, when the American Civil War shifted America's centers of wealth and political power to areas with fewer cultural connections to the old colonial and British elite.[9] This largely removed the prestige associated with non-rhotic pronunciation in America, and when the advent of radio and television in the 20th century established a national standard of American pronunciation, it became a rhotic variety that has preserved historical /r/.[9] The trend seems to have accelerated after the Second World War.[10] The Mid-Atlantic accent, a 20th-century American cultivated accent, may be called the last bastion of non-rhotic prestige speech, staying fashionable in certain contexts (most notably theatre and film) into the 1950s.

Modern pronunciation

In most non-rhotic accents, if a word ending in written "r" is followed immediately by a word beginning with a vowel, the /r/ is pronounced, as in water ice. That phenomenon is referred to as "linking R". Many non-rhotic speakers also insert an epenthetic /r/ between vowels when the first vowel is one that can occur before syllable-final r (drawring for drawing). The so-called "intrusive R" has been stigmatized, but many speakers of Received Pronunciation (RP) now frequently "intrude" an epenthetic /r/ at word boundaries, especially if one or both vowels is schwa. For example, the idea of it becomes the idea-r-of it, Australia and New Zealand becomes Australia-r-and New Zealand, the formerly well-known India-r-Office and "Laura Norder" (Law and Order). The typical alternative used by RP speakers (and some rhotic speakers as well) is to insert a glottal stop wherever an intrusive R would otherwise have been placed.[17][18]

For non-rhotic speakers, what was historically a vowel, followed by /r/, is now usually realized as a long vowel. That is called compensatory lengthening, which occurs after the elision of a sound. In RP and many other non-rhotic accents card, fern, born are thus pronounced [k?:d], [f?:n], [b?:n] or similar (actual pronunciations vary from accent to accent). That length may be retained in phrases and so car pronounced in isolation is [k?:], but car owner is ['k?:rn?]. However, a final schwa usually remains short and so water in isolation is [w?:t?]. In RP and similar accents, the vowels /i:/ and /u:/ (or /?/), when they are followed by r, become diphthongs that end in schwa and so near is [n] and poor is [p]. However, they have other realizations as well, including monophthongal ones. Once again, the pronunciations vary from accent to accent. The same happens to diphthongs followed by r, but they may be considered to end in rhotic speech in /?r/, which reduces to schwa, as usual, in non-rhotic speech. Thus, in isolation, tire, is pronounced [ta] and sour is [sa].[19] For some speakers, some long vowels alternate with a diphthong ending in schwa and so wear may be [w] but wearing ['w?:].

The compensatory lengthening view is challenged by Wells, who stated that during the 17th century, stressed vowels followed by /r/ and another consonant or word boundary underwent a lengthening process, known as pre-r lengthening. The process was not a compensatory lengthening process but an independent development, which explains modern pronunciations featuring both [?:] (bird, fur) and [?:r] (stirring, stir it) according to their positions: [?:r] was the regular outcome of the lengthening, which shortened to [?:] after r-dropping occurred in the 18th century. The lengthening involved "mid and open short vowels" and so the lengthening of /?:/ in car was not a compensatory process caused by r-dropping.[20]

Even General American speakers commonly drop the /r/ in non-final unstressed syllables if another syllable in the same word also contains /r/, which may be referred to as r-dissimilation. Examples include the dropping of the first /r/ in the words surprise, governor, and caterpillar. In more careful speech, however, all /r/ sounds are still retained.[21]


Final post-vocalic /r/ in farmer in English rural dialects of the 1950s[22]
  [?] (non-rhotic)
  [] (alveolar)
  [] (retroflex)
  [:] (retroflex & long)
  [] (uvular)
  [] (back & rounded)

Rhotic accents include most varieties of Scottish English, Irish or Hiberno-English, North American English, Barbadian English and Philippine English.

Non-rhotic accents include most varieties of English English, Welsh English, New Zealand English, Australian English, South African English, and Trinidadian and Tobagonian English.

Semi-rhotic accents have also been studied, such as Jamaican English, in which r is pronounced (as in even non-rhotic accents) before vowels, but also in stressed monosyllables or stressed syllables at the ends of words (e.g. in "car" or "dare"); however, it is not pronounced at the end of unstressed syllables (e.g. in "water") or before consonants (e.g. "market").[23]

Variably rhotic accents are also widely documented, in which deletion of r (when not before vowels) is optional; in these dialects the probability of deleting r may vary depending on social, stylistic, and contextual factors. Variably rhotic accents comprise much of Indian English,[24] Pakistani English,[25] and Caribbean English, for example, as spoken in Tobago, Guyana, Antigua and Barbuda, and the Bahamas.[26] They also include current-day New York City English most modern varieties of Southern American English,[27] New York Latino English, and some Boston English, as well as some varieties of Scottish English.[28]

Non-rhotic accents in the Americas include those of the rest of the Caribbean and Belize. Additionally, there are people with non-rhotic accents who are children of at least one rhotic-accented parent but grew up, or were educated, in non-rhotic countries like Australia, England, New Zealand, South Africa, or Wales. By contrast, people who have at least one non-rhotic-accented parent but were raised, or started their education, in Canada, any rhotic Caribbean country, Ireland, Scotland, or the United States, speak with rhotic accents.


Though most English varieties in England are non-rhotic today, stemming from a trend toward this in southeastern England accelerating in the very late 18th century onwards, rhotic accents are still found in the West Country (south and west of a line from near Shrewsbury to around Portsmouth), the Corby area, some of Lancashire (north and west of the centre of Manchester), some parts of Yorkshire and Lincolnshire, and in the areas that border Scotland. The prestige form, however, exerts a steady pressure toward non-rhoticity. Thus the urban speech of Bristol or Southampton is more accurately described as variably rhotic, the degree of rhoticity being reduced as one moves up the class and formality scales.[29]


Most Scottish accents are rhotic, but non-rhotic speech has been reported in Edinburgh since the 1970s and Glasgow since the 1980s.[28]


Welsh English is mostly non-rhotic, however variably rhotic accents are present in accents influenced by Welsh, especially in North Wales. Additionally, while Port Talbot English is largely non-rhotic, some speakers may supplant the front vowel of bird with /?/.[30]

United States

Red dots show major U.S. cities where the 2006 Atlas of North American English found 50% or higher non-rhotic speech in at least one white speaker within their data sample.[10] (Non-rhotic speech may be found in speakers of African-American English throughout the country.)

American English is predominantly rhotic today, but at the end of the 1800s non-rhotic accents were common throughout much of the coastal Eastern and Southern U.S., including along the Gulf Coast. In fact, non-rhotic accents were established in all major U.S. cities along the Atlantic coast except for the Delaware Valley area, with its early Scots-Irish influence, centered around Philadelphia and Baltimore. Since the American Civil War and even more intensely during the early to mid-1900s (presumably correlated with the Second World War),[10] rhotic accents began to gain social prestige nationwide, even in the aforementioned traditionally non-rhotic areas. Thus, non-rhotic accents are increasingly perceived by Americans as sounding foreign or less educated due to an association with working-class or immigrant speakers in Eastern and Southern cities, while rhotic accents are increasingly perceived as sounding more "General American".[31]

Today, non-rhoticity in the American South is found primarily among older speakers, and only in some areas such as central and southern Alabama; Savannah, Georgia; and Norfolk, Virginia,[6] as well as in the Yat accent of New Orleans. The local dialects of eastern New England, especially Boston, Massachusetts, extending into the states of Maine and (less so) New Hampshire, show some non-rhoticity, as well as the traditional Rhode Island dialect; however, this feature has been receding in the recent generations. The New York City dialect is traditionally non-rhotic, though William Labov more precisely classifies its current form as variably rhotic,[32] with many of its sub-varieties now fully rhotic, such as in northeastern New Jersey.

African-American Vernacular English (AAVE) is largely non-rhotic, and in some non-rhotic Southern and AAVE accents, there is no linking r, that is, /r/ at the end of a word is deleted even when the following word starts with a vowel, so that "Mister Adams" is pronounced [m?st?(?)'æd?mz].[33] In a few such accents, intervocalic /r/ is deleted before an unstressed syllable even within a word when the following syllable begins with a vowel. In such accents, pronunciations like [kæ?'la:n?] for Carolina, or [b?:'?p] for "bear up" are heard.[34] This pronunciation also occurs in AAVE[35] and also occurred for many older non-rhotic Southern speakers.[36] Nonetheless, AAVE spoken in areas where non-AAVE speakers are rhotic is likelier to be rhotic, and rhoticity is also generally commoner among young AAVE speakers.[37]

Typically, even non-rhotic modern varieties of American English pronounce the /r/ in /?r/ (as in "bird," "work," or "perky") and realize it, as in most rhotic varieties, as (an r-colored mid central vowel) or [] (a sequence of a mid central vowel and a postalveolar or retroflex approximant).


