Space Shuttle Retirement
Get Space Shuttle Retirement essential facts below. View Videos or join the Space Shuttle Retirement discussion. Add Space Shuttle Retirement to your topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
Space Shuttle Retirement
Atlantis welcome home ceremony after last mission
Atlantis begins the last mission of the Space Shuttle program.
Atlantis touches down for the final time, July 21, 2011, at the end of STS-135.
Empty status board in the Vehicle Assembly Building
Penultimate launch of Atlantis

The retirement of NASA's Space Shuttle fleet took place from March to July 2011. Discovery was the first of the three active Space Shuttles to be retired, completing its final mission on March 9, 2011; Endeavour did so on June 1. The final shuttle mission was completed with the landing of Atlantis on July 21, 2011, closing the 30-year Space Shuttle program.

The Shuttle was presented to the public in 1972 as a "space truck" which would, among other things, be used to build a United States space station in low Earth orbit in the early 1990s and then be replaced by a new vehicle.[] When the concept of the U.S. space station evolved into that of the International Space Station, which suffered from long delays and design changes before it could be completed, the service life of the Space Shuttle was extended several times until 2011 when it was finally retired.

In 2010 the Shuttle was formally scheduled for retirement with Atlantis being taken out of service first after STS-132 in May of that year, but the program was once again extended when the two final planned missions were delayed until 2011.[1] Later, one additional mission was added for Atlantis for July 2011, extending the program further. Counter-proposals to the shuttle's retirement were considered by Congress[2] and the prime contractor United Space Alliance as late as spring 2010.[3]

Hardware developed for the Space Shuttle met various ends with conclusion of the program, including donation, disuse and/or disposal, or reuse. An example of reuse, is that one of the three Multi-Purpose Logistics Module (MPLM) was converted to a permanent module for the International Space Station.[4]

Fate of surviving STS program hardware


On April 12, 2011, NASA announced a selection of locations for the remaining Shuttle orbiters:[5][6][7]

Retirement Destination
Enterprise 1977 Approach and Landing Test mission patch.png Enterprise* OV-101 Intrepid Sea, Air & Space Museum,
New York City, New York
Space Shuttle Discovery Tribute.jpg Discovery OV-103 Udvar-Hazy Center,
Smithsonian Institution's National Air and Space Museum,
Chantilly, Virginia
Space Shuttle Atlantis Tribute2.jpg Atlantis OV-104 Kennedy Space Center,
Merritt Island, Florida
Space Shuttle Endeavour Tribute.jpg Endeavour OV-105 California Science Center,
Los Angeles, California

* Prior to its move to New York, Enterprise was displayed at the Udvar-Hazy Center, Smithsonian Institution's National Air and Space Museum, Chantilly, Virginia, where Discovery has taken its place.

Atlantis towed back to the Orbiter Processing Facility for the last time at the end of the Shuttle program

Museums and other facilities not selected to receive an orbiter were disappointed. Elected officials representing Houston, Texas, location of the Johnson Space Center; and Dayton, Ohio, location of the National Museum of the United States Air Force, called for Congressional investigations into the selection process, though no such action was taken.[8] While local and Congressional politicians in Texas questioned if partisan politics played a role in the selection, former JSC Director Wayne Hale wrote, "Houston didn't get an orbiter because Houston didn't deserve it", pointing to weak support from area politicians, media and residents, describing a "sense of entitlement".[9][10] Chicago media questioned the decision not to include the Adler Planetarium in the list of facilities receiving orbiters, pointing to Chicago's 3rd-largest population in the United States. The chair of the NASA committee that made the selections pointed to the guidance from Congress that the orbiters go to facilities where the most people could see them, and the ties to the space program of Southern California (home to Edwards Air Force Base, where nearly half of shuttle flights have ended and home to the plants which manufactured the orbiters and the RS-25 engines), the Smithsonian (curator of the nation's air and space artifacts), the Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex (where all Shuttle launches originated, and a large tourist draw) and the Intrepid Sea, Air & Space Museum (Intrepid also served as the recovery ship for Project Mercury and Project Gemini).[11]

In August 2011 the NASA Inspector General released an audit of the display selection process; it highlighted issues which led to the final decision. The Museum of Flight in Seattle, Washington, March Field Air Museum, Riverside, California, Evergreen Aviation and Space Museum, McMinnville, Oregon, National Museum of the U.S. Air Force, Dayton, Ohio, San Diego Air and Space Museum, San Diego, Space Center Houston, Houston, Texas, Tulsa Air and Space Museum & Planetarium, Tulsa, Oklahoma and U.S. Space and Rocket Center, Huntsville, Alabama scored poorly on international access. Additionally Brazos Valley Museum of Natural History and the Bush Library at Texas A&M, in College Station, Texas scored poorly on museum attendance, regional population and was the only facility found to pose a significant risk in transporting an orbiter there. Overall, the California Science Center scored first and Brazos Valley Museum of Natural History scored last. The two most controversial locations which were not awarded an orbiter, Space Center Houston and National Museum of the U.S. Air Force, finished 2nd to last and near the middle of the list respectively. The report noted a scoring error, which if corrected would have placed the National Museum of the U.S. Air Force in a tie with the Intrepid Museum and Kennedy Visitor Complex (just below the California Science Center), although due to funding concerns the same decisions would have been made.[12]

