User Talk:Fgnievinski
Get User Talk:Fgnievinski essential facts below. View Videos or join the User Talk:Fgnievinski discussion. Add User Talk:Fgnievinski to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
User Talk:Fgnievinski

Taliban had est. 200,000 soldiers in 2017.

Autopatrolled granted

Wikipedia Autopatrolled.svg

Hi Fgnievinski, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see popflock.com Resource: Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Mike (talk) 00:09, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject Rocketry invitation

Apollo 11 launch.jpg
Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's rocketry-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Rocketry? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Wikipedia's rocketry-related content. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants. Please see our list of open tasks for ideas on where to get started.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 09:51, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 November 2020

Your submission at Articles for creation: Indian Society of Remote Sensing (November 7)

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nightenbelle was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Nightenbelle (talk) 22:41, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Fgnievinski! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on popflock.com resource where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nightenbelle (talk) 22:41, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:StarOne satellites

A tag has been placed on Category:StarOne satellites requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:37, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Scale of justice 2.svgHello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Real utopian sociology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Domination.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2020

Disambiguation link notification for December 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Targeted killing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Killing.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:39, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 December 2020

Proposed deletion of Tutor (education)

Notice

The article Tutor (education) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this occupation/job/position is notable. Could redirect to tutoring.

While all constructive contributions to popflock.com resource are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:20, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Tutor (education) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tutor (education) is suitable for inclusion in popflock.com resource according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at popflock.com Resource: Articles for deletion/Tutor (education) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:49, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Geolocation (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Geolocation (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant popflock.com resource page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
  • disambiguates zero extant popflock.com resource pages, regardless of its title; or
  • is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:00, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:Scalar quantities has been nominated for discussion

Category:Scalar quantities has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Srleffler (talk) 02:20, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2021

Category:People associated with the International Committee on Intellectual Cooperation has been nominated for deletion

Category:People associated with the International Committee on Intellectual Cooperation has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 10:50, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

"Freedom to choose" listed at Redirects for discussion

Information.svg A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Freedom to choose. The discussion will occur at popflock.com Resource: Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 13#"Right to choose" redirects until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin (they/she) | o toki tawa mi. 07:01, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Video evidence for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Video evidence is suitable for inclusion in popflock.com resource according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at popflock.com Resource: Articles for deletion/Video evidence until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Magnolia677 (talk) 23:43, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Merge proposal

F, when you tag articles for merging, it would be good to at least follow the discussion link and state your reasoning to start the discussion. I'm removing stage merge tags from places with no discussion, like Damped wave. Start over if you want to make the case, which in this case I might agree with. Dicklyon (talk) 06:20, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2021

Cepstrum question

F, you put "*computation of the logarithm of the spectral amplitude (directly as a complex value or indirectly in terms of its absolute square, real part, or complex argument)". I don't understand. Sure nobody would use the logarithm of the real part of the complex spectral amplitude, would they? And what does "complex argument" mean here? The argument is the phase of the amplitude, right? That's already a logarithm (the imaginary part of the complex logarithm); not something you'd take a logarithm of. Maybe the "its" refers sometimes to the spectral amplitude, and sometimes to the logarithm? If I understood the intent, I could help fix it. Dicklyon (talk) 17:59, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Dicklyon:, the correspondence is as follows:
  • directly as a complex value: complex cepstrum
  • indirectly in terms of its absolute square: power spectrum
  • ... real part: real cepstrum
  • ... complex argument (redirect for argument of a complex number): phase cepstrum
The description of the last two seems sketchy in the article, but that's what was already there. fgnievinski (talk) 18:21, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
And I think you're right about the phase cepstrum: it seems just the phase of the complex cepstrum, it doesn't follow the same definition as the other types of cepstrum. fgnievinski (talk) 18:43, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
And the real cepstrum uses the log of the magnitude, not the log of the real part. I'm going to rv that edit, and we can try to clarify the intent. Dicklyon (talk) 06:30, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Well, the text ("setting the phase of the spectrum to zero") contradicts the formula, F^-1{log|F{f(t)}|}. I thought the text was more fitting to the name (real), so I was inclined to correct the formula, replacing the magnitude for the real-part operator. But now I've checked a source and it seems the formula is correct, the text is incorrect, and the title is just misleading: y=real(ifft(log(abs(fft(x))))); [1]. fgnievinski (talk) 07:04, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Merge proposals