Canadian English is entirely rhotic except for small isolated areas in southwestern New Brunswick, parts of Newfoundland, and the Lunenburg English variety spoken in Lunenburg and Shelburne Counties, Nova Scotia, which may be non-rhotic or variably rhotic.[38]


The prestige form of English spoken in Ireland is rhotic and most regional accents are rhotic although some regional accents, particularly in the area around counties Louth and Cavan are notably non-rhotic and many non-prestige accents have touches of non-rhoticity. In Dublin, the traditional local dialect is largely non-rhotic but the more modern varieties, referred to by Hickey as "mainstream Dublin English" and "fashionable Dublin English", are fully rhotic. Hickey used this as an example of how English in Ireland does not follow prestige trends in England.[39]


The English spoken in Asia is predominantly rhotic. In the case of the Philippines, this may be explained because the English that is spoken there is heavily influenced by the American dialect and because of Spanish influence in the various Philippine languages. In addition, many East Asians (in Mainland China, Japan, Korea, and Taiwan) who have a good command of English generally have rhotic accents because of the influence of American English. This excludes Hong Kong, whose English dialect is a result of its almost 150-year history as a British Crown colony (and later, a British dependent territory). The lack of consonant /r/ in Cantonese also contributes to the phenomenon (although rhoticity started to exist due to the handover in 1997 and influence by US and East Asian entertainment industry). However, many older (and younger) speakers among South and East Asians have a non-rhotic accent. Speakers of Semitic (Arabic, Hebrew, etc), Turkic (Turkish, Azeri, etc), Iranian languages (Farsi, Kurdish, etc) in West Asia would also speak English with a rhotic pronunciation due to the inherent phonotactics of their native languages.

Indian English is variably rhotic, and can vary between being non-rhotic due to most education systems being based on British English or rhotic due to the underlying phonotactics of the native Indo-Aryan and Dravidian languages and the influence of American English.[24][40] Other Asian regions with non-rhotic English are Malaysia, Singapore, and Brunei.[41] A typical Malaysian's English would be almost totally non-rhotic due to the nonexistence of rhotic endings in both languages of influence, whereas a more educated Malaysian's English may be non-rhotic due to Standard Malaysian English being based on RP (Received Pronunciation). The classical English spoken in Brunei is non-rhotic. But one current change that seems to be taking place is that Brunei English is becoming rhotic, partly influenced by American English and partly influenced by the rhoticity of Standard Malay, also influenced by languages of Indians in Brunei (Tamil and Punjabi) (rhoticity is also used by Chinese Bruneians), although English in neighboring Malaysia and Singapore remains non-rhotic; rhoticity in Brunei English is equal to Philippine dialects of English and Scottish and Irish dialects. Non-rhoticity is mostly found in older generations, its phenomenon is almost similar to the status of American English, wherein non-rhoticity reduced greatly.[42][43]

A typical teenager's Southeast Asian English would be rhotic,[44] mainly because of prominent influence by American English.[44] Spoken English in Myanmar is non-rhotic[], but there are a number of English speakers with a rhotic or partially rhotic pronunciation. Sri Lankan English may be rhotic.[]


The English spoken in most of Africa is based on RP and is generally non-rhotic. Pronunciation and variation in African English accents are largely affected by native African language influences, level of education and exposure to Western influences. The English accents spoken in the coastal areas of West Africa are primarily non-rhotic as are the underlying varieties of Niger-Congo languages spoken in that part of West Africa. Rhoticity may be present in English spoken in areas where rhotic Afro-Asiatic or Nilo Saharan languages are spoken across northern West Africa and in the Nilotic regions of East Africa. More modern trends show an increasing American influence on African English pronunciation particularly among younger urban affluent populations, where the American rhotic 'r' may be over-stressed in informal communication to create a pseudo-Americanised accent. By and large official spoken English used in post colonial African countries is non-rhotic. Standard Liberian English is also non-rhotic because liquids are lost at the end of words or before consonants.[45] South African English is mostly non-rhotic, especially Cultivated dialect based on RP, except for some Broad varieties spoken in the Cape Province (typically in -er suffixes, as in writer). It appears that postvocalic /r/ is entering the speech of younger people under the influence of American English, and maybe an influence of Scottish dialect brought by Scottish settlers.[46][47]


Standard Australian English is non-rhotic. A degree of rhoticity has been observed in a particular sublect of Australian Aboriginal English spoken on the coast of South Australia, especially in speakers from the Point Pearce and Raukkan settlements. These speakers realise /r/ as [?] in the preconsonantal postvocalic position - after a vowel but before another a consonant - but only within stems. For example: [bo:?d] "board", [tt?] "church", [p] "Perth"; but [flæ:] "flour", [d?kt?] "doctor", [jz] "years". It has been speculated that this feature may derive from the fact that many of the first settlers in coastal South Australia - including Cornish tin-miners, Scottish missionaries, and American whalers - spoke rhotic varieties.[48]

New Zealand

Although New Zealand English is predominantly non-rhotic, Southland and parts of Otago in the far south of New Zealand's South Island are rhotic from apparent Scottish influence. Many M?ori and Pasifika people, who tend to speak a specific dialect of English (which is not limited to them) also speak with strong Rs.[49] Older Southland speakers use /?/ variably after vowels, but today younger speakers use /?/ only with the NURSE vowel and occasionally with the LETTER vowel. Younger Southland speakers pronounce /?/ in third term /:?d 't?:?m/ (General NZE pronunciation: /:d 't?:m/) but sometimes in farm cart /f?:m k?:t/ (same as in General NZE).[stress needed][50] However, non-prevocalic /?/ among non-rhotic speakers is sometimes pronounced in a few words, including Ireland /'l?nd/, merely /'mili/, err /?:?/, and the name of the letter R /?:?/ (General NZE pronunciations: /'l?nd, 'mi?li, ?:, ?:/).[51] The M?ori accent varies from the European-origin New Zealand accent; some M?ori speakers are semi-rhotic like most European New Zealand speakers, although it is not clearly identified to any particular region or attributed to any defined language shift. The M?ori language itself tends in most cases to use an r with an alveolar tap [?], like Scottish dialect.[52]

Mergers characteristic of non-rhotic accents

Some phonemic mergers are characteristic of non-rhotic accents. These usually include one item that historically contained an R (lost in the non-rhotic accent), and one that never did so.

Batted-battered merger

This merger is present in non-rhotic accents which have undergone the weak vowel merger. Such accents include Australian, New Zealand, most South African speech, and some non-rhotic English speech (e.g. Norfolk, Sheffield). The third edition of Longman Pronunciation Dictionary lists /?d/ (and /?z/ mentioned below) as possible (though less common than /?d/ and /?z/) British pronunciations, which means that the merger is an option even in RP.

A large number of homophonous pairs involve the syllabic -es and agentive -ers suffixes, such as merges-mergers and bleaches-bleachers. Because there are so many, they are excluded from the list of homophonous pairs below.

// /?r/ IPA Notes
batted battered 'bæt?d
betted bettered 'b?t?d
busted bustard 'b?st?d
butches butchers 'b?tz
butted buttered 'b?t?d
charted chartered 't:t?d
chatted chattered 't?æt?d
founded foundered 'fa?nd?d
humid humo(u)red 'hju:m?d
masted mastered 'mæst?d, 'm?:st?d
matted mattered 'mæt?d
modding modern 'm?d?n With G-dropping.
patted pattered 'pæt?d
patting pattern 'pæt?n With G-dropping.
satin Saturn 'sæt?n
scatted scattered 'skæt?d
splendid splendo(u)red 'spl?nd?d
tatted tattered 'tæt?d
tended tendered 't?nd?d
territory terror tree 't?r?tri: With happy-tensing and in British and Southern Hemisphere English. In the US, territory is /'t?r?t?:ri:/.

Bud-bird merger

A merger of /?:(r)/ and /?/ occurring for some speakers of Jamaican English making bud and bird homophones as /b?d/.[53] The conversion of /?:/ to [?] or [?] is also found in places scattered around England and Scotland. Some speakers, mostly rural, in the area from London to Norfolk exhibit this conversion, mainly before voiceless fricatives. This gives pronunciation like first [f?st] and worse [w?s]. The word cuss appears to derive from the application of this sound change to the word curse. Similarly, lurve is coined from love.