The Museum of Flight in Seattle, Washington was not selected to receive an orbiter but instead received the three-story Full Fuselage Trainer from the Space Vehicle Mockup Facility at Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas.[13] Museum officials, though disappointed, were able to allow the public to go inside the trainer, something not possible with an actual orbiter.[14]

Space Shuttle Discovery on display at the Udvar-Hazy Center for restorations

In addition to the challenge of transporting the large vehicles to the display site, placing the units on permanent display required considerable effort and cost. An article in the February 2012 issue of Smithsonian magazine[15] discussed the work performed on Discovery. It involved removing the three main engines (they were slated to be reused on NASA's Space Launch System); the windows were given to project engineers for analysis of how materials and systems fared after repeated space exposure; the communications modules were removed due to national-security concerns; and hazardous materials such as traces of propellants were thoroughly flushed from the plumbing. The total cost of preparation and delivery via a modified Boeing 747 was estimated at $26.5 million in 2011 dollars.

Payload hardware

  • Spacelab Pallet Elvis - handed over to the Swiss Museum of Transport, Switzerland, in March 2010.[16]
  • One of the two Spacelabs--on display at Bremen Airport, Germany.[16]
  • Another Spacelab is on display at the Udvar-Hazy center behind Discovery
  • MPLM Leonardo: converted to the ISS Permanent Multipurpose Module[4]
  • MPLM Rafaello: removed from the bay of Atlantis, fate unknown
  • MPLM Donatello: the unused MPLM, some parts were cannibalized for Leonardo. The remainder is mothballed in the ISS processing facility at Kennedy Space Center.
  • Various space pallets used since STS-1: the fates of these objects range from space center storage to scrap to museum pieces


NASA ran a program to donate thermal protection system tiles to schools and universities for US$23.40 each (the fee for shipping and handling).[17] About 7000 tiles were available on a first-come, first-served basis, but limited to one per institution.[17] Each orbiter incorporated over 24,000 tiles.[18]


Six rocket engines, consisting of a large bell-shaped nozzle with working parts mounted to the top, stored in a large warehouse with white walls decorated with flags. Each engine has several pieces of red protective equipment attached to it and is mounted on a yellow wheeled pallet-like structure.
6 RS-25Ds used during STS-134 and STS-135 in storage at Kennedy Space Center

About 42 reusable RS-25 engines have been part of the STS program, with three used per orbiter per mission.[19] The decision was made to retain sixteen engines with plans to make use of them on the Space Launch System. The rest were donated to the Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex, Johnson Space Center Space Center Houston, the National Air and Space Museum, and other exhibits around the country.

RS-25 nozzles

Worn out engine nozzles are typically considered scrap, although nine nozzles were refurbished for display on the donated orbiters, so the actual engines can be retained by NASA.[20]

Canadarm (SRMS) and OBSS

Boom in use on STS-120

Three Shuttle arms were used by NASA; the arms of both Discovery and Atlantis will be left in place for their museum display.[21] Endeavour's arm is to be removed from the orbiter for separate display in Canada.[21] The OBSS extension of Endeavours arm was left on the International Space Station, for use with the station's robotic arm.[21]

Information technology

In December 2010, as NASA prepared for the STS program ending, an audit by the NASA Office of Inspector General (OIG) found that information technology had been sold or prepared for sale that still contained sensitive information.[22] NASA OIG recommended NASA be more careful in the future.[22]

Other shuttle hardware

Atlantis about 30 minutes after final touchdown
Feed through connector for the main tank: one of many thousands of Shuttle parts
Each Shuttle tile had a specific location on an orbiter and was numbered (in yellow on this tile)