Hi, I've noticed that the merge proposal backlog in WP:WikiProject Astronomy lists several of your split proposals (Nutation, List of common misconceptions, Magnetosphere), two of which are more than three months old. The reason why your split proposals haven't received any response is because you have not started any discussion in the articles' respective talk pages. Splitting an article does not work by simply tagging a section; please see WP:SPLIT for additional information on splitting articles. Nrco0e 02:25, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Repurposed drugs for Covid19

Hi, the re-purposed drug section for COVID-19 should really have the controversy around the many different drugs that have been tried. In particular, ivermectin has a wealth of studies behind it suggesting that it does work and only a few studies behind it saying it does not work. There has been active suppression of information about this drug. I feel that all of that ought to be covered in popflock.com resource which should remain agnostic as an overall body. I would like permission to add that information, in the context of the controversy. Alexis Lieberman, MD -- Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexis Lieberman MD (talk o contribs) 12:59, 15 March 2021 (UTC)


help request

Hi you posted a question on Help talk:User contributions which is talk about the content of that help page,

for specific help you are better off at the popflock.com Resource: Teahouse Lee∴V 11:54, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 March 2021

"Random sampling" listed at Redirects for discussion

Information.svg A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Random sampling. The discussion will occur at popflock.com Resource: Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 28#Random sample until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 03:06, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Re: (Relativistic) Doppler Effect

Sorry, my bad, somehow managed to swap the history diff. Evgeny (talk) 17:42, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Hmm, my comment was about the sidebar, not the "Doppler". I still believe it's very wrong to call the effect just "Doppler". If you really wish, add a comment that sometimes it may be called like that. But this doesn't belong to the Intro. And a citation to an essentially internal document is not a proof. In the whole life I haven't seen it called like that. No need to give the Wiki readers mostly irrelevant info.Evgeny (talk) 18:20, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Canadian Cartographic Association for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canadian Cartographic Association is suitable for inclusion in popflock.com resource according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at popflock.com Resource: Articles for deletion/Canadian Cartographic Association until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bearcat (talk) 17:14, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Undiscussed move of Chernobyl

I have reverted your undiscussed move of Chernobyl to Chernobyl (Ukraine). An editor of your experience should know that this move requires discussion. - Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 14:17, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

@Lord Bolingbroke: please discuss at Talk:Chernobyl disaster#Redirect "Chernobyl" here?. thanks fgnievinski (talk) 19:53, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Earth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MSL.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Ref cleanup tag: what's going on?

Found this ref cleanup tag on Ensemble averaging (machine learning), which it looks like you put there in 2014. I don't see anything particularly inappropriate in the papers mentioned, and I don't see any explanation of what the problem was on the talk page. Is there some specific thing that you had a problem with, or should I remove it? jp×g 02:05, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

@JPxG: looks like the situation has improved since the original tagging, so I've removed the tag, thanks for checking. fgnievinski (talk) 02:36, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks

...for all the effort in the earth mensuration articles. Strebe (talk) 17:45, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

fgnievinski (talk) 21:53, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paris meridian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lapland.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 12

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Carl Friedrich Gauss
added a link pointing to Heliotrope
Zenith camera
added a link pointing to Survey

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Closure phase, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phase.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Category:Simultaneity has been nominated for deletion

Category:Simultaneity has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BD2412 T 04:45, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anders Andersen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Precipitation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depth.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 June 2021

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Areal velocity
added a link pointing to Rate of change
Numerical-value equation
added a link pointing to Displacement

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 8

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

American Congress on Surveying and Mapping
added a link pointing to Journal
Irene Fischer
added a link pointing to Last ice age

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 July 2021

MfD nomination of Ensemble average (disambiguation)

Ambox warning orange.svg Ensemble average (disambiguation), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at popflock.com Resource: Miscellany for deletion/Ensemble average (disambiguation) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Ensemble average (disambiguation) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Widefox; talk 19:41, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Field strength (theoretical physics)

Notice

The article Field strength (theoretical physics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

claims to be a synonym for a term on which we already have an article. Author appears to support deletion in a 2017 talk page comment. This subject is beyond me, but this contradicts the claim of synonymous so this is at best a WP:TNT case.

While all constructive contributions to popflock.com resource are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SpinningSpark 23:10, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chart datum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depth.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 August 2021


  This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

User_talk:Fgnievinski
 



 



 
Music Scenes