/?/ /?:r/ IPA Notes
blood blurred 'bl?d
bub burb 'b?b
buck Burke 'b?k
Buckley Berkeley 'b?kli
bud bird 'b?d
bud burred 'b?d
budging burgeon 'b?dn With weak vowel merger and G-dropping.
bug berg 'b
bug burg 'b
bugger burger 'b
bugging bergen; Bergen 'bn With weak vowel merger and G-dropping.
bummer Burma 'b?m?
bun Bern 'b?n
bun burn 'b?n
bunt burnt 'b?nt
bused; bussed burst 'b?st
bust burst 'b?st
but Bert 'b?t
but Burt 'b?t
butt Bert 'b?t
butt Burt 'b?t
button Burton 'b?t?n
buzz burrs 'b?z
chuck chirk 'tk
cluck clerk 'kl?k
colo(u)r curler 'k?l?
coven curving 'k?v?n With weak vowel merger and G-dropping.
cub curb 'k?b
cub kerb 'k?b
cud curd 'k?d
cud curred 'k?d
cud Kurd 'k?d
cuddle curdle 'k?d?l
cuff you curfew 'k?fju
cull curl 'k?l
culler curler 'k?l?
cunning kerning 'k?n
cuss curse 'k?s
cut curt; Curt 'k?t
cutting curtain 'k?t?n With G-dropping.
dost durst 'd?st
doth dearth 'd
duck dirk 'd?k
ducked dirked 'd?kt
ducks dirks 'd?ks
duct dirked 'd?kt
dust durst 'd?st
dux dirks 'd?ks
fud furred 'f?d
fun fern 'f?n
fussed first 'f?st
fuzz furs 'f?z
gull girl 'l
gully girly 'li
gutter girder '? With the t-d merger.
hub herb '(h)?b With or without H-dropping.
huck Herc 'h?k
huck irk '?k With H-dropping.
huddle hurdle 'h?d?l
hull hurl 'h?l
hum herm 'h?m
Hun earn '?n With H-dropping.
Hun urn '?n With H-dropping.
hush Hirsch 'h
hut hurt 'h?t
love lurve 'l?v
luck lurk 'l?k
lucks lurks 'l?ks
lunt learnt 'l?nt
luxe lurks 'l?ks
much merch 'm?t?
muck merc 'm?k
muck mirk 'm?k
muck murk 'm?k
muddle myrtle 'ml With the t-d merger.
mudder murder 'm?d?
mull merl 'm?l
mutter murder 'm With the t-d merger.
mutton Merton 'm?t?n
oven Irving '?v?n With weak vowel merger and G-dropping.
puck perk 'p?k
pudge purge 'p?d?
pup perp 'p?p
pus purse 'p?s
pussy (pus) Percy 'p?si
putt pert 'p?t
scut skirt 'sk?t
shuck shirk 'k
spun spurn 'sp?n
stud stirred 'st?d
such search 's?t?
suck cirque 's?k
suckle circle 's?k?l
suffer surfer 's?f?
sully surly 's?li
Sutton certain 's?t?n With weak vowel merger.
thud third 'd
ton(ne) tern 't?n
ton(ne) turn 't?n
tough turf 't?f
tuck Turk 't?k
tucks Turks 't?ks
Tuttle turtle 't?t?l
tux Turks 't?ks
us Erse '?s
wont weren't 'w?nt

Comma-letter merger

In the terminology of John C. Wells, this consists of the merger of the lexical sets comma and letter. It is found in all or nearly all non-rhotic accents and is present even in some accents that are in other respects rhotic, such as those of some speakers in Jamaica and the Bahamas.[54]

In some accents, syllabification may interact with rhoticity and result in homophones for which non-rhotic accents have centering diphthongs. Possibilities include Korea-career,[55] Shi'a-sheer, and Maia-mire,[56] and skua may be identical with the second syllable of obscure.[57]

/?/ /?r/ IPA Notes
Ana honor '?:n? With father-bother merger.
Anna honor '?:n? In American English, with father-bother merger. In the UK, Anna can be pronounced /'æn?/.
area airier 'ri?
Basia basher 'bæ In British English. In North America, Basia can be pronounced /'b?:/.
CAPTCHA capture 'kæpt
Carla collar 'k?:l? With god-guard merger.
Carta Carter 'k?:t?
cheetah cheater 't?i:t?
coca coker 'ko?k?
coda coder 'ko?d?
cola coaler 'ko?l?
coma comber 'ko?m?
custody custardy 'k?st?di
Darla dollar 'd?l? With god-guard merger.
data darter 'd?:t? With trap-bath split and bisyllabic laxing.
data dater 'de?t?
data daughter 'd?:t? With cot-caught merger and bisyllabic laxing.
Dhaka darker 'd?:k? In American English. In the UK, Dhaka is /'dæk?/.
Dinah diner 'da?n?
Easton eastern 'i:st?n
FEMA femur 'fi:m?
Ghana Garner ':n?
Helena Eleanor '?l?n? With h-dropping. Outside North America.
eta eater 'i:t?
eyen iron 'an
feta fetter 'f?t?
formally formerly 'f?:m?li
geta getter 't?
ion iron 'an
karma calmer 'k?:m?
kava carver 'k?:v?
Lena leaner 'li:n?
Lima lemur 'li:m?
Lisa leaser 'li:s?
Luna lunar 'l(j)u:n?
Maia Meier 'ma
Maia mire 'ma
Maya Meier 'ma
Maya mire 'ma
manna manner 'mæn?
manna manor 'mæn?
Marta martyr 'm?:t?
Mia mere 'm
miner myna(h); mina(h) 'ma?n?
minor myna(h); mina(h) 'ma?n?
Mona moaner 'mo?n?
Nia near 'n
Palma palmer; Palmer 'p?:m?
panda pander 'pænd?
parka Parker 'p?:k?
Parma palmer; Palmer 'p?:m?
Patton pattern 'pæt?n
PETA peter; Peter 'pi:t?
pharma farmer 'f?:m?
Pia peer 'p
Pia pier 'p
pita peter; Peter 'pi:t? "Pita" may also be pronounced 'p?t? and therefore not merged.
Rhoda rotor 'ro With the t-d merger.
Rita reader 'ri: With the t-d merger.
Roma roamer 'ro?m?
rota rotor 'ro?t?
Saba sabre; saber 'se?b?
schema schemer 'ski:m?
Sia sear 's
Sia seer 's
seven Severn 's?v?n
soda solder 'so?d? "Solder" may also be pronounced 's?d?(r) and therefore not merged.
soya sawyer 's
Stata starter 'st?:t? Stata is also pronounced /'stæt?/ and /'ste?t?/.
taiga tiger 'ta
terra; Terra terror 't?r?
Tia tear (weep) 't
tuba tuber 't(j)u:b?
tuna tuner 't(j)u:n?
Vespa vesper 'v?sp?
via veer 'v
Wanda wander 'w?nd?
Weston western 'w?st?n
Wicca wicker 'w?k?

Face-square-near merger

The merger of the lexical sets FACE, SQUARE and NEAR is possible in Jamaican English and partially also in Northern East Anglian English.

In Jamaica, the merger occurs after deletion of the postvocalic /r/ in a preconsonantal position, so that fade can be homophonous with feared as [fe:d], but day [de:] is normally distinct from dear [de:?], though vowels in both words can be analyzed as belonging to the same phoneme (followed by /r/ in the latter case, so that the merger of FACE and SQUARE/NEAR does not occur). In Jamaican Patois, the merged vowel is an opening diphthong [i?] and that realization can also be heard in Jamaican English, mostly before a sounded /r/ (so that fare and fear can be both [fe:?] and [fi]), but sometimes also in other positions. Alternatively, /e:/ can be laxed to before a sounded /r/, which produces a variable Mary-merry merger: [f].[58]

It is possible in northern East Anglian varieties (to ), but only in the case of items descended from ME /a:/, such as daze. Those descended from ME /ai/ (such as days), /?i/ and /?ih/ have a distinctive /æi/ vowel. The merger appears to be receding, as items descended from ME /a:/ are being transferred to the /æi/ class; in other words, a pane-pain merger is taking place. In the southern dialect area, the pane-pain merger is complete and all three vowels are distinct: FACE is [æi], SQUARE is and NEAR is [].[59]

A near-merger of FACE and SQUARE is possible in General South African English, but the vowels typically remain distinct as [e?] (for FACE) and (for SQUARE). The difference between the two phonemes is so sometimes subtle that they're [ðe:] can be misheard as they [ðe?e ~ ðee?] (see zero copula). In other varieties the difference is more noticeable, e.g. [ðe:] vs. [ð] in Broad SAE and [ð] vs. [ðe?] in the Cultivated variety. Even in General SAE, SQUARE can be [] or , strongly distinguished from FACE [e?]. NEAR remains distinct in all varieties, typically as [].[60][61]