Kennedy Space Center Launch Complex 39

The twin pads originally built for the Apollo program are now inactive. LC-39B was deactivated first on January 1, 2007. Three lightning towers were added to the pad and it was temporarily "re-activated" in April 2009 when Endeavour was placed on standby to rescue the STS-125 crew (the STS-125 mission was the last to visit the Hubble Space Telescope, which meant that the ISS was out of range) if needed; Endeavour was then moved over to LC-39A for STS-126. In October 2009 the prototype Ares I-X rocket was launched from 39B. The pad was then permanently deactivated and has since been dismantled and is being modified for the Space Launch System program, and possibly other launch vehicles. Like the Apollo structures before them, the shuttle structures were scrapped. 39A was deactivated in July 2011 after STS-135 was launched. On January 16, 2013, it was erroneously reported[who?] that NASA planned to abandon the pad, but the actual plan is to, like pad B, convert it for other rockets without dismantling it.[] If NASA did plan to permanently decommission the pads, they would have to restore them to their original Apollo-era appearance, as both pads are on the National Historic Register.[] In December 2013 NASA announced that SpaceX would be the new tenant of pad 39A. SpaceX has since converted the pad to launch Falcon Heavy and crewed Crew Dragon Falcon 9 flights. Following the destruction of Space Launch Complex 40 in an on-pad explosion in September 2016, SpaceX had to move all east coast launches to 39A while SLC-40 was being rebuilt. The first launch, Dragon resupply vehicle carried by a Falcon 9, occurred February 12, 2017.[23][24] This flight was the first uncrewed launch from Complex 39 since Skylab was launched in 1973. Once SLC-40 is back in action, SpaceX will finish modifying the pad for Falcon Heavy. Due to SLC-40s destruction, 39A had to be rushed into service, and activities such as dismantling the RSS were put on hold.

Vehicle Assembly Building

After STS-135, the VAB was used as a storage shed for the decommissioned shuttles before they were sent to museums. High Bay 3 is now[when?] being gutted of all equipment and given upgraded platforms, to support the Space Launch System as well as other vehicles. After the shuttle was decommissioned, NASA opened the VAB for public tours, which ended on February 11, 2014 as NASA prepares the VAB for future launch vehicles.[25]

NASA's Mobile Launcher Platform

Three mobile launcher platforms used to support the Space Shuttle will be used for commercial launch vehicles.

The Mobile Launcher Platform-1 (MLP-1) was used for 62 Shuttle launches, starting in 1981. It was the most used of the three MLPs.

The Ares I-X suborbital mission utilized the MLP-1 to support the stacking and launch operations. The canceled Ares I-Y would have used the same MLP.[26][27] Following the STS-135, usable parts from MLP-1 were removed and stored in the Vehicle Assembly Building, with no plans to use the MLP again.[28]

Mobile Launcher Platform-2 (MLP-2) was used for 44 Shuttle launches, starting in 1983. All of the orbiters except Columbia made their maiden flights from MLP-2. It was also the launch site for the ill-fated STS-51L mission, when Challenger disintegrated shortly after launch, killing all seven crew members.[29]

Mobile Launcher Platform-3 (MLP-3) was used for 29 Shuttle launches, starting in 1990. It was the least used of the three MLPs.

The MLP-3 was acquired by Orbital ATK (who was later bought out by Northrop Grumman) to launch their future OmegA rocket with. They will use the Vehicle Assembly Building High Bay 2 to assemble the rocket, and crawler-transporter 1 to move the rocket to LC-39B for launch.


The Crawler-Transporters were used as the mobile part of the pad with the Shuttles; the two vehicles were deactivated and are being upgraded for the Space Launch System. The crawlerways used for transporting launch vehicles from the VAB to the twin pads of KSC are also being extensively renovated for the Artemis program.[30]

Shuttle Carrier Aircraft

Two modified Boeing 747s were used to fly the shuttles back to KSC when they landed at Edwards AFB. N911NA was retired on February 8, 2012 and is now a parts hulk for the Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy. Beginning in September 2014, N911NA was loaned out to the Joe Davies Heritage Airpark, in Palmdale, CA, where it is on outdoor display next to a B-52. The other aircraft, N905NA was used to send Discovery, Endeavour and Enterprise to their museums and in September 2012 was found to have few parts for SOFIA. It is currently a museum piece at the Johnson Space Center, displayed carrying a full-scale replica of an orbiter.

NASA recovery ships

Used to retrieve the SRBs, MV Liberty Star and Freedom Star are now separated. Liberty Star was renamed as TV Kings Pointer and was transferred to the Merchant Marine Academy in New York for use as a training vessel. It will remain on call in case NASA needs it for further missions. Freedom Star was transferred to the James River Reserve Fleet on September 28, 2012 and placed under ownership of the United States Department of Transportation.

Orbiter Processing Facility

The buildings used to process the shuttles after each mission were decommissioned. OPF-1 was leased to Boeing in January 2014 for processing the X-37B spaceplane[31] while OPF-3 is also used by Boeing for the manufacture and testing of the CST-100 spacecraft.[32] OPF-2 also currently[when?] remains under lease by Boeing for its X-37B spaceplane.

Shuttle Landing Facility

The runway at KSC is used as a normal runway for the center and neighboring Cape Canaveral's daily operations.[] It is used to land the X-37B and will be for Sierra Nevada Dream Chaser spaceplanes. The SLF received its first landing from space since Atlantis in June 2017 when the USAF X-37B landed on it at the end of almost two years in orbit.

Former planned Space Shuttle successors

There were a number of proposals for space access systems in the 1970s also, such as the Rockwell Star-raker[33] Star-raker was a large single-stage to orbit (SSTO) design that used both rockets and ramjet for propulsion.[33] It was a contemporary to the Boeing Reusable Aerodynamic Space Vehicle, which was an all-rocket propulsion SSTO design.[33]

Some programs from the early 1980s were the Future Space Transportation System program and the later NASA Advanced Manned Launch System program.[34][35]

In the late 1980s, a planned successor to STS was called "Shuttle II", which encompassed a number of different ideas and was influenced by the Challenger disaster.[36] At one point before retirement, extension of the Space Shuttle program for an additional five years while a replacement could be developed, was considered by the U.S. government.[2] Some programs to provide access to space after the shuttle were the Lockheed Martin X-33, VentureStar, the Orbital Space Plane Program, and Ares I launcher.

For comparison to an earlier retirement, when the Saturn IB was last flown in 1975 for the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project, the Shuttle development program was already well underway. However, the Shuttle did not fly until 1981, which left a six-year gap in U.S. human spaceflight. Because of this and other reasons, in particular, higher than expected Solar activity that caused Skylab's orbit to decay faster than hoped, the U.S. space station Skylab burned up in the atmosphere.[37]

The Ares I was going to be NASA's crewed spacecraft after STS, with Congress attempting to accelerate its development so it would be ready as early as 2016 for the ISS, in addition they attempted to delay retirement of the shuttle to reduce the time gap.[38] However, Ares I was cancelled along with the rest of Constellation in 2010.[39] The successor to STS with the cancellation would be combination of developed and yet-to-be developed commercial crew spacecraft, such as the Dragon 2 from SpaceX which launched May 30, 2020 as the Demo-2 mission on launchpad 39A, and the Boeing Starliner which is in development from Boeing with NASA's Orion plus the SLS

Constellation Program

Artist's rendition of the docking of Orion to the ISS.

Following the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster, in early 2003 President George W. Bush, announced his Vision for Space Exploration which called for the completion of the American portion of the International Space Station by 2010 (due to delays this would not happen until 2011), the retirement of the Space Shuttle fleet following its completion, to return to the moon by 2020 and one day to Mars.[40] A new vehicle would need to be developed, it eventually was named the Orion spacecraft, a six-person variant would have serviced the ISS and a four-person variant would have traveled to the Moon. The Ares I would have launched Orion, and the Ares V heavy-lift vehicle (HLV) would have launched all other hardware. The Altair lunar lander would have landed crew and cargo onto the Moon. The Constellation program experienced many cost overruns and schedule delays, and was openly criticized by the subsequent U.S. President, Barack Obama.[39][41]

In February 2010, the Obama administration proposed eliminating public funds for the Constellation program and shifting greater responsibility of servicing the ISS to private companies.[42] During a speech at the Kennedy Space Center on April 15, 2010, President Obama proposed the design selection of the new HLV that would replace the Ares-V but would not occur until 2015.[43] The U.S. Congress drafted the NASA Authorization Act of 2010 and President Obama signed it into law on October 11 of that year.[44] The authorization act officially cancelled the Constellation program.[44]

The development of the combination of Ares I and Orion was predicted to cost about 50 billion dollars.[45] One of the issues with Ares I was the criticism of the second stage, which the post-cancellation Liberty proposal attempted to address by using a second stage from an Ariane 5.[46] The Liberty proposal applied for but was not chosen for commercial crew.[46] The other ongoing complaint was that it made more sense to make a man-rated version of the Atlas or Delta.[45] The first crewed flight for Ares I was scheduled for March 2015, and one of its priorities was crew safety.[47] One reason for the emphasis on safety was that it was envisioned in the aftermath of the Columbia disaster.[47]

Current and future Space Shuttle successors

NASA's first direct action with the Soyuz was in 1975, as part of the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project (pictured). As the ISS lifeboat spacecraft all participants needed to train on it in the event of an emergency, if they stayed after the Shuttle left. NASA used the Soyuz concurrently with STS system as far back as 2000, and many other ISS participants have also used this spacecraft to access the space station


U.S. astronauts have continued to access the ISS aboard the Russian Soyuz spacecraft.[48] The Soyuz was chosen as the ISS lifeboat during the development of the International Space Station.[49] The first NASA astronaut to launch on a Soyuz rocket was Norman Thagard, as part of the Shuttle-Mir program.[50] Launching on March 14, 1995 on Soyuz TM-21, he visited the Mir however he returned to Earth on the Space Shuttle mission STS-71.[50] The start of regular use of the Soyuz began as part of the International Space Station program, with William Shepherd launching on Soyuz TM-31 in October 2000.[50] NASA has continued to take regular flights in the following two decades.[50] NASA was contracted to use Soyuz seats until at least 2018.[51]