In the Cardiff dialect SQUARE can also be similar to cardinal (though long , as in South Africa), but FACE typically has a fully close ending point [ei] and thus the vowels are more distinct than in the General South African accent. An alternative realization of the former is an open-mid monophthong . Formerly, FACE was sometimes realized as a narrow diphthong [e?], but this has virtually disappeared by the 1990s. NEAR is phonemically distinct, normally as before any /r/ (a fleece-near merger) and a disyllabic [i:?] elsewhere.[62]

In Geordie, the merger of FACE and NEAR is recessive and has never been categorical (SQUARE has always been a distinct vowel), as FACE can instead be pronounced as the closing diphthong [e?] or, more commonly, the close-mid front monophthong . The latter is the most common choice for younger speakers who tend to reject the centering diphthongs for FACE, which categorically undoes the merger for those speakers. Even when FACE is realized as an opening-centering diphthong, it may be distinguished from NEAR by the openness of the first element: [] or [e?] for FACE vs. [i?] for NEAR.[63][64][65]

Some of the words listed below may have different forms in traditional Geordie. For the sake of simplicity, the merged vowel is transcribed with ⟨e:⟩. For a related merger not involving FACE, see near-square merger.

/e?/ (from ME /a:/) /e?/ (from ME /ai, ?i(h)/) /e?/ // IPA Notes
A hay hair here 'e: With h-dropping, in fully non-rhotic varieties.
A hay hare here 'e: With h-dropping, in fully non-rhotic varieties.
A hey hair here 'e: With h-dropping, in fully non-rhotic varieties.
A hey hare here 'e: With h-dropping, in fully non-rhotic varieties.
aid aired eared 'e:d
aid hared eared 'e:d With h-dropping.
bade bared beard 'be:d
bade bared beered 'be:d
bade beared beard 'be:d
bade beared beered 'be:d
base Bierce 'be:s
bass Bierce 'be:s
bay bare beer 'be: In fully non-rhotic varieties.
bay bear beer 'be: In fully non-rhotic varieties.
bays bares beers 'be:z
bays bears beers 'be:z
day dare dear 'de: In fully non-rhotic varieties.
day there dear 'de: With th-stopping, in fully non-rhotic varieties.
daze days dares dears 'de:z
daze days theirs dears 'de:z With th-stopping.
daze days there's dears 'de:z With th-stopping.
face fierce 'fe:s
fade fared feared 'fe:d
fade faired feared 'fe:d
fay fare fear 'fe: In fully non-rhotic varieties.
fay fair fear 'fe: In fully non-rhotic varieties.
gay gear '?e: In fully non-rhotic varieties.
gaze gays gears '?e:z
hay hair here 'he: In fully non-rhotic varieties.
hay hare here 'he: In fully non-rhotic varieties.
haze hays airs ears 'e:z With h-dropping.
haze hays airs here's 'e:z With h-dropping.
haze hays hairs ears 'e:z With h-dropping.
haze hays hairs here's 'he:z
haze hays hares ears 'e:z With h-dropping.
haze hays hares here's 'he:z
haze hays heirs ears 'e:z With h-dropping.
haze hays heirs here's 'e:z With h-dropping.
hey hair here 'he: In fully non-rhotic varieties.
hey hare here 'he: In fully non-rhotic varieties.
jade jeered 'd?e:d
K Kay care Keir 'ke: In fully non-rhotic varieties.
K Kay care Kerr 'ke: In fully non-rhotic varieties.
K Kay care kir 'ke: In fully non-rhotic varieties.
may mare mere 'me: In fully non-rhotic varieties.
maze maize mares Mears 'me:z
nay near 'ne: In fully non-rhotic varieties.
nays nears 'ne:z
phase fays fares fears 'fe:z
phase fays fairs fears 'fe:z
paid paired peered 'pe:d
pay pair peer 'pe: In fully non-rhotic varieties.
pay pear peer 'pe: In fully non-rhotic varieties.
pays pairs peers 'pe:z
pays pears peers 'pe:z
praise prayers 'pre:z In fully non-rhotic varieties. Prayers can also be disyllabic, /'prez/.
pray prayer 'pre: In fully non-rhotic varieties. Prayer can also be disyllabic, /'pre/.
prays prayers 'pre:z In fully non-rhotic varieties. Prayers can also be disyllabic, /'prez/.
raid reared 're:d
ray rare rear 're: In fully non-rhotic varieties.
raze raise rears 're:z
raze rays rears 're:z
shade shared sheered '?e:d
shay share sheer '?e: In fully non-rhotic varieties.
shays shares sheers '?e:z
spade spared speared 'spe:d
stade staid stared steered 'ste:d
stade stayed stared steered 'ste:d
stay stare steer 'ste: In fully non-rhotic varieties.
stays stares steers 'ste:z
they their 'ðe: In fully non-rhotic varieties.
they there 'ðe: In fully non-rhotic varieties.
they they're 'ðe: In fully non-rhotic varieties.
way wear Wear 'we: In fully non-rhotic varieties.
way wear we're 'we: In fully non-rhotic varieties.
way where Wear 'we: With the wine-whine merger, in fully non-rhotic varieties.
way where we're 'we: With the wine-whine merger, in fully non-rhotic varieties.
ways wears 'we:z
ways where's 'we:z With the wine-whine merger.
weigh wear Wear 'we: In fully non-rhotic varieties.
weigh wear we're 'we: In fully non-rhotic varieties.
weigh where Wear 'we: With the wine-whine merger, in fully non-rhotic varieties.
weigh where we're 'we: With the wine-whine merger, in fully non-rhotic varieties.
wade weighed where'd 'we:d With the wine-whine merger.
weighs wears 'we:z
weighs where's 'we:z With the wine-whine merger.
whey wear Wear 'we: With the wine-whine merger, in fully non-rhotic varieties.
whey wear we're 'we: With the wine-whine merger, in fully non-rhotic varieties.
whey where Wear 'we: With the wine-whine merger, in fully non-rhotic varieties.
whey where we're 'we: With the wine-whine merger, in fully non-rhotic varieties.
vase vairs veers 've:z

Father-farther and god-guard mergers

In Wells' terminology, the father-farther merger consists of the merger of the lexical sets PALM and START. It is found in the speech of the great majority of non-rhotic speakers, including those of England, Wales, the United States, the Caribbean, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa. It may be absent in some non-rhotic speakers in the Bahamas.[54]

Minimal pairs are rare in accents without the father-bother merger. In non-rhotic British English (especially the varieties without the trap-bath split) and, to a lesser extent, Australian English, /?:/ most commonly corresponds to /?:r/ in American English, therefore it is most commonly spelled with ⟨ar⟩. In most non-rhotic American English (that includes non-rhotic Rhode Island, New York City, some Southern U.S., and some African-American accents),[66] the spelling ⟨o⟩ is equally common in non-word-final positions due to the aforementioned father-bother merger. Those accents have the god-guard merger (a merger of LOT and START) in addition to the father-farther merger, yielding a three-way homophony between calmer (when pronounced without /l/), comma and karma, though minimal triplets like this are scarce.