The consideration of Soyuz as a lifeboat began in the aftermath of the dissolution of the Soviet Union.[50] Russia proposed using the Soyuz as a life boat for what was still Space Station Freedom in late 1991, leading to further analysis of this concept in the early 1990s.[50] One of the milestones was in 1992, when after three months of negotiations the heads of the two Space Agencies agreed to study applications of the Soyuz spacecraft.[50]

In March 1992, Russian and US space officials discussed the possibility of cooperation in manned space program, including ACRV. On June 18, 1992, after three months of negotiations, NASA Administrator Daniel S. Goldin and Director General of the Russian Space Agency Yuri Nikolayevich Koptev, "ratified" a contract between NASA and NPO-Energia to study possible application of the Soyuz spacecraft and Russian docking port in the Freedom project

-- NASA Astronauts on Soyuz:Experience and Lessons for the Future, 2010[50]

In the course of a few decades NASA astronauts have flown on the following Soyuz versions:

NASA also purchased several space modules from Russia including Spektr, Docking Module (Mir), Priroda, and Zarya.

Orion and the SLS

Orion test launches on a Delta IV Heavy, 2014

The NASA Authorization Act of 2010 required a new heavy-lift vehicle design to be chosen within 90 days of its passing.[53] The authorization act called this new HLV the Space Launch System (SLS). The Orion spacecraft was left virtually unchanged from its previous design. The Space Launch System will launch both Orion and other necessary hardware.[54] The SLS is to be upgraded over time with more powerful versions. The initial version of SLS will be capable of lifting 70 tonnes into low-Earth orbit. It is then planned to be upgraded in various ways to lift 105 tonnes, and then, eventually, 130 tonnes.[55][56]

Exploration Flight Test 1 (EFT-1), an uncrewed test flight of Orion's crew module, launched on December 5, 2014 on a Delta IV Heavy rocket.[56]

Artemis 1 is planned to be the first flight of the SLS and will be launched as a test of the completed Orion and SLS system.[57] During the mission, an uncrewed Orion capsule will spend 10 days in a distant retrograde 60,000 kilometers (37,000 mi) orbit around the Moon before returning to Earth.[58] Artemis 2, the first crewed mission of the program, will launch four astronauts in 2023[59] on a free-return flyby of the Moon at a distance of 8,900 kilometers (5,500 mi).[60][61][62]

After Artemis 2, the Power and Propulsion Element of the Lunar Gateway and three components of an expendable lunar lander are planned to be delivered on multiple launches from commercial launch service providers.[63]

Artemis 3 is planned to launch in 2024 aboard a SLS Block 1 rocket and will use the minimalist Gateway and expendable lander to achieve the first crewed lunar landing of the program. The flight is planned to touch down on the lunar south pole region, with two astronauts staying there for about one week.[63][64][65][66][67]

ISS crew and cargo resupply

The International Space Station as seen by STS-134 flight to it
Crew poster for Expedition 50, with text saying "Off the Earth, For the Earth"

The ISS is planned to be funded until at least 2020.[68] There has been discussion to extend it to 2028 or beyond.[69] Until another U.S. crew vehicle is ready, crews will access the ISS exclusively aboard the Russian Soyuz spacecraft.[48] The Soyuz was chosen as the ISS lifeboat during the development of the International Space Station, and has been one of the space taxis used by the international participants to this program.[49] A Soyuz took Expedition 1, which included one U.S. astronaut in the year 2000.[49] Previously the United States and Russia had collaborated on extended the Mir space station with the Shuttle-Mir program in the 1990s.[49]

Although the Orion spacecraft is oriented towards deep-space missions such as NEO visitation, it can also be used retrieve crew or supplies from the ISS if that task is needed once the spacecraft is operational.[70] However, it is expected that the Commercial Crew Program (CCP) will produce a functioning crewed space vehicle starting operations in 2020, providing an alternative to Orion or Soyuz. The delay is longer than expected because the Ares I was cancelled in 2010, leaving little time before the STS retired for something new to be ready for flight.[38] U.S. Congress was aware a spaceflight gap could occur and accelerated funding in 2008 and 2009 in preparation for the retirement of the Shuttle.[38] At that time the first crewed flight of the planned Ares I launcher would not have occurred until 2015, and its first use at ISS until 2016.[38] Another option that has been analyzed is to adapt Orion to a human-rated heavy launch vehicle like the Delta IV Heavy.[45] (see also Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle) Another spacecraft evaluated by NASA, and also for commercial crew, is the OmegA rocket, which will look similar to Ares I and will based on Space Shuttle Solid Rocket Booster.[46]

Commercial Resupply Services

The Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) development program began in 2006 with the purpose of creating commercially operated automated cargo spacecraft to service the ISS.[71] The program is a fixed-price milestone-based development program, meaning that each company that received a funded award had to have a list of milestones with a dollar value attached to them that they would not receive until after achieving the milestone.[72] Private companies are also required to have some "skin in the game" which refers to raising additional private investment for their proposal.[73]

On December 23, 2008, NASA awarded Commercial Resupply Services contracts to SpaceX and Orbital Sciences Corporation (later, this company and Alliant Techsystems become Orbital ATK).[74] SpaceX will use its Falcon 9 rocket and Dragon spacecraft.[75] Orbital Sciences will use its Antares rocket and Cygnus spacecraft. The first Dragon resupply mission occurred in May 2012.[76] The first Cygnus resupply mission occurred in September 2013.[77] The CRS program provides for all the projected U.S. cargo-transportation needs to the ISS, with the exception of a few vehicle-specific payloads to be delivered on the European ATV and the Japanese HTV.[78]

Commercial Crew Program

The Commercial Crew Program (CCP) was initiated in 2010 with the purpose of creating commercially operated crew vehicles capable of delivering at least four astronauts to the ISS, staying docked for 180 days and then returning them to Earth.[79] Like COTS, CCP is a fixed-price milestone-based developmental program that requires some private investment.[72]

In the first phase of the program, NASA provided a total of $50 million divided among five U.S. companies, intended to foster research and development into human spaceflight concepts and technologies in the private sector. In 2011, during the second phase of the program, NASA provided $270 million divided among four companies.[80] During the third phase of the program, NASA provided $1.1 billion divided among three companies.[81] This phase of the CCP was expected to last from June 3, 2012 to May 31, 2014.[81] The winners of that round were SpaceX Dragon 2 (derived from the Dragon cargo vehicle), Boeing's CST-100 and Sierra Nevada's Dream Chaser.[82] The United Launch Alliance is working[when?] on human-rating their Atlas V rocket as part of the latter two proposals. Ultimately NASA selected the Crew Dragon and CST-100 Starliner with the Dream Chaser only receiving a cargo contract. These spacecraft are expected to begin delivering crew in 2020.

On May 30, 2020, SpaceX launched Crew Dragon on the Crew Dragon Demo-2 mission to the International Space Station. It carried a crew of two NASA astronauts, Doug Hurley and Bob Behnken, for a 62-day mission, which was incorporated as part of Expedition 63.[83] This was the first crewed launch of a US-built capsule since the Apollo-Soyuz Test project on July 15, 1975. Hurley, who was the pilot for Atlantis on the final Shuttle mission, STS-135, commanded the Demo-2 mission. Operational use of the Crew Dragon began with the launch of SpaceX Crew-1, carrying four astronauts, on November 16, 2020. The crew would join Expedition 64. Of the crew, only Japanese astronaut Soichi Noguchi had previously flown on the Space Shuttle.[84]