/?:/ /?/ /?:r/ IPA Notes
ah N/A are '?:
ah N/A hour '?: With smoothing.
ah N/A our '?: With smoothing.
ah N/A R; ar '?:
alms arms '?:mz
alms harms '?:mz With H-dropping.
Ana honor Arne '?:n?
aunt aren't '?:nt With the trap-bath split.
balmy barmy 'b?:mi
Bata barter 'b?:t?
bath barf 'b?:f With the trap-bath split and th-fronting.
bath Bart 'b?:t With the trap-bath split and th-stopping.
bob; Bob barb; Barb 'b?:b
bock bark 'b?:k
bocks barks 'b?:ks
bocks Berks 'b?:ks
bod bard 'b?:d
bod barred 'b?:d
boff barf 'b?:f
bot Bart 'b?:t
box barks 'b?:ks
box Berks 'b?:ks
calmer comma karma 'k?:m? Calmer can also be pronounced with /l/: /'k?:lm?/.
calve carve 'k?:v With the trap-bath split.
cast cost karst 'k?:st With the trap-bath split.
caste cost karst 'k?:st With the trap-bath split.
Chalmers charmers 't:m?z
clock Clark; Clarke 'kl?:k
clock clerk 'kl?:k
cob carb 'k?:b
cod card 'k?:d
collar Carla 'k?:l?
collie Carlie 'k?:li
cop carp 'k?:p
cot cart 'k?:t
Dahmer dharma 'd?:m?
data darter 'd?:t? With the trap-bath split and bisyllabic laxing.
daughter darter 'd?:t? With the cot-caught merger.
Dhaka docker darker 'd?:k? In American English. In the UK, Dhaka is /'dæk?/.
dock dark 'd?:k
dollar Darla 'd?:l?
dolling darling 'd?:l
don; Don darn 'd?:n
dot dart 'd?:t
fa N/A far 'f?:
fast farced 'f?:st With the trap-bath split.
father farther 'f?:ð?
Ghana gonna Garner ':n? With the strong form of gonna (which can be /':n?/ or /'?o tu:/ instead).
gob garb ':b
gobble garble ':b?l
god garred ':d
god guard ':d
Hamm harm 'h?:m In American English. In the UK, Hamm is /'hæm/.
hock hark 'h?:k
holly; Holly Harley 'h?:li
hominy harmony 'h?:m?ni With the weak vowel merger.
hop harp 'h?:p
hot hart 'h?:t
hot heart 'h?:t
hottie hardy 'h?:?i With the t-d merger.
hottie hearty 'h?:?i Normally with intervocalic alveolar flapping.
hough hark 'h?:k
hovered Harvard 'h?:v?d
Jah N/A jar 'd:
Jahn yarn 'j?:n
Jan yarn 'j?:n Jan can be /'jæn/ instead.
Ka N/A car 'k?:
kava carver 'k?:v?
knock narc 'n?:k
knock nark 'n?:k
knocks narcs 'n?:ks
knocks narks 'n?:ks
Knox narcs 'n?:ks
Knox narks 'n?:ks
lava larva 'l?:v?
lock lark 'l?:k
Locke lark 'l?:k
lodge large 'l?:d?
lop larp 'l?:p
ma N/A mar 'm?:
mock mark; Mark 'm?:k
mocks marks; Mark's 'm?:ks
mocks Marx 'm?:ks
mod marred 'm?:d
modge Marge 'm?:d?
moll; Moll marl 'm?:l
molly; Molly Marley 'm?:li
mosh marsh 'm?:?
nock narc 'n?:k
nock nark 'n?:k
nocks narcs 'n?:ks
nocks narks 'n?:ks
Nox narcs 'n?:ks
Nox narks 'n?:ks
ox arcs '?:ks
ox arks '?:ks
pa N/A par 'p?:
Pali polly; Polly parley; Parley 'p?:li
Palma Parma 'p?:m?
palmer; Palmer Parma 'p?:m?
passed parsed 'p?:st With the trap-bath split.
past parsed 'p?:st With the trap-bath split.
path pot part 'p?:t With the trap-bath split and th-stopping.
pock park; Park 'p?:k
pocks parks; Park's 'p?:ks
potch parch 'p?:t?
potty party 'p?:?i Normally with intervocalic alveolar flapping.
pox parks; Park's 'p?:ks
shod shard ':d
shock shark ':k
shop sharp ':p
shopping sharpen ':p?n With the weak vowel merger and G-dropping.
ska N/A scar 'sk?:
sock Sark 's?:k
sod Sard 's?:d
spa N/A spar, SPAR 'sp?:
Spock spark 'sp?:k
spotter Sparta 'sp?: Normally with intervocalic alveolar flapping.
Stata starter 'st?:t?
stock stark 'st?:k
tod tard 't?:d
tod tarred 't?:d
Todd tard 't?:d
Todd tarred 't?:d
top tarp 't?:p
tot tart 't?:t
yon yarn 'j?:n

Foot-goose-thought-north-force merger

The foot-goose-thought-north-force merger occurs in cockney in fast speech in the word-final position (as long as the historical sequence /?:l/ in the syllable coda is analyzed as /o:/; see Merger of non-prevocalic /?l/, /?:l/, /?l/, /o:l/ with /o:/ and THOUGHT split) and possibly also in the unstressed syllables of compounds (such as airborne /'e?bo:n/), in both cases towards the [? ~ ] of FOOT. It renders coup /k?:/ homophonous with call /ko:/ as [k?]. The distinction is always recoverable, and the vowels are readily distinguished by length (or length and quality) in more deliberate speech: [ ~ ~ ?: ~ ?:] for GOOSE, [o? ~ ?o ~ o:] for THOUGHT and, in the non-final positions alone, [? ~ ] for FOOT. In addition, the allophone of GOOSE is rather similar to monophthongal THOUGHT , but the former has a weaker rounding and it is unclear whether the two are ever confused.[67]

It is unclear whether a contrastive CURE vowel /u?/ participates in the merger with FOOT, which is why it is not mentioned in its name. The cure-force merger is common in cockney, and at least in morphologically open syllables, the cure-force-merged vowel is // (the open variety of THOUGHT). It merges with LOT in fast speech, not FOOT - see lot-thought-north-force merger. In morphologically closed syllables, /u?/ is neutralized with /?/ in fast speech whenever the cure-force merger applies.[68]

For a bare merger of FOOT and GOOSE, see foot-goose merger.

boo ball 'b?
boo bull 'b? With the /?l-o:/ merger.
coup call 'k?
poo Paul 'p?
poo pool 'p? With the /?:l-o:/ merger.
poo pull 'p? With the /?l-o:/ merger.
sue it's all 's? With yod-dropping and a strongly reduced form of it's ([s]).
too tall 't?
too tool 't? With the /?:l-o:/ merger.
two tall 't?
two tool 't? With the /?:l-o:/ merger.
who all '? With h-dropping.
who who'll '? With the /?:l-o:/ merger. Normally with h-dropping.

Goat-thought-north-force merger

The goat-thought-north-force merger is a merger of the lexical sets GOAT on the one hand and THOUGHT, NORTH and FORCE on the other. It occurs in certain non-rhotic varieties of British English, such as Bradford English and Geordie (particularly among females). The phonetic outcome of the merger is an open-mid monophthong in Bradford.[69][70]

In cockney, the THOUGHT-NORTH-FORCE vowel in morphologically closed syllables (transcribed by Wells as /o:/) sometimes approaches the pre-lateral variant of GOAT (transcribed by Wells as //, see wholly-holy split). Thus, bawling ['b?ol?n] and bowling ['bl?n] can be nearly homophonous, though bawling can be ['bo?l?n] or ['bo:l?n] instead.[71]

The dough-door merger is a merger of GOAT and FORCE alone. It may be found in some southern U.S. non-rhotic speech, some speakers of African-American English and some speakers in Guyana and Northern Wales. In Northern Wales, a complete goat-thought-north-force merger is sometimes encountered, though this requires further study. In either case, the merger in Welsh English applies only to the GOAT items descended from Early Modern English /o:/, see toe-tow merger.[72]

from EME /o:/ from EME /ou/
abode a board ?'b?:d
abode a bored ?'b?:d
bode bowed bawd board 'b?:d Bowed meaning 'played music using a bow'.
bode bowed bawd bored 'b?:d Bowed meaning 'played music using a bow'.
bone bawn born borne 'b?:n
bow boar 'b?: Bow meaning 'a weapon'.
bow bore 'b?: Bow meaning 'a weapon'.
chose chores 't:z
coast coursed 'k?:st
coat caught court 'k?:t
cone corn 'k?:n

Lot-thought-north-force merger

The lot-thought-north-force merger occurs in cockney in fast speech (though only in the morpheme-final position in the case of THOUGHT/NORTH/FORCE; in the morpheme-internal position [o:~o?] is used instead - see thought split), so that ignored /'nd/ may rhyme with nod /'n?d/ as [?g'n?d] vs. ['n?d]. The distinction is always recoverable, and the vowels are readily distinguished by length (or length and quality) in more deliberate speech: [?g'n?:d] or [?g'nd] vs. ['n?d] or ['n?d]. Because of the cure-force merger, some of the CURE words also join this neutralization. The lot-thought-north merger (with a distinct FORCE vowel /o?/) may be also present in some Eastern New England accents.[73][74]

The lot-thought-north-force merger is also present in Singapore English.

A complete merger of LOT with NORTH can be alternatively called the shot-short merger.[] The name is inappropriate in the case of cockney, where short [?o:? ~ ?o] is always distinct from shot [ ~ ]. Therefore, the columns labelled as morpheme-internal always have a distinct /o:/ vowel in cockney. Unlike the LOT vowel itself, this neutralization is not restricted to phonemically closed syllables; in phonemically open syllables, THOUGHT/NORTH/FORCE and CURE can also have an /?/-like quality, merge to // or stay distinct as // vs. /u?/. Morpheme-internal /o:/ (including /u?/ whenever the cure-force merger applies) and any /?:/ can neutralize with /?/ in fast speech.[75]

For a bare merger of LOT and THOUGHT, see cot-caught merger.

morpheme-internal morpheme-final morpheme-internal morpheme-final morpheme-internal morpheme-final
a LOD a laud a lord allured ?'l?d With yod-dropping and the cure-force merger.
a shod assured ?'d With the cure-force merger.
bod baud bored 'b?d
bod bawd bored 'b?d
body bawdy bored he 'b?di With the weak form of he.
bon born 'b?n
borrow bore a 'b?r? With the unstressed /o?/ merged with /?/, a characteristic of cockney.
box borks 'b?ks
Boz boars 'b?z
Boz Boers 'b?z With the cure-force merger.
Boz bores 'b?z
'cause cause cores 'k?z
cock cork; Cork 'k?k
cocks corks; Cork's 'k?ks
cops corpse 'k?ps
cox corks; Cork's 'k?ks
cod cawed chord cored 'k?d
cod cawed cord cored 'k?d
con corn 'k?n
dock dork 'd?k
dod doored 'd?d
dodd doored 'd?d
dodder doored her 'd?d? With the weak form of her.
dom dorm 'd?m
Doric door it 'd?r With glottal replacement of both /k/ and /t/.
Dorrit door it 'd?r?t
fox forks 'f?ks
god gaud gored 'd
hod hawed hoard hoared 'h?d
hod hawed horde hoared 'h?d
hod hawed hoard whored 'h?d
hod hawed horde whored 'h?d
LOD laud lord lored 'l?d
mod moored 'm?d With the cure-force merger.
mog morgue 'm
morrow moorer 'm?r? With the cure-force merger and the unstressed /o?/ merged with /?/, a characteristic of cockney.
morrows moorers 'm?r?z With the cure-force merger and the unstressed /o?/ merged with /?/, a characteristic of cockney.
mot Mort 'm?t
not north 'n?t With Th-stopping.
odd awed ord hoared '?d With h-dropping.
odd awed ord oared '?d
odd awed ord whored '?d With h-dropping.
odd hawed ord hoared '?d With h-dropping.
odd hawed ord oared '?d With h-dropping.
odd hawed ord whored '?d With h-dropping.
odds ords '?dz
odder order ' Normally with intervocalic alveolar flapping.
otter order ' With the t-d merger.
ox orcs '?ks
Oz awes ors oars '?z
Oz awes ors ores '?z
Oz awes ors whores '?z With h-dropping.
pod pawed pored 'p?d
pod pawed poured 'p?d
pond porned 'p?nd
pock pork 'p?k
Porrick pour it 'p?r With glottal replacement of both /k/ and /t/.
Porritt pour it 'p?r?t
posh Porsche 'p
pot port 'p?t
poz pause paws pores 'p?z
poz pause paws poor's 'p?z With the cure-force merger.
poz pause paws pours 'p?z
scotch; Scotch scorch 'sk?t?
shod Shaw'd shored 'd
shoddy shorty 'i With the t-d merger.
shot short 't
snot snort 'sn?t
sob Sorb 's?b
sod sawed sword soared 's?d
solder sorter 's With the t-d merger.
sot sort 's?t
Spock spork 'sp?k
spot sport 'sp?t
stock stork 'st?k
swan sworn 'sw?n
swat swart 'sw?t
tock talk torque 't?k
tod toured 't?d With the cure-force merger.
Todd toured 't?d With the cure-force merger.
tot taught tort 't?t
tox torques 't?ks
wabble warble 'w?b?l
wad ward warred 'w?d
wan warn 'w?n
wand warned 'w?nd
wanna Warner 'w?n?
was waws wars 'w?z With the strong form of was (with the LOT vowel).
watt wart 'w?t
whap warp 'w?p With wine-whine merger.
what wart 'w?t With wine-whine merger.
whop warp 'w?p With wine-whine merger.
wobble warble 'w?b?l
yock York 'j?k

Pawn-porn and caught-court mergers

In Wells' terminology, the pawn-porn merger consists of the merger of the lexical sets THOUGHT and NORTH. It is found in most of the same accents as the father-farther merger described above, but is absent from the Bahamas and Guyana.[54]

Labov et al. suggest that, in New York City English, this merger is present in perception not production. As in, although even locals perceive themselves using the same vowel in both cases, they tend to produce the NORTH/FORCE vowel higher and more retracted than the vowel of THOUGHT.[76]

Most speakers with the pawn-porn merger also have the same vowels in caught and court (a merger of THOUGHT and FORCE), yielding a three-way merger of awe-or-ore/oar (see horse-hoarse merger). These include the accents of Southern England (but see THOUGHT split), non-rhotic New York City speakers, Trinidad and the Southern hemisphere.

The lot-cloth split coupled with those mergers produces a few more homophones, such as boss-bourse. Specifically, the phonemic merger of the words often and orphan was a running gag in the Gilbert and Sullivan musical, The Pirates of Penzance.

/?:/ /?:r/ /o?r/ IPA Notes
alk orc '?:k
auk orc '?:k
aw or oar '?:
aw or ore '?:
awe or oar '?:
awe or ore '?:
awk orc '?:k
balk bork 'b?:k
baud board 'b?:d
baud bored 'b?:d
bawd board 'b?:d
bawd bored 'b?:d
bawn born borne 'b?:n
bawn born bourn(e) 'b?:n
boss bourse 'b?:s With the lot-cloth split.
caught court 'k?:t
caulk cork 'k?:k
caw core 'k?:
caw corps 'k?:
cawed chord cored 'k?:d
cawed cord cored 'k?:d
daw door 'd?:
draw drawer 'dr?:
flaw floor 'fl?:
fought fort 'f?:t
gaud gored ':d
gnaw nor 'n?:
haw whore 'h?:
hawk orc '?:k With H-dropping.
hoss[77] horse 'h?:s With the lot-cloth split.
laud lord 'l?:d
law lore 'l?:
lawed lord 'l?:d
lawn lorn 'l?:n
maw more 'm?:
maw Moore 'm?:
moss Morse 'm?:s With the lot-cloth split.
off Orff; orfe; orf '?:f With the lot-cloth split.
often orphan '?:f?n With the lot-cloth split. "Often" is pronounced with a sounded T by some speakers.
paw pore 'p?:
paw pour 'p?:
pawn porn 'p?:n
raw roar 'r?:
sauce source 's?:s
saw soar 's?:
saw sore 's?:
sawed soared 's?:d
sawed sword 's?:d
Sean shorn ':n
shaw shore ':
Shawn shorn ':n
sought sort 's?:t
stalk stork 'st?:k
talk torque 't?:k
taught tort 't?:t
taut tort 't?:t
taw tor tore 't?:
thaw Thor ':
yaw yore 'j?:
yaw your 'j?: Your can be /'j/ instead.

Paw-poor merger

In Wells' terminology, this consists of the merger of the lexical sets THOUGHT and CURE. It is found in those non-rhotic accents containing the caught-court merger that have also undergone the pour-poor merger. Wells lists it unequivocally only for the accent of Trinidad, but it is an option for non-rhotic speakers in England, Australia and New Zealand. Such speakers have a potential four-way merger taw-tor-tore-tour.[78]

/?:/ /r/ IPA Notes
gaud gourd ':d
haw whore 'h?:
law lure 'l?: With yod-dropping.
maw moor 'm?:
maw Moore 'm?:
paw poor 'p?:
shaw sure ':
taw tour 't?:
tawny tourney 't?:ni
yaw your 'j?:
yaw you're 'j?:

Show-sure merger

In Wells' terminology, this consists of the merger of the lexical sets GOAT and CURE. It may be present in those speakers who have both the dough-door merger described above, and also the pour-poor merger. These include some southern U.S. non-rhotic speakers, some speakers of African-American English (in both cases towards /o?/) and some speakers in Guyana.[54]

In Geordie, the merger (towards //, phonetically [u?]) is variable and recessive. It is also not categorical, as GOAT can instead be pronounced as the close-mid monophthongs and . The central is as stereotypically Geordie as the merger itself, though it is still used alongside by young, middle-class males who, as younger speakers in general, reject the centering diphthongs for /o:/ (females often merge /o:/ with /?:/ instead, see thought-goat merger). This categorically undoes the merger for those speakers. Even when GOAT is realized as an opening-centering diphthong, it may be distinguished from CURE by the openness of the first element: [] or [o?] vs. [u?].[63][64][79]

Some of the words listed below may have different forms in traditional Geordie.