See also


  1. ^ Malik, Tariq "NASA Delays Space Shuttle Program's End to 2011"., July 1, 2010
  2. ^ a b "Shuttle flights would continue under new proposal". Orlando Sentinel. March 3, 2010. Archived from the original on March 7, 2010. Retrieved 2010.
  3. ^ Coppinger, Rob (February 3, 2010). "NASA weighs plan to keep space shuttle until 2017". NBC News.
  4. ^ a b Chris Gebhardt - "PMM Leonardo: The Final Permanent U.S. Module for the ISS" (October 6, 2010)
  5. ^ NASA (April 12, 2011). "NASA Announces New Homes for Space Shuttle Orbiters After Retirement". Retrieved 2011.
  6. ^ McGeehan, Patrick (April 12, 2011). "Space Shuttle to Land in Manhattan". The New York Times. Retrieved 2011.
  7. ^ Matthew Travis (June 1, 2011). "Homes of Retired Space Shuttle Orbiters Announcement by NASA Admin Charlie Bolden". Retrieved 2011.
  8. ^ Nolan, John. "No shuttle for Dayton; Air Force museum came close". Dayton Daily News.
  9. ^ "Why Houston Did Not Get A Shuttle". Wayne Hale's Blog. April 14, 2011.
  10. ^ "Lost in space: Shuttle snub offers a warning that our Space City standing may be at risk". Houston Chronicle.
  11. ^ "No space shuttle for Adler, but space-flight simulator on its way". Chicago Sun.
  12. ^
  13. ^ Broom, Jack (November 7, 2012). "Museum of Flight's Space Shuttle Trainer exhibit opens Saturday". Seattle Times. Retrieved 2014.
  14. ^ Broom, Jack (April 12, 2011). "Seattle won't get shuttle - but will get full-size simulator". Seattle Times.
  15. ^ Smithsonian, February 2012, p. 108
  16. ^ a b "ESA hands over a piece of space history".
  17. ^ a b Channel 13 News - "NASA offers space shuttle tiles to school and universities" (December 1, 2010) Archived July 8, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
  18. ^ Michael Cabbage and Robyn Suriano Sentinel - "A stunned NASA searches for answers" (February 2, 2003) -
  19. ^ KSC booklet, Quote: "Since the first Space Shuttle launch on April 12, 1981, 42 different SSMEs have successfully demonstrated the performance, safety, and reliability of the world's only reusable liquid-fuel rocket engine.", source
  20. ^ Bergin, Chris (October 21, 2010). "Replica engines recommended for retired orbiters - Flown SSMEs for HLV".
  21. ^ a b c Chris Gebhardt - "Discovery's retirement plans provide insight into the fate of the robotic arms" (November 17, 2010) -
  22. ^ a b Lead - NASA Office of Inspector General - "Preparing for the Space Shuttle Program's Retirement: A Review of NASA's Disposition of Information Technology Equipment" (December 7, 2010)
  23. ^ "SpaceX Falcon 9 - EchoStar 23 - NET Feb 28, 2017 - UPDATES". Retrieved 2017.
  24. ^ "Chris B - NSF on Twitter". Twitter. Retrieved 2017.
  25. ^ Forgione, Mary (January 22, 2014). "Florida: Kennedy Space Center's Vehicle Assembly Building tour to end". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2014.
  26. ^ "Pad 39B suffers substantial damage from Ares I-X launch - Parachute update". October 31, 2009. Retrieved 2019.
  27. ^ "Ares I Rollercoaster EES continues to evolve". July 8, 2008. Retrieved 2019.
  28. ^ KSC, Anna Heiney. "NASA - Mobile Launcher Platforms Prepped for New Generation". Retrieved 2018.
  29. ^ "Apollo to OmegA: NASA signs over legacy launcher for new rocket | collectSPACE". Retrieved 2020.
  30. ^ Herridge, Linda (February 22, 2013). "Upgrades Will Prepare Crawlerway for Space Launch System". NASA. Retrieved 2014.
  31. ^ Boeing (January 6, 2014). "Boeing Expands at KSC To Support X-37B Program". SpaceRef Business. Retrieved 2014.
  32. ^ Chow, Denise (October 31, 2011). "Boeing to Build Private Space Taxis in Old NASA Shuttle Hangar". Retrieved 2014.
  33. ^ a b c ROCKWELL "Star-raker" Ramjet HTHL SSTO
  34. ^ Advanced Manned Launch System 1989
  35. ^ Future Space Transportation System 1981-84
  36. ^ Shuttle II 1985-88
  37. ^ Edelson, Edward. "Saving Skylab: The untold story" Popular Science, January 1979.
  38. ^ a b c d [1]
  39. ^ a b "Review of U.S. Human Spaceflight Plans Committee". NASA. October 22, 2009. Retrieved 2012.
  40. ^ Bush, George (January 14, 2004). "President Bush Announces New Vision for Space Exploration Program". Retrieved 2012.
  41. ^ Atkinson, Nancy (July 17, 2008). "Problems Surface For Constellation Program". Universe Today. Retrieved 2012.
  42. ^ Achenbach, Joel (February 1, 2010). "NASA budget for 2011 eliminates funds for manned lunar missions". Washington Post. Retrieved 2010.
  43. ^ "President Barack Obama on Space Exploration in the 21st Century". Office of the Press Secretary. April 15, 2010. Retrieved 2012.
  44. ^ a b "Today-President Signs NASA 2010 Authorization Act". Retrieved 2010.
  45. ^ a b c [2]
  46. ^ a b c [3]
  47. ^ a b [4]
  48. ^ a b Chow, Denise (November 17, 2011). "U.S. Human Spaceflight Program Still Strong, NASA Chief Says". Retrieved 2012.
  49. ^ a b c d [5]
  50. ^ a b c d e f g h [6]
  51. ^ [7]
  52. ^ Zak, Anatoly (July 7, 2016). "First Soyuz MS enters orbit". Russian Space Web. Retrieved 2016.
  53. ^ Svitak, Amy (March 31, 2011). "Holdren: NASA Law Doesn't Square with Budgetary Reality". Space News. Retrieved 2012.
  54. ^ "NASA Announces Design for New Deep Space Exploration System". NASA. September 14, 2011. Retrieved 2012.
  55. ^ "National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010" (PDF). p. 11. Retrieved 2019.