/o?/ /r/ IPA Notes
beau Boer 'bo?
beau boor 'bo?
bow Boer 'bo?
bow boor 'bo?
goad gourd '?o?d
hoe whore 'ho?
lo lure 'lo? With yod-dropping.
low lure 'lo? With yod-dropping.
Moe moor 'mo?
Moe Moore 'mo?
mode moored 'mo?d
mow moor 'mo?
mow Moore 'mo?
mowed moored 'mo?d
Po poor 'po?
Poe poor 'po?
roe Ruhr 'ro?
row Ruhr 'ro?
shew sure '?o?
show sure '?o?
toad toured 'to?d
toe tour 'to?
toed toured 'to?d
tow tour 'to?
towed toured 'to?d
yo your 'jo?
yo you're 'jo?

Strut-palm-start merger

In Wells' terminology, this consists of the merger of the lexical sets STRUT on the one hand and PALM and START on the other. It occurs in Black South African English. The outcome of the merger is an open central vowel or, less frequently, an open-mid back vowel . The merger co-occurs with the trap-bath split.[80]

In Australia and New Zealand, the two vowels contrast only by length: [ä, ä:]. This (as well as SQUARE-monophthongization in Australian English) introduces phonemic vowel length to those dialects.[81][82] In Colchester English, the vowels undergo a qualitative near-merger (with the length contrast preserved) as and , at least for middle-class speakers. A more local pronunciation of /?:/ is front .[83] A qualitative near-merger is also possible in contemporary General British English, where the vowels come close as vs. , with only a slight difference in height in addition to the difference in length.[84]

A three-way merger of /?/, /?:/ and /æ/ is a common pronunciation error among L2 speakers of English whose native language is Italian, Spanish and Catalan. Notably, EFL speakers who aim at the British pronunciation of can't /k?:nt/ but fail to sufficiently lengthen the vowel are perceived as uttering a highly taboo word cunt /k?nt/.[85][86][87]

buck bark 'bak
bud bard 'bad
bud barred 'bad
bun barn 'ban
but Bart 'bat With the strong form of but.
butt Bart 'bat
cull Carl 'kal
cunt can't 'kant With the trap-bath split.
cussed cast 'kast With the trap-bath split.
cussed caste 'kast With the trap-bath split.
cut cart 'kat
duck dark 'dak
duckling darkling 'dakl
done darn 'dan
fuss farse 'fas
fussed fast 'fast With the trap-bath split.
grunt grant 'grant With the trap-bath split.
hud hard 'had
hut heart 'hat
lust last 'last With the trap-bath split.
mud marred 'mad
puss pass 'pas With the trap-bath split.
putt part 'pat
sum psalm 'sam
stuff staff 'staf With the trap-bath split.
us arse 'as

Up-gliding NURSE

Up-gliding NURSE is a diphthongized vowel sound, [], used as the pronunciation of the NURSE phoneme /?/. This up-gliding variant historically occurred in some non-rhotic dialects of American English and is particularly associated with the early twentieth-century (but now extinct or moribund) dialects of New York City, New Orleans, and Charleston,[88] likely developing in the prior century. In fact, in speakers born before World War I, this sound apparently predominated throughout older speech of the Southern United States, ranging from "South Carolina to Texas and north to eastern Arkansas and the southern edge of Kentucky."[89] This variant happened only in an open syllable, so, for example, stir was never [st];[90] rather stir would have been pronounced [st?(?)].

Coil-curl merger

In some cases, particularly in New York City, the NURSE sound gliding from a schwa upwards even led to a phonemic merger of the vowel classes associated with the General American phonemes // as in CHOICE with the /?r/ of NURSE; thus, words like coil and curl, as well as voice and verse, were homophones. The merged vowel was typically a diphthong [], with a mid central starting point, rather than the back rounded starting point of // of CHOICE in most other accents of English. The merger is responsible for the "Brooklynese" stereotypes of bird sounding like boid and thirty-third sounding like toity-toid. This merger is known for the word soitanly, used often by the Three Stooges comedian Curly Howard as a variant of certainly in comedy shorts of the 1930s and 1940s. The songwriter Sam M. Lewis, a native New Yorker, rhymed returning with joining in the lyrics of the English-language version of "Gloomy Sunday". Except for New Orleans English,[91][92][93] this merger did not occur in the South, despite up-gliding NURSE existing in some older Southern accents; instead, a distinction between the two phonemes was maintained due to a down-gliding CHOICE sound: something like [].

In 1966, according to a survey that was done by William Labov in New York City, 100% of the people over 60 used [] for bird. With each younger age group, however, the percentage got progressively lower: 59% of 50- to 59-year-olds, 33% of 40- to 49-year-olds, 24% of 20- to 39-year-olds, and finally, only 4% of people 8-19 years old used []. Nearly all native New Yorkers born since 1950, even those whose speech is otherwise non-rhotic, now pronounce bird as [b?d].[94] However, Labov reports this vowel to be slightly raised compared to other dialects.[95]

// /?:r/ IPA Notes
adjoin adjourn ?'dn
boil burl 'bl
Boyd bird 'bd
Boyle burl 'bl
coil curl 'kl
coin kern 'kn
coitus Curtis 'k?s With weak vowel merger, normally with intervocalic alveolar flapping.
foil furl 'fl
goitre; goiter girder 'r With the t-d merger.
hoist Hearst 'hst
hoist hurst; Hurst 'hst
Hoyle hurl 'hl
loin learn 'ln
oil earl 'l
poil pearl 'pl
poise purrs 'pz
toyed turd 'td
voice verse 'vs
Voight vert 'vt

Effect of non-rhotic dialects on orthography

Certain words have spellings derived from non-rhotic dialects or renderings of foreign words through non-rhotic pronunciation. In rhotic dialects, spelling pronunciation has caused these words to be pronounced rhotically anyway. Examples include:

  • Er, used in non-rhotic dialects to indicate a filled pause, which most rhotic dialects would instead convey with uh or eh.
  • The game Parcheesi, from Indian Pachisi.
  • British English slang words:
  • In Rudyard Kipling's books:
    • dorg instead of dawg for a drawled pronunciation of dog.
    • Hindu god name Kama misspelled as Karma (which is a concept in several Asian religions, not a god).
    • Hindustani / ? k?ghaz ("paper") spelled as kargaz.
  • The donkey Eeyore in A.A. Milne's stories, whose name comes from the sound that donkeys make, commonly spelled hee-haw in American English.
  • Southern American goober and pinder from KiKongo and ngubá and mpinda
  • Burma and Myanmar for Burmese [b?mà] and [mjàmmà]
  • Orlu for Igbo [l]
  • Transliteration of Cantonese words and names, such as char siu (Chinese: ; Jyutping: caa¹ siu¹) and Wong Kar-wai (Chinese: ; Jyutping: Wong? Gaa1wai?)
  • The spelling of schoolmarm for school ma'am, which Americans pronounce with the rhotic consonant.
  • The spelling Park for the Korean surname ? (pronounced [pak]), which does not contain a liquid consonant in Korean.

See also


  1. ^ Other terms synonymous with "non-rhotic" include "/r/-deleting",[2] "r-dropping",[3] "r-vocalizing", and "r-less";[4] synonyms for "rhotic" include "/r/-pronouncing", "r-constricting", and "r-ful".[2][4]