  56. ^ a b Bergin, Chris (February 23, 2012). "Acronyms to Ascent - SLS managers create development milestone roadmap". NASA. Retrieved 2012.
  57. ^ Foust 2019, "Artemis 1, or EM-1, will be an uncrewed test flight of Orion and SLS and is scheduled to launch in June of 2020."
  58. ^ Hill 2018, Page 2, "The first uncrewed, integrated flight test of NASA's Orion spacecraft [...] Enter Distant Retrograde Orbit for next 6-10 days [...] 37,000 miles from the surface of the Moon [...] Mission duration: 25.5 days"
  59. ^ "Report No. IG-20-018: NASA's Management of the Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle Program" (PDF). OIG. NASA. July 16, 2020. Retrieved 2020.
  60. ^ Hambleton, Kathryn (August 27, 2018). "First Flight With Crew Important Step on Long-Term Return to Moon". NASA. Retrieved 2019.
  61. ^ Hambleton, Kathryn (May 23, 2019). "NASA's First Flight With Crew Important Step on Long-term Return to the Moon, Missions to Mars". NASA. Retrieved 2019.
  62. ^ Hill 2018, Page 3, "Crewed Hybrid Free Return Trajectory, demonstrating crewed flight and spacecraft systems performance beyond Low Earth orbit (LEO) [...] lunar fly-by 4,800 nmi [...] 4 astronauts [...] Mission duration: 9 days"
  63. ^ a b Foust 2019, "And before NASA sends astronauts to the moon in 2024, the agency will first have to launch five aspects of the lunar Gateway, all of which will be commercial vehicles that launch separately and join each other in lunar orbit. First, a power and propulsion element will launch in 2022. Then, the crew module will launch (without a crew) in 2023. In 2024, during the months leading up to the crewed landing, NASA will launch the last critical components: a transfer vehicle that will ferry landers from the Gateway to a lower lunar orbit, a descent module that will bring the astronauts to the lunar surface, and an ascent module that will bring them back up to the transfer vehicle, which will then return them to the Gateway."
  64. ^ Bridenstine & Grush 2019, "Now, for Artemis 3 that carries our crew to the Gateway, we need to have the crew have access to a lander. So, that means that at Gateway we're going to have the Power and Propulsion Element, which will be launched commercially, the Utilization Module, which will be launched commercially, and then we'll have a lander there.
  65. ^ Bridenstine & Grush 2019, "The direction that we have right now is that the next man and the first woman will be Americans, and that we will land on the south pole of the Moon in 2024."
  66. ^ Chang, Kenneth (May 25, 2019). "For Artemis Mission to Moon, NASA Seeks to Add Billions to Budget". The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 25, 2019. Retrieved 2019. Under the NASA plan, a mission to land on the moon would take place during the third launch of the Space Launch System. Astronauts, including the first woman to walk on the moon, Mr. Bridenstine said, would first stop at the orbiting lunar outpost. They would then take a lander to the surface near its south pole, where frozen water exists within the craters.
  67. ^ "NASA outlines plans for lunar lander development through commercial partnerships". July 21, 2019.
  68. ^ Clark, Stephen (March 23, 2011). "European states finally agree to space station extension". SpaceFlightNow. Retrieved 2012.
  69. ^ Leone, Dan (March 29, 2012). "Sen. Mikulski Questions NASA Commercial Crew Priority". Space News. Retrieved 2012.
  70. ^ "Orion Possibility".
  71. ^ "NASA Selects Crew and Cargo Transportation to Orbit Partners" (Press release). NASA. August 18, 2006. Retrieved 2006.
  72. ^ a b "Moving Forward: Commercial Crew Development Building the Next Era in Spaceflight" (PDF). Rendezvous. NASA. 2010. pp. 10-17. Retrieved 2011. Just as in the COTS projects, in the CCP projects we have fixed-price, pay-for-performance milestones," Thorn said. "There's no extra money invested by NASA if the projects cost more than projected.
  73. ^ McAlister, Phil (October 2010). "The Case for Commercial Crew" (PDF). NASA. Retrieved 2012.
  74. ^ "NASA Awards Space Station Commercial Resupply Services Contracts". NASA, December 23, 2008
  75. ^ "Space Exploration Technologies Corporation - Press". Retrieved 2009.
  76. ^ Clark, Stephen (June 2, 2012). "NASA expects quick start to SpaceX cargo contract". SpaceFlightNow. Retrieved 2012.
  77. ^ "Worldwide launch schedule". Retrieved 2012.
  78. ^ "SpaceX/NASA Discuss launch of Falcon 9 rocket and Dragon capsule". NASA. May 22, 2012. Retrieved 2012.
  79. ^ Berger, Brian (February 1, 2011). "Biggest CCDev Award Goes to Sierra Nevada". Imaginova Corp. Retrieved 2011.
  80. ^ Dean, James. "NASA awards $270 million for commercial crew efforts"., April 18, 2011
  81. ^ a b "NASA Announces Next Steps in Effort to Launch Americans from U.S. Soil". NASA. August 3, 2012. Retrieved 2012.
  82. ^ Archived December 21, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
  83. ^ Chang, Kenneth (May 30, 2020). "SpaceX Lifts NASA Astronauts to Orbit, Launching New Era of Spaceflight". The New York Times. Retrieved 2020.
  84. ^ Clark, Stephen (November 16, 2020). "Astronauts fly with SpaceX in landmark launch for commercial spaceflight". Retrieved 2021.

External links

  This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.



Music Scenes