  1. ^ Paul Skandera, Peter Burleigh, A Manual of English Phonetics and Phonology, Gunter Narr Verlag, 2011, p. 60.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i Lass (1999), p. 114.
  3. ^ Wells (1982), p. 216.
  4. ^ a b c Labov, Ash, and Boberg (2006): 47.
  5. ^ Gick (1999:31), citing Kurath (1964)
  6. ^ a b Labov, Ash, and Boberg, 2006: pp. 47-48.
  7. ^ a b c d Lass (1999), p. 115.
  8. ^ a b c Fisher (2001), p. 76.
  9. ^ a b c Fisher (2001), p. 77.
  10. ^ a b c d Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), pp. 5, 47.
  11. ^ Based on H. Orton, et al., Survey of English Dialects (1962-71). Some areas with partial rhoticity, such as parts of the East Riding of Yorkshire, are not shaded on this map.
  12. ^ Based on P. Trudgill, The Dialects of England.
  13. ^ Lass (1999), pp. 114-15.
  14. ^ Original French: "...dans plusieurs mots, l'r devant une consonne est fort adouci, presque muet, & rend un peu longue la voyale qui le precede". Lass (1999), p. 115.
  15. ^ Fisher (2001), p. 73.
  16. ^ Gordon, Elizabeth; Campbell, Lyle; Hay, Jennifer; Maclagan, Margaret; Sudbury, Peter; Trudgill, Andrea, eds. (2004). New Zealand English: Its Origins and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 174.
  17. ^ Wells (1982), pp. 224-225.
  18. ^ Gimson (2014), pp. 119-120.
  19. ^ Shorter Oxford English Dictionary
  20. ^ Wells (1982), p. 201.
  21. ^ Wells (1982), p. 490.
  22. ^ Wakelyn, Martin: "Rural dialects in England", in: Trudgill, Peter (1984): Language in the British Isles, p.77
  23. ^ Wells (1982), pp. 76, 221.
  24. ^ a b Wells (1982), p. 629.
  25. ^ Mesthrie, Rajend; Kortmann, Bernd; Schneider, Edgar W., eds. (18 January 2008), "Pakistani English: phonology", Africa, South and Southeast Asia, Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 244-258, doi:10.1515/9783110208429.1.244, ISBN 9783110208429, retrieved 2019
  26. ^ Schneider, Edgar (2008). Varieties of English: The Americas and the Caribbean. Walter de Gruyter. p. 396. ISBN 9783110208405.
  27. ^ McClear, Sheila (2 June 2010). "Why the classic Noo Yawk accent is fading away". New York Post. Retrieved 2013.
  28. ^ a b Stuart-Smith, Jane (1999). "Glasgow: accent and voice quality". In Foulkes, Paul; Docherty, Gerard (eds.). Urban Voices. Arnold. p. 210. ISBN 0-340-70608-2.
  29. ^ Trudgill, Peter (1984). Language in the British Isles. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-28409-7.
  30. ^ Coupland, Nikolas; Thomas, Alan Richard (1990a). English in Wales: Diversity, Conflict, and Change - Google Books. ISBN 9781853590313. Retrieved 2021.[page needed]
  31. ^ Milla, Robert McColl (2012). English Historical Sociolinguistics. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 25-26. ISBN 978-0-7486-4181-9.
  32. ^ Trudgill, Peter (2010). Investigations in Sociohistorical Linguistics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781139489799.
  33. ^ Gick, Bryan. 1999. A gesture-based account of intrusive consonants in English Archived 12 April 2013 at the Wayback Machine. Phonology 16: 1, pp. 29-54. (pdf). Retrieved 12 November 2010.
  34. ^ Harris 2006: pp. 2-5.
  35. ^ Pollock et al., 1998.
  36. ^ Thomas, Erik R. "Rural white Southern accents" (PDF). p. 16. Retrieved 2019.
  37. ^ Wolfram, Walt; Kohn, Mary E. (forthcoming). "The regional development of African American Language Archived 2018-11-06 at the Wayback Machine". In Sonja Lanehart, Lisa Green, and Jennifer Bloomquist (eds.), The Oxford Handbook on African American Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 147.
  38. ^ Trudgill, Peter (2000). "Sociohistorical linguistics and dialect survival: a note on another Nova Scotian enclave". In Magnus Leung (ed.). Language Structure and Variation. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International. p. 197.
  39. ^ Hickey, Raymond (1999). "Dublin English: current changes and their motivations". In Foulkes, Paul; Docherty, Gerard (eds.). Urban Voices. Arnold. p. 272. ISBN 0-340-70608-2.
  40. ^ Reddy, C. Rammanohar. "The Readers' Editor writes: Why is American English becoming part of everyday usage in India?". Scroll.in. Retrieved 2021.
  41. ^ Demirezen, Mehmet (2012). "Which /r/ are you using as an English teacher? rhotic or non-rhotic?" (PDF). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Elsevier. 46: 2659-2663. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.542. ISSN 1877-0428. OCLC 931520939.
  42. ^ Salbrina, S.; Deterding, D. (2010). "Rhoticity in Brunei English". English World-Wide. 31 (2): 121-137. doi:10.1075/eww.31.2.01sha.
  43. ^ Nur Raihan Mohamad (2017). "Rhoticity in Brunei English : A diachronic approach". Southeast Asia: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 17: 1-7.
  44. ^ a b Gupta, Anthea F.; Hiang, Tan Chor (January 1992). "Post-Vocalic /r/ in Singapore English". York Papers in Linguistics. 16: 139-152. ISSN 0307-3238. OCLC 2199758.
  45. ^ Brinton, Lauren and Leslie Arnovick. The English Language: A Linguistic History. Oxford University Press: Canada, 2006
  46. ^ Bowerman (2004), p. 940.
  47. ^ Lass (2002), p. 121.
  48. ^ Sutton, Peter (1989). "Postvocalic R in an Australian English dialect". Australian Journal of Linguistics. 9 (1): 161-163. doi:10.1080/07268608908599416.
  49. ^ Clark, L.," Southland dialect study to shed light on language evolution," New Zealand Herald. 9 December 2016. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
  50. ^ "5. - Speech and accent - Te Ara Encyclopedia of New Zealand". Teara.govt.nz. 5 September 2013. Retrieved 2017.
  51. ^ Bauer & Warren (2004), p. 594.
  52. ^ Hogg, R.M., Blake, N.F., Burchfield, R., Lass, R., and Romaine, S., (eds.) (1992) The Cambridge history of the English language. (Volume 5) Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521264785 p. 387. Retrieved from Google Books.
  53. ^ Wells (1982), pp. 136-37, 203-6, 234, 245-47, 339-40, 400, 419, 443, 576.
  54. ^ a b c d Wells (1982), p. ?.
  55. ^ Wells (1982), p. 225.
  56. ^ Upton, Clive; Eben Upton (2004). Oxford rhyming dictionary. Oxford University Press. p. 59. ISBN 0-19-280115-5.
  57. ^ Upton, Clive; Eben Upton (2004). Oxford rhyming dictionary. Oxford University Press. p. 60. ISBN 0-19-280115-5.
  58. ^ Devonish & Harry (2004), pp. 460, 463, 476.
  59. ^ Trudgill (2004), pp. 170, 172.
  60. ^ Lass (1990), pp. 277-279.
  61. ^ Bowerman (2004), p. 938.
  62. ^ Collins & Mees (1990), pp. 92-93, 95-97.
  63. ^ a b Watt (2000), p. 72.
  64. ^ a b Watt & Allen (2003), pp. 268-269.
  65. ^ Beal (2004), pp. 123, 126.
  66. ^ Wells (1982), pp. 504, 544, 577.
  67. ^ Wells (1982), pp. 305-307, 310-311, 313-314, 316, 318-319, 320-322.
  68. ^ Wells (1982), pp. 305, 310-311, 316, 318-319.
  69. ^ Watt, Dominic; Tillotson, Jennifer (2001). "A spectrographic analysis of vowel fronting in Bradford English" (PDF). English World-Wide. 22 (2): 270. doi:10.1075/eww.22.2.05wat. S2CID 16403375. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 August 2019. Retrieved 2019.
  70. ^ Watt & Allen (2003), p. 269.
  71. ^ Wells (1982), pp. 310-313.
  72. ^ Wells (1982), pp. 382, 384, 387.
  73. ^ Wells (1982), pp. 305, 310, 318-319, 520.
  74. ^ Dillard, Joey Lee (1980). Perspectives on American English. The Hague; New York: Walter de Gruyter. p. 53. ISBN 90-279-3367-7.
  75. ^ Wells (1982), pp. 305, 310-311, 318-319.
  76. ^ Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), p. 235
  77. ^ Dialectal variant of "horse"
  78. ^ Wells (1982), p. 287.
  79. ^ Beal (2004), pp. 123-124, 126.
  80. ^ van Rooy (2004), pp. 945-947.
  81. ^ Bauer et al. (2007), p. 98.
  82. ^ Cox & Fletcher (2017), p. 65.
  83. ^ Trudgill (2004), pp. 167, 172.
  84. ^ Gimson (2014), pp. 122, 124.
  85. ^ Swan (2001), p. 91.
  86. ^ [1]
  87. ^ [2]
  88. ^ Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), p. 259
  89. ^ Thomas (2006), p. 8
  90. ^ Wells (1982), pp. 508 ff
  91. ^ Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), p. 260
  92. ^ Canatella, Ray (2011). The YAT Language of New Orleans. iUniverse. p. 67. ISBN 978-1-4620-3295-2. MOYCHANDIZE - Translation: Merchandise. "Dat store seem to be selling nutin' but cheap moychandize"
  93. ^ Trawick-Smith, Ben (1 September 2011). "On the Hunt for the New Orleans Yat". Dialect Blog. Retrieved 2019.
  94. ^ Labov (1966)
  95. ^ Labov (1966), p. 216


  This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.



Music Scenes